May, 02 2011, 01:51pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Kate Fried, Food & Water Watch, (202) 683-4905;
Eric Weltman, Food & Water Watch, (617) 304-5330;
Claire Sandberg, Frack Action, (646) 641-6431
Consumer Advocates, Businesses, Farmers, Doctors and Scientists Join Elected Officials to Call for a Ban on Fracking in New York
ALBANY, N.Y.
As the six-month moratorium on hydraulic fracturing (fracking) in New York is soon set to expire, a diverse group of civic leaders and citizens are today calling upon Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature to issue a permanent ban on this dangerous, polluting practice. The "Rally and March for a Statewide Ban," which is expected to draw hundreds of participants from across the state, will unite elected officials, consumer advocates, farmers, members of the business community, organized labor, scientists, medical professionals, students, good government groups and others to illustrate why New York cannot afford to allow fracking given its threat to the well-being of the state's water and food resources, public health and economy.
"Fracking endangers vital food and water resources, taxes our nation's already overburdened water infrastructure systems, and sacrifices our rural communities to our seemingly insatiable thirst for energy resources," said Food & Water Watch executive director Wenonah Hauter. "As consumers around the U.S. reject this dangerous energy extraction process, legislators in New York have an opportunity to be real leaders on this issue. A ban on fracking in New York State would represent a watershed moment in the fight to defend our communities, while serving as model for other states who wish to protect their essential resources from the hazards of fracking."
Rally participants from the business community, including the Cooperstown Chamber of Commerce and Brewery Ommegang, will decry the economic downsides of fracking for New York State's agriculture and tourism industries, and long-term economic viability. "The plans for drilling pose a direct and material threat to the interests of the Chamber membership," said Cooperstown Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Susan O'Handley. "Industrial-scale hydrofracking in the upstate region will irreparably damage the essential qualities that make the Cooperstown area an excellent place to live, raise families, farm and work. It puts at risk much of the local economy, ranging from hotel and tourism to restaurant and retail businesses, most of which are driven by the hundreds of thousands of tourists who choose to visit the region every year."
"Economic impact research NOT funded by the gas industry has reached vastly different conclusions than has research funded or sponsored by industry groups openly seeking to gain financially in the gas plays," said economist Jannette Barth, of J.M. Barth and Associates. "In reality, the economic health of the Marcellus Shale region may be worse off in the long run if gas drilling is allowed."
Farmers will speak to the potential impacts of fracking on agricultural communities, and highlight the recent Chesapeake Energy gas well blowout in Bradford County, Pa., where thousands of gallons of undiluted fracking chemicals spewed across farmland and forced residents to evacuate. "I don't want to farm in an industrial zone. I don't want to live in an industrial zone," said Mark Dunau, farmer from Delaware County and policy co-chair for the Northeast Organic Farming Association-New York. "And if the water's poisoned, that's a threat to me whether or not I'm farming. For humanity the most important fuel is food and water. The gas is for fifty years. The water is forever."
Cornell University biologist and acclaimed author Sandra Steingraber will address the long-term public health consequences of allowing this practice to move forward across the state: "Fracking relies on chemicals linked to cancer, preterm birth, and miscarriage. It fills our air with asthma-inducing air pollutants. It releases radioactive substances. It turns fresh water into poison and uses it as a club to smash the bedrock a mile below our feet. Is this what we want to do to the farmlands and cow pastures of upstate New York? To the watershed that serves as a source of drinking water for millions of people? Think again, New York. Don't fracture our children's future."
The event comes as the legislature considers S4220-A 57218, introduced by event participants Senator Tony Avella (D-11) and Assemblymember William Colton (D-47), which would ban fracking.
The process of extracting gas from shale rock, fracking uses toxic chemicals that have been shown to contaminate water resources. To date, there have been more than 1,000 documented cases of water contamination near drilling sites around the country. The process also endangers consumers who do not reside near drilling sites because fracking fluids, which often contain radioactive elements, cannot be effectively treated by municipal treatment plants, and are often released into waterways where they can pollute drinking water resources and the water used to irrigate food crops.
Late last year, outgoing Governor David Paterson imposed a temporary moratorium on fracking in New York that will expire on July 1, 2011. Last month, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced plans to sue the federal government if it does not produce an environmental impact assessment of proposed fracking projects in the Delaware River Basin before drilling again commences. The Delaware River provides drinking water for 15 million Americans.
Sponsored by: Frack Action, Food & Water Watch, Onondaga Nation, WaterDefense.Org, Democracy for America, Citizen Action of New York, Josh Fox - Gasland, Neighbors of the Onondaga Nation, CDOG - Chenango Delaware Otsego Gas Group, Syracuse Peace Council, Shaleshock, Sustainable Otsego, Damascus Citizens for Sustainability, NYH2O, Ommegang Brewery, Gas Drilling Awareness of Cortland County (GDACC), Capital District Against Fracking, Coalition to Protect New York, Frack Free Catskills, New York Action Network, New York Residents Against Drilling, Syracuse Cultural Workers, Cooperstown Chamber of Commerce, Students Against Fracking, Cornell Sustainability Hub, Mountain View Movies, Ithaca College Frack Off!, Honest Weight Food Co-op, Dryden Resource Awareness Coalition, Gray Panthers, The Green Bus Tour, KyotoNOW!, Water Back Project, Davenport Concerned Citizens, The Ad Hoc Committee to Uphold Environmental Law, Allegany County Non-violent Action Group, Concerned Citizens of Allegany County, Delaware Action Group, Sullivan Area Citizens for Responsible Energy Development, Advocates for Cherry Valley, Inc, Schoharie Valley Watch, Binghamton Environmental, Mamalama, Brecht Forum, Delaware Action Group, NYC Friends of Clearwater, No Fracking Way Project, Theater of the Oppressed Laboratory, Peacemakers, The Lower Manhattan Public Health Project, Woodstock Hidden Kitchen, Up North Movement, Take Back the Tap, Fly Creek/Otsego Neighbors, Shaleshock Action Alliance, People for a Healthy Environment, Inc., PDAWNY, New Yorkers for Sustainable Energy Solutions Statewide, R*CAUSE-Rochesterians Concerned About Unsafe Shale-gas Extraction, Walk About Water
Food & Water Watch mobilizes regular people to build political power to move bold and uncompromised solutions to the most pressing food, water, and climate problems of our time. We work to protect people's health, communities, and democracy from the growing destructive power of the most powerful economic interests.
(202) 683-2500LATEST NEWS
National Team Member Becomes at Least 265th Palestinian Footballer Killed by Israel in Gaza
Muhannad al-Lili's killing by Israeli airstrike came as the world mourned the death of Portugal and Liverpool star Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva in a car crash in Spain.
Jul 04, 2025
Muhannad Fadl al-Lili, captain of the Al-Maghazi Services Club and a member of Palestine's national football team, died Thursday from injuries suffered during an Israeli airstrike on his family home in the central Gaza Strip earlier this week, making him the latest of hundreds of Palestinian athletes killed since the start of Israel's genocidal onslaught.
Al-Maghazi Services Club announced al-Lili's death in a Facebook tribute offering condolences to "his family, relatives, friends, and colleagues" and asking "Allah to shower him with his mercy."
The Palestine Football Association (PFA) said that "on Monday, a drone fired a missile at Muhannad's room on the third floor of his house, which led to severe bleeding in the skull."
"During the war of extermination against our people, Muhannad tried to travel outside Gaza to catch up with his wife, who left the strip for Norway on a work mission before the outbreak of the war," the association added. "But he failed to do so, and was deprived of seeing his eldest son, who was born outside the Gaza Strip."
According to the PFA, al-Lili is at least the 265th Palestinian footballer and 585th athlete to be killed by Israeli forces since they launched their assault and siege on Gaza following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Sports journalist Leyla Hamed says 439 Palestinian footballers have been killed by Israel.
Overall, Israel's war—which is the subject of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case—has left more than 206,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million more forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened, according to Gaza officials.
The Palestine Chronicle contrasted the worldwide press coverage of the car crash deaths of Portuguese footballer Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva with the media's relative silence following al-Lili's killing.
"Jota's death was a tragedy that touched millions," the outlet wrote. "Yet the death of Muhannad al-Lili... was met with near-total silence from global sports media."
Last week, a group of legal experts including two United Nations special rapporteurs appealed to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, the world football governing body, demanding that its Governance Audit and Compliance Committee take action against the Israel Football Association for violating FIFA rules by playing matches on occupied Palestinian territory.
In July 2024, the ICJ found that Israel's then-57-year occupation of Palestine—including Gaza—is an illegal form of apartheid that should be ended as soon as possible.
During their invasion and occupation of Gaza, Israeli forces have also used sporting facilities including Yarmouk Stadium for the detention of Palestinian men, women, and children—many of whom have reported torture and other abuse at the hands of their captors.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Highly Inspiring' Court Ruling Affirms Nations' Legal Duty to Combat Climate Emergency
"While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections," said one observer.
Jul 04, 2025
In a landmark advisory opinion published Thursday, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights—of which the United States, the world's second-biggest carbon polluter, is not a member—affirmed the right to a stable climate and underscored nations' duty to act to protect it and address the worsening planetary emergency.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change," a summary of the 234-page ruling states. "Any rollback of climate or environmental policies that affect human rights must be exceptional, duly justified based on objective criteria, and comply with standards of necessity and proportionality."
"The court also held that... states must take all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising, on the one hand, from the degradation of the global climate system and, on the other, from exposure and vulnerability to the effects of such degradation," the summary adds.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change."
The case was brought before the Costa-Rica based IACtHR by Chile and Colombia, both of which "face the daily challenge of dealing with the consequences of the climate emergency, including the proliferation of droughts, floods, landslides, and fires, among others."
"These phenomena highlight the need to respond urgently and based on the principles of equity, justice, cooperation, and sustainability, with a human rights-based approach," the court asserted.
IACtHR President Judge Nancy Hernández López said following the ruling that "states must not only refrain from causing significant environmental damage but have the positive obligation to take measures to guarantee the protection, restoration, and regeneration of ecosystems."
"Causing massive and irreversible environmental harm...alters the conditions for a healthy life on Earth to such an extent that it creates consequences of existential proportions," she added. "Therefore, it demands universal and effective legal responses."
The advisory opinion builds on two landmark decisions last year. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Swiss government violated senior citizens' human rights by refusing to abide by scientists' warnings to rapidly phase out fossil fuel production.
The following month, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea found in an advisory opinion that greenhouse gas emissions are marine pollution under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and that signatories to the accord "have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce, and control" them.
The IACtHR advisory opinion is expected to boost climate and human rights lawsuits throughout the Americas, and to impact talks ahead of November's United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, in Belém, Brazil.
Climate defenders around the world hailed Thursday's advisory opinion, with United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk calling it "a landmark step forward for the region—and beyond."
"As the impact of climate change becomes ever more visible across the world, the court is clear: People have a right to a stable climate and a healthy environment," Türk added. "States have a bedrock obligation under international law not to take steps that cause irreversible climate and environmental damage, and they have a duty to act urgently to take the necessary measures to protect the lives and rights of everyone—both those alive now and the interests of future generations."
Amnesty International head of strategic litigation Mandi Mudarikwa said, "Today, the Inter-American Court affirmed and clarified the obligations of states to respect, ensure, prevent, and cooperate in order to realize human rights in the context of the climate crisis."
"Crucially, the court recognized the autonomous right to a healthy climate for both individuals and communities, linked to the right to a healthy environment," Mudarikwa added. "The court also underscored the obligation of states to protect cross-border climate-displaced persons, including through the issuance of humanitarian visas and protection from deportation."
Delta Merner, lead scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement that "this opinion sets an important precedent affirming that governments have a legal duty to regulate corporate conduct that drives climate harm."
"Though the United States is not a party to the treaty governing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, this opinion should be a clarion call for transnational fossil fuel companies that have deceived the public for decades about the risks of their products," Merner added. "The era of accountability is here."
Markus Gehring, a fellow and director of studies in law at Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge in England, called the advisory opinion "highly inspiring" and "seminal."
Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, said that "the Inter-American Court's ruling makes clear that climate change is an overriding threat to human rights in the world."
"Governments must act to cut carbon emissions drastically," Caputo stressed. "While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections for all from the realities of climate harm."
Climate litigation is increasing globally in the wake of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. In the Americas, Indigenous peoples, children, and green groups are among those who have been seeking climate justice via litigation.
However, in the United States, instead of acknowledging the climate emergency, President Donald Trump has declared an "energy emergency" while pursuing a "drill, baby, drill" policy of fossil fuel extraction and expansion.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Admin Quietly Approves Massive Crude Oil Expansion Project
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest," said one environmental attorney.
Jul 04, 2025
The Trump administration has quietly fast-tracked a massive oil expansion project that environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers warned could have a destructive impact on local communities and the climate.
As reported recently by the Oil and Gas Journal, the plan "involves expanding the Wildcat Loadout Facility, a key transfer point for moving Uinta basin crude oil to rail lines that transport it to refineries along the Gulf Coast."
The goal of the plan is to transfer an additional 70,000 barrels of oil per day from the Wildcat Loadout Facility, which is located in Utah, down to the Gulf Coast refineries via a route that runs along the Colorado River. Controversially, the Trump administration is also plowing ahead with the project by invoking emergency powers to address energy shortages despite the fact that the United States for the last couple of years has been producing record levels of domestic oil.
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) issued a joint statement condemning the Trump administration's push to approve the project while rushing through environmental impact reviews.
"The Bureau of Land Management's decision to fast-track the Wildcat Loadout expansion—a project that would transport an additional 70,000 barrels of crude oil on train tracks along the Colorado River—using emergency procedures is profoundly flawed," the Colorado Democrats said. "These procedures give the agency just 14 days to complete an environmental review—with no opportunity for public input or administrative appeal—despite the project's clear risks to Colorado. There is no credible energy emergency to justify bypassing public involvement and environmental safeguards. The United States is currently producing more oil and gas than any country in the world."
On Thursday, the Bureau of Land Management announced the completion of its accelerated environmental review of the project, drawing condemnation from climate advocates.
Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, described the administration's rush to approve the project as "pure hubris," especially given its "refusal to hear community concerns about oil spill risks." She added that "this fast-tracked review breezed past vital protections for clean air, public safety and endangered species."
Landon Newell, staff attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, accused the Trump administration of manufacturing an energy emergency to justify plans that could have a dire impact on local habitats.
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest by authorizing the transport of more than 1 billion gallons annually of additional oil on railcars traveling alongside the Colorado River," he said. "Any derailment and oil spill would have a devastating impact on the Colorado River and the communities and ecosystems that rely upon it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular