July, 22 2009, 03:35pm EDT
![Amnesty International](https://assets.rbl.ms/32012687/origin.png)
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7413 5566,After hours: +44 7778 472 126,Email:,press@amnesty.org
Saudi Arabia: Stop Human Rights Violations Committed in the Name of Fighting Terrorism
The Saudi Arabian authorities have launched a sustained assault on
human rights under the facade of countering terrorism, Amnesty
International said in a new comprehensive report published today.
Thousands of people have been arrested and detained in virtual
secrecy, and others have been killed in uncertain circumstances.
Hundreds more people face secret and summary trials and possible
execution. Many are reported to have been tortured in order to extract
confessions or as punishment after conviction.
LONDON
The Saudi Arabian authorities have launched a sustained assault on
human rights under the facade of countering terrorism, Amnesty
International said in a new comprehensive report published today.
Thousands of people have been arrested and detained in virtual
secrecy, and others have been killed in uncertain circumstances.
Hundreds more people face secret and summary trials and possible
execution. Many are reported to have been tortured in order to extract
confessions or as punishment after conviction.
As recently as 8 July, the Ministry of Justice announced that 330
people had been tried for terrorism offences with sentences ranging
from fines to the death penalty. The names of the people or the details
of the charges were not disclosed, continuing the secrecy of the trial
process.
"These unjust anti-terrorism measures have made an already dire
human rights situation worse," said Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty
International's Middle East and North Africa Programme. "The Saudi
Arabian government has used its powerful international clout to get
away with it. And the international community has failed to hold the
government to account for these gross violations."
Of the thousands detained by the authorities, some are prisoners of
conscience, targeted for their peaceful criticism of government
policies. The majority are suspected supporters of Islamist groups or
factions opposed to the Saudi Arabian government's close links to the
USA and other Western countries, which have carried out a number of
attacks targeting Westerners and others, and are officially dubbed as
"misguided". They also include people forcibly returned from Iraq,
Pakistan, Yemen and other countries.
"The abuses take place behind a wall of secrecy. Detainees are held
with no idea of what is going to happen to them," said Malcolm Smart.
"Most are held incommunicado for years without trial, and are denied
access to lawyers and the courts to challenge the legality of their
detention. This has a devastating effect on both the individuals who
are detained and on their families."
The anti-terrorism measures adopted by the government since the
attacks in the USA on 11 September 2001 have exacerbated long-standing
human rights abuses in the country.
Arbitrary arrests and prolonged detention of political and security
suspects without trial and without access to lawyers have been
long-standing human rights problems in Saudi Arabia. However, the
number of people being detained arbitrarily has risen from hundreds to
thousands since 2001. Those arrested include Saudi Arabians and foreign
nationals.
In July 2007, the Interior Minister reported that 9,000 security
suspects had been detained between 2003 and 2007 and that 3,106 of them
are still being held. Others have been moved to an official
"re-education" programme though it is unclear how they are selected and
under what conditions they can obtain release.
Reported methods of torture and other ill-treatment include severe
beatings with sticks, punching, and suspension from the ceiling, use of
electric shocks and sleep deprivation. Flogging is also imposed as a
legal punishment by itself or in addition to imprisonment, and
sentences can include thousands of lashes.
The Amnesty International report highlights how trials of political
or security detainees in Saudi Arabia take place in extreme secrecy and
fail to meet international standards of fairness. In March this year
the government announced that the trials of 991 detainees accused of
capital offences had begun in a special criminal court. In many cases
defendants and their families are not informed of the progress of legal
proceedings against them.
The anti-terrorism measures introduced since 2001 have set back the
process of limited human rights reform in Saudi Arabia. Combined with
severe repression of all forms of dissent and a weak human rights
framework there is now an almost complete lack of protection of
freedoms and rights.
Background
"Please do not abandon us to the claws of tyranny and blind power. I
fear for myself, my children and especially for my husband, who is in
detention. I don't know what has happened to my husband, where he is,
or what will happen to him. As for my children and for me, without him,
we are the living dead. Please help me to get my husband justice. I beg
of you in the Name of Allah."
This is one of many cries for help that Amnesty International has
received from the wives, mothers, fathers, brothers and sisters of
people whose human rights are being abused with impunity in Saudi
Arabia in the name of security and counter-terrorism. Her name has been
withheld for fear of reprisal.
Dr Saud al-Hashimi, a prisoner of conscience, is reported to have
been subjected to torture and other ill-treatment several times since
his arrest in February 2007.The latest such treatment is reported to
have taken place in June 2009 for starting a hunger strike against his
indefinite detention without trial. He was reportedly stripped of all
his clothes, except his underwear, shackled and dragged from his cell
and placed in a severely cold cell for about five hours. He and at
least six other prisoners of conscience held with him in Dhahban Prison
near Jeddah were targeted by the authorities for calling for political
reform; discussing a proposal to establish an independent human rights
organization in Saudi Arabia; and calling for an end to impunity for
human rights violations committed by Ministry of Interior officials.
The Ministry of Interior says they were arrested for collecting money
to support terrorism, but the detainees strongly deny this. Since their
arrest, they have been detained without charge or trial and held in
solitary confinement, and they remain at risk of torture and other
ill-treatment.
Abdul Rahman al-Sudais, a 48-year-old Saudi Arabian lecturer at Um
al-Qura University in Makkah, was arrested in 2003. The government said
that he was arrested with a cell of "terrorists" but his trial was held
in secret and he was not allowed any legal assistance or
representation. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found the
detention of Abdul Rahman al-Sudais to be in contravention of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and said that "the fight against
terrorism threats cannot justify undermining due process rights
afforded to all accused..." In at least one other case, three of four
defendants accused of responsibility for killings were executed and
their bodies were crucified.
Amnesty International is a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights for all. Our supporters are outraged by human rights abuses but inspired by hope for a better world - so we work to improve human rights through campaigning and international solidarity. We have more than 2.2 million members and subscribers in more than 150 countries and regions and we coordinate this support to act for justice on a wide range of issues.
LATEST NEWS
'Tragic Outcome' for Gig Workers as California Supreme Court Hands Win to Uber, DoorDash
"Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers," the case plaintiff said.
Jul 25, 2024
Labor advocates on Thursday decried a ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a lower court's affirmation of a state ballot measure allowing app-based ride and delivery companies to classify their drivers as independent contractors, limiting their worker rights.
The court's seven justices ruled unanimously in Castellanos v. State of California that Proposition 22, which was approved by 58% of California voters in 2020, complies with the state constitution. Prop 22—which was overturned in 2021 by an Alameda County Superior Court judge in 2021—was upheld in March 2023 by the state's 1st District Court of Appeals.
The business models of app-based companies including DoorDash, Instacart, Lyft, and Uber rely upon minimizing frontline worker compensation by categorizing drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Independent contractors are not entitled to unemployment insurance, health insurance, or compensation for business expenses.
There are approximately 1.4 million app-based gig workers in California, according to industry estimates.
While DoorDash hailed Thursday's ruling as "not only a victory for Dashers, but also for democracy itself," gig worker advocates condemned the decision.
"Over the last three years, gig workers across California have experienced firsthand that Prop 22 is nothing more than a bait-and-switch meant to enrich global corporations at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers who power their earnings," plaintiff Hector Castellanos, who drives for Uber and Lyft, said in a statement.
"Prop 22 has allowed gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to deprive us of a living wage, access to workers compensation, paid sick leave, and meaningful healthcare coverage," Castellanos added. "Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers."
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, said that "we are deeply disappointed that the state Supreme Court has allowed tech corporations to buy their way out of basic labor laws despite Proposition 22's inconsistencies with our state constitution."
"These companies have upended our social contract, forcing workers and the public to take on the inherent risk created by this work, while they profit," she continued. "A.B. 5 granted virtually all California workers the right to be paid for all hours worked, health and safety standards, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, and the right to organize."
"Rideshare and delivery drivers deserve those rights as well," Gonzalez stressed.
The Gig Workers Rising campaign said on social media that "Uber and other app corporations spent $220 million to buy this law, and they did it by tricking Californians."
Prop 22's passage in November 2020 with nearly 59% of the vote was the culmination of what was by far the most expensive ballot measure in California history. App-based companies and their backers outspent labor and progressive groups by more than 10 to 1, with proponents pouring a staggering $204.5 million into the "yes" campaign's coffers against just $19 million for the "no" side.
"Voters were told the initiative would provide us with 'historic new benefits' and guaranteed earnings," said Gig Workers Rising. "But since it went into effect, drivers have seen our pay go down, learned the benefits are a sham, and have to accept unsafe rides because of the constant threat of being 'deactivated,' kicked off the app with little explanation or warning."
"If Uber really cared about good benefits and fair wages, it could make that happen tomorrow," the campaign added. "Instead, it has shown it would rather slash pay, bamboozle voters, and put drivers' lives and livelihoods in danger—all while promising $7 billion in stock buybacks to banks and billionaires."
Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality, toldCalMatters that Thursday's ruling was "a really tragic outcome," but "it's not the end of the road."
Dubal's sentiment was echoed by some California state legislators, who said the ruling presents an opportunity to act.
"While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating," said state Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-28). "I'm more determined than ever to ensure that all workers—including our diverse and Black, Indigenous, and people of color-led gig workforce—have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, disability insurance, and the right to form a union."
Prop 22 has served as a template for lawmakers in other states seeking to deny or limit basic worker rights, benefits, and protections.
In Massachusetts, app-based companies have been fighting for years to get a measure to classify drivers as contractors on the state ballot. In 2022, Lyft made the largest political donation in state history—$14.4 million—to a coalition funding one such proposal.
Last month, Uber and Lyft reached an agreement with the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, a Democrat, to pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit filed in 2020. As part of the deal, the companies also agreed to increase driver pay and provide paid sick leave, accident insurance, and some health benefits. The agreement does not address how app-based gig workers should be classified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Young Voters Tell Kamala Harris to 'Fight for Our Future'
"This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Jul 25, 2024
Four youth-led groups on Thursday urged Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to "fight for our future" by pursuing a policy agenda the coalition unveiled in a March letter to U.S. President Joe Biden.
It's been less than a week since Biden left the race and endorsed Harris, who is expected to face former Republican Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), in the November election. Since then, she's racked up endorsements from Democratic members of Congress and progressive groups focused on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
March for Our Lives, which was launched after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, honored Harris with the group's first-ever endorsement on Wednesday, calling her "the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve."
"To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters."
The gun violence prevention organization is part of the youth-led coalition behind the new letter, which also includes the climate-focused Sunrise Movement; Gen-Z for Change, which advocates on a range of issues; and the national immigrant network United We Dream Action.
"You have an urgent and important task. To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters," the coalition told Harris on Thursday, noting that she sought the Democratic nomination during the last cycle. "You should build on your 2020 campaign platform where you put forward a strong vision to make the economy work for everyday people and ensure a livable future for us all."
The groups urged Harris to support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. They pushed her to expand pathways to citizenship, keep families together, end fossil fuel subsidies, and create good, union jobs. They also called on her to prioritize gun violence prevention and investments in public health solutions and green, affordable housing.
"Democrats are at a critical crossroads with young people," the coalition wrote to Harris on Thursday. "Polls showed Biden and Trump neck-and-neck among young voters."
ANew York Times/Siena College poll conducted July 22-24 shows Trump leading Harris 48% to 47% among likely voters and 48% to 46% among registered voters—differences that fall within the margin of error.
Forbesnoted Thursday that "Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Harris than they were Biden, the Times/Siena survey found, with nearly 80% of voters who lean Democrat saying they would like Harris to be the nominee, compared to 48% of Democrats who said the same about Biden three weeks ago."
The outlet also pointed to two other polls conducted by Morning Consult and Reuters/Ipsos since Biden dropped out, which both show Harris with a narrow lead over Trump.
"You have an opportunity to win the youth vote by turning the page and differentiating yourself from Biden policies that are deeply unpopular with us, such as approving new oil and gas projects, denying people their right to seek refuge and asylum, and funding the Israeli government's killing of civilians in Gaza," the youth coalition highlighted Thursday. "You must speak to the economic pain young people are facing from crushing student debt and skyrocketing housing and food prices."
Looking beyond November, the groups told Harris—who could be the first Black woman and person of Asian descent elected to the country's highest office—that "you could be a historic president. Not just because of who you are, but what you can accomplish."
"Young people are energized and ready to organize against fascism and for the future we deserve," they concluded. "This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Video Game Actors Strike for AI Protections
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said one union leader. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games."
Jul 25, 2024
After nearly two years of negotiations with video game giants and no deal that would protect performers from artificial intelligence, unionized voice and motion capture actors who work in video game development announced Thursday that they will go on strike starting at 12:01 am on Friday, July 26.
The performers are represented by Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which last year won a contract for TV and film actors that included "unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation that will protect members from the threat of AI," after the union went on strike for four months.
The union has been negotiating on behalf of video game actors with major production companies including Disney Character Voices Inc., Activision Productions Inc., and WB Games Inc., and has won concessions over wages and job safety—but "AI protections remain the sticking point," said SAG-AFTRA on Thursday as the impending strike was announced.
Unionized actors want protections that would stop video game companies from training AI to replicate actors' voices or likeness without their consent and without compensating them.
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games. That includes the SAG-AFTRA members who bring memorable and beloved game characters to life, and they deserve and demand the same fundamental protections as performers in film, television, streaming, and music: fair compensation and the right of informed consent for the AI use of their faces, voices, and bodies."
"Frankly, it's stunning that these video game studios haven't learned anything from the lessons of last year—that our members can and will stand up and demand fair and equitable treatment with respect to AI, and the public supports us in that," he added.
Sarah Elmaleh, negotiating committee chair for the union's interactive media agreement, said the negotiations have shown the companies "are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation."
"We look forward to collaborating with teams on our interim and independent contracts, which provide AI transparency, consent, and compensation to all performers, and to continuing to negotiate in good faith with this bargaining group when they are ready to join us in the world we all deserve," said Elmaleh.
The unionized actors voted in favor of the strike authorization with a 98.32% yes vote, said SAG-AFTRA.
The strike was announced as more than 500 workers who help develop the popular World of Warcraft video game franchise voted to join the Communications Workers of America (CWA), with the games publisher, Blizzard Entertainment, recognizing the bargaining unit.
CWA noted that the workers' journey to union representation began with a walkout in 2021 at Activision Blizzard, which was later bought by Microsoft, over sexual harassment and discrimination.
"What we've accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning," Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst, said in a statement. "We know that when workers have a protected voice, it's a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular