

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

The Saudi Arabian authorities have launched a sustained assault on
human rights under the facade of countering terrorism, Amnesty
International said in a new comprehensive report published today.
Thousands of people have been arrested and detained in virtual
secrecy, and others have been killed in uncertain circumstances.
Hundreds more people face secret and summary trials and possible
execution. Many are reported to have been tortured in order to extract
confessions or as punishment after conviction.
The Saudi Arabian authorities have launched a sustained assault on
human rights under the facade of countering terrorism, Amnesty
International said in a new comprehensive report published today.
Thousands of people have been arrested and detained in virtual
secrecy, and others have been killed in uncertain circumstances.
Hundreds more people face secret and summary trials and possible
execution. Many are reported to have been tortured in order to extract
confessions or as punishment after conviction.
As recently as 8 July, the Ministry of Justice announced that 330
people had been tried for terrorism offences with sentences ranging
from fines to the death penalty. The names of the people or the details
of the charges were not disclosed, continuing the secrecy of the trial
process.
"These unjust anti-terrorism measures have made an already dire
human rights situation worse," said Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty
International's Middle East and North Africa Programme. "The Saudi
Arabian government has used its powerful international clout to get
away with it. And the international community has failed to hold the
government to account for these gross violations."
Of the thousands detained by the authorities, some are prisoners of
conscience, targeted for their peaceful criticism of government
policies. The majority are suspected supporters of Islamist groups or
factions opposed to the Saudi Arabian government's close links to the
USA and other Western countries, which have carried out a number of
attacks targeting Westerners and others, and are officially dubbed as
"misguided". They also include people forcibly returned from Iraq,
Pakistan, Yemen and other countries.
"The abuses take place behind a wall of secrecy. Detainees are held
with no idea of what is going to happen to them," said Malcolm Smart.
"Most are held incommunicado for years without trial, and are denied
access to lawyers and the courts to challenge the legality of their
detention. This has a devastating effect on both the individuals who
are detained and on their families."
The anti-terrorism measures adopted by the government since the
attacks in the USA on 11 September 2001 have exacerbated long-standing
human rights abuses in the country.
Arbitrary arrests and prolonged detention of political and security
suspects without trial and without access to lawyers have been
long-standing human rights problems in Saudi Arabia. However, the
number of people being detained arbitrarily has risen from hundreds to
thousands since 2001. Those arrested include Saudi Arabians and foreign
nationals.
In July 2007, the Interior Minister reported that 9,000 security
suspects had been detained between 2003 and 2007 and that 3,106 of them
are still being held. Others have been moved to an official
"re-education" programme though it is unclear how they are selected and
under what conditions they can obtain release.
Reported methods of torture and other ill-treatment include severe
beatings with sticks, punching, and suspension from the ceiling, use of
electric shocks and sleep deprivation. Flogging is also imposed as a
legal punishment by itself or in addition to imprisonment, and
sentences can include thousands of lashes.
The Amnesty International report highlights how trials of political
or security detainees in Saudi Arabia take place in extreme secrecy and
fail to meet international standards of fairness. In March this year
the government announced that the trials of 991 detainees accused of
capital offences had begun in a special criminal court. In many cases
defendants and their families are not informed of the progress of legal
proceedings against them.
The anti-terrorism measures introduced since 2001 have set back the
process of limited human rights reform in Saudi Arabia. Combined with
severe repression of all forms of dissent and a weak human rights
framework there is now an almost complete lack of protection of
freedoms and rights.
Background
"Please do not abandon us to the claws of tyranny and blind power. I
fear for myself, my children and especially for my husband, who is in
detention. I don't know what has happened to my husband, where he is,
or what will happen to him. As for my children and for me, without him,
we are the living dead. Please help me to get my husband justice. I beg
of you in the Name of Allah."
This is one of many cries for help that Amnesty International has
received from the wives, mothers, fathers, brothers and sisters of
people whose human rights are being abused with impunity in Saudi
Arabia in the name of security and counter-terrorism. Her name has been
withheld for fear of reprisal.
Dr Saud al-Hashimi, a prisoner of conscience, is reported to have
been subjected to torture and other ill-treatment several times since
his arrest in February 2007.The latest such treatment is reported to
have taken place in June 2009 for starting a hunger strike against his
indefinite detention without trial. He was reportedly stripped of all
his clothes, except his underwear, shackled and dragged from his cell
and placed in a severely cold cell for about five hours. He and at
least six other prisoners of conscience held with him in Dhahban Prison
near Jeddah were targeted by the authorities for calling for political
reform; discussing a proposal to establish an independent human rights
organization in Saudi Arabia; and calling for an end to impunity for
human rights violations committed by Ministry of Interior officials.
The Ministry of Interior says they were arrested for collecting money
to support terrorism, but the detainees strongly deny this. Since their
arrest, they have been detained without charge or trial and held in
solitary confinement, and they remain at risk of torture and other
ill-treatment.
Abdul Rahman al-Sudais, a 48-year-old Saudi Arabian lecturer at Um
al-Qura University in Makkah, was arrested in 2003. The government said
that he was arrested with a cell of "terrorists" but his trial was held
in secret and he was not allowed any legal assistance or
representation. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found the
detention of Abdul Rahman al-Sudais to be in contravention of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and said that "the fight against
terrorism threats cannot justify undermining due process rights
afforded to all accused..." In at least one other case, three of four
defendants accused of responsibility for killings were executed and
their bodies were crucified.
Amnesty International is a worldwide movement of people who campaign for internationally recognized human rights for all. Our supporters are outraged by human rights abuses but inspired by hope for a better world - so we work to improve human rights through campaigning and international solidarity. We have more than 2.2 million members and subscribers in more than 150 countries and regions and we coordinate this support to act for justice on a wide range of issues.
"This is the Iraq War 2.0 with a South American flavor to it," warned one Democratic senator.
US President Donald Trump late Tuesday declared a blockade on "all sanctioned oil tankers" approaching and leaving Venezuela, a major escalation in what's widely seen as an accelerating march to war with the South American country.
The "total and complete blockade," Trump wrote on his social media platform, will only be lifted when Venezuela returns to the US "all of the Oil, Land, and other Assets that they previously stole from us."
"Venezuela is completely surrounded by the largest Armada ever assembled in the History of South America," Trump wrote, referring to the massive US military buildup in the Caribbean. "It will only get bigger, and the shock to them will be like nothing they have ever seen before."
The government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which has mobilized its military in response to the US president's warmongering, denounced Trump's comments as a "grotesque threat" aimed at "stealing the riches that belong to our homeland."
The US-based anti-war group CodePink said in a statement that "Trump’s assertion that Venezuela must 'return' oil, land, and other assets to the United States exposes the true objective" of his military campaign.
"Venezuela did not steal anything from the United States. What Trump describes as 'theft' is Venezuela’s lawful assertion of sovereignty over its own natural resources and its refusal to allow US corporations to control its economy," said CodePink. "A blockade, a terrorist designation, and a military buildup are steps toward war. Congress must act immediately to stop this escalation, and the international community must reject this lawless threat."
The announced naval blockade—an act of aggression under international law—came a week after the Trump administration seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela and made clear that it intends to intercept more.
US Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), one of the leaders of a war powers resolution aimed at preventing the Trump administration from launching a war on Venezuela without congressional approval, said Tuesday that "a naval blockade is unquestionably an act of war."
"A war that the Congress never authorized and the American people do not want," Castro added, noting that a vote on his resolution is set for Thursday. "Every member of the House of Representatives will have the opportunity to decide if they support sending Americans into yet another regime change war."
"This is absolutely an effort to get us involved in a war in Venezuela."
Human rights organizations have accused the Republican-controlled Congress of abdicating its responsibilities as the Trump administration takes belligerent and illegal actions in international waters and against Venezuela directly, claiming without evidence to be combating drug trafficking.
Last month, Senate Republicans—some of whom are publicly clamoring for the US military to overthrow Maduro's government—voted down a Venezuela war powers resolution. Two GOP senators, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, joined Democrats in supporting the resolution.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, wrote Tuesday that "the White House minimized Republican 'yes' votes by promising that Trump would seek Congress’ authorization before initiating hostilities against Venezuela itself."
"Trump today broke that promise to his own party’s lawmakers by ordering a partial blockade on Venezuelan ships," wrote Williams. "A blockade, including a partial one, definitively constitutes an act of war. Trump is starting a war against Venezuela without congressional authorization."
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) warned in a television appearance late Monday that members of the Trump administration are "going to do everything they can to get us into this war."
"This is the Iraq War 2.0 with a South American flavor to it," he added. "This is absolutely an effort to get us involved in a war in Venezuela."
"Obviously, they have issues with what is in that video, and that’s why they don’t want everybody to see it," Sen. Mark Kelly said of administration officials after the meeting.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday that the Pentagon will not release unedited video footage of a September airstrike that killed two men who survived an initial strike on a boat allegedly carrying drugs in the Caribbean Sea, a move that followed a briefing with congressional lawmakers described by one Democrat as an "exercise in futility" and by another as "a joke."
Hegseth said that members of the House and Senate Armed Services committees would be given a chance to view video of the September 2 "double-tap" strike, which experts said was illegal like all the other boat bombings. The secretary did not say whether all congressional lawmakers would be provided access to the footage.
“Of course we’re not going to release a top secret, full, unedited video of that to the general public,” Hegseth told reporters following a closed-door briefing during which he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio fielded questions from lawmakers.
As with a similar briefing earlier this month, Tuesday's meeting left some Democrat attendees with more questions than answers.
“The administration came to this briefing empty-handed,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told reporters. “If they can’t be transparent on this, how can you trust their transparency on all the other issues swirling about in the Caribbean?”
That includes preparations for a possible attack on oil-rich Venezuela, which include the deployment of US warships and thousands of troops to the region and the authorization of covert action aimed at toppling the government of longtime Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.
Tuesday's briefing came as House lawmakers prepare to vote this week on a pair of war powers resolutions aimed at preventing President Donald Trump from waging war on Venezuela. A similar bipartisan resolution recently failed in the Senate.
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and co-author of one of the new war powers resolution, said in a statement: “Today’s briefing from Secretaries Rubio and Hegseth was an exercise in futility. It did nothing to address the serious legal, strategic, and moral concerns surrounding the administration’s unprecedented use of US military force in the Caribbean and Pacific."
"As of today, the administration has already carried out 25 such strikes over three months, extrajudicially killing 95 people," Meeks noted. "That this briefing to members of Congress only occurred more than three months since the strikes began—despite numerous requests for classified and public briefings—further proves these operations are unable to withstand scrutiny and lack a defensible legal rationale."
Briefing attendee Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.)—who is in the administration's crosshairs for reminding US troops that military rules and international law require them to disobey illegal orders—said of Trump officials, "Obviously, they have issues with what is in that video, and that’s why they don’t want everybody to see it."
Defending Hegseth's decision to not make the boat strike video public, Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) argued that “there’s a lot of members that’s gonna walk out there and that’s gonna leak classified information and there’s gonna be certain ones that you hold accountable."
Mullin singled out Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), who, along with the Somalian American community at large, has been the target of mounting Islamophobic and racist abuse by Trump and his supporters.
“Not everybody can go through the same background checks that need to be cleared on this,” he said. “Do you think Omar needs all this information? I will say no.”
Rejecting GOP arguments against releasing the video, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said after attending Tuesday's briefing: “I found the legal explanations and the strategic explanations incoherent, but I think the American people should see this video. And all members of Congress should have that opportunity. I certainly want it for myself.”
"This administration's racist cruelty knows no limits, expanding their travel ban to include even more African and Muslim-majority countries, even Palestinians fleeing a genocide," said Rep. Rashida Tlaib.
President Donald Trump faced sharp criticism on Tuesday after further expanding his travel ban—an effort the US leader launched during his first term, reinstated upon returning to office in January, and previously ramped up in June.
The Republican's new proclamation maintains full restrictions for people from Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, and introduces them for travelers from Laos and Sierra Leone, who previously faced partial limitations.
Trump also added Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, South Sudan, and Syria to that list, just days after he vowed to "retaliate" for an Islamic State gunman killing three Americans, including two service members, and wounding three others in Syria. Journalist James Stout warned that "expanding the travel ban to Syria leaves few options for the people who fought and defeated the Islamic State and are being increasingly threatened by the Syrian state."
While the US government does not recognize Palestine as a state—and has backed Israel's genocidal assault on the Gaza Strip—the president also imposed full restrictions on individuals holding travel documents issued by the Palestinian Authority.
"The harm isn't theoretical," stressed Etan Nechin, a New York-based reporter for the Israeli newspaper Haaretz. Pointing to Palestinian peace activist Awdah Hathaleen, who earlier this year was denied entry at San Francisco International Airport, deported, and then murdered by an Israeli settler in the West Bank, the journalist suggested that Trump and his allies know the consequences of the travel ban, and "they don't care."
As Common Dreams reported earlier Tuesday, Sudan, Palestine, and South Sudan topped the International Rescue Committee's annual humanitarian crisis forecast.
Trump's latest proclamation continues partial restrictions for Burundi, Cuba, Togo, and Venezuela, and adds such limitations for Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Cote d'Ivoire, Dominica, Gabon, Gambia, Malawi, Mauritania, Nigeria, Senegal, Tanzania, Tonga, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
It also lifts a ban on nonimmigrant visas for people from Turkmenistan but maintains the suspension of entry for them as immigrants, with a White House fact sheet stating the country "has engaged productively with the United States and demonstrated significant progress."
Writer Mark Chadbourn said, "It's a white nationalist list—mainly Africa, some Middle East, plus Haiti and Cuba."
Here is a map of the affected countries (excluding Tonga), to give you a sense of how much this new ban restricts immigration from Africa in particular.Of the newly-added country, Nigeria faces the largest impact, with tens of thousands of visas issued every year to Nigerians.
[image or embed]
— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@reichlinmelnick.bsky.social) December 16, 2025 at 3:58 PM
US Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), the only Palestinian American in Congress, said that "this administration's racist cruelty knows no limits, expanding their travel ban to include even more African and Muslim-majority countries, even Palestinians fleeing a genocide."
Tlaib also accused the president, along with his deputy chief of staff for policy and homeland security adviser, of wanting the United States to resemble a Ku Klux Klan event, declaring that "Trump and Stephen Miller won't be satisfied until our country has the demographics of a klan rally."
As the Associated Press noted:
The administration suggested it would expand the restrictions after the arrest of an Afghan national suspect in the shooting of two National Guard troops over Thanksgiving weekend...
The Afghan man accused of shooting the two National Guard troops near the White House has pleaded not guilty to murder and assault charges. In the aftermath of that incident, the administration announced a flurry of immigration restrictions, including further restrictions on people from those initial 19 countries who were already in the US.
Laurie Ball Cooper, vice president of US Legal Programs at the International Refugee Assistance Project, said in a statement that "IRAP condemns the Trump administration's escalating crackdown on immigrants from Muslim-majority and nonwhite countries. This expanded ban is not about national security but instead is another shameful attempt to demonize people simply for where they are from."
"Subjecting more people to this policy is especially harmful given the administration's recent invocation of the travel ban to prevent immigrants already living in the United States from accessing basic immigration benefits, including pulling them out of line at citizenship ceremonies," she continued.
"The expanded proclamation notably includes Palestinians and eliminates some exceptions to the original ban," she added. "This racist and xenophobic ban will keep families apart, but we are prepared to defend our clients, their communities, and the American values of welcome, justice, and dignity for all."