April, 10 2009, 03:15pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Lisa Nurnberger, Media Director, lnurnberger@ucs.org
UCS: Information on Benefits of Auctioning Emissions Allowances
Auction off "allowances" for heat-trapping emissions that cause global warming or give them away? That is the question.
John Holdren, President Obama's science adviser, told the Washington Post
this week that the administration is considering delaying auctioning
100 percent of the heat-trapping emission credits or "allowances" that
would be created under a climate program.
WASHINGTON
Auction off "allowances" for heat-trapping emissions that cause global warming or give them away? That is the question.
John Holdren, President Obama's science adviser, told the Washington Post
this week that the administration is considering delaying auctioning
100 percent of the heat-trapping emission credits or "allowances" that
would be created under a climate program. "[W]hether you get to start
with [a 100-percent auction] or get there over a period of time," he
said, "is something that's being discussed."
Duke
Energy, a member of a coalition of 25 companies and five environmental
organizations called the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, wants to wait
10 years before moving to a 100-percent auction.
In
the House of Representatives, a recently introduced discussion draft of
comprehensive climate and energy legislation by Reps. Henry Waxman
(D-Calif.) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) did not include details on whether
or not allowances would be auctioned or given away for free. Nor did it
indicate how any potential auction revenue would be spent.
Meanwhile, candidate Barack Obama's campaign platform
(pdf) affirmed the value of auctioning all pollution allowances. "A 100
percent auction ensures that all large corporate polluters pay for
every ton of emissions they release," it stated, "rather than giving
these emission rights away for free to coal and oil companies."
Experts
at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) say immediately auctioning
100 percent of allowances is the best approach. That would raise the
money we need to provide consumer benefits, ensure that we meet our
heat-trapping emissions reduction goals, and help transition the
country to a new, cleaner economy.
"Giving
away allowances would be a huge sweetheart deal for polluters," said
Liz Perera, congressional representative for UCS's Climate Program.
"Worse, freebies for polluters would come at the expense of energy
efficiency and renewable energy programs that would benefit the public.
Electric utilities and other polluters are pushing for free allowances
so they can delay cutting their heat-trapping emissions, but we've
already had enough delay. We shouldn't sacrifice the economic and
environmental advantages of auctioning because polluters want to
maintain the status quo."
AUCTIONING UNDER CAP-AND-INVEST PROGRAM: HOW IT WOULD WORK
Under
a cap-and-invest system, the government would establish a national
limit, or cap, on heat-trapping emissions that would decline each year.
Polluters would have to purchase allowances in a periodic auction to
cover the heat-trapping emissions they produce each year. The cost of
those allowances would provide an incentive for polluters to cut their
emissions and would provide a strong incentive to invest in clean
energy technologies.
Auctioning allowances has two key advantages:
First,
auctioning would allow the market to set an appropriate price for
pollution, because polluters would have to estimate how much the
allowances are worth. Giving away allowances for free would diminish
their value, distorting the market and reducing the incentive for
investments in clean energy technology.
Second,
auctioning allowances would generate revenue that could fund measures
to help consumers, workers and low-income families make the switch to
cleaner energy as well as technologies and initiatives that help
prevent the worst consequences of global warming. Those include
renewable energy technologies, energy efficiency and international
forest protection.
The
country's first cap-and-invest program for heat-trapping emissions, the
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative covers utilities in 10 Northeastern
states. Most of the participating states have chosen to auction nearly
all of their allowances and invest the proceeds in energy efficiency
and renewable electricity sources. This program has already raised
$262.3 million for participating states. For more information, see
UCS's cap-and-invest fact sheet.
The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.
LATEST NEWS
'Killing Is Normalized': IDF Soldier Speaks Out About Orders to Shoot Civilians in Gaza
The commands are: everyone that comes inside needs to die," the soldier said. "If they're inside, they're dangerous, you need to kill them. No matter who it is."
Jul 07, 2025
Another Israel Defense Forces soldier has spoken out publicly against the IDF's brutalization of civilians in Gaza.
In an interview with the British Sky News Monday, a reservist who has served three tours of duty in Gaza spoke candidly about orders he and other soldiers received to shoot any person arbitrarily who entered defined "no-go zones," regardless of whether they posed a threat.
The soldier gave his testimony anonymously for fear of being labeled a "traitor." However, he identified himself as a reservist from the 252nd Division who was stationed at the Netzarim Corridor, a road which divides North and South Gaza.
The area has been one of the most critical strategic points for Israel's occupation of Gaza, allowing control over the flow of aid and people.
The soldiers, stationed on the edge of a civilian neighborhood in the homes of displaced Palestinians, were ordered by their commanders to kill anyone who passed an "imaginary line" that marked the beginning of the military stronghold, the soldier said.
"We have a territory that we are in, and the commands are: everyone that comes inside needs to die," the soldier said. "If they're inside, they're dangerous, you need to kill them. No matter who it is."
"It was like pretty much everyone that comes into the territory, and it might be like a teenager riding his bicycle," he said.
The soldier said that the prevailing attitude among the troops was that all Palestinians were "terrorists," and that this attitude was reinforced by commanders.
"They say if someone comes here, it means that he knows he shouldn't be there, and if he still comes, it means he's a terrorist," he said. "This is what they tell you. But I don't really think it's true. It's just poor people, civilians, that don't really have too many choices."
He said that when soldiers in the corridor kill civilians, a lot of them "think that they did something good."
That sense of impunity, he said, comes from the higher-ups.
"Some commanders can really decide to do war crimes and bad things and don't face the consequences of that," he said.
"You can't be in this scenario for so long and not normalize it," he said. "Killing is normalized, and you don't see the problem."
This anonymous soldier is the latest of many who have decided to speak out against atrocities their military has committed.
His testimony comes on the heels of a harrowing Haaretz expose, in which several other Israeli soldiers described being ordered to shoot Palestinian aid-seekers, turning the U.S.-Israeli administered Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) sites into "killing fields." Others provided The Associated Press with video of soldiers bombarding civilians in an aid site with pepper spray and stun grenades.
Others have spoken out against the attacks on civilians near the Israeli stronghold at Netzarim.
In April, a report by the Israeli veterans group Breaking the Silence detailed many more accounts of brutality over the first year-and-a-half of the war. It included accounts of Israeli soldiers razing agricultural land, bulldozing entire city blocks, and designating "large swathes of the land" that "were turned into massive kill zones."
"All of them were wiped off the face of the Earth. Annihilation, expropriation, and expulsion are immoral and must never be normalized or legitimized," the report said.
The soldier who spoke to Sky News said his deployment left a similar stain on his conscience.
"I kind of feel like I took part in something bad, and I need to counter it with something good that I do, by speaking out, because I am very troubled about what I took and still am taking part of, as a soldier and citizen in this country," he said. "I think the war is... a very bad thing that is happening to us, and to the Palestinians, and I think it needs to be over."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Oxfam Says Russian Use of Chemical Weapons in Ukraine Would Be 'Egregious Violation of International law'
"The increasing erosion of the rule of law is deeply concerning," said an Oxfam campaigns manager.
Jul 07, 2025
Anti-poverty organization Oxfam on Monday expressed grave concern over reports that Russia has been increasingly deploying chemical weapons in Ukraine.
The Associated Press reported late last week that two Dutch intelligence agencies are claiming that Russia has been ramping up its use of chemical weapons in its war against Ukraine. Among the chemical weapons allegedly being deployed by Russia are chloropicrin, a banned poison gas that was used by European powers during World War I, and CS gas, which is typically used as a riot control agent.
Sarah Redd, Oxfam's advocacy and campaigns manager in Ukraine, called reports of banned chemical weapons use deeply troubling and called for a full investigation into the matter.
"Oxfam is appalled at the recent intensification of violence against civilians in Ukraine, especially the reports of Russia's use of chemical weapons, which would be an egregious violation of international law," she said. "The increasing erosion of the rule of law is deeply concerning. Such laws were put in place to prevent humanity from sliding back into a darker chapter of history. Oxfam calls for an immediate and independent international investigation into these allegations and to hold those responsible to account."
Russia is a signatory of the Chemical Weapons Convention, a treaty first drafted and enacted in the 1990s that bars the use of both chloropicrin and CS gas in war. This makes Russia subject to potential investigations carried out by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, although such an investigation can only take place if requested by member states.
Ukraine has claimed that Russia has carried out more than 9,000 chemical weapons attacks ever since it launched its invasion of the country more than three years ago. During the 2024 election campaign, President Donald Trump claimed that he could bring an end to the Ukraine-Russia war within a single day although so far fighting between the two nations has only intensified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Indefensible': Trump Budget Law Subsidizes Private Jet Owners While Taking Healthcare From Millions
A provision of the budget law that President Donald Trump signed last week will leave taxpayers to "pick up the tab for the private jet industry and billionaire high flyers."
Jul 07, 2025
The Republican budget measure that U.S. President Donald Trump signed into law late last week contains a provision that analysts say will allow private jet owners to write off the full cost of their aircraft in the first year of purchase, a boon to the ultra-rich that comes as millions of people are set to lose healthcare under the same legislation.
FlyUSA, a private aviation provider, gushed in a blog post that with final passage of the unpopular budget reconciliation package, "business jet ownership has never looked more fiscally attractive or more fun to explain to your accountant."
The law, crafted by congressional Republicans and approved with only GOP support, permanently restores a major corporate tax break known as 100% bonus depreciation, which allows businesses to deduct the costs of certain assets in the first year of purchase rather than writing them off over time.
Forbes noted that the bonus depreciation policy "applies to a slew of qualified, physical business expenses which depreciate over time, such as machinery and company cars, but the policy is often associated with big-ticket luxury items, such as private aircraft, and its institution last decade led to a boom in jet sales."
"Trump and congressional Republicans have certainly delivered for the billionaire class."
Chuck Collins, director of the Program on Inequality at the Institute for Policy Studies, called bonus depreciation "a massive tax break for billionaires and centi-millionaires that use the most polluting form of transportation on the planet."
"A corporation purchasing a $50 million private jet could potentially deduct the entire $50 million from their taxes in the year of the purchase, rather than spreading the deduction over many years," Collins wrote. "This amounts to a massive taxpayer subsidy, as ordinary taxpayers pick up the tab for the private jet industry and billionaire high flyers."
"Subsidizing more private jets on a warming planet is reckless and indefensible," he added.
The National Business Aviation Association, a lobbying group for the private aviation industry, celebrated passage of the Republican legislation, specifically welcoming the bonus depreciation policy as "effective for incentivizing aircraft purchase." (The Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy argues that "depreciation tax breaks have never been shown to encourage more capital investment.")
Meanwhile, communities across the United States are bracing for the law's deep cuts to Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance, which are expected to impose damaging strains on state budgets and strip food benefits and health coverage from millions of low-income Americans.
"Trump and congressional Republicans have certainly delivered for the billionaire class," said Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen. "This is certainly one of the cruelest bills in American history, backtracking on the country's painfully slow history of expanding healthcare coverage and, equally remarkably, taking food away from the hungry."
"That's a lot of needless suffering just to make the richest Americans richer," he added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular