January, 21 2011, 02:58pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Deborah Richter, M.D.
Ali Thebert, Vermont Physicians for a National Health
Program, (802) 595-2820, ali@pnhp.org
Mark Almberg, PNHP, (312) 782-6006, mark@pnhp.org
Vermont Single-Payer Proposals a 'Major Step in Right Direction': Doctors' Group
Longtime reform advocate and Vermont
family physician Dr. Deborah Richter hailed Wednesday's report of
health system
expert William Hsiao to the Vermont Legislature, particularly
Hsiao's findings
that a single-payer system would be the best remedy for what he
called the
state's "broken" and "unsustainable" way of paying for care.
WASHINGTON
Longtime reform advocate and Vermont
family physician Dr. Deborah Richter hailed Wednesday's report of
health system
expert William Hsiao to the Vermont Legislature, particularly
Hsiao's findings
that a single-payer system would be the best remedy for what he
called the
state's "broken" and "unsustainable" way of paying for care.
"Dr. Hsiao's team of researchers found that a streamlined,
single-payer system for financing health care would save money by
reducing
excess paperwork and bureaucracy, cover everyone in Vermont with no
increase in
health spending, reduce or eliminate patient co-pays, promote job
growth and
economic development, and control costs," Richter said.
"Although the devil is in the details, the broad outlines of
his single-payer proposals are very promising," she said. "They
represent a
major step in the right direction.
"This thoughtful, evidence-based approach to solving our
state's health care problems - an approach that involves our new
governor, our
congressional delegation and state lawmakers poised to take swift,
positive
action to translate reform proposals into law - stands in stark
contrast to the
noisy goings-on in Washington this week," Richter said, alluding to
the
Republican party's symbolic vote in the House to repeal the federal
health law.
While her overall attitude toward Hsiao's draft report was
very positive, Richter said that her group, the Vermont chapter of
Physicians for a National
Health Program, would be making recommendations to improve the
single-payer
models to maximize administrative savings and strengthen cost
control even
further. After a period of public comment, a final report from Hsiao
is due
Feb. 17.
"Only a one-payer system can maximize the efficiencies and
cost savings," Richter said. "So it will be important to fully
incorporate
Medicare and Medicaid into the system as soon as possible. We will
also be
recommending the use of single-payer tools like separate operating
and capital
budgets for hospitals."
"Optimally, a single-payer program would also prohibit the
participation of investor-owned, for-profit delivery systems, which
studies
show drive up costs and produce worse medical outcomes," she said.
Hsiao is a professor of economics at the Harvard School of
Public Health and an internationally recognized authority on health
care
systems. Last year he and his team were commissioned by the
Legislature to
analyze three models for state health reform, including a
single-payer model,
where private insurers are excluded from the system and all medical
bills are
paid by a single public or quasi-public authority.
In his presentation to Vermont lawmakers, Hsiao outlined the three
models: a public single-payer plan, a plan that builds on the new
federal
health law but adds a so-called public option, and his team's
recommended plan.
Hsiao's team found that the "public option" plan would yield
the poorest results, having only a very modest impact on reducing
costs and
having almost no impact on reducing the number of the uninsured.
While citing the merits of a publicly administered
single-payer plan, Hsiao's team ended up by recommending a
"public-private
hybrid single-payer" model that would be managed by an independent
board and
that would contract-out the job of claims processing to private and
public
bidders. A private company like Vermont Blue Cross Blue Shield, for
example,
could be hired to process the claims, as is done currently by
Medicare.
Richter likes the idea of the independent board and says
physicians in Vermont
favor single payer because it's the only approach that gives them a
voice and
negotiating power - something they lack with insurers today. Single
payer will
also benefit the state's physicians by simplifying billing and
giving them a
choice of practice options. "It will make primary care very
attractive in Vermont," she said.
"We'll be able to choose where we want to practice and patients will
be able to
freely choose their doctors."
She also would like to see the enactment of a plan that
provides for comprehensive care.
Richter practices family medicine in Montpelier,
and has pushed for single payer in Vermont
for more than two decades. She is a past president of Physicians for
a National
Health Program, a nationwide organization of 18,000 doctors who
favor
single-payer national health insurance, commonly referred to as an
improved
Medicare for all.
"Dr. Hsiao has performed an extraordinary service," Richter
said. "Vermont
has an historic opportunity to lead the nation on fundamental health
reform."
Physicians for a National Health Program is a single issue organization advocating a universal, comprehensive single-payer national health program. PNHP has more than 21,000 members and chapters across the United States.
LATEST NEWS
'The Opposite of Leadership': US Vetoes Palestine's UN Membership
Palestine's permanent observer at the United Nations said the resolution's failure "will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination."
Apr 18, 2024
U.S. President Joe Biden's administration on Thursday used the country's veto power at the United Nations Security Council to block Palestine's bid to become a full member of the U.N.
While 12 nations voted in favor of Palestinian membership and two abstained, the United States is one of five countries—along with China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom—who have veto authority at the Security Council.
Since Israel launched what the International Court of Justice has said is a "plausibly" genocidal assault of the Gaza Strip in response to a Hamas-led October attack, the Biden administration has blocked three cease-fire resolutions at the Security Council. Under mounting global pressure last month, the U.S. finally abstained last month, allowing a cease-fire measure to pass.
In the lead-up to Thursday's vote, the Biden administration was pressuring other counties to oppose the Palestinian Authority's renewed membership effort so it could possibly avoid a veto, according to leaked cables obtained by The Intercept.
"Take a moment to ponder how isolated Biden has made the U.S.," said Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, after the veto. "Biden lobbied Japan, South Korea, and Ecuador HARD to oppose the Palestine resolution so that the U.S. wouldn't have to veto. They refused. So Biden cast his fourth veto in seven months (!!) This is the opposite of leadership."
In addition to the nations Parsi highlighted, Algeria, China, France, Guyana, Malta, Mozambique, Russia, Sierra Leone, and Slovenia giving Palestine full U.N. membership while Switzerland and the United Kingdom abstained.
After the vote, U.N. Newsreported on remarks from Riyad Mansour, a U.N. permanent observer for the state of Palestine:
"We came to the Security Council today as an important historic moment, regionally and internationally, so that we could salvage what can be saved. We place you before a historic responsibility to establish the foundations of a just and comprehensive peace in our region."
Council members were given the opportunity "to revive the hope that has been lost among our people" and to translate their commitment towards a two-state solution into firm action "that cannot be maneuvered or retracted," and the majority of council members "have risen to the level of this historic moment, and they have stood on the side of justice and freedom and hope, in line with the ethical and humanitarian and legal principles that must govern our world and in line with simple logic."
"The fact that this resolution did not pass will not break our will, and it will not defeat our determination," Mansour added. "We will not stop in our effort. The state of Palestine is inevitable. It is real. Perhaps they see it as far away, but we see it as near, and we are the faithful."
Parsi said that "a Western-friendly senior Global South diplomat" told him of Biden's veto: "Whatever agonizing claim the U.S. had to lead a self-appointed free world has died a very loud public death on the Security Council horseshoe tonight. YOU CAN'T LEAD IF YOU CAN'T LISTEN."
Biden, a Democrat seeking reelection in November, has faced fierce criticism in the United States and around the world for U.S. complicity in Israel's war on Gaza—which Hamas, not the Palestinian Authority, has controlled for nearly two decades. In under seven months, Israeli forces have killed 33,970 Palestinians, injured another 76,770, displaced most of the besieged enclave's 2.3 million population, devastated civilian infrastructure, and severely limited the flow of lifesaving humanitarian assistance.
Israel—which already got $3.8 billion in annual U.S. military aid before October 7—continues to receive weapons support from the Biden administration, even as a growing chorus of critics, including some Democrats in Congress, argues that the arms transfers violate U.S. and international law.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Shameful': Columbia Greenlights Police Crackdown on Anti-War Encampment
Even after dozens of students were arrested, hundreds "rushed to take the place of their classmates" and continued the protest.
Apr 18, 2024
The arrests of dozens of Columbia University and Barnard College students on Thursday "galvanized" other supporters of Palestinian rights on the campuses, as hundreds of students occupied the school's western lawn after New York City police filled at least two buses with protesters who had been detained for setting up an encampment.
"Disclose, divest, we will not stop, we will not rest," chanted hundreds of students as they marched around the area where organizers had set up a tent encampment early Wednesday morning.
Columbia President Minouche Shafik informed the campus community on Thursday that she had authorized the police to clear the encampment.
As it has been in the past, the school has become a center of anti-war protests—and crackdowns by school officials and the police—since Israel began its bombardment of Gaza in October.
Pro-Palestinian students and alumni have demanded that Columbia divest from companies that profit from Israel's apartheid policies in the occupied Palestinian territories and cancel its dual degree program with Tel Aviv University.
In response to pro-Palestinian demonstrations, Columbia in November suspended the campus chapters of Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine—an action that pushed the New York Civil Liberties Union and Palestine Legal to file a lawsuit on behalf of the students last month.
On Thursday, police and Columbia employees took down about 50 tents that had been up for more than a day and disposed of them in trash cans and alleyways—but The New York Times reported later that "demonstrators repitched a couple of tents, and ... recovered the main signage from the encampment as well," while hundreds of students were "still gathered and chanting on the south side of the grass."
The arrests came a day after Shafik testified before the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce about antisemitism on campus.
U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), whose daughter, Isra Hirsi, was among the Barnard students who were suspended on Thursday for participating in the encampment protest, questioned Shafik about whether antisemitic protests have actually taken place at Columbia, prompting the president to say there have not.
"There has been a rise in targeting and harassment against anti-war protesters, because it's been pro-war and anti-war protesters is what it seems, like, correct?" asked Omar.
"Correct," replied Shafik.
On Thursday, Omar posted on social media two images of protesters at Columbia: one from the encampment this week, and one from 1968, when students protested the U.S. war in Vietnam.
New York City Council member Tiffany Cabán was among those who condemned the university's crackdown on the protests on Thursday.
"Suspending and arresting Columbia/Barnard student activists and disbanding student organizations—including Jewish students and organizations—doesn't combat antisemitism or increase safety," said Cabán. "All it does is punish and intimidate those who believe in human rights for Palestinians. Shameful."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'The Pressure Is Working': Biden Weighs Climate Emergency Declaration
Campaigners urged the president to "keep listening to the millions of young, people of color, and working-class voters who are demanding climate policy that meets the moment."
Apr 18, 2024
The youth-led Sunrise Movement on Thursday celebrated Bloombergreporting that "White House officials have renewed discussions about potentially declaring a national climate emergency."
The Wednesday revelation came just two days after six young activists were arrested outside Vice President Kamala Harris' Los Angeles, California home to increase pressure on the Biden administration to make such a declaration, which would unlock various federal powers to combat the fossil fuel-driven global crisis.
According to Bloomberg:
Top advisers to President Joe Biden have recently resumed talks about the merits of such a move, which could be used to curtail crude exports, suspend offshore drilling, and curb greenhouse gas emissions, according to people familiar with the matter who asked not to be named because a final decision has not been made.
White House advisers are divided over the idea of declaring a climate emergency, with some saying it wouldn't provide Biden with enough newfound authority to make substantial changes, the people said. Others, however, argue such an announcement would galvanize climate-minded voters.
"The pressure is working. Let's keep it up," Sunrise said on social media, highlighting some of what Biden—who claimed last year that "practically speaking," he had already declared a national climate emergency—could do with a real declaration.
Sunrise wasn't alone in welcoming the news. The Center for Popular Democracy (CPD) Action said that "we've BEEN calling for a climate emergency!! Now, the White House is considering declaring one."
The group urged Biden to "keep listening to the millions of young, people of color, and working-class voters who are demanding climate policy that meets the moment."
As Biden and Harris have campaigned for reelection in November—when they are expected to face former Republican President Donald Trump, whose plan for the planet is "drill, baby, drill"—the Democrats have encountered intense pressure from campaigners including members of CPD and Sunrise to step up their climate actions.
"I'm on the frontlines raising my voice for my Black and Latine families and friends, because I know that we deserve to have affordable housing and healthcare, we deserve an administration who will fight for us, but instead of declaring a climate emergency, we are seeing Biden and Harris expand oil and gas production to record levels," 18-year-old Ariela Lara, who was arrested at Harris' house, said Monday.
Climate campaigners have praised the Biden administration for parts of the Inflation Reduction Act and a recent pause on liquefied natural gas exports but blasted the president for skipping last year's United Nations summit, continuing fossil fuel lease sales, and enabling the Mountain Valley Pipeline, Willow oil project, and construction of the nation's largest offshore oil terminal.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular