January, 21 2011, 02:58pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Deborah Richter, M.D.
Ali Thebert, Vermont Physicians for a National Health
Program, (802) 595-2820, ali@pnhp.org
Mark Almberg, PNHP, (312) 782-6006, mark@pnhp.org
Vermont Single-Payer Proposals a 'Major Step in Right Direction': Doctors' Group
Longtime reform advocate and Vermont
family physician Dr. Deborah Richter hailed Wednesday's report of
health system
expert William Hsiao to the Vermont Legislature, particularly
Hsiao's findings
that a single-payer system would be the best remedy for what he
called the
state's "broken" and "unsustainable" way of paying for care.
WASHINGTON
Longtime reform advocate and Vermont
family physician Dr. Deborah Richter hailed Wednesday's report of
health system
expert William Hsiao to the Vermont Legislature, particularly
Hsiao's findings
that a single-payer system would be the best remedy for what he
called the
state's "broken" and "unsustainable" way of paying for care.
"Dr. Hsiao's team of researchers found that a streamlined,
single-payer system for financing health care would save money by
reducing
excess paperwork and bureaucracy, cover everyone in Vermont with no
increase in
health spending, reduce or eliminate patient co-pays, promote job
growth and
economic development, and control costs," Richter said.
"Although the devil is in the details, the broad outlines of
his single-payer proposals are very promising," she said. "They
represent a
major step in the right direction.
"This thoughtful, evidence-based approach to solving our
state's health care problems - an approach that involves our new
governor, our
congressional delegation and state lawmakers poised to take swift,
positive
action to translate reform proposals into law - stands in stark
contrast to the
noisy goings-on in Washington this week," Richter said, alluding to
the
Republican party's symbolic vote in the House to repeal the federal
health law.
While her overall attitude toward Hsiao's draft report was
very positive, Richter said that her group, the Vermont chapter of
Physicians for a National
Health Program, would be making recommendations to improve the
single-payer
models to maximize administrative savings and strengthen cost
control even
further. After a period of public comment, a final report from Hsiao
is due
Feb. 17.
"Only a one-payer system can maximize the efficiencies and
cost savings," Richter said. "So it will be important to fully
incorporate
Medicare and Medicaid into the system as soon as possible. We will
also be
recommending the use of single-payer tools like separate operating
and capital
budgets for hospitals."
"Optimally, a single-payer program would also prohibit the
participation of investor-owned, for-profit delivery systems, which
studies
show drive up costs and produce worse medical outcomes," she said.
Hsiao is a professor of economics at the Harvard School of
Public Health and an internationally recognized authority on health
care
systems. Last year he and his team were commissioned by the
Legislature to
analyze three models for state health reform, including a
single-payer model,
where private insurers are excluded from the system and all medical
bills are
paid by a single public or quasi-public authority.
In his presentation to Vermont lawmakers, Hsiao outlined the three
models: a public single-payer plan, a plan that builds on the new
federal
health law but adds a so-called public option, and his team's
recommended plan.
Hsiao's team found that the "public option" plan would yield
the poorest results, having only a very modest impact on reducing
costs and
having almost no impact on reducing the number of the uninsured.
While citing the merits of a publicly administered
single-payer plan, Hsiao's team ended up by recommending a
"public-private
hybrid single-payer" model that would be managed by an independent
board and
that would contract-out the job of claims processing to private and
public
bidders. A private company like Vermont Blue Cross Blue Shield, for
example,
could be hired to process the claims, as is done currently by
Medicare.
Richter likes the idea of the independent board and says
physicians in Vermont
favor single payer because it's the only approach that gives them a
voice and
negotiating power - something they lack with insurers today. Single
payer will
also benefit the state's physicians by simplifying billing and
giving them a
choice of practice options. "It will make primary care very
attractive in Vermont," she said.
"We'll be able to choose where we want to practice and patients will
be able to
freely choose their doctors."
She also would like to see the enactment of a plan that
provides for comprehensive care.
Richter practices family medicine in Montpelier,
and has pushed for single payer in Vermont
for more than two decades. She is a past president of Physicians for
a National
Health Program, a nationwide organization of 18,000 doctors who
favor
single-payer national health insurance, commonly referred to as an
improved
Medicare for all.
"Dr. Hsiao has performed an extraordinary service," Richter
said. "Vermont
has an historic opportunity to lead the nation on fundamental health
reform."
Physicians for a National Health Program is a single issue organization advocating a universal, comprehensive single-payer national health program. PNHP has more than 21,000 members and chapters across the United States.
LATEST NEWS
Four People on a Florida Speedboat Killed in Shootout With Cuban Troops
"This is going to be a shitshow," one social media user said of the deadly encounter, which occurred amid high tensions with the Trump administration.
Feb 25, 2026
This is a developing story… Please check back for updates…
In a deadly development that could further strain relations between Havana and Washington DC, Cuba's Ministry of the Interior announced Wednesday afternoon that four people on a Florida-registered speedboat were killed in a gunfire exchange with Cuban troops in the island nation's territorial waters.
The boat, "with registration number FL7726SH, approached up to 1 nautical mile northeast of the El Pino channel, in Cayo Falcones, Corralillo municipality, Villa Clara province," Cuba's ministry said in a statement shared on social media. When a five-member crew of border troops "approached the vessel for identification, the crew of the violating speedboat opened fire on the Cuban personnel, resulting in the injury of the commander of the Cuban vessel."
"As a consequence of the confrontation, as of the time of this report, four aggressors on the foreign vessel were killed and six were injured," the ministry said. "The injured individuals were evacuated and received medical assistance. In the face of current challenges, Cuba reaffirms its determination to protect its territorial waters, based on the principle that national defense is a fundamental pillar of the Cuban state in safeguarding its sovereignty and ensuring stability in the region. Investigations by the competent authorities continue in order to fully clarify the events."
The New York Times reported that "a US official initially said the firefight had involved a US civilian boat that was part of flotilla to get relatives out of Cuba, adding that the vessel was not a US Naval or Coast Guard boat. But later intelligence confirmed that a single boat had been attacked."
The shootout came as Cubans contend with a humanitarian crisis resulting from President Donald Trump's oil embargo.
The US Supreme Court Friday decision to strike down Trump's use of an emergency law to impose sweeping tariffs sparked fresh calls for countries around the world to send oil to Cuba. Canadian Foreign Minister Anita Anand said Monday that her government is "preparing a plan to assist" the island, and Mexico on Tuesday sent two more military ships carrying humanitarian supplies.
Trump's secretary of state, Marco Rubio, the son of Cuban immigrants, made clear in an appearance before Congress last month that "we would love to see a change" in Cuba.
While Trump and Rubio haven't yet commented, multiple Florida Republicans, including US Sen. Rick Scott and Congressman Carlos Gimenez, turned to social media to call for a US investigation into the shootout.
Responding to Gimenez's post, GOP Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced that "I've directed the Office of Statewide Prosecution to work with our federal, state, and law enforcement partners to begin an investigation. The Cuban government cannot be trusted, and we will do everything in our power to hold these communists accountable."
Also replying to the congressman, Andrés Pertierra, a PhD student in Latin American and Caribbean history at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said: "Gimenez is already trying to use this to further escalate tensions, but so far we don't have much confirmed information... Let's get the facts first."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Demands Anthropic Let Military Use AI However It Wants—Even for Autonomous Killer Drones and Spying On Americans
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said the company that owns the AI assistant Claude would be punished unless it drops all ethical guidelines.
Feb 25, 2026
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has threatened to punish the artificial intelligence company Anthropic if it doesn't let the Pentagon use its technology however it wants—apparently even to create autonomous killer drones or conduct surveillance of Americans.
Anthropic's powerful AI model, Claude, is currently the only one permitted to handle classified military data, and the company was awarded a $200 million contract last year to develop AI capabilities for the Department of Defense to use alongside other AI firms.
However, the company's usage policy prohibits its use for mass surveillance and for the development of autonomous weapons—such as drones that attack targets without a human operator.
These limitations have infuriated the Defense Department leadership. On Tuesday, Hegseth called Anthropic's CEO, Dario Amodei, to a meeting at the Pentagon, where he demanded "unfettered" access to Claude without any guardrails.
This goal was outlined last month in the department's "AI Strategy" memo, which called for the US to adopt an "AI-first warfighting force" and for companies to allow their technology to be deployed for "any lawful use," free from ethical safeguards.
According to a senior defense official who spoke to Axios, Hegseth issued an ultimatum to Amodei on Tuesday: If he does not grant the Pentagon unrestricted use of Anthropic's technology by 5:01 pm on Friday, the department would take measures to coerce the company.
It would either declare Anthropic a "supply chain risk," effectively blacklisting it for military use and ending its contract, or it would invoke the Defense Production Act, which would force the company to tailor the product to the military's needs.
While it would not be an unusual step for the Pentagon to cut ties with Anthropic, threats to declare it a supply chain risk have been described as extraordinary.
Jessica Tillipman, the associate dean for government procurement law studies at George Washington University, who specializes in AI governance, wrote on social media that the threat of "declaring Anthropic a supply chain risk is deeply problematic," as it's "generally something we reserve for products that create security risks, and using it in this way undermines its purpose."
As Elizabeth Nolan Brown wrote on Wednesday for Reason, it "would mean anyone who wants to work with the US military in any capacity must sever ties with the AI company," which could deal a major blow to the business.
Last month, Amodei published an essay about how "AI-enabled autocracies" could use the technology to surveil and repress their citizens and wage war on less developed countries:
A swarm of millions or billions of fully automated armed drones, locally controlled by powerful AI and strategically coordinated across the world by an even more powerful AI, could be an unbeatable army, capable of both defeating any military in the world and suppressing dissent within a country by following around every citizen...
A powerful AI looking across billions of conversations from millions of people could gauge public sentiment, detect pockets of disloyalty forming, and stamp them out before they grow. This could lead to the imposition of a true panopticon on a scale that we don’t see today.
Amodei reportedly resisted Hegseth's demands to lift restrictions at Tuesday's meeting, refusing to budge on the two key issues of mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. Following reports of the meeting, the company has said it still wants to work with the government while also ensuring its models are used in line with what they could “reliably and responsibly do.”
A senior Pentagon spokesperson said the military must be free to use the technology how it sees fit. According to the Associated Press, the official argued that "the Pentagon has only issued lawful orders and stressed that using Anthropic’s tools legally would be the military’s responsibility."
The question of whether the Pentagon has issued only "lawful" orders is in dispute—in fact, the Pentagon is fighting to cut the retirement pay of Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a retired Navy captain, after he made a video in November reminding active duty troops that they have a duty not to obey illegal orders.
That video was made in response to reports that Hegseth had given orders to bomb the survivors of one of the administration's boat strikes in the Caribbean—an act described as a potential "war crime" amid a broader campaign that legal experts have said is illegal under both US and international law.
The military also reportedly used Claude as part of another legally questionable act last month: the operation to kidnap Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which involved bombing across Caracas and killed at least 83 people. It is not clear how the model was used during the attack.
While the Pentagon has not specified which restricted activities it wishes to pursue using Anthropic's technology, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) said that with his demands, Hegseth was essentially telling the company, "Let us use your AI for mass surveillance, or we’ll pull your contract."
Under President Donald Trump, Gallego added, “corporations are punished for refusing to spy on American citizens.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Disgraceful Act of Complicity': Indian Left Denounces Modi's Israel Visit
"Modi's embrace of Zionist Israel amidst its relentless genocidal assault on Palestine is a betrayal of India's anti-colonial legacy," said one leftist leader.
Feb 25, 2026
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's arrival in Israel on Wednesday sparked widespread condemnation among his country's leftists, many of whom accused the Hindu nationalist leader of complicity in Israel's annihilation of Gaza.
Modi was warmly welcomed at Ben-Gurion International Airport by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his wife Sara to kick off a two-day state visit that is expected to focus on issues including military cooperation and arms sales, as Indian purchases of Israeli weaponry have increased exponentially in recent years.
The Indian leader was also joyously greeted at his place of accommodation, the King David Hotel, where in 1946 Jewish militants seeking independence from British occupation carried out a bombing that killed 91 people, including at least 15 Jews.
Modi addressed the Israeli Knesset, or Parliament, lamenting the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023 in which 1,195 Israelis and others were killed and 251 abducted. But he said nothing about the more than 250,000 Palestinians killed or wounded by Israel's genocidal retaliation.
He did say that "no cause can justify the murder of civilians." But he was talking about Israeli, not Palestinian, civilians.
"Modi endorsed the brutal killing of 71,000 innocent Palestinians from reckless Israeli bombing," Calcutta-based journalist Seema Sengupta said on social media in response to the Knesset speech. "The death on both sides should've been mourned by him. Instead, he sounded like a partisan leader of a party which gained prominence through disharmony, violence, and bloodshed."
The Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M)—which leads the ruling Left Democratic Front that currently heads the Kerala state government—said it "strongly opposes" Modi's visit, which it called "a betrayal of the Palestinian cause" that "legitimizes the murderous Netanyahu regime."
"The visit comes at a juncture when Israel has been waging a genocidal war in Gaza," the party continued. "Despite a ceasefire, there are daily violations by Israel which conducts strikes killing scores of Palestinians. In the occupied West Bank, there are stepped up attacks on Palestinians and a spurt in illegal settlements."
"The declared intent of the visit is also to deepen strategic, military, and economic ties with a Zionist expansionist regime which seeks to dominate the region with the help of the United States," CPI-M added. "The visit is all the more inopportune because it is taking place at a time when the United States is preparing to attack Iran militarily at the instigation of Israel."
CPI-M General Secretary M A Baby said that "Modi's embrace of Zionist Israel amidst its relentless genocidal assault on Palestine is a betrayal of India's anti-colonial legacy."
The Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation, whose stronghold is in the eastern state of Bihar, said that it "condemns Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Israel as a disgraceful act of complicity in the ongoing genocidal assault on the Palestinian people."
"At a time when Palestinian civilians are being massacred, displaced, and starved under a brutal Israeli occupation, this visit amounts to political endorsement and profiteering on Palestinian blood," CPI (ML) Liberation continued. "After mortgaging India’s sovereignty and strategic autonomy to [US President Donald] Trump's racist agenda, Modi is now completely surrendering India’s historic legacy of anti-colonialism and solidarity with the oppressed by visiting Israel."
"Since assuming office in 2014, the Modi regime has systematically imported Israeli models of repression to consolidate its own politics of hate at home," the party added. "From bulldozer demolitions and collective punishment tactics against minorities and marginalized, to the expansion of illegal surveillance infrastructures, the [Bharatiya Janata Party]’s fascist politics has found a role model in Israel."
Israel and India have deepened ties since Modi and the BJP were elected over a decade ago. Both Modi and Netanyahu are right-wing nationalists who utilize religious supremacism to exclude or marginalize Muslims, and both have been accused of increasing authoritarianism, just like their common ally Trump.
Center-leftists including members of the opposition Indian National Congress—which has been criticized for its "pragmatic" engagement with Israel—also condemned Modi's visit.
Left-leaning members of Indian civil society and academia also decried the visit.
Rebuffing Modi's claim that this week's shirtless anti-BJP demonstrations by members of the Indian Youth Congress were an embarrassment for the nation, Delhi School of Economics professor Nandini Sundar said on social media that visiting "genocide-committing Israel has embarrassed and shamed Indians more than a 1,000 shirtless protests."
The activist group Indian People in Solidarity With Palestine and the India chapter of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement issued a joint statement accusing the "fascist BJP government" of working "hands-in-gloves with genocidal Israel" to "suppress voices of dissent while maintaining a facade of being democratic."

“At a time when the ceasefire is being used as an excuse to bomb and vaporize Palestinians and occupy Gaza," the groups said, "the Indian government is choosing to stand with genocidal Israel and its imperialist masters like America and is working overtime to benefit the corporations from the occupation of Palestine."
Update: This article has been updated with additional remarks from Modi.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


