

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
I am not going to discount the value of having 7 million people show up to protest the fascist, genocidal Trump regime, but we need more from the movement.
I attended the downtown local No Kings Day festivities in Northampton, Massachusetts, and estimate that some 1,500 people came out. I liked the crowds, but the character and will of the people rather collided with the self-serving ambitions of Democratic Party speakers who hogged microphones that might have been given to ordinary people. The potential for a spontaneous, free-flowing expression of public feeling remained unrealized.
What does No Kings Day represent? How does a loosely affiliated collection of organizations achieve a viable identity, a sense of unity, and a vision that goes beyond a mutual feeling that we ought to do something (anything!) as fascist momentum gathers in all its ugly certainty?
If it were up to me I would not have any public speeches at No Kings Day delivered by Democratic Party office holders. This is not because Democrats have become historically unpopular, with Pew polling showing only a 27% approval rating among registered voters, but, rather, to break with the centers of political and corporate power in favor of an association of grassroots individuals and factions. Australian journalist Caitlin Johnstone took the most conceivably hostile view of No Kings Day by posting a photo of a sign at a demonstration that read, “If Kamala Had Won We’d All Be At Brunch.” While I certainly don’t dismiss the value of No Kings Day in Johnstone’s summarily contemptuous manner, I am skeptical of performative nostalgia. The idea that “we’d all be at brunch” obviously labels the sign holder as a bourgeois dilettante who views activism as an inconvenience, but more critically, the longing for the public civility of Kamala Harris, Barack Obama, Joe Biden or Bill Clinton trivializes the No Kings Day movement.
We are living within the most ominous moment in American history—it would hardly be hyperbolic to imagine that biological history squirms on the pitchfork of American fascism. Scientists give us bleak updates while our fascist leaders literally pour gasoline on a five-alarm apocalypse. We need as broad a coalition as possible, but, paradoxically the scope of the resistance movement creates its own set of roadblocks. How do we create an alliance that unites organizations deeply tied to the US political establishment with grassroots movements and ordinary people that have a deep suspicion of the Democratic Party and its satellite organizations?
We need to swiftly transform No Kings from a Democratic Party spectacle to a grassroots resistance movement.
I believe that the No Kings Movement has three fundamental tasks: 1) to assure that the Democratic Party does not gain control of the coalition, 2) to expand the coalition to include those without an institutional voice (the poor, the unhoused, the unregistered and nonvoters, and most importantly, the millions of undocumented US residents at risk for MAGA’s genocidal zeal). The third task is the most difficult and subsumes the goal of limiting the influence of the Democratic Party. 3) The No Kings Day project must take the critical jump from protest to civil disobedience.
The Democratic Party members have habitually seen their role as one tied to the election cycle. They see their goal as flipping the House and Senate in the midterms and electing a Democrat for president in 2028. With the Project 2025 technicians disassembling electoral structures, we should expect that dreams of our continued back-and-forth power transitions no longer exist as a realistic aspiration. Nor should that have ever been a goal—the Democratic Party created the very conditions that made Trump in the first place. Chicago’s Democratic Mayor Brandon Johnson called for a nationwide general strike, suggesting that some small contingent of Democrats now understand that conventional political tactics no longer address the dire nature of our predicament.
We are almost certain to see an escalating and annihilating orgy of state violence directed toward immigrants, dissidents, and even garden variety Democrats who stray into Trump’s retributive field of awareness. The role of the No Kings Movement has yet to take effective shape. The expansion from 5 million to 7 million from the first No Kings Day event ought to give us hope, but an increase in numbers must be tied to a more expansive collective vision. I believe that people who might be reticent to commit to a movement perceived as an astrotuf project of the Democratic Party will eagerly embrace real grassroots activism. The US population has grown weary of corrupt politics—the No Kings project absolutely must offer more than a facelift to the moribund Democratic Party.
The Northampton No Kings Day event manifest a microcosm of our shortcomings—we had a performance dominated by Democratic office holders and media figures in the local party sphere. Jim McGovern, our national congressional representative, spoke, so did State Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa, Northampton Mayor Gina-Louise Sciarra, Northampton City Council Member Garrick Perry, and local talk show host Bill Newman. I would have rather passed out microphones to random demonstrators. No Kings has to do more than encourage requisite platitudes from those in power.
McGovern is the face of Massachusetts progressives, but he is a politician and not a grassroots figure. Sabadosa has taken a moderate stance on most issues, and the Northampton mayor has been accused by responsible observers as having shamelessly harmed the city in a highly suspicious deal to buy a gutted church from a notoriously unethical landlord. City Councilor Perry is well known as one of the mayor’s many sycophants. Northampton has cut school staff, violated IEPs, and gone head over heels for the “strong towns” approach to gentrification. Are these the people who ought to define the quality of No Kings Day resistance?
The Communist Party USA had a table with brochures at the event, but no CPUSA representative addressed the crowds. Why? No one from “Demilitarize Western Mass” spoke, and no one from “Veterans for Peace” addressed the gathering. Northampton has a large community of anti-war activists who wage an ongoing struggle to evict a major arms dealer (L3Harris) from our midst, but no one spoke about the issues vital to our civic identity. Instead, the microphone defaulted to the most reactionary forces of our city. Centrist Democratic figures simply lack the credibility and charisma to inspire resistance. Is No Kings Day really about campaign speeches for dreary local politicians and their corrupt plans to gentrify Northampton?
More critically, No Kings Day, in its future events, will need to prioritize acts of civil disobedience, define the role of local government’s ability to resist Immigration and Customs Enforcement, mobilize public confrontations against invading federal forces, and explore the role of unions as the country mobilizes for an inevitable general strike.
I am not going to discount the value of having 7 million people show up to protest the fascist, genocidal Trump regime, but we need more from No Kings Day. We need to swiftly transform No Kings from a Democratic Party spectacle to a grassroots resistance movement.
Ushering in a vigorous celebration of the real history of the US working class in the lead up to May 1 couldn’t be more necessary to buttress workers’ class consciousness and solidarity under Trump.
Just two months ago, my union—the United Automobile Workers—did a remarkable thing. It made public its pledge to fight for the rights of autoworkers—not its own dues-paying members, but workers overseas—based on the slogan, “An injury to one is an injury to all.”
That slogan has its origins in the radical US labor formation from the last century, the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), also known as the “Wobblies.” The Wobblies were famous for advocating “One Big Union,” uniting workers without distinction, and directly targeting the capitalist system. Its founders 120 years ago included anarchists, socialists, and Marxists.
The UAW pledged to support injured workers in Colombia who assembled cars and trucks under antiquated, onerous working conditions for one of the largest transnational corporations in the world, General Motors. They were all men, mostly in their 20s, 30s, and 40s when they were fired by GM due to their job-related injuries. When they hired in, they had to sign a pledge they wouldn’t join a union.
This was GM’s routine practice, and they got away with it for a long time, making their factory on the outskirts of the capital city, Bogotá, the most profitable GM plant in Latin America. That is, until dozens of the injured and fired workers formed their own association, ASOTRECOL, and collectively fought back. GM didn’t see that coming, and they’ve tried to be blind to it ever since.

A lot of autoworkers in the US and around the world, and the solidarity network that grew to support ASOTRECOL, became familiar with these courageous workers when a group of them waged three successive hunger strikes, with their lips sewn shut. The tent they occupied at the foot of the massive fortress housing the US Embassy, now going on for over 14 years, has become iconic. All this took place in the country with the worst reputation in the world for the assassination of trade unionists—3,000 organizers during 1990-2010—by paramilitaries and Colombian military forces. There’s no record of GM complaining about these murders.
It was only after one full year of the encampment, and a weeks-long hunger strike, that the UAW and AFL-CIO took notice and lent support to the workers’ struggle. When the workers didn’t bend the knee to GM and declined a settlement “final offer,” everything changed—US Labor’s support disappeared, including the UAW’s. My union was gripped in a corruption scandal which ultimately led to changes in the UAW Constitution enabling the membership, for the first time, to directly elect the top leadership.
The reform caucus, Unite All Workers for Democracy (UAWD), which I helped birth, can take credit for this turn of events. A new slate of leaders (UAW Members United) was elected to the International Executive Board in 2022-23, including President Shawn Fain and the UAW’s GM Department Director, Mike Booth.
The current effort on behalf of ASOTRECOL presents a different face of global solidarity, one not predicated on reciprocity or “what’s in it for us?”
Beginning in 2024, Fain and Booth put GM on notice—calling on GM to “deliver justice for the remaining 12 Colombian workers illegally fired after suffering debilitating injuries at GM’s Bogotá plant.” In August, on the 14th anniversary of the tent occupation the UAW posted on Facebook about the struggle, including a YouTube video, with a call to share and post on GM social media.
The UAW is currently building international support, directly engaging with GM, and garnering support from unions around the globe which represent GM workers.
With this campaign, Fain and Booth are redefining the meaning and practice of the UAW’s “international solidarity.” Former (and convicted) UAW President Dennis Williams and Secretary-Treasurer Gary Casteel elaborated on their view in We Don’t Quit: Stories of UAW Global Solidarity published in 2015. They wrote that “global solidarity is a two-way street—one that shows that those we support regularly use their power on behalf of the UAW when we need their help.” One example: the German IG Metal union’s support for the UAW’s organizing campaign at VW in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
The current effort on behalf of ASOTRECOL presents a different face of global solidarity, one not predicated on reciprocity or “what’s in it for us?” ASOTRECOL is not a union. It does not have the organized power to directly support the UAW. Yet the UAW is investing time, energy, staff, and political capital to see this through, with victory not guaranteed. Standing with 12 South American disabled GM autoworkers who were kicked under the bus literally embraces the IWW tenet that, “An Injury to One is an Injury to All.” That’s a cultural norm that UAW members embrace on the shop floor, more often than not. Fain and Booth have made it international.
One of the most interesting outcomes of the “Stand Up Strikes” at the “Big 3” in 2023 was the agreement on the contract expiration dates. The strategy behind choosing April 30, 2028 is an envisioned “general strike” on May Day, International Workers Solidarity Day. The UAW’s aim is to win US unions to align their contracts to expire at the same time under the mantra, “We have more power if we strike together.”
The headline of an editorial by President Fain published in In These Times (May, 2024) read, “May Day 2028 Could Transform the Labor Movement—and the World.” In it he doubles down, explaining the date was chosen “…in hopes the labor movement can collectively aspire to building the power needed to change the world.” Much of the UAW’s focus is on the goals of the proposed coordinated strikes: healthcare as a human right, pensions, improved standard of living, work-life balance. Fain argues: If working people are going to accomplish these objectives, “unions have to start thinking bigger.”
The vision for how May Day 2028 would work out, and what exactly it would look like, deserves a lot of study, discussion, and debate. In the meantime, there have been a lot of rumblings among unionists and progressives asking, “Can we wait that long?” Fain’s pronouncements were made before President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance were elected, and before the vile, anti-working class Project 2025 became the US government’s agenda. With the growing military occupation of our Democratic Party-leaning cities, there’s no assurance of fair elections in 2026. Will we be experiencing a full-fledged dictatorship by 2028? We need to reevaluate our thinking.
There’s no better way to begin to demonstrate this truth than with a global one-day shut down on May Day 2026.
May Day 2025 commemorations in the US were historic. An estimated quarter million workers and allies turned out at over 1,100 rallies and marches, nationwide—the most ever! Local organizing committees and coalitions, supported by a national network, May Day Strong, organized for May Day like never before, tearing off the stigma that the billionaire class has used historically to ‘kettle” workers to the more “acceptable” Labor Day parades and barbecues. No more!
However, the UAW—except for a scattering of rank-and-file members and retirees—was absent in the Detroit May Day Rally and March, missing the opportunity to educate and mobilize its members. UAW Region 1 Rep Paul Torrente, who spoke at the rally on the importance of May Day, was the exception. UAW Solidarity House cannot afford to be absent next year, the 140th anniversary of the most hallowed celebration of the global working class.
In Fain’s words, “...To reshape the economy into one that works for the benefit of everyone—not just the wealthy—we need to reclaim our country’s history of militant trade unions that united workers across race, gender, and nationality.”
That history must be reclaimed now and marshalled to build a united working class—not in 2-plus years, but now! We must begin now to recalibrate the culture of our working class movement, by explaining—as Fain does in the In These Times article, “The cause of those Haymarket Martyrs became the cause of the working class around the world, and May 1 became an international holiday commemorating the fight of workers everywhere to reclaim their time and the value of their labor.”
How many UAW members or retirees know about the “Haymarket Martyrs?” Aligning contracts is one thing, but it can’t be done in isolation of building the class consciousness that the struggle of “workers over billionaires” requires. That education cannot begin a moment too soon.
The reality is that the US working class and especially UAW members are torn between nationalism and internationalism—hence the fractures within its ranks over the UAW’s position supporting Trump’s tariff agenda. It’s no surprise because the dominant elites within the organized sector of labor—the AFL-CIO—have been steeped and saturated for over a century in American exceptionalism and make “American Great.”
Next year, with Trump at the helm of US celebrations of its 250th anniversary, the working class will be inundated with appeals to patriotism, jingoism, militarism, patriarchy, white supremacy, flag waving, etc. Ushering in a vigorous celebration of the real history of the US working class in the lead up to May 1 couldn’t be more necessary, to buttress workers’ class consciousness and solidarity. Fain is clear:
May Day is celebrated as an official holiday in countries from Argentina to South Africa to Sweden to Hong Kong, just about everywhere—except its country of origin. When unions organize together across industries and countries, our power is exponentially amplified. The fact is: Without workers, the world stops running.
There’s no better way to begin to demonstrate this truth than with a global one-day shut down on May Day 2026. It falls on a Friday. The UAW and the broader labor movement can call for a day of “no work,” for a three-day weekend, and begin to test its capacity to organize a broad “general strike” in the true meaning of the term. Back to Fain:
A united working class is the only effective wall against the billionaire class’ race to the bottom. For the US labor movement, that means grappling with some hard truths. Like the undeniable fact that it is impossible to protect American jobs while ignoring the plight of everyone else.
Stepping up, as the Fain leadership has done, in defense of the Colombian GM ex-workers is a real-life implementation of what otherwise can easily pass as rhetoric. “As working people, we must come together,” concludes President Fain, “We can no longer allow corporations, politicians, and borders to divide us. It’s time we reclaim May Day for the working class.”
"Meloni should take a stand with the facts against those who have slaughtered 20,000 children, rather than limiting herself to saying 'I do not agree,'" said one critic of Italy's right-wing prime minister.
Italian labor unions led a massive 24-hour general strike on Monday to protest Israel's ongoing genocide in Gaza, with estimates of hundreds of thousands of demonstrators rallying in dozens of cities across Italy.
Protesters took to squares, streets, transport hubs, ports, university campuses, and other spaces in more than 75 cities and towns, rallying under the call to "Block Everything." Places including schools, train stations, and retail stores were shut for the day.
"The strike is called in response to the ongoing genocide in the Gaza Strip, the blockade of humanitarian aid by the Israeli army, and the threats directed against the... Global Sumud Flotilla, which has on board Italian workers and trade unionists committed to bringing food and basic necessities to the Palestinian population," explained Unione Sindacale di Base (USB), a grassroots union confederation known for its militant stance on labor and political issues.
In Rome, tens of thousands of Palestine defenders rallied at the Termini rail station, Italy's largest, with many of the demonstrators occupying the building.
While protest activities snarled traffic in some parts of the Italian capital, many Roman motorists showed solidarity with the demonstrators by honking their horns and raising their fists into the air.
Watch: Pro-Gaza protesters who blocked a highway near Rome were met with visible solidarity from drivers. Regional news coverage of the paralyzed Central Station showed only people expressing support for the protest.Source: Paolo Mossetti on X (@paolomossetti)
[image or embed]
— Drop Site (@dropsitenews.com) September 22, 2025 at 11:35 AM
Milan saw an estimated 50,000 people turn out to locations including the central rail station, where some protesters damaged property and clashed with police, who said 10 people were arrested and 60 officers were injured.
“If we don’t block what Israel is doing, if we don’t block trade, the distribution of weapons and everything else with Israel, we will not ever achieve anything,” protester Walter Montagnoli, who is the Base Unitary Confederation's (CUB) national secretary, told The Associated Press at a march in Milan.
In Bologna—home to the world's oldest continuously operating university—students occupied lecture halls and thousands of demonstrators took to the streets, including the Tangenziale, the ring highway around the city, where police attacked them with water cannons and tear gas.
Dockworkers and other demonstrators marched and blocked ports in cities including Genoa, Trieste, and Livorno.
Thousands of protesters also blocked the main train station in Naples.
Source: Potere al Popolo via X (@potere_alpopolo)
[image or embed]
— Drop Site (@dropsitenews.com) September 22, 2025 at 11:06 AM
In the Adriatic seaside resort of Termoli, hundreds of student-led Palestine defenders rallied in St. Anthony's Square and, with Mayor Nicola Balice's permission, draped a Palestinian flag from the façade of City Hall.
"Faced with such an important subject, the genocide in Palestine, we students... said this would be a nonpartisan demonstration because in the face of what is happening in the Gaza Strip—hospitals bombed, children killed every day—there can be no political ideology," said one Termoli protester. "We must all be united.”
Some participants in Monday's general strike pointed the finger at their own government.
"In the face of what is happening in Gaza you have to decide where you are," Italian General Confederation of Labor leader Maurizio Landini told La Stampa. "If you don’t tell the Israeli government that you have to stop and don't send them more weapons, but instead you keep sending them... you actually become complicit in what’s happening.”
While European nations including Ireland, Norway, Spain, Slovenia, the United Kingdom, Portugal, France, Luxembourg, and Denmark have formally recognized Palestine or announced their intent to do so since October 2023, Italy has given no indication that it will follow suit. More than 150 of 193 United Nations member states have recognized Palestine.
Although increasingly critical of Israel's 718-day genocidal assault—which has left at least 241,000 Palestinians dead, wounded, or missing in Gaza—right-wing Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has been accused of complicity in genocide for actions including presiding over arms sales to the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. Meloni has rejected the ICC warrants and said Netanyahu would not be arrested if he enters Italy.
"Meloni should listen to the voice of those who are peacefully protesting and asking her to act, rather than curling up to Washington to protect her friend, the war criminal Netanyahu," Giuseppe Conte, who leads the independent progressive Five Star Movement, said Monday on social media. "Meloni should take a stand with the facts against those who have slaughtered 20,000 children, rather than limiting herself to saying, 'I do not agree.' And she should stop running away from the debate in Parliament."