

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Maria del Carmen Rodriguez for Spanish, Austin Sanctuary Network Organizer at (512) 773-4508 carmendezuvieta40@gmail.com
Peggy Morton, Board President Austin Sanctuary Network at (512) 751-6415, peggy@austinsanctuarynetwork.
For Vicky Chávez and First Unitarian Church of Salt Lake City: Joan M. Gregory, Sanctuary Director, First Unitarian Church of Salt Lake City, UT at 801-949-2906, joanmzg@gmail.com
Jen Nessel, Center for Constitutional Rights, (212) 614-6449, jnessel@ccrjustice.org
Four sanctuary leaders - Vicky Chavez, Maria Chavalan Sut, Edith Espinal, and Hilda Ramirez - along with Austin Sanctuary Network (ASN), Free Migration Project (FMP), and First Unitarian Church of Salt Lake City, have filed a
Four sanctuary leaders - Vicky Chavez, Maria Chavalan Sut, Edith Espinal, and Hilda Ramirez - along with Austin Sanctuary Network (ASN), Free Migration Project (FMP), and First Unitarian Church of Salt Lake City, have filed a Second Amended Complaint in their lawsuit against U.S. immigration agencies and officials for targeting the leaders with retaliatory and excessive civil fines. They added new claims under the Federal Torts Claim Act (FTCA), alleging that the immigration agencies and officials intentionally and recklessly inflicted emotional distress on the sanctuary leaders through the civil fines policy under which they were fined hundreds of thousands of dollars. The groups also sent a sign-on letter today to Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from clergy members, faith leaders, congregations, and allied communities across the country calling for redress.
The sanctuary leaders are four asylum-seeking women who, under the threat of deportation, took sanctuary in houses of worship. Each woman became an immigrant rights activist and leader, garnering significant media attention as part of the national sanctuary movement and received support from the organizations joining them in the suit. Records obtained through ongoing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation show a concerted effort on behalf of the Trump administration to track and target these leaders over a multi-year period and to penalize them with the largest fines statutorily possible for "failure to depart" with a deportation order. The lawsuit alleges that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) targeted these sanctuary leaders with the enormous fines to stop the women from speaking out, infringing upon their rights of free speech, association, and religion under the First Amendment, their right to be free from excessive fines under the Eighth Amendment, and their religious freedom under the Religious Freedom and Restoration Act (RFRA).
Maria Chavalan-Sut said, "The fine imposed by ICE was an incalculably stressful pressure tactic, a direct attack on our lives."
Last year, on April 23, 2021, DHS Secretary Mayorkas announced that the Biden administration would no longer be pursuing civil fines for "failure to depart," acknowledging it as an "unnecessary and punitive measure." Despite this change in direction, the administration is poised to defend the policy in the litigation against the sanctuary leaders and has not conceded the illegality of the policy. Statutory authorization for the fines policy remains, leaving this administration and future administrations free to reinstate the policy at any time.
"This case raises serious questions about the Biden administration's commitment to free speech, religious freedom, and the reversal of Trump-era policies," said Jencey Paz and Lily Gutterman of the NYU Immigrant Rights Clinic.
It has taken nearly a year for sanctuary leaders to receive confirmation that their fines are officially canceled. At present, three of the four sanctuary leaders still await an official notice. The sanctuary leaders, who are unable to pay the fines, allege that ICE has caused them considerable emotional and physical distress through the exorbitant fines and their failure to cancel them, in violation of the Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA). ICE has previously denied each of the leaders' FTCA claims through the administrative process, despite supporting medical records and statements from health professionals about the harms they have suffered. The sanctuary leaders now add these claims to the lawsuit to contest this determination.
Vicky Chavez said, "When I received my fine letter the first time, my legs were shaking. The letter came in English. I thought I read it wrong, so I asked someone from the church to please read the letter and explain it to me, but I was right. Since then, my nights have been longer. Being able to sleep became uncontrollable. I was afraid in the church knowing that ICE could arrive at any moment, and I did not know how to react or how to protect my daughters. Any strange noise scared me, so I asked for help to have someone check the church. The migraines became more intense. The nerves remain."
Edith Espinal said, "From the first time the church secretary informed me that I had mail from ICE, I was so scared that I spent nights without being able to sleep. I was more depressed for not being able to know or understand why the administration of former President Trump and ICE were attacking us in this way - for wanting to keep my family together. To this day, more than a year has passed and I still have a fine of almost $60,000, even though Secretary Mayorkas promised to withdraw these fines."
"After passing a credible fear interview at the border, the U.S. government locked my son and me in a detention center for 11 months, where we ate spoiled food and drank water that smelled and tasted horrible until they released us and forced me to wear an ankle shackle for eight months that hurt me and made me bleed," said Hilda Ramirez, who was fined $323,000, a fine that was later reduced to $59,000 before the U.S. rescinded the fine two weeks ago. "Why did President Biden continue this extortion from the Trump administration for a year when it was meant to silence me? My son and I have suffered so much from this persecution and trauma, all because I took refuge in a church and spoke publicly alongside people who love and trust us. The government must stop this and, at a minimum, use prosecutorial discretion and grant me the help I asked for at the border more than seven years ago."
The sanctuary leaders have garnered public support in their efforts to seek redress. Today, they are sending a sign-on letter to Secretary Mayorkas of DHS. The letter has 965 signatories from across the United States: including 190 clergy members and faith leaders from diverse faith traditions, 96 organizations and faith congregations, and 679 community members and leaders. It calls for a grant of deferred action and other forms of prosecutorial discretion for each sanctuary leader. Immigration relief and relief from future fines remain the utmost priority for the sanctuary leaders, FMP, ASN, and First Unitarian Church.
"As an ally of Hilda and her son, I am shocked and disappointed to see how slow President Biden and his administration have been to resolve this lawsuit considering all the promises he made during his campaign and having acknowledged the mistakes made during the previous administration he served under," ASN Organizer Maria del Carmen Rodriguez said. "As an immigrant and survivor of pain and persecution in my own life from the same failed immigration policy in the U.S., and as an ally and friend to Hilda, I want to see compassion, action, and resolution. This time is traumatizing these people and their children, and they will carry this trauma throughout their lives. We beg the government to stop with these tortures by granting a solution to these four sanctuary leaders."
Joan Gregory of First Unitarian Church said, "The community response to collecting signatures in support of Vicky, Maria, Hilda, and Edith was amazing. In just a short period of time we collected 965 signatures. Signatures have come from all over the country - in fact from 34 states and the District of Columbia, from California to Maine, from Washington to Florida, and all points in between."
Ms. Gregory added, "We need the Biden administration to keep its promises, to transform our system from a deportation system to a true immigration system, welcoming all 11 million immigrants who are already here and establishing an equitable and just system for those who will continue to seek refuge, asylum, safety, and freedom."
For more information, please visit:
Individual Plaintiffs
Hilda Ramirez Mendez and Ivan (Austin, Texas)
Edith Espinal Moreno (Columbus, Ohio)
Maria Chavalan Sut (Charlottesville, Virginia)
Vicky Chavez (Salt Lake City, Utah)
Organizational Plaintiffs
Austin Sanctuary Network, Austin, TX
First Unitarian Church, Salt Lake City, UT
Free Migration Project, Philadelphia, PA
Attorneys
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. CCR is committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.
(212) 614-6464"He’s the Jim Cramer of Iran war predictions," said one critic.
Conservative commentator Dave Rubin, who for months has been a top booster of President Donald Trump's illegal war with Iran, was inundated with mockery on Sunday after a viral video exposed months' worth of his failed predictions about the conflict.
The video, which was posted on social media Saturday, begins with Rubin telling viewers to not listen to any of the prognostications being made by critics of the war, which Trump launched in late February without any authorization from Congress.
"I'm pretty good with predictions," Rubin says. "And my prediction here is that everything the media is now going to say about Iran—it's going to close the Strait of Hormuz, and energy prices are going to go crazy—none of this is going to come to pass."
Iran war: greatest hits from the last 12 weeks pic.twitter.com/9pgXyvmsgF
— Dave Rubin Clips II (Parody) - Retired Jan.20/2025 (@DaveClips) May 24, 2026
The video then cuts to Rubin wrongly predicting that gas prices during the conflict "will continue to come down," before switching to claims that Iran lacks the military capability to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed in the face of US military power.
"If the United States wants to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, which it does," says Rubin, "and Donald Trump says we'll escort ships through if we have to, it's going to stay open."
From there, the video shows Rubin hyping of the prospect of Iranian dissident Reza Pahlavi swooping in to take over the country after the war, and then getting fooled by a fake artificial intelligence-generated video of Iranians giving thanks to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for bombing their country.
The video compilation of Rubin's failed predictions drew immediate ridicule from critics.
"He’s the Jim Cramer of Iran war predictions," joked Krystal Ball.
Commentator Adam Mockler wrote of Rubin that "it’s brutal watching him make failed predictions week after week."
Journalist Glenn Greenwald argued that the video should be the last nail in the coffin of whatever credibility Rubin had left.
"Imagine having sat through and listened to all of this Israeli propaganda, which turned out to be (predictably and completely) false," commented Greenwald, "and then thinking there was some value in continuing to listen to this person."
The Bulwark's Tim Miller said that while he knew Rubin was "a smooth-brained hack," he still "couldn’t even fathom how bad these war takes would be."
Political analyst Omar Baddar, meanwhile, said the video should erase any doubt that Rubin is "the dumbest man on the internet."
The Trump administration last week sued Minnesota after it passed a law banning prediction markets from operating in the state.
A Sunday report in The New York Times revealed how the Trump administration is using a key government agency to shut down any efforts to regulate online betting markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket.
According to the Times, the administration has stacked the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) with industry insiders who have systematically "mowed down" staffers at the agency who have expressed interest in providing oversight on prediction markets.
Among other things, the report documented how multiple officials at CTFC have been put on leave simply for asking questions about the betting markets' ties to members of President Donald Trump's family or for having past experience enforcing regulations related to cryptocurrencies.
What's more, the Times found that even being an industry insider isn't enough to guarantee good standing in the agency. Brian Quintenz, who was tapped by Trump to lead CTFC last year, saw his nomination withdrawn after he drew the ire of Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss for refusing to support their cryptocurrency exchange's complaint against the agency.
Revelations about industry insiders rolling over regulators at CTFC come as the Trump administration is fighting any attempts by states to regulate prediction markets.
As explained in a Thursday report from CNBC, the Trump administration is "fighting a multi-front battle to stop the state actions and assert its regulatory authority," with CTFC arguing that it is "the only entity that can regulate" betting platforms.
16 different states are engaged in legal proceedings against the platforms, and Minnesota last week passed a law to ban them outright, which immediately drew a lawsuit from the administration.
The new Minnesota law, which is scheduled to take effect in August, bans prediction markets "from hosting, creating or advertising in the state," according to ABC News.
In an interview with ABC, Minnesota state Rep. Emma Greenman (D-63B) said she authored the legislation because she has grown increasingly concerned about young people in the state seeing their finances drained from placing online bets.
"We're seeing studies come out that say [the companies] are targeting 18- to 21-year-olds," said Greenman, "and we are seeing gambling starting younger and younger."
CFTC Chair Michael Selig last month warned states against trying to regulate prediction markets, which he said would "circumvent the clear directive of Congress."
"Our message to Wisconsin is the same as to New York, Arizona, and others," said Selig. "If you interfere with the operation of federal law in regulating financial markets, we will sue you."
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz," said one critic of the war.
President Donald Trump revealed on Saturday that he is mulling a deal that would end his illegal war with Iran, and some hawks within the Republican Party are expressing alarm.
According to a Sunday report in The New York Times, many details of the agreement to end the war remain murky, with the fate of Iran's enriched uranium up in the air. US and Iranian officials have also given contradictory messages about the proposed deal's contents, suggesting there is much work still to be done before any agreement is finalized.
Regardless, three hawkish GOP senators on Saturday raised major concerns about the contents of the deal, warning against accepting any agreement that will leave Iran in a stronger position than before Trump illegally launched a war against it without any authorization from Congress in late February.
"If it is perceived in the region that a deal with Iran allows the regime to survive and become more powerful over time, we will have poured gasoline on the conflicts in Lebanon and Iraq," wrote Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who lobbied Trump to attack Iran repeatedly before the start of the war. "A deal that is perceived to allow Iran to survive and possess the ability to control the [Strait of Hormuz] in the future will put Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Shia militias in Iraq on steroids.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), another longtime Iran hawk, said he was "deeply concerned" about what he's been hearing about the deal and expressed particular worry about Iran getting relief from US sanctions while still maintaining the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.
"If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant 'death to America'—now receiving billions of dollars," Cruz wrote, "being able to enrich uranium and develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake."
Sen. Roger Wicker (D-Miss.) was even blunter in his condemnation of the reported agreement.
"The rumored 60-day ceasefire—with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith—would be a disaster," Wicker wrote. "Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!"
Ben Rhodes, a former deputy national security adviser for President Barack Obama, challenged Wicker's claims that Trump's illegal war had achieved anything of value.
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury," Rhodes wrote, "except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz."
Rhodes' criticism was echoed by Stephen Wertheim, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who wrote that "everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury is already for naught."
Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, accused the Iran hawks of being delusional for thinking further bombing would force Iran to capitulate.
"DC's Iran hawks got two wars, nearly every conceivable sanction designation, a blockade, threw a wrench in global economy," Vaez wrote, "and will still claim that just a little more pressure and a touch more bombing will magically yield the concessions they still won't be satisfied with."