May, 11 2021, 12:00am EDT

Colombia: 350.Org Supports People's Demands for Freedom of Demonstration and New Social Policies
Police repression against protesters demanding better living conditions and the right to free speech is unacceptable and must stop immediately.
WASHINGTON
The rights to freedom of demonstration, health and a healthy environment are non-negotiable and must be fully respected everywhere across the world. Based on these principles, 350.org makes public its support for the peaceful demonstrators who are taking to the streets in several Colombian cities, demanding changes in social, health and economic policies. Above all, they are demanding an immediate end to police, military and state violence against unarmed citizens.
"It is unacceptable that the Colombian government allows repressive and extremely violent police actions against a large majority of unarmed and peaceful citizens, who are only exercising their right to demand changes that they consider essential for the country", said Ilan Zugman, 350.org's Latin America director.

According to AFP, and also based on reports from the Colombian NGO Temblores, the police actions are leaving a terrifying toll. In just the first three days of the protests, there were a total of 1181 cases of police violence, 92 victims of abuse of force, 26 deaths, four victims of sexual aggression, 672 arbitrary detentions and 12 aggressions to the eyes of the demonstrators.
Colombian media outlets that extensively cover environmental and human rights issues - such as La Silla Vacia, Cero Setenta and Pacifista - are also recording the irresponsible actions of the police in several areas, as well as the enormous peaceful response of thousands of Colombians to these abuses.

"Colombia's social movements and youth are setting an example of courage and commitment by taking their demands for fairer and more efficient social, health and economic policies to the streets of the country. However, the police response has been terrifying and reprehensible. The people who died and those who were assaulted or threatened deserve a proper investigation into these abuses of authority and assurances that they will have safety and freedom from now on," said Zugman.
Opportunities for a Just Recovery
It is also worth noting that, although the government's tax reform proposal was the trigger for the protests, the demonstrations already encompass other demands, such as the desire for urgent public policies that put the most vulnerable communities at the centre of attention.
Climate youth groups, indigenous associations and several NGOs are expressing concern about the government's reform of the public health system, which could subsequently undermine healthcare in rural and poor areas of the country. They are also highlighting the inadequacy of measures to combat the pandemic, as well as the insufficiency of financial support to help the most vulnerable families in need.
Two issues closely related to 350.org's mission also appear on the agenda of a considerable part of the protesters: the need to guarantee the safety and dignity of climate activists and the implementation of environmental policies that will lead Colombia to a just and complete energy transition.

Colombia holds the shameful title of 'world champion country' for the highest rate of assassinations targeting social and environmental leaders around the world, including indigenous leaders who end up being killed for defending their territories from encroachment and environmental destruction. A very important part of the Colombian civil society movement is therefore demanding that the State act much more responsively to protect these people and do justice to those who have already been killed.
In this sense, the cases that stand out are those of the "false positives", as are called the innocent young people, generally of very low income, who were executed by the military forces under the argument that they were involved in guerrillas. These murders were made in order to make people believe that the security policies of the government of the day were producing results.
Fracking would aggravate Colombia's current problems
On the environmental side, the national government's insistence on expanding oil, gas and coal extraction and, in particular, on promoting the use of fracking for gas production, at a time when the world desperately needs to keep fossil fuels in the ground, is striking.
Besides the fact that fossil fuels clearly have their days numbered in the global marketplace, these investments can lead to soil, water and food pollution. Moreover, the fossil fuel industry concentrates its revenues, as we know, and does nothing to prepare the country for the global economic challenges of the coming decades.
Another point of concern is the repression against anti-fracking protesters in the region known as Medio Magdalena, where the government is trying to develop a pilot fracking project. As the 350.org team has expressed in this letter sent to Colombian President Ivan Duque and in events about the issue, activists in this region are being threatened and intimidated for their defense of a territory free from the serious harm caused by fracking.
The Colombian government needs to guarantee the protection of constitutional rights to free expression, dignity and life, which are not being respected in this case.

"Development is done by including people in decision-making and supporting the improvement of the quality of life of communities. The case of fracking in Colombia goes in the opposite direction in both aspects. The country has the opportunity to review its public policies in this area and invest in a Just Recovery immediately, as many of the protesters are calling for," added Zugman.
For ideas for a Just Recovery in Colombia and around the world, see these sessions from 350.org's April 2021 Global Gathering for a Just Recovery.
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
LATEST NEWS
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Memo Shows Pam Bondi Wants List of 'Domestic Terrorism' Groups Who Express 'Anti-American Sentiment'
"Millions of Americans like you and I could be the target," warned journalist Ken Klippenstein of the new memo.
Dec 07, 2025
A leaked memo written by US Attorney General Pam Bondi directs the Department of Justice to compile a list of potential "domestic terrorism" organizations that espouse "extreme viewpoints on immigration, radical gender ideology, and anti-American sentiment."
The memo, which was obtained by journalist Ken Klippenstein, expands upon National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), a directive signed by President Donald Trump in late September that demanded a "national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts."
The new Bondi memo instructs law enforcement agencies to refer "suspected" domestic terrorism cases to the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs), which will then undertake an "exhaustive investigation contemplated by NSPM-7" that will incorporate "a focused strategy to root out all culpable participants—including organizers and funders—in all domestic terrorism activities."
The memo identifies the "domestic terrorism threat" as organizations that use "violence or the threat of violence" to advance political goals such as "opposition to law and immigration enforcement; extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders; adherence to radical gender ideology, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, or anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; hostility towards traditional views on family, religion, and morality."
Commenting on the significance of the memo, Klippenstein criticized mainstream media organizations for largely ignoring the implications of NSPM-7, which was drafted and signed in the wake of the murder of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"For months, major media outlets have largely blown off the story of NSPM-7, thinking it was all just Trump bluster and too crazy to be serious," he wrote. "But a memo like this one shows you that the administration is absolutely taking this seriously—even if the media are not—and is actively working to operationalize NSPM-7."
Klippenstein also warned that NSPM-7 appeared to be the start of a new "war on terrorism," but "only this time, millions of Americans like you and I could be the target."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


