

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Don Owens, dowens@citizen.org, (202) 588-7767
Angela Bradbery, abradbery@citizen.org, (202) 588-7741
Note: Today, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 234-193 to pass the For the People Act (H.R. 1). H.R.1's restorative democracy principles earned it the distinction of being the first-introduced bill of the 116th Congress, indicating its importance and urgency. Backed by more than 130 public interest groups, if enacted H.R. 1 expands access to voting by declaring Election Day a federal holiday, raises ethics standards at all levels of government, enacts automatic voter registration, calls for restoration of the Voting Rights Act and replaces a corrupt campaign finance system with one that relies on small donors and public funds.
The legislation now moves to the U.S. Senate where U.S. Sen. Tom Udall (N.M.) is expected to introduce a companion bill that Americans and advocacy groups will push to have considered in committee and brought to the floor for a vote. The national push for H.R. 1 parallels a movement in states to fix their politics as well. The coalition supporting H.R. 1 hopes that states like New York follow the lead of Congress and pass ballot reforms like Fair Elections for NY.
"The historic passage of H.R. 1 responds to the public's overwhelming demand for fundamental and far-reaching reforms to our corrupt political system. Its enactment would remove the political barriers to the policy agenda favored by the public - slashing medicine prices, providing Medicare-for-All, preventing climate catastrophe, providing a living wage, holding Wall Street accountable and more - an agenda currently thwarted by the political power of corporations and the superrich. Now the bill must be taken up in the Senate. If Mitch McConnell wants to bring up the Green New Deal, why is he scared of a vote on H.R. 1?"
- Robert Weissman, president, Public Citizen
"We have long recognized that fixing democracy must be the first order of business to ensure that the people are represented in the halls of power. The truth is in the name - this bill is called For the People for a reason."
- Lisa Gilbert, vice president of legislative affairs, Public Citizen
"H.R. 1 draws a clear line of demarcation between those who support democracy and those who favor Trump's rule by the wealthy. Congressional Democrats today have staked out a united front for democracy reforms to turn control of government back to regular Americans. The choice is now very clear, and the voters in the 2020 elections will decide which path America will take."
- Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist, Public Citizen
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000"Congress must make it clear that the United States will not be dragged into Netanyahu's war of choice," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders late Monday led the introduction of a bill that would prevent the Trump administration from using federal funds for a military attack on Iran without explicit authorization from Congress, as Israel's unlawful assault on the country continued for the fifth consecutive day.
"Netanyahu's reckless and illegal attacks violate international law and risk igniting a regional war," Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a statement. "Congress must make it clear that the United States will not be dragged into Netanyahu's war of choice."
"Our Founding Fathers entrusted the power of war and peace exclusively to the people's elected representatives in Congress," the senator added, "and it is imperative that we make clear that the president has no authority to embark on another costly war without explicit authorization by Congress."
Seven Democratic senators—Peter Welch (Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), Jeff Merkley (Ore.), Chris Van Hollen (Md.), Ed Markey (Mass.), Tammy Baldwin (Wis.), and Tina Smith (Minn.)—joined Sanders in introducing the legislation, which is titled the No War Against Iran Act.
The legislation states that "no federal funds may be obligated or expended for any use of military force in or against Iran" unless Congress declares war or enacts "specific statutory authorization for such use of military force."
"Another war in the Middle East could cost countless lives, waste trillions more dollars, and lead to even more deaths, more conflict, and more displacement," Sanders said Monday. "I will do everything that I can as a senator to defend the Constitution and prevent the U.S. from being drawn into another war."
Tonight, I introduced legislation to stop Trump from from leading us into an illegal war with Iran.
Another war in the Middle East could cost countless lives, waste trillions more dollars, and lead to even more deaths, more conflict, and more displacement. pic.twitter.com/CchHlSnLZy
— Bernie Sanders (@SenSanders) June 17, 2025
The bill came hours after Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) introduced a war powers resolution similarly aimed at preventing the Trump administration from launching an unauthorized attack on Iran. Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) announced plans to introduce a companion resolution in the House, a sign of burgeoning congressional opposition to a U.S. war with Iran.
"This is not our war," Massie wrote on social media. "But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution. I'm introducing a bipartisan war powers resolution tomorrow to prohibit our involvement."
The legislative efforts kicked off as Israel expanded its aerial attacks on Iran and as Trump—who has suggested U.S. forces could get more deeply involved in the conflict—urged residents of the Iranian capital to "immediately evacuate," heightening chaos and panic in the densely populated city and fueling concerns of American intervention.
The National Iranian American Council (NIAC) condemned Trump's evacuation call as "both reckless and disturbing," noting that "Tehran is one of the most populous cities in the world, home to ten million people and many millions more in the surrounding suburbs."
"While many have tried to flee Israel's campaign of terror, the fact is that many cannot flee—the elderly, or those who can't get gas amid war shortages, and those who have nowhere to go," said NIAC. "We hope that this does not mean an unauthorized U.S. entry into the war, or that he has knowledge of further depraved attacks from Israel."
"There is a choice before Trump: take the pathway of peace by telling Bibi to stop the war, or join with a war criminal and wreak further havoc and endanger U.S. troops in a fight that isn't ours," the group added.
"We're watching in real time as Senate Republicans line up to gut healthcare for millions of Americans in order to pay for tax cuts for themselves, their wealthy donors, and big businesses."
Senate Republicans on Monday proposed cutting Medicaid even more aggressively than their House colleagues to help offset the cost of trillions of dollars in tax breaks that would disproportionately benefit the wealthiest Americans.
The legislative text unveiled by the GOP-controlled Senate Finance Committee is a central component of the sprawling reconciliation package that Republicans are hoping to send to President Donald Trump's desk by next month.
The bill contains broader Medicaid work requirements than the House-passed legislation, expanding the ineffective and punitive mandates to low-income adults with children over the age of 14.
The Senate version would also sharply limit provider taxes that states use to fund their Medicaid programs. Edwin Park, a research professor at Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families, warned the provision would "devastate" state finances, particularly where lawmakers have expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
"This will create huge budget holes over time, some in as little as two years, forcing states to make severe, highly damaging cuts," Park wrote in an analysis of the new legislation.
"Senate Republicans have made this cruel, heartless bill even worse as they continue on their endless pursuit to destroy our healthcare system."
Senate Republicans released the bill text less than two weeks after the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the House-passed reconciliation package would strip healthcare from nearly 11 million Americans over the next decade—a number that rises to 16 million when accounting for the GOP's refusal to renew ACA tax credits set to expire at the end of the year.
Even more people would lose healthcare if Republicans adopt the Senate plan, analysts and advocates warned. One recent study estimated that around 51,000 additional people across the U.S. would die unnecessarily each year due to large-scale health insurance losses caused by the GOP's proposals.
"It shocks the conscience that Senate Republican leaders saw the impacts of the House bill—16 million more people uninsured and millions losing help buying groceries, including families with children—and chose to double down," said Sharon Parrott, president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Leslie Dach, chair of the advocacy group Protect Our Care, said in a statement that "this bill was already a five-alarm fire for American healthcare, and Senate Republicans have just poured gasoline on it."
"Contrary to what they've repeatedly promised, Republicans are torching Medicaid, ripping apart the Affordable Care Act, and leaving 16 million people without the critical care they need, all so Trump and the GOP can funnel more money to their billionaire and corporate friends," said Dach. "Seniors will be thrown out of nursing homes, people fighting cancer will be cut off from treatment, and rural hospitals will shutter. Senate Republicans have made this cruel, heartless bill even worse as they continue on their endless pursuit to destroy our healthcare system."
If Senate Republicans adopt the proposed changes, the House would have to pass the reconciliation bill again before it can reach Trump's desk. One House Republican, granted anonymity by Politico, said "hell no" in response to the Senate language pertaining to Medicaid provider taxes, a signal that the proposal is likely to face intraparty opposition.
But experts stressed that both the House and Senate versions of the reconciliation bill would be disastrous for low-income Americans and a boon for the rich.
"Now that we've seen Senate text, we can say for certain: Either the House or the Senate version would be the largest transfer from the poor to the rich in a single law in history," wrote Bobby Kogan, senior director of federal budget policy at the Center for American Progress.
"Each would kick millions of people off their health insurance and each would rip food assistance away from millions of households," Kogan noted. "Each would increase deficits by trillions of dollars while making the poorest Americans poorer and making the richest Americans richer."
"This is not just hypocrisy," said one climate campaigner. "It is a death sentence for communities on the frontlines of the climate crisis."
Four wealthy nations—the United States, Canada, Norway, and Australia—account for the majority of planned oil and gas expansion over the next decade, according to new data published by Oil Change International on Monday, the first day of the Bonn Climate Change Conference in Germany.
Oil Change's analysis, titled Planet Wreckers, notes that if those four Global North nations stopped their planned new oil and gas extraction, 32 billion tons of carbon pollution would stay in the ground instead of being burned and released into the atmosphere, where they fuel planetary heating. That's the equivalent of three times the annual global emissions created by burning coal.
"A handful of the world's richest nations remain intent on leading us into disaster. This is not just hypocrisy. It is a death sentence for communities on the frontlines of the climate crisis," Oil Change International global policy lead Romain Ioualalen said in a statement Monday.
"It is sickening that countries with the highest incomes and outsized historical responsibility for causing the climate crisis are planning massive oil and gas expansion with no regard for the lives and livelihoods at stake," Ioualalen added.

Nations that took part in the 2023 United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP28, in Dubai committed to an equitable transition from fossil fuels. However, as Ioualalen noted, "this commitment is largely being ignored by some of the world's richest countries."
"Equity is not a buzzword. It is a foundational requirement to accelerate the transition," he asserted. "Until the richest countries commit to ending fossil fuel production and use and deliver adequate climate finance on fair terms, global calls for fossil fuel phaseout will ring hollow to developing countries that are struggling to meet development, energy access, and climate resilience needs."
The prospects of the U.S. making any meaningful near-term contribution to such a transition are dim given the Trump administration's "drill, baby, drill" energy policy.
The new report, and this year's Bonn conference, come between last year's COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan and the upcoming COP30 in Belém, Brazil. Oil Change noted that Brazil ranks among the 10 largest projected expanders of oil and gas over the next decade, with plans to surpass Saudi Arabia.
"Countries have an opportunity to course correct by working together," Ioualalen stressed. "COP30 must deliver a collective roadmap for equitable phaseout dates for fossil fuel production and use, to actually deliver on commitments all countries made at COP28."