

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Serena Ingre, singre@nrdc.org, 415-875-6155
The 2011 California legislative session wrapped-up late Friday night with legislators handing victory to children's health, job stimulus and energy efficiency - all bills that will play a key role in the environmental health and economic recovery of the State, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council.
"In a legislative session that continued to be dominated by the state budget, jobs and the economy, California's Legislature made headway in moving forward policies to protect public health, sharks, drinking water supplies and to stimulate the clean energy economy," said Ann Notthoff, NRDC's director of California advocacy. "Collectively, these bills promote a healthy environment and a healthy economy that are vital for the State's recovery."
The good news: The California legislature passed legislation that prohibits the sale, trade or possession of shark fins in California; voted to protect drinking water and Native American sacred sites by stopping the approval and construction of a new landfill at Gregory Canyon in San Diego County; and banned the use of the chemical bisphenol A in baby bottles and sippy cups, making California the 11th state in the nation to ban BPA. The legislature also passed a bill to improve the enforcement of California's energy efficiency requirements for household appliances. The push to bring the NFL to Los Angeles resulted in a bill to expedite judicial review and retained full CEQA review with additional environmental requirements.
The bad news: The California legislature failed to pass a bill that would phase out Styrofoam food containers by 2016. Californians alone throw away 300,000 tons of Styrofoam annually - quite a sum for a product that is known for being super lightweight. Besides littering our communities and beaches, Styrofoam also releases toxic substances into the air and water during manufacturing and harms water quality when it makes its way to our waterways. The legislature also failed to pass the Infill Development & Sustainable Community Act, a bill that would have allowed builders more flexibility in the amount of parking spots needed for projects that are close to transit. Reducing the amount of parking that is required would have allowed for more affordable housing to be built in California, and jump start projects that are currently stalled. Reauthorization of the Public Goods Charge, which funds clean energy programs, also stalled.
NRDC's backgrounder below summarizes this year's California legislative session highlights. These bills now need only Governor Brown's signature to be enacted into law:
Sharks Protected
AB 376: Authored by Assemblymember Paul Fong (D-Mountain View) and Assemblymember Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael), AB 376 helps to end the cruel practice of shark finning by prohibiting the sale, possession or trade of shark fins in California. The bill was sponsored by the Monterey Bay Aquarium and the Asian Pacific American Ocean Harmony Alliance, and supported by thousands of individuals and a broad coalition of diverse groups, including NRDC. More on this here: https://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/lmonroe/
Gregory Canyon
SB 833: Authored by Senator Juan Vargas (D-San Diego) and co-author Assembly member Ben Hueso (D-San Diego), this bill would stop the approval of a new landfill at Gregory Canyon in San Diego County. The proposed landfill would threaten drinking water sources for tens of thousands of people and desecrate adjacent Native American sacred sites. In addition, increased recycling, new technologies and the expansion of existing landfills make the proposed landfill unnecessary.
Consumer and Business Protection
SB 454: Authored by Senator Fran Pavley (D-Santa Monica), this bill would improve enforcement of California's energy efficiency standards for appliances such as air conditioners, televisions, refrigerators and light bulbs. SB 454 helps level the playing field for builders, contractors and businesses who are complying with energy efficiency standards by improving enforcement against those who try to skirt the requirements. The bill also ensures that expected energy savings are more fully realized; thereby saving money and reducing pollution.
BPA Ban
AB 1319: Co-sponsored by Senator Fran Pavley (D-Santa Monica) and authored by Assemblywoman Betsy Butler (D-El Segundo), this bill would ban the use of the chemical bisphenol A in baby bottles and sippy cups, marking a victory for health and environmental advocates who've sought a similar measure since early 2009. If signed into law by Governor Brown, California would be the 11th state in the nation to ban BPA in baby bottles and sippy cups.
Farmers Field
SB 292: Authored by Senator Alex Padilla (D-San Fernandino Valley), the bill would require developer AEG to achieve national green building, transportation and greenhouse gas reduction standards and meet existing environmental review requirements in return for a speedier schedule for judicial review of legal challenges of its proposal to build a football stadium in downtown Los Angeles. The final bill requires AEG to implement "best in nation" mode shift transportation that's permanent, and authorizes the City of Los Angeles to enforce it so long as the stadium exists. More on this here: https://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dpettit/
What's next?:
The 2011 California legislative session officially ended without an extension of the Public Goods Charge (PGC), which is set to expire in January 2012. Bills SB 870 and AB 724, sponsored by Senator Alex Padilla (D-San Fernandino Valley) and Assemblymember Steven Bradford (D-Inglewood), respectively, would have reauthorized collection of the existing Public Goods Charge from California utility customer bills that support a range of investments in RD&D, renewables, and energy efficiency. Legislative options include another effort during a still ongoing special legislative session and a push for action as soon as the legislature reconvenes in January 2012; meanwhile, NRDC and coalition partners will be working with utilities and their regulators to ensure no interruption in a strong collective commitment to clean energy progress.
Bills that were held to next year, the second year of the two-year legislative session:
NRDC works to safeguard the earth--its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. We combine the power of more than three million members and online activists with the expertise of some 700 scientists, lawyers, and policy advocates across the globe to ensure the rights of all people to the air, the water, and the wild.
(212) 727-2700"The billionaires who sat behind Trump at his inauguration: Yeah, the economy is the best ever for them," said Sen. Bernie Sanders. "But for the average working person, not quite the case."
US Sen. Bernie Sanders responded incredulously on Tuesday to President Donald Trump's claim that the nation's economy under his stewardship is "the greatest... actually ever in history," despite surging personal and business bankruptcies, plunging consumer sentiment, rising costs, and anemic job and wage growth.
In an appearance on MS NOW, Sanders (I-Vt.) said that "you wonder whether Trump is completely crazy and delusional or just a pathological liar, but the idea that anybody would believe that this is a great economy when 60% of our people are living paycheck to paycheck, when the cost of healthcare is going up, people can't afford housing, people can't afford their basic groceries, the childcare system is dysfunctional, people can't afford to go to college."
"If this is the greatest economy in the history of the world," the senator added, "God help us."
Watch:
Sanders' remarks came in response to Trump's interview Tuesday with Fox Business host Larry Kudlow, during which the president falsely claimed he has ushered in "the greatest period of anything that we've ever seen," including "the greatest economy actually ever in history."
While Trump and members of his class have seen their wealth surge to record levels during his second White House term, working-class Americans are struggling to make ends meet as the president's tariffs and assault on the social safety net drive up costs. One recent analysis estimated that the average US family paid $1,625 in higher costs last year as prices for groceries, housing, and other necessities continued to rise.
Trump's claim of an economic "golden age" in the US was also undermined by a new House Budget Committee report report showing that personal bankruptcy filings increased 11% last year, reaching levels not seen since 2019—during the president's first term in the White House. Those figures came on top of earlier data showing that business bankruptcies are at a 15-year high.
“Donald Trump’s reckless tariff taxes are driving up prices, hurting the economy, and leaving families to pay the price," Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.), the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said in a statement. "The only people benefiting in Donald Trump’s economy are his billionaire donors—everyone else is falling further behind.”
Sanders echoed that message during his MS NOW appearance late Tuesday, saying, "The billionaires who sat behind Trump at his inauguration: Yeah, the economy is the best ever for them."
"But for the average working person," Sanders said, "not quite the case."
"No reason given. No one, not even military users, were apparently given advanced warning," said one veteran journalist. "Aside from 9/11, I can't remember anything like that."
Update: 9:50 am ET:
Just hours after ordering a halt to all airline traffic coming in and out of the El Paso International Airport, the FAA on Wednesday morning reversed the order and reopened the airspace in the city's region along the Texas border with Mexico.
In an agency social media post, the FAA said, "The temporary closure of airspace over El Paso has been lifted. There is no threat to commercial aviation. All flights will resume as normal."
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy claimed in a social media post that the FAA and Defense Department “acted swiftly to address a cartel drone incursion. The threat has been neutralized and there is no danger to commercial travel in the region.”
Earlier...
Speculation and alarm was triggered overnight after the Federal Aviation Administration late Tuesday, with nothing more than "special security reasons” given as a reason, ordered the suspension of all incoming and outgoing flights from the airport in El Paso, Texas.
"What on Earth is going on?" asked Franklin Leonard, a contributing editor with Vanity Fair, in a reaction to the news—given the limited information provided by the federal government—that was similarly expressed by many online.
In a post on Instagram, the El Paso International Airport said, "All flights to and from El Paso are grounded, including commercial, cargo and general aviation. The FAA has issued a flight restriction halting all flights to and from El Paso effective from February 10 at 11:30 PM (MST) to February 20 at 11:30PM (MST)." No further details were given and passengers were told to contact their carrier for status on specific flights.
Inevitable online speculation—including concerns about US military operations in Mexico, a connection to President Donald Trump's sweeping deportation operations, and other less plausible notions—was rife in the early hours of Wednesday morning as word spread of the closure. Others simply noted the unusual nature of the FAA order.
"So this is really strange," John Stempkin, a veteran news producer with NPR, said of the unexplained closure. "No reason given. No one, not even military users, were apparently given advanced warning. Aside from 9/11, I can't remember anything like that."
A statement from the airport said the grounding order had been given “on short notice” and that it was waiting for additional guidance from the FAA. In its notice, the FAA said the federal government “may use deadly force” against aircraft violating the airspace and determined to pose “an imminent security threat.”
The grounding of flights, noted the Associated Press, "is likely to create significant disruptions given the duration and the size of the metropolitan area. El Paso, a border city with a population of nearly 700,000 and larger when you include the surrounding metro area, is hub of cross-border commerce alongside neighboring Ciudad Juarez in Mexico."
Reached by phone early Wednesday by the New York Times for his reaction, Representative Joaquin Castro, a Democrat who represents San Antonio, said he had no idea what was going on. “Sorry, I don’t have some clear answer,” Castro told the Times. Asked if he was surprised, the lawmaker simply said, “Yes.”
"They tried to have me charged with a crime—all because of something I said that they didn’t like," said Sen. Mark Kelly. "That’s not the way things work in America."
A federal grand jury on Tuesday declined to go along with an effort by the Trump Justice Department to indict Democratic lawmakers involved in a November video reminding members of the US military of their duty to refuse illegal orders, a message that came as President Donald Trump deployed troops to major American cities.
The failed attempt to indict the six Democratic lawmakers was led by Trump loyalist Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now serving as US attorney for the District of Columbia. The New York Times reported that federal prosecutors "sought to persuade the grand jurors that the lawmakers had violated a statute that forbids interfering with the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the US armed forces."
Trump, who has repeatedly weaponized the Justice Department against his political opponents, erupted in response to the 90-second video, accusing the Democratic lawmakers behind it of "seditious behavior, punishable by death."
The lawmakers who appeared in the video were Sens. Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan as well as Reps. Jason Crow of Colorado, Chrissy Houlahan and Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania, and Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire. The Democrats learned they were under investigation last month when they received inquiries from Pirro's office.
Lawmakers and legal observers said it was deeply alarming that the DOJ even tried to secure the indictment.
"What an ugly assault on the First Amendment and on Congress," said legal scholar Ryan Goodman. "Thankfully, thwarted."
Kelly, a retired Navy captain who is facing Pentagon attempts to censure him and cut his military benefits, said the effort to indict him and his fellow Democratic lawmakers was "an outrageous abuse of power by Donald Trump and his lackies."
"It wasn’t enough for Pete Hegseth to censure me and threaten to demote me, now it appears they tried to have me charged with a crime—all because of something I said that they didn’t like," Kelly wrote on social media. "That’s not the way things work in America."
We want to speak directly to members of the Military and the Intelligence Community.
The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution.
Don’t give up the ship. pic.twitter.com/N8lW0EpQ7r
— Sen. Elissa Slotkin (@SenatorSlotkin) November 18, 2025
Slotkin, a former CIA officer who organized the November video, said Pirro pursued the indictment "at the direction of President Trump, who said repeatedly that I should be investigated, arrested, and hanged for sedition."
"Today, it was a grand jury of anonymous American citizens who upheld the rule of law and determined this case should not proceed. Hopefully, this ends this politicized investigation for good," the senator said. "But today wasn’t just an embarrassing day for the administration. It was another sad day for our country."
"Because whether or not Pirro succeeded is not the point. It’s that President Trump continues to weaponize our justice system against his perceived enemies," Slotkin added. "No matter what President Trump and Pirro continue to do with this case, tonight we can score one for the Constitution, our freedom of speech, and the rule of law."