March, 30 2010, 12:14pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Bill Snape, Center for Biological
Diversity, (202)
536-9351, bsnape@biologicaldiversity.org
Campaign Launched to Gather 500,000 Signatures to Cap Greenhouse Gas Pollution at 350 Parts Per Million
Dr. James Hansen, Barbara Kingsolver, Ed Begley, Jr., Bonnie Raitt, Lemony Snicket, Sierra Club Board Member Among First Signers
WASHINGTON
The
Center for Biological Diversity
today launched a campaign to gather 500,000 signatures on a People's
Petition
asking the Environmental Protection Agency to set a national pollution
standard
to reduce carbon dioxide pollution in the atmosphere to 350 parts per
million.
Atmospheric CO2 is currently at 390 parts per million and
growing,
causing a dangerous climate disruption.
The People's Petition is in
support of
a Clean Air Act legal filing submitted by the Center and 350.org in December
2009 to set an upper limit of 350 parts per million on dangerous
greenhouse gas
pollution. The EPA is currently reviewing the request and is expected to
render
a decision later this year.
Though Congress and the White
House
have been crafting legislation, and the EPA is beginning the process of
regulation, there is as yet no formal scientific standard determining
what the
safe level of carbon dioxide is and how deeply emissions need to be
reduced to
return to the safety zone.
According to actor and
environmental
activist, Ed Begley, Jr.:
"Setting climate policy
without a
scientific target is like driving with your eyes closed. You don't know
where
you're going and you'll probably crash. The EPA should open everyone's
eyes as
soon as possible by determining the safe level of greenhouse
gases."
Begley is joined as an initial
signer
of the petition by Dr. Jim Hansen of NASA, who said:
"Science
demands that we reduce atmospheric carbon pollution to a level of 350
parts per
million (ppm) or less to sustain life as we know it. Energy and climate
policies must recognize this 350 ppm limit."
The grassroots campaign is
also
supported by musician and activist Bonnie Raitt, who said:
"In 40 years of performing and
working
for social change, I've learned that the best, longest-lasting policy
reforms
come from the ground up. I hope that 500,000 people join me in asking
the EPA to
bring atmospheric carbon dioxide pollution back down to 350 parts per
million.
The lives of polar bears, sea turtles, and the human race depend on
it."
Bestselling author Barbara
Kingsolver
explained the ethical and personal imperative of establishing a clear,
specific
target for greenhouse gas pollution reduction:
"Reaching 350 ppm is a matter
of living
by my values - which include both 'love your neighbor' and 'try not to
wreck
every blooming thing on the planet while you're here.'"
Among the many notables
joining these
initial signers of the People's Petition are activists Michael Dorsey
(Sierra
Club board member), Brock Evans (president of the Endangered Species
Coalition),
Dr. Helen Caldicott (anti-nuclear activist), former government official
Curtis Moore (Republican counsel to
the Senate's Committee on Environment and Public Works), scientists Dr.
Thomas
Lovejoy (biodiversity chair, Heinz Center), Dr. Niles Eldredge (American
Museum
of Natural History) and Dr. John Terborgh (Center for Tropical
Conservation,
Duke University), and authors Lemony Snicket (i.e. Daniel Handler),
Jonathan
Lethem (author of Motherless
Brooklyn), Rick Moody (author of The
Ice Storm) and Donna Tartt (author of The Secret
History).
Click here
to read the 'People's Petition' and see a current list of
signatories.
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252LATEST NEWS
Green Party Scores Upset Win in UK Election in Blow to Labour, Far-Right Reform
"Instead of working for a nice life, we’re working to line the pockets of billionaires," victorious Green Party candidate Hannah Spencer said during her victory speech. "We’re being bled dry."
Feb 27, 2026
Green Party candidate Hannah Spencer on Thursday won an upset victory in a byelection in the Gorton and Denton constituency, delivering a blow to both Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the far-right Reform Party led by Nigel Farage.
As reported by the Guardian, Spencer, a local plumber, won by overturning a 13,000-vote majority that the Labour Party achieved in the 2024 general election.
In fact, Labour fell to third place in the Thursday election, winning 9,364 votes, compared to 14,980 votes for the Greens and 10,578 votes for Reform.
In her victory speech, Spencer emphasized major class divides in the UK, where she said people are working increasingly harder for fewer benefits.
"Working hard used to get you something," she said. "It got you a house. A nice life. Holidays. It got you somewhere. But now—working hard? What does that get you?... Instead of working for a nice life, we’re working to line the pockets of billionaires. We’re being bled dry."
The Green Party said Spencer's victory showed it was now a viable force in national elections, projecting that it is "on track to win over a hundred seats at the next general election, if the historic swing achieved to win Gorton and Denton is replicated nationwide."
Green Party leader Zack Polanski hailed the election result and predicted "a tidal wave of new Green MPs" in future elections should current trends continue.
"When I was elected Leader of the Greens I said we were here to replace Labour and I meant it," Polanski said. "Hannah was a fantastic candidate and I know she’ll make a brilliant MP."
Starmer, who has pushed the Labour Party to the right on issues such as immigration and transgender rights during his tenure, reacted bitterly to the defeat in a letter he sent to other Labour MPs.
"The result in Gorton and Denton is deeply disappointing," Starmer wrote. "Instead of a Labour MP who can be a local champion delivering for Gorton and Denton alongside a Labour Government and a Labour mayor, the people of Gorton and Denton now have a representative who is more interested in dividing people than uniting them."
Starmer, whose job approval rating in polls is consistently under 20%, also predicted that "over the coming months, people will feel the benefit of the long-term decisions this government is taking."
Socialist commentator Owen Jones, a longtime Starmer critic, gloated over the result in a social media post in which he reminded followers of Starmer's past statement that left-wing voters could "leave" if they didn't like the changes he was making to Labour.
"OK, Keir Starmer, we did as you asked us!" he wrote. "Happy now?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
For First Time, Gallup Poll Shows Americans Sympathize More With Palestinians Than With Israelis
"It is difficult to overstate the significance of this," said one analyst. "This is a key reason why Israel—and its supporters in the US—have a sense of desperate urgency when it comes to war with Iran and annexation of Palestine."
Feb 27, 2026
A Gallup survey released Friday found that a larger percentage of Americans sympathize with the Palestinians than with the Israelis in the decades-long Middle East conflict, which has exploded over the past two and a half years with the Hamas-led attack on Israel and the latter's genocidal response—fueled by military and diplomatic support from the US government.
The new poll marks the first time since Gallup began tracking the question in 2001 that a larger portion of respondents (41%) expressed sympathy for the Palestinians than the Israelis (36%) "in the Middle East situation." The organization noted that while "the five-percentage-point difference is not statistically significant," it "contrasts with a clear lead for the Israelis only a year ago (46% vs. 33%) and larger leads over the prior 24 years."
"From 2001 to 2025, Israelis consistently held double-digit leads in Americans’ Middle East sympathies, with the gap averaging 43 points between 2001 and 2018," Gallup reported. "However, public opinion began narrowing in 2019, several years before the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza. The cumulative effect of gradual changes in US attitudes since then has led to the Israelis no longer being viewed more sympathetically."

Notably, the Gallup survey shows that "Americans of all age groups have grown more sympathetic to the Palestinians in recent years." A majority of Americans between the ages of 18 and 34 (53%) said they sympathize more with the Palestinians and 23% said they sympathize more with the Israelis, "a record low for the age group," according to Gallup.
The survey also showed a "near reversal" among Americans aged 35 to 54—with 46% now saying they sympathize more with the Palestinians—and the "narrowest gap in sympathies" Gallup has ever recorded for Americans aged 55 and older.
In terms of political affiliation, Gallup found that "Americans’ shifting sympathies in the Middle East situation this year are mostly driven by changes among political independents," who now sympathize more with the Palestinians than the Israelis by a margin of 41% to 30%.
"It is difficult to overstate the significance of this," Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, wrote in response to the Gallup survey. "This is a key reason why Israel—and its supporters in the US—have a sense of desperate urgency when it comes to war with Iran and annexation of Palestine."
"The window for these aggressions with US support is closing," Parsi added.
The new poll also found that Americans' support for a Palestinian state is at its highest level in more than two decades as current Israeli leaders vow to prevent Palestinian statehood and ramp up their illegal annexation of territory—an effort effectively endorsed by the Trump administration.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hundreds Reportedly Killed as 'Open War' Breaks Out Between Pakistan and Afghanistan
A spokesperson for the head of the United Nations implored both sides to "seek to resolve any differences through diplomacy."
Feb 27, 2026
This is a developing story... Please check back for updates...
Pakistan's defense minister said Friday that his country and Afghanistan are in an "open war" after Afghan forces attacked Pakistani border troops in what Kabul characterized as retaliation for recent airstrikes.
Pakistan, which has nuclear weapons, responded to the attack on its border troops with airstrikes on at least three Afghan provinces early Friday, reportedly killing more than 220 people. A spokesperson for Afghanistan's Taliban government said its forces killed dozens of Pakistanis in Thursday's onslaught.
Al Jazeera’s Kamal Hyder, reporting from Pakistan on Friday, said that "we were able to see and hear outgoing fire from the Pakistani side that appears to be heavy artillery, which means that the clashes are still continuing."
Stéphane Dujarric, a spokesperson for United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, said the UN chief is alarmed by the escalating hostilities and urged the "parties to continue to seek to resolve any differences through diplomacy."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


