December, 02 2009, 10:59am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Melinda St. Louis, Jubilee USA (202) 783-0215 / (202) 441-7579
Michael Stulman, Africa Action (202) 546-7961 / (202) 469-9542
Tamara Gaw, TransAfrica Forum (202) 223-1960
Ian Schwab, American Jewish World Service (202) 379-4271
Emira Woods, Institute for Policy Studies (202) 234-9832 / (301) 523-2979
Advocacy Groups Decry Profiteering by Vulture Funds in Liberia
UK Judge Awards Funds $20 million, More Than Liberia’s Total Spending on Education Last Year
WASHINGTON
Leading global development and Africa advocacy groups reacted with
outrage today to news that a London court recently awarded two Vulture
Funds a $20 million judgment against Liberia. This amount of money
represents the country's entire education budget and 150% of their
spending on health in 2008.
On November 26, the British High Court announced that Vulture Funds
Hamsah Investments and Wall Capital were to be awarded $20 million
based on a default judgment received in 2002 by previous creditors in
New York courts. The Vulture Funds had recently acquired the loan to
Liberia on the secondary market. The original credit, dating back to
1978, was estimated to be worth $6 million, but it had been in default
since 1984.
Advocates point out that Liberian President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf's
government has demonstrated its commitment to start fresh by clearing
its past debts, even those incurred by dictatorial governments and used
to fuel and finance the 14 years of civil war. In 2007, Liberia paid
off its arrears to the World Bank and African Development Bank, and in
April of this year successfully negotiated a $1.2 billion buy-back of
its commercial debt. Under the aegis of the World Bank, the process was
widely acknowledged by creditors to be fair and open.
However, Hamsah Investments and Wall Capital were the only two private creditors that refused to participate.
"The Liberia case is a textbook example of kicking a country while it's down," said Ruth Messinger, President of American Jewish World Service. "Liberia
has done everything right to gain debt relief, yet our system allows an
off-shore, unaccountable corporation to hold out on the deal and
instead profiteer in international courts by squeezing the country for
funds representing more than its entire education budget."
"U.S. taxpayers who finance debt relief for poor countries intend
for that money to be redirected towards poverty alleviation, not into
the private accounts of Vulture Funds that operate in secret and
without any sense of corporate responsibility," said Melinda St. Louis, Deputy Director of Jubilee USA Network.
Gerald LeMelle, Executive Director of Africa Action stated, "We
call these debts illegitimate precisely because of irresponsible
lending policies by U.S. and UK based international financial
institutions, and military support that protected and defended the
regime of a dictator, Samuel Doe, while he mismanaged the country's
resources and looted Treasury. The final insult is that now poor
Liberian people are being asked to pay back wealthy investors."
This judgment in favor of the Vulture Funds sets back much of the
progress made in Liberia, a country that ranks 169 out of 182 in the
UN's Human Development Index. In response to last week's news, the
Liberian Finance Minister Augustine Ngafuan has told reporters that the
country is unable to pay the awarded judgment.
The advocacy groups note that because Vulture Funds are set up in tax
havens of the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands, Hamsah
Investments' and Wall Capital's actions and their principal
beneficiaries are almost impossible follow.
"There is an ever-urgent need for the U.S. and the UK to prevent raw
exploitation of poor countries and profiteering on their debt relief.
The most recent judgment will unfortunately result in Liberia facing
ever larger barriers to providing the necessary social services to lift
its population out of poverty," said Nicole Lee, Executive Director of TransAfrica Forum.
Advocacy groups dismayed by this latest attack by Vulture Funds point
to the urgent need to pass legislation currently before the U.S. House
of Representatives and the UK government to prevent the further misuse
of US and UK courts for debt profiteers. The Stop VULTURE Funds Act,
H.R.2932, introduced by Representatives Maxine Waters and Spencer
Bachus on June 18 of this year, would prohibit sovereign debt
profiteering from poor countries and require greater levels of
transparency by creditors suing those poor countries.
"These Vulture Funds are violating the promise of debt relief and Liberia's path to peace and economic stability,"
decried Emira Woods, a Liberian national and Co-director of Foreign
Policy in Focus at the Institute for Policy Studies. She added, "After
26 years of war, Liberia's schools and healthcare centers remain
severely underfunded. Unemployment is over 80%. The government and
people of Liberia cannot have scarce resources funneled to Vultures.
Women and children will pay the heaviest price. Congress and the courts
must act urgently to clip the wings of these Vultures."
For more information visit:
https://www.jubileeusa.org/
Africa Action is a national organization that works for political, economic and social justice in Africa. Through the provision of accessible information and analysis combined with the mobilization of public pressure we work to change the policies and policy-making processes of U.S. and multinational institutions toward Africa. The work of Africa Action is grounded in the history and purpose of its predecessor organizations, the American Committee on Africa (ACOA), The Africa Fund, and the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC), which have fought for freedom and justice in Africa since 1953. Continuing this tradition, Africa Action seeks to re-shape U.S. policy toward African countries.
LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular