April, 14 2009, 12:17pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Steve
Holmer, American Bird Conservancy, 202/234-7181, ext. 216, sholmer@abcbirds.org,
Delta
Willis, National Audubon Society, 212/979-3197, dwillis@audubon.orgÂ
Cat
Lazaroff, Defenders of Wildlife, 202/772-3270, clazaroff@
Petitioners Urge Federal Communications Commission to Protect Millions of Migratory Birds
WASHINGTON
Conservation organizations and concerned
citizens are petitioning the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to
address the killing of millions of migratory birds from collisions with the
more than 100,000 communications towers throughout the United States.
American Bird Conservancy, National Audubon Society, and Defenders of
Wildlife filed a petition with the FCC today asking the agency to adopt new
rules to comply with federal environmental laws, including the National
Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act, in order to ensure
that the impact of towers on migratory birds is properly considered and
addressed in agency decisions. The groups are also delivering over 15,000
petitions to the regulatory agency signed by citizens concerned for
threatened wildlife.
"We urge
the FCC to respond to the scientific evidence that millions of migratory birds
are being killed every year by communications towers, and act swiftly to
release rules that can halt this needless carnage," said George
Fenwick, President of American Bird Conservancy.
An American
Bird Conservancy report analyzing documented tower kills
lists 230 species - over one third of all avian species found in the
United States- that are known to bekilled at towers,
including many species of conservation concern such as the Blackpoll Warbler,
Gray-cheeked Thrush, and Yellow-billed Cuckoo.
The vast
majority of bird mortality occurs during fall and spring when night-migrating
birds are attracted in large flocks to the aviation safety lights on
towers. The lights, especially red solid-state or slow pulsing lights,
interfere with the birds' celestial navigation cues, particularly
during poor visibility conditions such as rain and fog. Confused, the birds
fly around the towers repeatedly, crashing into one another, the tower, its
guy wires, or the ground. Others simply drop from exhaustion.
FCC
Commissioners have recognized that this is a serious problem, resulting in
the release of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in November 2006, but the FCC
has yet to release a proposed rule.
"Our
communications network needn't be a death sentence for birds,"
said Audubon Chief Scientist Dr. Thomas Bancroft. "The FCC needs
to take action now to make communications towers safe for birds as well as
for human aviation."
In
February 2008, a federal court of appeals ordered the FCC to carefully
evaluate the potential adverse effects of communications towers on migratory
bird populations of the Gulf Coast region. A panel of federal judges ruled
that national environmental laws such as the Endangered Species Act and the
National Environmental Policy Act require the FCC to more carefully consider
these possible adverse effects in its tower permitting process.
"The FCC
has been aware of this problem for at least ten years. Now more than a year
after the court clearly found the Commission in violation of federal
environmental law when it comes to migratory birds, still no progress has
been made,"
said Jamie Rappaport Clark, executive vice president for Defenders of
Wildlife. "The commission should stop dragging its feet and take action
to implement rules that address this significant conservation issue."
These specific
rules would include procedures for consulting with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service regarding species listed under the Endangered Species Act and
considering the effects of communications towers on migratory birds under the
National Environmental Policy Act. The groups also call for the FCC to
develop an environmental impact statement considering the effects of
communications towers on birds and methods to reduce bird losses on a
national basis.
A
copy of the groups' petition is available at https://www.abcbirds.org/abcprograms/policy/towers/fcc_petition.html
#30#
American Bird Conservancy (ABC) works to
conserve native wild birds and their habitats throughout the Americas. ABC
acts to safeguard the rarest bird species, restore habitats, and reduce threats,
while building capacity in the conservation movement. ABC is a 501(c)(3)
membership organization that is consistently awarded a top, four-star rating
by the independent group, Charity Navigator.
Defenders of Wildlife is dedicated to the protection of all
native animals and plants in their natural communities. With more than 1
million members and activists, Defenders of Wildlife is a leading advocate
for innovative solutions to safeguard our wildlife heritage for generations
to come. For more information, visit www.defenders.org.
Audubon, now in its
second century, is dedicated to protecting birds and other wildlife and the
habitat that supports them. Our national network of community-based nature
centers and chapters, scientific and educational programs, and advocacy on
behalf of areas sustaining important bird populations, engage millions of
people of all ages and backgrounds in conservation. www.audubon.org.
LATEST NEWS
Biden Tax Boost Targeting the Rich Called 'Fair, Popular, and Long Overdue'
"Republicans have already made clear they're on the side of the 1 Percenters and big corporations by trying to shield rich tax cheats and endangering Social Security and Medicare with deficit-busting tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations," said one expert. "The contrast couldn't be sharper."
Mar 10, 2023
While far-right Republicans continue threatening to blow up the global economy unless Congress makes cuts to popular social programs, progressive taxation experts are celebrating U.S. President Joe Biden's latest push to invest in "widespread prosperity" by raising taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations.
As part of his fiscal year 2024 budget blueprint unveiled Thursday, Biden calls for a 25% minimum tax on the wealthiest 0.01%; reforms to ensure high-income individuals pay their fair share into the Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund; and repealing 2017 tax cuts and restoring the top tax rate of 39.6% for people making over $400,000 a year.
Along with pushing for raising the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%—which is still far below the 35% rate that was in place prior to Republicans' 2017 tax overhaul—the president advocates expanding the child tax credit while eliminating tax subsidies for cryptocurrency transactions, fossil fuel companies, and real estate.
Biden also "proposes to reform the international tax system to reduce the incentives to book profits in low-tax jurisdictions, stop corporate inversions to tax havens, and raise the tax rate on U.S. multinationals' foreign earnings from 10.5% to 21%," according to a White House fact sheet.
Although many of these proposals are unlikely to go anywhere due to the GOP-controlled U.S. House and divided Senate, Groundwork Collaborative executive director Lindsay Owens said Friday that "it's great to see President Biden leading the charge to increase taxes on billionaires, crack down on stock buybacks by massive corporations, and prevent the wealthiest Americans from cheating on their taxes and avoiding paying what they owe."
"The tax policies laid out in this budget are fair, popular, and long overdue," she declared. "The next time someone claims that we can't afford to protect Social Security and Medicare for future generations—or that we need to cut popular investments in education, healthcare, housing, or clean energy—show them President Bident's latest budget proposal and ask them why they care so much about protecting the ultrawealthy from paying their fair share."
According to Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy executive director Amy Hanauer, "President Biden's budget proposal presents a bold vision for what tax justice should look like in America."
"The provisions would raise substantial revenue, fund important priorities, and increase tax fairness," she stressed. "The revenue raisers are laser-focused on taxing very wealthy individuals and corporations, and the budget would reduce the deficit while easing costs for American families, particularly for middle and low-income parents."
Americans for Tax Fairness executive director Frank Clemente asserted Thursday that "President Biden's budget plainly shows whose side he's on: working families struggling with the high cost of healthcare, childcare, housing and more—not the wealthy elite and their big corporations rolling in dough and dodging their fair share of taxes."
"Republicans have already made clear they're on the side of the 1 Percenters and big corporations by trying to shield rich tax cheats and endangering Social Security and Medicare with deficit-busting tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations," Clemente added. "The contrast couldn't be sharper."
As Common Dreams reported earlier Friday, the House Freedom Caucus said its 45 members would "consider voting" to raise the U.S. debt limit if their colleagues in Congress abandon some of Biden's key economic priorities, slash hundreds of billions of dollars in social spending, and restrict federal agencies' future budgets.
Responding on Twitter, Biden said that "extreme MAGA House Republicans are showing us what they value: tax breaks for the rich."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Three Years Into Covid Pandemic, World Leaders Say 'Never Again' to Vaccine Apartheid
"These past three years should act as a warning for future pandemics," said former U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. "We need a return to genuine cooperation between nations in our preparation and response to global threats."
Mar 10, 2023
Around 200 current and former world leaders, Nobel laureates, health and faith leaders, and activists this week marked the third anniversary of the World Health Organization's Covid-19 pandemic declaration by taking aim at the "vaccine apartheid" that according to one advocacy group was responsible for one death every 24 seconds during the outbreak's first year alone.
A letter led by the People's Vaccine Alliance notes that three years have passed since "the World Health Organization (WHO) first characterized Covid-19 as a pandemic" on March 11, 2020 and implores governments to "never again" allow nationalism and capitalist greed to supersede human needs."
"We have seen extraordinary feats of scientific innovation and an enormous mobilization of public resources to develop effective vaccines, tests, and treatments," the letter continues. "But we have also seen a global response held back by profiteering and nationalism."
The signers asserted:
We are hopeful that an end to the acute stage of the Covid-19 pandemic may be in sight. Thus, the world is at a critical juncture. Decisions made now will determine how the world prepares for and responds to future global health crises. World leaders must reflect on mistakes made in responding to the Covid-19 pandemic so that they are never repeated.
There are decades of publicly funded research behind Covid-19 vaccines, treatments, and tests. Governments have poured taxpayer money by the billions into research, development, and advance orders, reducing the risks for pharmaceutical companies. These are the people's vaccines, the people's tests, and the people's treatments. Yet, a handful of pharmaceutical companies has been allowed to exploit these public goods to fuel extraordinary profits, increasing prices in the Global North while refusing to share technology and knowledge with capable researchers and producers in the Global South.
"Instead of rolling out vaccines, tests, and treatments based on need, pharmaceutical companies maximized their profits by selling doses first to the richest countries with the deepest pockets," the letter adds. "Billions of people in low- and middle-income countries, including frontline workers and the clinically vulnerable, were sent to the back of the line."
These inequities, the alliance said, resulted in over 1.3 million preventable deaths—one every 24 seconds—in the pandemic's first year alone. Even today, as the pandemic enters its fourth year, much of the Global South lacks adequate access to Covid-19 testing and treatments.
The letter's signatories urge world leaders to take immediate action to:
- Support a pandemic accord at the WHO that embeds equity and human rights in pandemic preparedness and response;
- Invest in scientific innovation and manufacturing capacity in the Global South through projects like the mRNA Technology Transfer Hub established by the WHO and partners;
- Invest in global common goods; and
- Remove the intellectual property barriers that prevent knowledge and technology sharing.
"In the AIDS pandemic, pharmaceutical monopolies have resulted in an appalling number of unnecessary deaths—and it has been the same story with Covid-19," lamented Winnie Byanyima, executive director of UNAIDS and co-chair of the People's Vaccine Alliance.
"It was only the production of inexpensive generics in developing countries that made the first generation of HIV medicines available and affordable to people in the [Global] South," she added. "But governments still have not learned that lesson. Unless they break the monopolies that prevent people from accessing medical products, humanity will sleepwalk unprepared into the next pandemic."
East Timorese President José Manuel Ramos-Horta, who also signed the letter, said that "in the Covid-19 pandemic, those of us in low and middle-income countries were pushed to the back of the line for vaccines and denied access to the benefits of new technologies."
"Three years on, we must say 'never again' to this injustice that has undermined the safety of people in every country," he added. "Steps that we take today can hasten global access to vaccines, medicines, and tests in the next pandemic, with regional hubs researching, developing, and manufacturing medical products for everyone, everywhere."
Former United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon asserted:
The great tragedy of the Covid-19 pandemic has been the failure of multilateralism and the absence of solidarity between the Global North and Global South. These past three years should act as a warning for future pandemics. We need a return to genuine cooperation between nations in our preparation and response to global threats. That requires a pandemic accord rooted in equity and human rights, which places the needs of humanity above the commercial interests of a handful of companies.
Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response co-chair Helen Clark—who served as New Zealand's prime minister from 1999 to 2008—noted that "publicly funded science contributed a lot to the phenomenal success of Covid-19 vaccines."
"Yet, that public investment did not lead to vaccines being treated as global common goods," Clark continued. "Rather, nationalism and profiteering around vaccines resulted in a catastrophic moral and public health failure which denied equitable access to all."
"We need to fix the glaring gaps in pandemic preparedness and response today," she added, "so that people in all countries can be protected when a pandemic threat emerges."
Keep ReadingShow Less
South Carolina Teen Sues School, Teacher Who Shoved Her Over Pledge of Allegiance Refusal
"The thing that's beautiful about America is we have freedoms," said the student's lawyer. "Students in our schools should feel safe."
Mar 10, 2023
Marissa Barnwell, a 15-year-old high school student in Lexington, South Carolina, was joined by her parents and the family's lawyer on Thursday as they spoke publicly about a federal lawsuit they filed against her school district, the state Department of Education, and a teacher who they say assaulted Barnwell late last year for not reciting the Pledge of Allegiance.
Surveillance footage from River Bluff High School shows Barnwell walking through a school hallway on November 29, 2022 when the pledge began playing over a loudspeaker.
A state law passed three decades ago requires public schools to play the Pledge of Allegiance over their intercom systems each day at a specific time, but it prohibits any punishment of people who refuse to recite the pledge as long as "they are not disruptive or do not infringe on others."
Barnwell continued walking and was quickly confronted by a special education teacher, Nicole Livingston, who yelled at her and pushed her against a wall before sending her to the principal's office.
"I was just in disbelief," Barnwell said at the press conference Thursday. "You can hear me say in the video, 'Get your hands off of me.'"
Barnwell's parents learned about the incident when she called them in tears, according to the Associated Press. The school did not talk to them about the alleged assault and has reportedly "never responded" to their requests for an explanation.
"It will not be tolerated, and we will get justice for this action that [Livingston] did," Fynale Barnwell, Marissa's mother, toldNews 19 WLTX, a local CBS affiliate.
The lawsuit was filed last month, with the family arguing Livingston violated Barnwell's "constitutional rights by yelling and demanding that M.B. stop walking and physically assaulting her by pushing M.B., on the wall and forcefully touching M.B., in an unwanted way without her consent."
The Secular Coalition for America applauded the family for taking legal action.
Tyler Bailey, the Barnwells' attorney, said Barnwell was "threatened for exercising [her] constitutional rights."
"The thing that's beautiful about America is we have freedoms," Bailey said Thursday. "Students in our schools should feel safe."
According toThe State, a local newspaper, Livingston is still employed by the school.
"Nobody did anything," Bailey said. "This is why the federal civil rights lawsuit has been filed."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular
SUPPORT OUR WORK.
We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100%
reader supported.
reader supported.