May, 25 2016, 04:30pm EDT
Chevron CEO and Board Confronted for Lying To Shareholders, SEC and Public at Annual Shareholder Meeting
Watson unable to respond to fraud charges and clear ethics violations
San Ramon, CA
After six years as Chevron CEO and Chair of the Board John Watson has been unable to resolve major shareholder unrest over his leadership. In one of its strongest rebukes to date, thirty percent of Chevron shareholders representing $57.6 billion of assets under management sent a clear message to Watson and his team on the Ecuador issue: your leadership has failed. Sponsors of the resolution contended that "Chevron's management has materially mishandled legal matters brought against the company by communities in Ecuador - in ways that increased liabilities for the matter, currently amounting to $9.5 billion. Moreover, proponents are concerned about the adequacy of the company's disclosure of those risks to shareholders."
Again, the issue of the company's ongoing contamination in Ecuador and efforts by indigenous and farmer communities to enforce their $9.5 billion judgment against Chevron dominated the meeting.
Humberto Piaguaje, Secoya indigenous leaders whose community has been gravely affected by Chevron's pollution in the Amazon, addressed the CEO directly: "Mr. Watson, stop your racism against us. We are neither manipulated nor will we ever be manipulated by lawyers or anyone else, as you continually repeat. We are intelligent enough to think and act for ourselves and to seek justice." To which Watson inexplicably responded, "We are sorry that the indigenous people of Ecuador have been manipulated by lawyers and by their own government."
Watson had absolutely no response to repeated questions about the company's $11 billion liability in Canada and specific criticism of his mismanagement of the issue. Instead he turned to a Chevron-produced video released months ago alleging that the company "cleaned up its part" in Ecuador. Unfortunately for Watson, Amazon Watch immediately responded to the video pointing out to the room, "If that were true, why did your own technicians find toxic contamination in 2005 on those very sites you claimed in this video to have cleaned up years prior? In 2014, your own lawyers authenticated leaked videos showing toxic contamination remains at the Texaco-only operated sites. They even interviewed local residents who were still getting sick at the time from the contamination you accepted responsibility for as recently as a few months ago in your new video."
While Chevron's propaganda video blames Petroecuador for its own legacy of contamination in Ecuador, after the Ecuadorian government Chevron is by far the largest processor of Petroecuador's oil. Not only is Chevron refusing to clean up its legacy of contamination; it's deepening it by refining nearly 70,000 barrels a day of oil from the Amazon.
At the next mention of the words "Amazon contamination," Watson become visibly flustered and frustrated, shutting off the microphone and disallowing further questions on the Ecuador issue. Tellingly, he said, "I've been trying to answer questions on Ecuador for seven years and I am not going to take any more questions."
For Watson, who took over the reins as CEO from David O'Reilly, Chevron's liability on the Ecuador issue is squarely on his shoulders. Watson was the principal architect of the merger between Texaco and Chevron in 2000, despite being fully aware of Texaco's toxic legacy in Ecuador and ongoing litigation. Texaco operated in Ecuador's Amazon between 1964 and 1990, using obsolete technology and dumping billions of gallons of toxic wastewater into the Amazon ecosystem and poisoning local communities. It left behind over a thousand toxic waste pits that continue to contaminate the region. The Ecuadorians won a historic verdict against the company and are seeking to enforce their judgment in several countries where Chevron has significant assets.
Chevron is staring down an $11 billion debt collection action in Canada for failure to pay the 2011 Ecuadorian verdict. The affected communities in Ecuador recently won a resounding victory before Canada's Supreme Court in their effort to force Watson to comply with the judgment by seizing the company's assets. In Canada, Chevron has an estimated $15 billion worth of oil fields, bank accounts, and refineries - or more than enough to pay the entirety of the Ecuador judgment. No mention was made of this liability in Watson's report to shareholders, nor has the company reported it to the SEC in accordance with the law.
Adding to Chevron's problems in Canada is growing solidarity between the country's First Nations and indigenous communities affected in Ecuador. Chevron has significant upstream development projects and pipelines planned in Canada, some of which are on or slated for First Nations' territory.
"As First Nations peoples of Canada, we stand with the affected indigenous communities in Ecuador who continue their decades-long quest for justice from Chevron for its deliberate contamination of the Amazon rainforest," said Michelle Thrush, Cree from Treaty 7 in Alberta Canada, noted Canadian actor and winner of a Gemini Award (Canada's highest honor for Screen Actors).
Adding to Watson's blunders as CEO, Chevron admits it is still paying disgraced Ecuadorian ex-judge Alberto Guerra, the key witness in Chevron's retaliatory RICO case who recently admitted under oath that he lied about the alleged bribe from the Ecuadorians. As part an ill-advised parallel case Chevron filed with the Hague, Chevron was forced to concede that a witness who already lacked any credibility for admitting to lying and accepting numerous bribes in his past, Guerra "exaggerated to Chevron in an attempt to improve his negotiating position," as Chevron itself indicated it its own legal filings. Yet Watson failed to disclose these important legal developments to his shareholders.
Watson also faced harsh criticisms for wasting millions more shareholder funds in an outright attempt to buy local elections in Richmond, CA last year. The company's candidates received a thumping from grassroots Richmond Progressive Alliance candidates and the entire debacle has made Chevron a prime target for the movement to get corporate funding out of politics. Richmond continues its $24 million suit against Chevron for the 2012 refinery fire which sent 15,000 people to the hospital.
In fact, Chevron faced six additional shareholder resolutions related to climate change in addition to appointing a board member with environmental expertise. Chevron leadership remains completely divorced from reality in insisting that by 2040 a full 60 percent of the world's energy needs will be met by oil and gas. Despite the clear climate science about the dangers of methane emissions, Watson said that the company would address climate issues primarily via the "miracle of hydraulic fracturing." Watson claimed Chevron "does not disagree" with the Paris Climate Accord but accepts none of the policies intended to implement it.
"It's astonishing that John Watson still has a job. Under his leadership, or lack thereof, Chevron's liabilities have snowballed, its brand has taken a beating, and any lingering idea that Chevron had any dedication to environmental or social responsibility has been eviscerated," said Paul Paz y Mino. "Poisoning local communities where you operate, belittling them afterwards, and in some cases suing them, is no way to conduct business.
For more information, visit amazonwatch.org and chevrontoxico.com.
Amazon Watch is a nonprofit organization founded in 1996 to protect the rainforest and advance the rights of indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with indigenous and environmental organizations in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability and the preservation of the Amazon's ecological systems.
LATEST NEWS
Listen Live: US Supreme Court Hears Outrageous Argument That Trump Is Above the Law
"The American people deserve a Supreme Court that does not hesitate to declare that no one is above the law, including a former president," said one campaigner.
Apr 25, 2024
After months of delay, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday will hear oral arguments in a closely watched case on whether former President Donald Trump should be immune from criminal charges stemming from his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss—an argument that legal experts say is both absurd and dangerous.
Listen live to the oral arguments, which are set to begin at 10:00 am ET:
Thursday's proceedings mark the high court's final argument of its current term, and pro-democracy campaigners are calling on the justices to quickly reject the former president's sweeping immunity claim so he can face trial on federal election subversion charges before his November rematch with President Joe Biden.
As Bloomberg's Greg Stohr noted earlier this week, Thursday's oral arguments give "Special Counsel Jack Smith only a narrow window to put the former president in front of a Washington jury before voters go to the polls on November 5."
"With the trial on hold until the high court rules," Stohr added, "Smith needs a clear-cut victory, and he needs it quickly."
Sean Eldridge, founder and president of the progressive advocacy group Stand Up America, said in a statement Thursday that "the Supreme Court's right-wing majority has already handed Trump a temporary victory by stalling this case for months, allowing him to delay accountability for his criminal attempts to cling to power."
"With so much at stake for our democracy, the Supreme Court should rule swiftly and decisively in this case," said Eldridge. "Accountability delayed could mean accountability denied."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular