Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

There are less than 48 hours left in this Mid-Year Campaign and our independent journalism needs your help today.
If you value our work, please support Common Dreams. This is our hour of need.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

For Immediate Release

Press Release

Environmental Groups Take Postal Service to Court for Scheme to Buy Massively Polluting Mail Trucks

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy is facing wave of litigation for decision to replace up to 90% of postal truck fleet with fuel-guzzling trucks without a thorough environmental review
SAN FRANCISCO -

Today, Earthjustice, CleanAirNow KC, the Sierra Club, and the Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of California challenging the US Postal Service's decision to replace the vast majority of its delivery fleet with polluting and fuel-guzzling combustion mail trucks. The Postal Service's analysis was deeply flawed right from the start: the agency signed a contract and spent millions of dollars on a new combustion fleet before it even began conducting an environmental analysis.

"The Postal Service's plan to purchase thousands of combustion mail trucks will not only deliver pollution to every neighborhood in America, it's also unlawful," said Adrian Martinez, senior attorney on Earthjustice's Right to Zero campaign. "DeJoy's environmental process was so rickety and riddled with error that it failed to meet the basic standards of the National Environmental Policy Act. We're going to court to protect the millions of Americans breathing in neighborhoods overburdened with tailpipe pollution. Mail delivery in this country should be electric for our health and for our future."

The Postal Service plans to purchase up to 165,000 vehicles, replacing a large swath of its fleet of over 200,000 trucks with a new model that gets a harrowing mileage of 8.6 mpg with the air conditioning on. Ninety percent of the new trucks would be combustion vehicles with a worse fuel economy than a gas-powered Ford F-150 and worse mileage than the 1988 Grumman postal truck model when new.

The decision is a missed opportunity to electrify the fleet, which would reduce diesel, smog, and particulate matter pollution in nearly every neighborhood in America. Investing in electric trucks would prevent the Postal Service from burning 135 million gallons of fuel every year, or two to four billion gallons of fuel over 20 years. Because mail trucks travel short distances each day at an average of 20 miles, and park at night in a centralized location that would facilitate charging, they're especially prime for electrification. Countries like the United Kingdom, Canada, and Norway have already begun to deploy electric mail trucks. 

"Electric mail trucks would facilitate clean air in our communities overburdened by asthma and health disparities that come with years of breathing toxic transportation pollution," said Beto Martinez with CleanAirNow KC, an environmental justice organization based in Kansas City. "There's a 22-year discrepancy in life expectancy between neighborhoods in Kansas City. Enough is enough. We want to see the Postal Service build a fleet that won't deliver pollution with the mail. The Postal Service failed to consider the environmental justice impacts we have to live with." 

The Postal Service has faced overwhelming criticism for its deeply flawed and delinquent environmental analysis. The agency received over 35,000 comments from federal and state agencies, scientists, labor organizations, environmentalists, and community groups all concerned about the gaping holes in the analysis and the long-term consequences of this mistake. 

The deeply flawed analysis included estimates for battery costs that were unrealistically high, with evaluations of gas prices that were unreasonably low even before the recent spike in gas prices to a national average of over $4 per gallon. The Postal Service used an estimate of $2.19 per gallon of gas, with a projected increase to a mere $2.55 per gallon by 2040. The Postal Service's environmental impact statement also dramatically underestimated the mileage range for EVs at 70 miles per charge, even though delivery EVs on the market today already surpass 200 miles per charge.

As the largest government fleet in the nation, the Postal Service makes up a third of the country's entire federal fleet. In January 2021, President Biden issued an executive order to electrify the federal fleet "including vehicles of the United States Postal Service," and committed to planning that would spur "the creation of union jobs in the manufacture of those new vehicles." But the new postal truck model is not slated to be built by American workers with good union jobs. Instead, the Postal Service appears to be allowing this program to be implemented with non-union labor in South Carolina, sparking opposition from the United Auto Workers, one of the largest unions in the country. 

"We're taking the Postal Service to court over its failure to electrify its vehicle fleet," said Katherine García, director of Sierra Club's Clean Transportation for All campaign. "Instead of moving forward with common-sense and available technology to mitigate the climate crisis, clean up our air, and create good union jobs, USPS has decided to keep polluting communities at a time when federal agencies should be leading the way on electrification. It's an unacceptable decision, and we won't let it slide."

 

###

The Sierra Club is the most enduring and influential grassroots environmental organization in the United States. We amplify the power of our 3.8 million members and supporters to defend everyone’s right to a healthy world.

###

Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.

Naomi Klein: The US Is in the Midst of a 'Shock-and-Awe Judicial Coup'

"The rolling judicial coup coming from this court is by no means over," warned the author of "The Shock Doctrine."

Jake Johnson ·


Markey, Bowman Join Climate Coalition in Urging SCOTUS Expansion

"We cannot sit idly by," said Markey, "as extremists on the Supreme Court eviscerate the authorities that the government has had for decades to combat climate change and reduce pollution."

Brett Wilkins ·


Ocasio-Cortez Says US 'Witnessing a Judicial Coup in Process'

"It is our duty to check the Court's gross overreach of power in violating people's inalienable rights and seizing for itself the powers of Congress and the president."

Brett Wilkins ·


Critics Say Biden Drilling Bonanza 'Won't Lower Gas Prices' But 'Will Worsen Climate Crisis'

"President Biden's massive public lands giveaway in the face of utter climate catastrophe is just the latest sign that his climate commitments are mere rhetoric," said one campaigner.

Kenny Stancil ·


Grave Warnings as Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Case That Threatens 'Future of Voting Rights'

"Buckle up," implores one prominent legal scholar. "An extreme decision here could fundamentally alter the balance of power in setting election rules in the states and provide a path for great threats to elections."

Brett Wilkins ·

Common Dreams Logo