April, 07 2020, 12:00am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Jayson O’Neill, Director
Western Values Project
jayson@westernvaluesproject.org
(406) 200-8582
Oil Corporations Begging Trump For Bailout Have Decimated Western Lands
Energy CEOs Recently Invited to White House Have Spilled Thousands of Barrels of Oil Across Western U.S., Imperiling Lands and Health.
Helena, MT
The same oil corporations clamoring for a bailout from President Trump have spilled nearly 10,000 barrels of oil and other toxic petroleum byproducts across the Western United States according to new research released today by Western Values Project, a Montana-based public lands-focused project of Accountable.US.
President Donald Trump recently met with big oil energy executives--whose companies have given vast sums to his campaign coffers--to discuss taxpayer-funded bailout options for their corporations. News reports indicate that Trump is still exploring unilateral action outside of Congress, such as royalty rate reductions, weakened environmental enforcement, and Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) purchases or leasing, to bail out the unsustainable oil and gas industry.
"Even for Trump, this is a new low: he wants to reward polluters for their bad behavior with hard-earned taxpayer dollars," said Western Values Project Director Jayson O'Neill. "Trump should be focusing on helping the hundreds of thousands of Americans who are sick and the millions who are unemployed instead of bailing out billionaire CEOs. Using a global pandemic to help his big oil cronies who have defiled western lands isn't just swampy, it's cruel."
This follows reports that Trump's Environmental Protection Agency will relax enforcement of environmental violations during the coronavirus epidemic, despite the heightened attention on links between air quality and public health.
Western Values Project found that each of the oil corporations Trump met with late last week has had hundreds of oil spills across the West. Previous research found that some of these same oil and gas corporations have major outstanding environmental violations.
ExxonMobil Corp Has Had Two Oil Spill Incidents In Wyoming
- ExxonMobil spilled 36.9 barrels of oil in Wyoming on March 14, 2012. [Wyoming incident 120315-162458, accessed 04/06/20]
- ExxonMobil spilled 75 gallons of oil near Kemmerer, Wyoming on January 27, 2014. [Wyoming incident 140128-203049, accessed 04/06/20]
Chevron Has Had 160 Separate Oil Spills In Wyoming, Colorado, And New Mexico
- Chevron spilled 12 barrels of oil into the ground at Wild Cat Canyon in Wyoming on April 14, 2010. [Wyoming incident 100414-0900, accessed 04/06/20]
- Chevron Has Filed 121 Separate Spill/Release Incident Reports In Colorado Since April 2015. [Colorado O&G Conservation Commission, accessed 04/06/20]
- Chevron has spilled 1,154 barrels of oil in 38 separate incidents in New Mexico Since 2015. [New Mexico Oil Conservation Division, accessed 04/06/20]
Occidental Petroleum Corp Has Had 28 Separate Oil Spills In Wyoming And New Mexico
- On October 1, 2019, Occidental Petroleum spilled .05 tons of VOC residual gas after a contractor struck a pipeline within its plant. [Wyoming incident 191002-150113, accessed 04/06/20]
- Occidental has had 27 separate incidents of crude oil spills in New Mexico since January 15, totaling 195 barrels of oil. [New Mexico Oil Conservation Division, accessed 04/06/20]
Energy Transfer Partners Has Had Two Small Oil Spills In New Mexico
- Energy Transfer Partners has had two separate incidents of crude oil spills in New Mexico since January 2016. In total, it spilled 10 barrels of crude oil. [New Mexico Oil Conservation Division, accessed 04/06/20]
Phillips 66 Has Spilled Gasoline And Diesel Throughout Wyoming And Has Spilled 338 Barrels Of Crude Oil In New Mexico
- On September 21, 2015, Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC spoiled 1 barrel of gasoline in Wyoming. [Wyoming incident 150921-193911, accessed 04/06/20]
- On June 21 2015, Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC spilled 200 barrels of diesel fuel in Wyoming. [Wyoming incident 150630-144037, accessed 04/06/20]
- On May 3, 2015, Phillips 66 Pipeline LLC spilled 2 barrels of diesel fuel in Wyoming. [Wyoming incident 150503-201720, accessed 04/06/20]
- On May 24, 2014, Phillips 66 spilled 42 gallons of a gasoline/diesel mixture in Wyoming. [Wyoming incident 140524-183709, accessed 04/06/20]
- On January 16, 2014, Phillips 66 spilled 33.62 gallons of gasoline/diesel mixture in Wyoming. [Wyoming incident 140116-190031 04/06/20]
- On November 18, 2016, Phillips 66 spilled 2 barrels of gasoline in Wyoming. [Wyoming incident 161118-102157, accessed 04/06/20]
- Phillips 66 has had three separate oil spills in New Mexico since January 2018. It spilled a total of 338 barrels of crude oil. [Nev Mexico Oil Conservation Division, accessed 04/06/20]
Continental Resources Spilled 367 Barrels Of Oil In Wyoming In Three Separate Incidents In 2011
- 3036 On September 15, 2011, Continental Resources spilled 92 barrels of oil in Wyoming. [Wyoming incident 110916-074315, accessed 04/06/20]
- 3218 On February 27, 2011, Continental Resources spilled 25 barrels of oil in Wyoming. [Wyoming Incident 110227-1100, accessed 04/06/20]
- 3289 On January 16, 2011, Continental Resources spilled 250 barrels of oil in Wyoming. [Wyoming Incident 110116-0900, accessed 04/06/20]
Devon Energy Corp Has Had Hundreds Of Separate Oil Spills Throughout The West, Spilling Thousands Of Gallons Of Crude Oil
- Devon Energy, Since 2010, has spilled 629 barrels of oil in 19 separate incidents in Wyoming. [Wyoming oil spill search, accessed 04/06/20]
- Devon Energy, since 2010, has spilled 6,478 barrels of produced water in its oil operations in 50 separate incidents in Wyoming. [Wyoming oil spill search, accessed 04/06/20]
- Devon Energy, since 2015, has had 226 separate oil spills in New Mexico, totaling 6,843 barrels of crude oil. [New Mexico Oil Conservation Division, accessed 04/06/20]
Western Values Project brings accountability to the national conversation about Western public lands and national parks conservation - a space too often dominated by industry lobbyists and their allies in government.
LATEST NEWS
Climate Movement Cheers Michigan AG's Plans to Sue Big Oil
"Pursuing this litigation will allow us to recoup our costs and hold those responsible for jeopardizing Michigan's economic future and way of life accountable," said the state attorney general
May 09, 2024
Advocates of holding fossil fuel giants accountable for their significant contributions to the climate emergency welcomed Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel's Thursday announcement that she intends to sue the polluting industry.
"Big Oil knew decades ago that their products would cause catastrophic climate change, but instead of doing the right thing they lied about it," declared Richard Wiles, president of the Center for Climate Integrity. "The people of Michigan deserve their day in court to make these companies pay for the massive harm they knowingly caused."
Dozens of municipalities and attorneys general for the District of Columbia and eight states—California, Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont—have already filed climate liability suits against Big Oil in recent years.
"Our 'Pure Michigan' identity is under threat from the effects of climate change," said Nessel, whose state was praised last year for passing clean energy legislation. "Warmer temperatures are shrinking ski seasons in the UP and disrupting the wonderful blooms of Holland's Tulip Time Festival. Severe weather events are on the rise."
"These impacts threaten not only our way of life but also our economy and pose long-term risks to Michigan's thriving agribusiness," she continued. "The fossil fuel industry, despite knowing about these consequences, prioritized profits over people and the environment. Pursuing this litigation will allow us to recoup our costs and hold those responsible for jeopardizing Michigan's economic future and way of life accountable."
The Democratic attorney general's office explained that she is "seeking proposals from attorneys and law firms to serve as special assistant attorneys general to pursue litigation related to the climate change impacts caused by the fossil fuel industry on behalf of the state of Michigan."
The Detroit Newsnoted that "Nessel took a similar tact in suing drugmakers for the opioid crisis, farming out much of the work to outside law firms in Michigan, Texas, and Florida."
According to the newspaper:
Nessel's office is working with other state departments to assess the costs associated with climate change, such as the cost of expanding storm water systems to handle flooding caused by stronger storms, responding to natural disasters, or supporting northern Michigan tourism economies dealing with dwindling ice and snow.
"This is going to be a massive discovery effort to find out exactly what our Michigan damages are now already and what can we expect to see in the future as a result of climate change," she said.
"I don't know that there's a bigger issue facing the state of Michigan than climate change," Nessel told the outlet. "We are talking about billions and billions of dollars in damages and we're already starting to see that on a day-to-day basis. We know this is only going to get worse."
The youth-led Sunrise Movement applauded Nessel's plans and asserted that U.S. President Joe Biden—who is seeking reelection in November—and the Department of Justice "must follow suit."
The group's call echoed similar demands that emerged last week in response to the U.S. Senate Budget Committee's hearing about a three-year investigation into "Big Oil's campaign of deception and distraction."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Compare Biden's Proposed Asylum Rule to 'Failed Trump-Era Policies'
"The Biden administration and Congress must not erect any more unjust barriers to asylum that will sow further disorder and result in irreparable harm," said one migrant rights advocate.
May 09, 2024
Immigrant rights advocates on Thursday slammed the Biden administration's proposal to fast-track the rejection of certain migrants seeking asylum in the United States.
On Thursday the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) proposed a rule that would empower immigration officials to disqualify certain asylum-seekers during their initial eligibility screening—called the credible fear interview (CFI)—using existing national security and terrorism-related criteria, or bars.
DHS said the rule would apply to noncitizens who have "engaged in certain criminal activity, persecuted others, or have been involved in terrorist activities."
"I urge President Biden to embrace our values as a nation of immigrants and use this opportunity to instead provide relief for the long-term immigrants of this nation."
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas called the proposed rule "yet another step in our ongoing efforts to ensure the safety of the American public by more quickly identifying and removing those individuals who present a security risk and have no legal basis to remain here."
However, Greg Chen, senior director of government relations for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, argued that while "bars are an important feature of our immigration laws to ensure that dangerous individuals are not allowed into the country," they must be "accurately applied where warranted."
"This change could make the process faster by excluding people who would not be entitled to stay," he noted. "However, due process will likely be eroded by accelerating what is a highly complex legal analysis needed for these bars and conducting them at the preliminary CFI screening."
As Chen explained:
At that early stage, few asylum seekers will have the opportunity to seek legal counsel or time to understand the consequences of a bar being applied. Under the current process, they have more time to seek legal advice, to prepare their case, and to appeal it or seek an exemption. Ultimately to establish a fair and orderly process at the border, Congress needs to provide the Department of Homeland Security with the resources to meet its mission and also ensure the truly vulnerable are not summarily denied protection without due process.
Democratic lawmakers—some of whom held a press conference Wednesday on protecting undocumented immigrants in the U.S.—also criticized the proposal.
"As the Biden administration considers executive actions on immigration, we must not return to failed Trump-era policies aimed at banning asylum and moving us backwards," said Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), referring to former Republican President Donald Trump, the presumptive 2024 GOP nominee to face President Joe Biden in November.
"I urge President Biden to embrace our values as a nation of immigrants and use this opportunity to instead provide relief for the long-term immigrants of this nation," he added.
One year ago, critics accused Biden of "finishing Trump's job" by implementing a crackdown on asylum-seekers upon the expiration of Title 42—a provision first invoked during Trump administration at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic and continued by Biden to expel more than 1 million migrants under the pretext of public safety.
Earlier this week, the advocacy group Human Rights First released a report detailing the harms of the policy on its anniversary. The group held a press conference to unveil the report and warn of the dangers of further anti-migrant policies.
"The interviews with hundreds of asylum-seekers make clear that the asylum ban and related restrictions strands in danger children and adults seeking asylum, punishes people for seeking protection, leads to the return of refugees to persecution, spurs irregular crossings, and denies equal access to asylum to people facing the most dire risks," Human Rights First director of research and analysis of refugee protection Christina Asencio said during the press conference.
"The Biden administration and Congress must not erect any more unjust barriers to asylum that will sow further disorder and result in irreparable harm," Asencio added.
On Wednesday, three advocacy groups—Al Otro Lado, the Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center, and the Texas Civil Rights Project—sued the federal government on behalf of noncitizens with disabilities seeking more information regarding CBP One, the problem-plagued Customs and Border Protection app migrants must use to schedule asylum interviews at U.S. ports of entry.
"We have and continue to see migrants with disabilities facing unlawful discrimination and unequal access to the asylum process due to the inaccessibility of the app," said Laura Murchie, an attorney with the Civil Rights and Education Enforcement Center involved in the case.
"CBP needs to release these documents so we can advocate for and ensure compliance with the law so asylum-seekers with disabilities do not continue to be harmed by CBP's disregard for rights that are guaranteed by federal disability law," she added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Netanyahu Says Israel 'Will Stand Alone' as Biden Threatens to Withhold Arms
"If we have to, we will fight with our nails," the Israeli prime minister said in response to the American leader's warning against a major Rafah invasion.
May 09, 2024
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday responded to U.S. President Joe Biden's threat to withhold shipments of arms used by the Israel Defense Forces to kill thousands of Palestinian civilians by declaring that his far-right government would continue its assault on Gaza with or without American help.
"If we are forced to stand alone, we will stand alone," Netanyahu said in a video ahead of next week's anniversary of Israel's establishment in 1948, largely via the ethnic cleansing of Palestine's Arabs. "I have already said that if we have to, we will fight with our nails."
Echoing Netanyahu, Israel Defense Forces spokesperson Daniel Hagari said the IDF already has the "necessary weapons" to wage war, "including in Rafah," where over 1 million people forcibly displaced from other parts of Gaza are sheltering alongside around 280,000 local residents, all of them bracing for a full-scale Israeli invasion.
The prime minister's remarks came a day after Biden threatened to withhold bombs and artillery shells from Israel if it launches a major invasion of Rafah—even as critics noted that Israeli forces have already attacked and entered the city. Some accused Biden of walking back a previous "red line" warning against any assault on Rafah.
Common Dreamsreported Tuesday that Biden is delaying shipments of two types of bombs to Israel in order to send a message that the president's tolerance for what he called Israel's "indiscriminate bombing" of Gazan civilians is waning.
However, observers noted that Biden recently signed off on $14.3 billion in emergency armed assistance for Israel atop the nearly $4 billion the key ally already receives from Washington each year. The Biden administration has quietly approved more than 100 arms sales to Israel since October 7, while pushing for billions of dollars worth of additional deals, including advanced fighter jets.
Biden has also repeatedly bypassed Congress to fast-track weapons transfers to Israel as it wages what the International Court of Justice in January called a "plausibly" genocidal war that's killed, injured, or left missing more than 124,000 Palestinians—mostly women and children—since October 7.
The U.S. administration also provides diplomatic cover for Israel's policies and practices in the form of United Nations Security Council vetoes.
Despite all this support—which comes as most election-year voters supporting Biden's Democratic Party believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza—Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir on Thursday tweeted, "Hamas ❤️ Biden."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular