July, 13 2010, 11:42am EDT
Afghanistan: Talks Shouldn't Ignore Taliban Abuse of Women
Any Deals With Insurgents Should Guarantee Women's Rights
KABUL
Ongoing Taliban attacks on women in Afghanistan show why women's
rights should be a priority in any political agreement with insurgent
forces, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. The
Afghan government and its international supporters have ignored the need
to protect women in programs to reintegrate insurgent fighters and have
not guaranteed that women's rights will be included in potential talks
with the Taliban, Human Rights Watch said.
The 65-page report, "The
'Ten-Dollar Talib' and Women's Rights: Afghan Women and the Risks of
Reintegration and Reconciliation,"addresses the potential
challenges to women's rights posed by future government agreements with
insurgent forces. The report describes how in areas under Taliban
control, women are often subjected to threats, intimidation and
violence, girls' education is targeted, and women political leaders and
activists are attacked and killed with impunity.
"Afghan women shouldn't have to give up their rights so the
government can cut a deal with the Taliban," said Tom Malinowski,
Washington director at Human Rights Watch. "It would be a tragic
betrayal to snatch away the progress made by and for women and girls
over the past nine years."
In areas they control or influence, the Taliban have threatened
and attacked women in public life and ordinary women who work outside
their homes. A common form of threat is the "night letter," a note often
left at a house or school.
A female government employee quit her job after receiving this letter
in February 2010: "We Taliban warn you to stop working for the
government otherwise we will take your life away. We will kill you in
such a harsh way that no woman has so far been killed in that manner.
This will be a good lesson for those women like you who are working."
Hossai, a 22-year-old working for an American development
company, received similar threats by phone but continued to work. In
April, unidentified gunmen shot her dead as she left her office. Soon
after, another woman received a night letter telling her that she would
be next: "In the same way that yesterday we have killed Hossai, whose
name was on our list, your name and other women's names are also on our
list."
Taliban and other insurgents regularly target girls' education,
including threatening and attacking female teachers and students. In
February, a girls' school in a northern province received the following
night letter:
"You were already informed by us to close the school and not mislead
the pure and innocent girls under this non-Muslim government; however
you did not pay attention.... This is the last warning to close the
school immediately... If you remain in the province, remember that you
and your family will be eliminated."
There is little sign so far that the government of President Hamid
Karzai is adequately addressing concerns about these attacks in its
programs to reintegrate insurgents or in proposals to shift from
fighting the Taliban to reconciling with senior Taliban leaders, Human
Rights Watch said.
The Afghan government has offered only weak assurances for women that
it intends to safeguard the freedoms they have regained since the fall
of the Taliban government in 2001. In recent years, Karzai has sold
women short when it was politically expedient. In March 2009, for
example, he signed the discriminatory Shia Personal Status Law (which
denies Shia women the rights to child custody and freedom of movement,
among other rights), and in 2008 he pardoned two convicted gang rapists
for political reasons.
Some international advocates of reintegration are recasting the
insurgency as primarily non-ideological, highlighting "ten-dollar
Talibs," who fight only for money. United States and NATO forces and
several major donors are strongly backing reintegration programs, which
they will largely finance. Their support for reconciliation with the
Taliban is more limited.
Despite promises from Afghanistan's international supporters to
promote women's rights, Human Rights Watch remains concerned that they,
too, may sacrifice women's rights as part of an exit strategy from
Afghanistan. For instance, although the Afghan government has said that
insurgents who reintegrate or reconcile with the government will have to
agree to the Afghan constitution, which upholds equal rights for women,
there is no vetting or mechanism to ensure compliance.
Human Rights Watch interviews suggest that there is division among
Afghan and international actors about whether it will be possible to
offer explicit safeguards for women's rights to education, work, and
political engagement.
"Donor governments rightfully stress Afghan leadership of these
processes," Malinowski said. "But that doesn't mean they have to
bankroll Afghan deals that will endanger women."
The Afghan government has sought to co-opt opposition factions by
offering them impunity for war crimes and other serious violations of
international law. But justice and accountability for serious crimes
should be at the core of any reconciliation process with the Taliban and
other insurgents, Human Rights Watch said. That requires bringing
current government officials to justice for serious crimes, as well as
stronger vetting of candidates for elected office and political
appointments.
The report outlines conditions that should be included in any
reintegration and negotiation or reconciliation process to ensure
women's rights. The rights of women to work, obtain an education, and
engage in political life should be explicitly safeguarded, Human Rights
Watch said. Individuals with a history of serious abuses against women
and girls should be excluded from power. And women leaders need to be
fully involved in the decision-making processes for both reintegration
and reconciliation, since they are themselves the best guarantors of
their rights.
"Afghan women are paying a heavy price in this conflict, and no
one wants peace more than they do," Malinowski said. "But their rights
don't have to be traded away in hasty deals. There can be peace with
justice."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and BrasÃlia's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular