March, 19 2009, 09:28am EDT
Morocco: Free Rights Activist
Whistleblower on Drug Trafficking, Chekib el-Khayari, Detained for a Month
RABAT, Morocco
Moroccan authorities are detaining Chekib el-Khayari for his human rights and whistle-blowing activities and should release him immediately, Human Rights Watch said today, after an on-the-ground investigation into the case. El-Khayari has been in detention for four weeks. The court has not yet formally charged him.
On February 21, 2009, el-Khayari appeared in a Casablanca court before Investigating Judge Jamal Serhane. The judge questioned el-Khayari on accusations that he had "undermined" or insulted state institutions or officials, an infraction punishable by a fine and up to one year in prison, under articles 263 and 265 of the penal code, said Mohamed Khattab, one of his lawyers, who was at the hearing. An official statement issued after el-Khayari's arrest added that he was also being investigated for having taken money from "foreign parties" to discredit the efforts taken by Moroccan authorities to combat drug-trafficking.
"El-Khayari has now been in pretrial detention for a month, and all Moroccan authorities can come up with is that he denigrated state efforts to suppress drug-trafficking," said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "It is clear that the progress Morocco has made in freedom of expression does not apply to whistleblowers."
El-Khayari, president of the Association for Human Rights in the Rif, was taken into custody on February 17, 2009, when he responded to a summons to report to the National Brigade of the Judicial Police in Casablanca. The following morning, plainclothes police searched his home in Nador, in northeast Morocco, without showing a warrant, confiscating his computer and papers related to the association.
El-Khayari remains in a cell by himself in Oukacha prison in Casablanca. Judge Serhane refused to release him pending trial. No date has been set for the second hearing before the investigating judge.
Before his arrest, el-Khayari made numerous statements to the international media and in conferences in Europe, questioning the diligence of Moroccan authorities in suppressing the smuggling of illegal drugs from Morocco to Spain. El-Khayari is also an activist on behalf of Amazigh (Berber) rights. He has criticized mistreatment by Moroccan security forces of migrants from other African countries who are trying to enter Europe clandestinely, and of Moroccan citizens by both Moroccan and Spanish security forces at the nearby frontier with the Spanish enclave of Melilla.
The repressive actions by Moroccan authorities make clear their intention to pressure el-Khayari and intimidate other human rights activists, regardless of the outcome of this court case, the Human Rights Watch research indicates. First, Investigating Judge Serhane refused to release el-Khayari provisionally. Moreover, according to Khattab and Ahmed Arhemouch, another of el-Khayari's lawyers, Judge Serhane has so far refused to provide the defense team access to el-Khayari's statement to the police, one of the main elements of the case file. Lawyers said the court usually grants prompt access to their clients' case files and called the judge's refusal until now highly unusual.
In Oukacha prison, authorities have refused to allow el-Khayari access to a radio, television or newspapers, even though other prisoners are permitted to have such amenities.
In the Rif, local authorities have blocked nearly all efforts to organize peaceful efforts to demand el-Khayari's release. They refused to give permission to a collective of associations to meet on March 2 in a public meeting hall in Nador to plan solidarity actions. (They did not interfere when the activists gathered instead in a nearby cafe.) Local authorities blocked similar events in the nearby city of el-Hoceima, and one planned for March 17 in the town of Midar. On March 14, police in Nador interrogated Mohamed el-Hammouchi, vice president of the Rif Association for Human Rights, for five hours about, among other things, his contacts with international organizations and about the visit by Human Rights Watch to the region.
Moroccan media have linked the el-Khayari case to the expulsion in early March of a suspected intelligence officer based in the Spanish consulate in Nador who, according to the press, had established close ties with the local civil society. Moroccan-Spanish relations have at times been tense due to drug interdiction policies, illegal migration and the contested Spanish enclaves of Melilla and Ceuta - all issues about which el-Khayari had spoken publicly.
"If there is a credible case against el-Khayari - and everything about their handling of this case suggests otherwise - authorities should charge him promptly with recognizable offenses other than acts of speech and grant him his provisional freedom and a fair trial," said Whitson.
One of his characteristically outspoken interviews aired on Radio Netherlands Worldwide in Arabic on January 16, 2009. (https://www.rnw.nl/hunaamsterdam/mideastafrica/16010905). In that interview, el-Khayari criticized recent arrests of supposed drug-traffickers in the region as a "sham" when the real traffickers "rule the region and even rule the affairs of the entire state from within Parliament. They are present in the major national parties that are in the government." El-Khayari, according to a transcript of the broadcast, named an alleged drug baron in a nearby village, "who is not afraid to say before one and all, 'Just as King Mohamed VI rules in Rabat, so I rule here.'"
In a September 2008 broadcast on M6 French television, el-Khayari can be seen showing the reporter local launching points for drug-laden speedboats and challenging Moroccan security officials over their alleged inaction (https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6r44w_enquete-exclusive-nador-maroc-le-de_news).
"If there are individuals who believe that el-Khayari has defamed them, let them pursue judicial remedies," said Whitson. "But laws that allow imprisonment - either as a pretrial measure or as a sentence - in response to criticism of individuals or of state institutions are incompatible with freedom of expression."
Human Rights Watch visited el-Khayari's parents in Nador on March 14. They said that since the February 18 search of their modest apartment - where Chekib maintains his office - authorities have neither harassed nor intimidated them. El-Khayari's brother Amine and Arhemouch, the lawyer, said that el-Khayari did not report having been physically mistreated while under police interrogation.
In December 2008, another activist, Brahim Sab'alil of the Moroccan Center for Human Rights, completed a six-month prison term on charges of "denigrating public authorities" by attributing to them "false crimes" in reporting that the police were responsible for causing deaths during clashes in the southern city of Sidi Ifni in June 2008.
"Morocco is to its credit experiencing a boom in human rights activity," said Whitson. "But that credit will be fully deserved only when the authorities stop using laws that criminalize speech to silence those who criticize the authorities on sensitive subjects."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular