February, 27 2009, 02:30pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Ed Shelleby 202-662-3602
Evan Holland 310-695-8324
Children's Defense Fund, National Leaders Convene to Address America's Cradle to Prison Pipeline
Heads of NAACP, NCLR, U.S. Conference of Mayors, PolicyLink, and Nearly 200 Young Leaders Meet in Sacramento
SACRAMENTO
Today, the Children's Defense Fund (CDF) and several co-conveners concluded their two-day California/National Cradle to Prison Pipeline
Summit in Sacramento, California. The more than 500 attendees at the
summit shared promising approaches and developed community action plans
to stop the funneling of thousands of children down a pipeline to
prison.
"In America, a Black boy born in 2001 has a 1 in 3 chance of
going to prison in his lifetime, and a Latino boy a 1 in 6 chance, and
yet we spend nearly three times as much on every prisoner as we do per
public school pupil," said CDF President Marian Wright Edelman. "We
gathered in California-which houses the largest prison system in the
United States, incarcerating more than one of every nine prisoners in
America-to share solutions and strategies for rerouting children on a
path to healthy adulthoods and reordering our priorities to save
taxpayer dollars. We must mount a concerted national effort to
dismantle the prison pipeline by eliminating its root causes through
implementation of the promising approaches articulated at the summit."
Co-conveners of the summit included the the NAACP, NCLR, U.S.
Conference of Mayors and PolicyLink, and noted speakers included:
Angela Glover Blackwell, founder and CEO of PolicyLink; Ben Jealous,
president and CEO of the NAACP; the Honorable Kevin Johnson, Mayor of
Sacramento, California; and Jurnee Smollett, actor.
"As a nation, we can ensure that all children reach their
full potential. We must use our vast knowledge about what works to
dismantle the cradle to prison pipeline which hurts so many of our
children," said Angela Glover Blackwell, Founder and CEO of PolicyLink. "Instead
of prison, our children deserve good schools, healthy and safe
communities, and opportunities to thrive. We have a blue print for
action. We must act to save our children."
Summit participants discussed the role of race and poverty in the
pipeline to prison, the importance of reweaving community relationships
and surrounding children and youths with the care and services they
need to succeed. The Summit also highlighted promising approaches to
addressing these challenges.
In September 2007, the Children's Defense Fund facilitated a
national summit in Washington, D.C., to focus attention on the Pipeline
and since then has gathered leaders across the country to plan for
action. The California/National Summit showcased strategies that work
in dismantling the pipeline to prison and engaged a broad range of
people in the search for solutions: policy experts, elected officials
and celebrities involved in education, child welfare, community
revitalization, health and mental health and juvenile justice.
Some 200 youths led and participated in the deliberations of the
first day to help define their own involvement in efforts to dismantle
the prison pipeline. During interactive sessions, they shared
challenges and discussed their personal experiences in the pipeline,
and the interventions that changed their lives. Their report and
recommendations were presented to the entire summit.
"The pipeline to prison is not an act of God; it has been created by our human political choices," said Edelman. "We
know what to do-and now we must call upon our leaders to create and
implement policies that will ensure every child a level playing field
in life so that we dismantle the pipeline to prison and improve the
lives of our children and all Americans."
CDF's Cradle to Prison Pipeline Campaign addresses the
urgent national crisis at the intersection of poverty and race that
puts Black boys born in 2001 at a one in three lifetime risk of going
to jail, and Latino boys at a one in six lifetime risk of the same
fate. The goal of the campaign is to reduce detention and incarceration
by increasing preventive supports and services children need, such as
access to quality early childhood development and education services
and accessible, comprehensive health and mental health coverage.
In California alone:
- 1.6 million children were poor in 2007.
- In 2007, 60% of White, 87% of Black, and 89% of Latino public school fourth graders could not read at grade level.
- In 2007, there were more than 600 juvenile arrests each day.
- In 2005, California lead the nation in number of children or teens (474) who died of firearm injuries.
For more information on CDF's Cradle to Prison Pipeline Campaign, visit www.childrensdefense.org/cradletoprison
The Children's Defense Fund (CDF) is a non-profit child advocacy organization that has worked relentlessly for 35 years to ensure a level playing field for all children. We champion policies and programs that lift children out of poverty; protect them from abuse and neglect; and ensure their access to health care, quality education, and a moral and spiritual foundation.
LATEST NEWS
Senate Tosses 'Dangerous Provision' Preventing State-Level AI Regulation From GOP Megabill
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry," said one advocate.
Jul 01, 2025
With a 99-1 vote early Tuesday, the Republican-controlled Senate decided to remove a controversial provision that would have prevented state-level regulation on artificial intelligence for 10 years from U.S. President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending bill that is currently being debated in Congress.
Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) was the lone lawmaker who voted to keep the moratorium in the bill.
While far from the only controversial part of the reconciliation package, the provision drew opposition from an ideologically diverse group that included Democratic and Republican state attorneys general; over 140 groups working to support children's online safety, consumer protections, and responsible innovation; and faith leaders.
Senators struck Sen. Ted Cruz's (R-Texas) AI measure from the megabill by adopting an amendment introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). They voted on Blackburn's amendment during a session known as a vote-a-rama. Blackburn introduced the amendment after considering an agreement that would have watered down the provision.
According to The Verge, the measure that was rejected on Tuesday required states to avoid regulation AI and "automated decision systems" if they wanted to get funding for their broadband programs.
The provision would have been a major win for Big Tech, which has made the case that state laws around AI are obstructing their ability to do business.
Advocates and Democratic lawmakers cheered the decision to strip the provision.
"From the start, this provision had Big Tech's money and lobbyists all over it. This is a major victory for the American people over the AI industry. It shows that Americans are aware of the proliferation of AI harms in real time," said J.B. Branch, Big Tech accountability advocate at the watchdog group Public Citizen.
Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) said Tuesday that "early this morning, the Senate overwhelmingly voted to reject a dangerous provision to block states from regulating artificial intelligence, including protecting kids online. This 99-1 vote sent a clear message that Congress will not sell out our kids and local communities in order to pad the pockets of Big Tech billionaires."
In addition to concerns focused on Big Tech, experts recently told The Guardian that in the absence of state-level AI regulation, untrammeled growth of AI would take a toll on the world's "dangerously overheating climate."
Sacha Haworth, the executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, credited the "massive" defeat of Cruz's provision to the "incredible mobilizing by advocates to beat back Big Tech lobbying and last-minute bullying."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular