

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Johanna Kichton, People’s Action, j.kichton@peoplesaction.org, +1 202 660 0605
Jessica Bassett, Health GAP, jessica@healthgap.org, +1 518 593 7628
Michael Galant, galant.michael.r@gmail.com, +1 203 260 4654
Hundreds of demonstrators marched through the streets today, stopping at the German Consulate and Pfizer Headquarters, where they peacefully blocked traffic for an hour, first on 42 St and then at the intersection of 42 St and 2 Ave, as they called on Chancellor Merkel and pharmaceutical corporations to stop blocking billions of people from accessing life-saving COVID-19 vaccines by limiting global vaccine production.
Starting at Dag Hammarskjold Plaza at 10am, about 100 demonstrators marched first to the German Consulate, where they called on Chancellor Angela Merkel to stop obstructing a waiver of World Trade Organization (WTO) intellectual property rules that are impeding global production of Covid-19 medical supplies and vaccines.
Holding signs reading "END COVID EVERYWHERE" and "PHARMA GREED COULD KILL US ALL," and chanting "vaccines for all" and "vaccine apartheid no more," the march continued to the headquarters of Pfizer, where demonstrators sat down and linked arms in protest of the pharmaceutical industry's role in lobbying to prevent an intellectual property rights waiver and refusal to share their vaccine recipes. "Pfizer Blocks Vaccines, We Block Pfizer" read one sign. This peaceful blockade halted access to the Pfizer building and blocked traffic for about an hour.
"On behalf of Partners In Health and all our allies across the world, we call on Chancellor Merkel to join the 150 other heads of state to waive patents and aid in an urgent, collaborative, and comprehensive global vaccine effort to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Everywhere, for everyone." -- Joia Mukherjee, Chief Medical Officer, Partners In Health
"The technology to save millions of people exists, but powerful people bankrolled by Pfizer continue to block access to this critical and lifesaving information. So today we blocked them. This crisis will never end unless we come together against big corporate bullies and demand that power back." -- Tobita Chow, Director, Justice is Global
"The COVID era is far from over, and we must all commit to a truly global response to this global threat. What we saw in New York is a people demanding a safer world for everyone, where no community or country gets left behind. We join our allies in asking Chancellor Merkel to support a TRIPS Waiver and asking President Biden to devote the full resources of his office to vaccinate the world." -- Vinay Krishnan, National Field Organizer, Center for Popular Democracy Action
"We have to sound the alarm. Pfizer wants to reap billions in profit from boosters in the richest countries while virtually no one in sub Saharan Africa has had even one dose. This is depraved. Merkel--and Biden--must be forced to rein them in. It is not exaggerating to call this a crime against humanity." -- Emily Sanderson, Senior Coordinator, Grassroots Advocacy, Health GA
"We have the technology to end the pandemic, for everyone, everywhere. But powerful corporations and the politicians who serve them have chosen to put private profits before public health. It's up to us to fight for a world that puts people first." -- Michael Galant, member of the International Committee of the Democratic Socialists of America
BACKGROUND: These demands came as a part of a nationwide series of protests in advance of Chancellor Merkel's planned meeting with President Biden on Thursday. Merkel is one of the last remaining opponents blocking a proposal at the WTO to remove intellectual property rights barriers on COVID-19 vaccines and treatments. Merkel's obstruction, together with that of Pfizer and other pharmaceutical giants, comes while a wave of 60% more transmissible delta-variant COVID-19 infection is resulting in terrifying spikes in preventable infection and death in the global South that have been denied vaccine access.
Artificial supply scarcity brought about by unchecked monopoly power, alongside vaccine dose hoarding by the wealthiest countries, has robbed the countries of the global South the widespread immunity that is being built up in high income countries. In the region of sub Saharan Africa, 1.3% of the population is fully vaccinated. While 3 billion COVID-19 vaccines have been administered globally, only 1.6% of those doses have been administered in Africa. Across the continent COVID-19 cases have surged by 52% and deaths increased by 32%. In June, COVID-19 cases surged by 1000% in Uganda, fueled by the delta variant. Only 4,000 of Uganda's 45 million people are fully vaccinated.
Photos from the event may be found here, with more to be added.
People's Action builds the power of poor and working people, in rural, suburban, and urban areas to win change through issue campaigns and elections.
"No reason given. No one, not even military users, were apparently given advanced warning," said one veteran journalist. "Aside from 9/11, I can't remember anything like that."
The is a developing story... Please check back for possible updates...
Speculation and alarm was triggered overnight after the Federal Aviation Administration late Tuesday, with nothing more than "special security reasons” given as a reason, ordered the suspension of all incoming and outgoing flights from the airport in El Paso, Texas.
"What on Earth is going on?" asked Franklin Leonard, a contributing editor with Vanity Fair, in a reaction to the news—given the limited information provided by the federal government—that was similarly expressed by many online.
In a post on Instagram, the El Paso International Airport said, "All flights to and from El Paso are grounded, including commercial, cargo and general aviation. The FAA has issued a flight restriction halting all flights to and from El Paso effective from February 10 at 11:30 PM (MST) to February 20 at 11:30PM (MST)." No further details were given and passengers were told to contact their carrier for status on specific flights.
Speculation on social media—including concerns about US military operations, connections to President Donald Trump's sweeping deportation operations, and other unsubstantiated notions—was rife in the early hours of Wednesday morning as word spread of the closure. Others simply noted the unusual nature of the FAA order.
"So this is really strange," John Stempkin, a veteran news producer with NPR, said of the unexplained closure. "No reason given. No one, not even military users, were apparently given advanced warning. Aside from 9/11, I can't remember anything like that."
A statement from the airport said the grounding order had been given “on short notice” and that it was waiting for additional guidance from the FAA. In its notice, the FAA said the federal government “may use deadly force” against aircraft violating the airspace and determined to pose “an imminent security threat.”
The grounding of flights, noted the Associated Press, "is likely to create significant disruptions given the duration and the size of the metropolitan area. El Paso, a border city with a population of nearly 700,000 and larger when you include the surrounding metro area, is hub of cross-border commerce alongside neighboring Ciudad Juarez in Mexico."
Reached by phone early Wednesday by the New York Times for his reaction, Representative Joaquin Castro, a Democrat who represents San Antonio, said he had no idea what was going on. “Sorry, I don’t have some clear answer,” Castro told the Times. Asked if he was surprised, the lawmaker simply said, “Yes.”
"They tried to have me charged with a crime—all because of something I said that they didn’t like," said Sen. Mark Kelly. "That’s not the way things work in America."
A federal grand jury on Tuesday declined to go along with an effort by the Trump Justice Department to indict Democratic lawmakers involved in a November video reminding members of the US military of their duty to refuse illegal orders, a message that came as President Donald Trump deployed troops to major American cities.
The failed attempt to indict the six Democratic lawmakers was led by Trump loyalist Jeanine Pirro, a former Fox News host who is now serving as US attorney for the District of Columbia. The New York Times reported that federal prosecutors "sought to persuade the grand jurors that the lawmakers had violated a statute that forbids interfering with the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the US armed forces."
Trump, who has repeatedly weaponized the Justice Department against his political opponents, erupted in response to the 90-second video, accusing the Democratic lawmakers behind it of "seditious behavior, punishable by death."
The lawmakers who appeared in the video were Sens. Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan as well as Reps. Jason Crow of Colorado, Chrissy Houlahan and Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania, and Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire. The Democrats learned they were under investigation last month when they received inquiries from Pirro's office.
Lawmakers and legal observers said it was deeply alarming that the DOJ even tried to secure the indictment.
"What an ugly assault on the First Amendment and on Congress," said legal scholar Ryan Goodman. "Thankfully, thwarted."
Kelly, a retired Navy captain who is facing Pentagon attempts to censure him and cut his military benefits, said the effort to indict him and his fellow Democratic lawmakers was "an outrageous abuse of power by Donald Trump and his lackies."
"It wasn’t enough for Pete Hegseth to censure me and threaten to demote me, now it appears they tried to have me charged with a crime—all because of something I said that they didn’t like," Kelly wrote on social media. "That’s not the way things work in America."
We want to speak directly to members of the Military and the Intelligence Community.
The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution.
Don’t give up the ship. pic.twitter.com/N8lW0EpQ7r
— Sen. Elissa Slotkin (@SenatorSlotkin) November 18, 2025
Slotkin, a former CIA officer who organized the November video, said Pirro pursued the indictment "at the direction of President Trump, who said repeatedly that I should be investigated, arrested, and hanged for sedition."
"Today, it was a grand jury of anonymous American citizens who upheld the rule of law and determined this case should not proceed. Hopefully, this ends this politicized investigation for good," the senator said. "But today wasn’t just an embarrassing day for the administration. It was another sad day for our country."
"Because whether or not Pirro succeeded is not the point. It’s that President Trump continues to weaponize our justice system against his perceived enemies," Slotkin added. "No matter what President Trump and Pirro continue to do with this case, tonight we can score one for the Constitution, our freedom of speech, and the rule of law."
Sen. Ron Wyden called the tax giveaway "indefensible at a time when so many Americans are getting battered by inflation and barely staying afloat."
Nearly all US Senate Republicans on Tuesday voted to block a resolution that would have reversed a Trump administration regulatory change set to give some of the country's richest companies a $10.3 billion tax break.
The Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution was spearheaded by Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Angus King (I-Maine). The vote on whether to advance it was 47-51. The only Republican to vote in favor was the other Mainer, Susan Collins, who just confirmed she is running for another term, despite two strong Democratic challengers.
In a statement after the vote, Wyden tied the target of his resolution—an Internal Revenue Service guidance undermining the corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT)—to the sweeping budget package that GOP lawmakers passed and President Donald Trump signed last summer, which also featured significant tax breaks for the rich.
"The ink is barely dry on the megabill Trump and Republicans passed to give $1 trillion in new tax breaks to giant corporations, and now his Treasury Department is throwing another $10 billion handout to the most profitable corporations in America," Wyden said.
"The pattern we're seeing is that the Trump administration gives big corporations and ultrawealthy donors whatever tax benefits they want the second they walk through the door at the Treasury Department, but that doesn't mean the Senate has to allow this giveaway to happen," he stressed. "Stuffing $10 billion into the coffers of corporations that are already raking in enormous profits is indefensible at a time when so many Americans are getting battered by inflation and barely staying afloat."
King similarly declared that "it's downright unfair to give billions in tax relief to America's most successful corporations when Maine people are struggling to afford their prescription drugs, childcare, and groceries." He described their resolution as "a commonsense step toward a fairer tax policy that prioritizes people over profits and levels the playing field."
Although the defeat was predictable, economic justice advocates lambasted Senate Republicans for killing the resolution.
Americans for Tax Fairness executive director David Kass said in a statement that "after passing historic tax giveaways for billionaires and big business through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBA), blowing up the deficit, and cutting billions from critical healthcare and nutrition programs to pay for it, Trump and his GOP allies in the Senate are taking every opportunity to ensure economic elites can avoid paying their fair share."
"This guidance would effectively circumvent Congress and create numerous opportunities for corporate tax evasion while increasing the deficit and national debt, thus creating more imbalance in a tax code that already favors the wealthy and large corporations," Kass said. "Sen. Wyden is right to lead the charge to stop this guidance—average Americans should not be forced to subsidize some of the most profitable companies on Earth."
Like the Senate, the House of Representatives is also narrowly controlled by the GOP. Matt Gardner, a senior fellow at the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, noted in a Tuesday blog post that "even if lawmakers of both parties had sufficient backbone to retake the legislative power that the executive branch has usurped, President Trump would veto such a bill."
"But as a matter of educating lawmakers and the public, the recently rejected measure was a success given that tax legislation (such as this resolution) up for a vote in Congress usually gets an official budget score from Congress' revenue estimators at the Joint Committee on Taxation," he wrote. "And in this case, that reveals that this unilateral corporate tax cut from the Trump administration will cost $10 billion over a decade unless it is reversed."
"The Senate's failure to ratify Wyden's resolution may be only the opening salvo for members of Congress who want to retake the power given them under the Constitution to make tax law," Gardner suggested. "The regulation in question is not the first, and surely not the last, attempt by President Trump to unilaterally cut corporate taxes."