January, 25 2013, 10:43am EDT
FSIS Announces Major Cut in Import Inspections Four Years After It Took Effect
Advocacy Group Says Public Comment on Gutted Import Safety Inspections “Too Little, Too Late”; Chinese Poultry Soon to Come Under “Self-Reported” Inspections
WASHINGTON
Today, USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) published a Notice in the Federal Register that it has made a major change to the way it conducts inspections of countries that are eligible to export meat, poultry and egg products to the U.S. (Ongoing Equivalence Verifications of Foreign Regulatory Systems, Docket No. FSIS-2012-0049). The agency is also requesting public comments on this change. Food & Water Watch, a national consumer organization, says the announcement and accompanying public comment period regarding changes in the import inspection program are too little, too late, since the change took place four years ago, at the beginning of the first Obama Administration.
"It is time for the Obama Administration to fund this vital consumer protection program adequately and stop trying to rationalize the ways it has weakened it," said Hauter. "Publishing a Federal Register Notice four years after the fact and requesting comments on the new policy is both futile and insulting."
Until 2009, FSIS conducted in-depth annual on-site audits of countries that are eligible to export meat, poultry and egg products to the U.S. The system that FSIS used has been hailed as a model for other food safety agencies both here and abroad to ensure the safety of imported food. Apparently in 2009, a major change occurred when FSIS stopped visiting countries annually and instead started to rely on a "Self-Reporting Tool" for countries as a substitute to annual audit visits; countries were self-reporting that they were in compliance with USDA food safety and inspection standards. FSIS began conducting audit visits every three years instead of annually and the agency stopped the practice of publishing the audit results of individual foreign meat, poultry, egg plants that exported products to the U.S.
Food & Water Watch recently filed a Freedom of information Act request for those plant audits and has received 155 pages of documents in response.
This new policy remained under the radar screen until the fall of 2012 when both the former Under Secretary for Food Safety for the George W. Bush Administration Richard Raymond and Helena Bottemiller of Food Safety News exposed it. Food & Water Watch also became concerned as early as February 2010 when the Obama Administration proposed its FY 2011 budget that showed a 15.8 percent reduction in the FSIS budget for international programs.
The Federal Register Notice that will appear tomorrow is announcing a change the agency has already made. The agency has rationalized its decision to reduce the number of foreign audits based on vague recommendations made by USDA's National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection in August 2008. Both members of that Committee and former Under Secretary for Food Safety Richard Raymond, have stated that they never contemplated that FSIS would gut the import inspection program the way it has.
Because FSIS stopped its practice of annual audits, Canada experienced its largest meat recall in history in the fall of 2012 that also spilled over into the U.S., with some 2.5 million pounds of imported contaminated beef entering U.S. commerce. Because FSIS stopped its annual audits, the number of rejections of Australian meat products for fecal contamination has skyrocketed over the past year.
The Obama Administration has cut the budget for the import inspection program at FSIS, despite the fact that Congress has appropriated the money that the Obama Administration requested. In the meantime, the Obama Administration is moving forward with plans to import processed poultry products from the People's Republic of China and South Korea at a time when FSIS cannot adequately monitor the safety of imports from the countries that already export their products here.
"We're not just importing China's food--we're importing China's food safety problems along with it," said Hauter. "It's doubly important to fund our import food inspection programs adequately as more foods from abroad reach our shores."
Food & Water Watch works to ensure the food, water and fish we consume is safe, accessible and sustainable. So we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of where their food comes from, keep clean, affordable, public tap water flowing freely to our homes, protect the environmental quality of oceans, force government to do its job protecting citizens, and educate about the importance of keeping shared resources under public control.
Food & Water Watch mobilizes regular people to build political power to move bold and uncompromised solutions to the most pressing food, water, and climate problems of our time. We work to protect people's health, communities, and democracy from the growing destructive power of the most powerful economic interests.
(202) 683-2500LATEST NEWS
'Appalling': US Funded Secret Industry Network Targeting Pesticide Critics
"It's one thing to have an industry come after you after publishing a critical article. This happens all the time in journalism," said writer Michael Pollan, one of those featured in the corporate files. "But to have your own government pay for it is outrageous."
Sep 27, 2024
New reporting published Friday exposes how U.S. taxpayer money was used to fund an elaborate effort by pesticide industry insiders to create detailed dossiers on public critics and environmentalist activists opposed to the widespread pollution created by agrochemical corporations.
The investigation was spearheaded by the nonprofit outlet Lighthouse Reports in collaboration with numerous outlets from around the globe, including The Guardian, Le Monde, The New Lede, ABC News, and the New Humanitarian. It details how outspoken critics of the pesticide paraquat—described as "among the most toxic agricultural chemicals ever produced"—were targeted by an "influence machine that works to suppress opposition to an $78 billion global industry."
While use of paraquat is banned in the European Union, it is still actively sold and applied on fields and farms in much of the world despite the documented harms it produces.
The year-long investigation, according to Lighthouse,
managed to penetrate a PR operation that casts those who raise the alarm, from pesticide critics to environmental scientists or sustainability campaigners, as an anti-science "protest industry," and used U.S. government money to do so.
The U.S.-based PR firm, v-Fluence, built profiles on hundreds of scientists, campaigners and writers, whilst coordinating with government officials, to counter global resistance to pesticides. These profiles are published on a private social network, which grants privileged entry to 1,000 people. The network's membership roster is a who's-who of the agrochemical industry and its friends, featuring executives from some of the world's largest pesticide companies alongside government officials from multiple countries.
These members can access profiles on more than 3,000 organisations and 500 people who have been critical of pesticides or Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). They come from all over the world and include scientists, U.N. human right experts, environmentalists, and journalists. Many of the profiles divulge personal details about the subjects, such as their home addresses and telephone numbers, and spotlight criticisms that disparage their work. Lawyers have told us this goes against data privacy laws in several countries.
The investigative team also released this video on Instagram detailing their findings:
Environmental writer and activist George Monbiot called the revelations "deeply shocking and appalling," and described the story as one which detailed how the U.S. government "funded attacks, denial, and outright lies to protect the pesticides industry from its critics."
The Guardian's reporting details how v-Influence—founded by former Monsanto executive Jay Byrne—received U.S. taxpayer dollars by subcontracting with another group that received a large USAID grant:
Public spending records show the USAID contracted with the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), a non-governmental organization that manages a government initiative to introduce GM crops in African and Asian nations.
In turn, IFPRI paid v-Fluence a little more than $400,000 from roughly 2013 through 2019 for services that included counteracting critics of "modern agriculture approaches"in Africa and Asia.
v-Fluence was to set up the "private social network portal" that would, among other things, provide "tactical support" for efforts to gain acceptance for the GM crops.
The reporting noted that prominent food writers, including Michael Pollan and Mark Bittman (both of whom have written critically of industrial agriculture), were among those listed in the private network to which industry heavyweights were given invite-only access.
"It's one thing to have an industry come after you after publishing a critical article. This happens all the time in journalism," Pollan told the Guardian. "But to have your own government pay for it is outrageous. These are my tax dollars at work."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Israeli Strikes Displace 140,000 Kids in Lebanon as Netanyahu Vows to Keep Bombing
"It is still possible to avert a humanitarian catastrophe, but we must act now," said Save the Children's country director in Lebanon.
Sep 27, 2024
An estimated 140,000 children have been displaced just this week by Israeli bombings in Lebanon, attacks that have killed close to 700 people and pushed the region to the precipice of a full-scale war.
Save the Children, a leading humanitarian group, said Thursday that the 140,000 kids forced from their homes over the past four days bring Lebanon's total number of displaced children to at least 175,000 people. Overall, half a million people have been displaced in Lebanon in the nearly 12 months of sustained violence that followed the Hamas-led October 7 attack on Israel.
Jennifer Moorehead, Save the Children's country director in Lebanon, said that "many children's lives, rights and futures have already been turned upside down and now their capacity to cope with this escalating crisis has been eroded."
"Children are telling us that it feels like danger is everywhere, and they can never be safe. Every loud sound makes them jump now," said Moorehead. "It is still possible to avert a humanitarian catastrophe, but we must act now. We urge all parties to immediately de-escalate tensions and for international actors to pressure all parties to comply with international humanitarian law. This must happen now to prevent further suffering for children and their families."
A sanitation technician identified as Mahmoud told Save the Children that he witnessed families "completely devastated" at a shelter in Beirut, the Lebanese capital to which many fled in panic to escape large-scale Israeli strikes.
"One woman was carrying her child along with several bags. Another woman's child fell from her arms. The situation was tragic, and simply heartbreaking," said Mahmoud. "People are still arriving, there are families sitting on the floor, waiting to be organized between different rooms. There was also an incredible mobilization by the community, with volunteers showing up to support, bringing pillows, bags, anything they could to help others."
Dozens of children and roughly 100 women have been killed this week by the Israeli military, which claims it is targeting the Lebanese political party and paramilitary group Hezbollah. The Associated Pressreported Friday that "among many in Lebanon, there is fear that Israel’s military operations in Lebanon would follow the same Gaza playbook: Evacuation orders, mass displacement, and overwhelming airstrikes."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that Israel's forces "will not stop" its attacks on Lebanon "until we achieve all of our objectives," rebuffing calls from the U.S. and other nations for a three-week cease-fire on the Lebanon-Israel border.
On Friday, Netanyahu's office said Israel "shares the aims of the U.S.-led initiative of enabling people along our northern border to return safely and securely to their homes" but would not commit to a cease-fire deal. Netanyahu has repeatedly tanked cease-fire efforts in the Gaza Strip, where Israeli forces have killed more than 41,500 people over the past year in an assault fueled by more than 50,000 tons of U.S.-supplied weaponry.
Israel's escalatory attacks on Lebanon and Hezbollah's rocket fire have heightened fears of a cataclysmic war. With Israel reportedly getting ready for a ground invasion of Lebanon and countries preparing to evacuate their citizens, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres warned this week that "hell is breaking loose."
"To all sides, let us say in one clear voice: Stop the killing and destruction. Tone down the rhetoric and threats. Step back from the brink," Guterres said during a meeting of the U.N. Security Council.
An all-out war, the U.N. chief added, "would surely be an all-out catastrophe."
Keep ReadingShow Less
X Suspends Journalist Ken Klippenstein Over Publication of JD Vance Dossier
"The 'free speech absolutist' has once again silenced a journalist he didn't like," said one observer.
Sep 26, 2024
X—the social media platform formerly known as Twitter—suspended Ken Klippenstein's account Thursday after the investigative journalist posted an article containing a link to a dossier on Republican U.S. vice presidential candidate JD Vance that allegedly came from an Iranian hack of former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign.
Klippenstein, who formerly worked at The Intercept, said on his paid Substack Thursday that his X account was suspended for violating the platform's ban on posting private information.
"I know that it is general practice to delete 'private' information from leaks and classified documents, but in this case, not only is Vance an elected official and vice presidential candidate, but the information is readily available for anyone to buy," he wrote. Vance is also the junior U.S. senator from Ohio.
Klippenstein continued:
We should be honest about so-called private information contained in the dossier and "private" information in general. It is readily available to anyone who can buy it. The campaign purchased this information from commercial information brokers. Those dealers make huge profits from selling this data. And the media knows it, because they buy the data for reporting purposes, just like the campaign. They don't like to mention that though.
According to Klippenstein, the corporate media has "been sitting on" the dossier since June, "declining to publish in fear of finding itself at odds with the government's campaign against 'foreign malign influence.'"
"If the document had been hacked by some 'Anonymous'-like hacker group, the news media would be all over it," he contended. "I'm just not a believer of the news media as an arm of the government, doing its work combatting foreign influence. Nor should it be a gatekeeper of what the public should know."
Klippenstein shared a general overview of the contents of the dossier, which he described as "a 271-page research paper the Trump campaign prepared to vet" Vance, pulling out select quotes from the document:
- "Vance has been one of the chief obstructionists to U.S. efforts to providing [sic] assistance to Ukraine."
- "Vance criticized public health experts and elected officials for supporting Black Lives Matter protests while condemning anti-lockdown [Covid] protests."
- "Vance 'embraced non-interventionism."
- "In 2020, Vance criticized President Trump's airstrike killing Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, worrying it would continue to bog down America in the Middle East to the advantage of China."
- "Vance suggested that the country had been entangled in wars in the Middle East so 'financial elites' could profit from the rise of China."
"While the news media has paraphrased some of the contents of the dossier, what they haven't done is provide the American people with the underlying document, in the language in which it appeared, so they can decide for themselves what they think," Klippenstein said. "You decide for yourself."
An X spokesperson toldZeteo's Justin Baragona that "Ken Klippenstein was temporarily suspended for violating our rules on posting unredacted private personal information, specifically Sen. Vance's physical addresses and the majority of his Social Security number."
The Federal Bureau of Investigation is investigating the Trump campaign's claim of an Iranian hack. Iran's government denies any such action.
Numerous observers accused Musk—a self-described "free speech absolutist"—of hypocrisy over X's suspension of Klippenstein's account, although it is not known if the billionaire owner had any role in the decision. Other users also reported punitive action against their accounts over the dossier post.
"I'm old enough to remember when free speech zealot Elon Musk was outraged by Twitter's censorship," journalist Seth Hettena said on X.
Jacobin writer Branko Marcetic posted that "this scenario is actually a good preview of the future none of us want, but that we're heading to currently: A major story breaks, establishment press refuses to cover it, and the indy media that does is throttled by tech censors."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular