December, 23 2008, 11:43am EDT
Rights Groups Demand CIA Turn Over 49 Cables Relating to Use of Waterboarding
Lawsuit Seeks Further CIA and DOJ Documents about Secret Detention, Rendition, and Torture Program
NEW YORK
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) must turn over information
regarding 49 cables it has admitted it has in its possession related to
the waterboarding of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, said three prominent human
rights groups today. The groups-Amnesty International USA (AIUSA), the
Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), and the International Human
Rights Clinic at NYU School of Law's Center for Human Rights and Global
Justice (NYU IHRC/CHRGJ)-filed the papers Monday night, as part of an
ongoing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit they have brought
against multiple government agencies, including the CIA, seeking
information on the administration's secret detention, rendition, and
torture program.
The human rights advocates are challenging the agency's refusal to
provide these cables related to the waterboarding of Mr. Mohammed,
charging that the government has already publicly admitted the former
ghost detainee and current Guantanamo detainee was waterboarded while
being held in the CIA's secret detention program. However, in response
to this FOIA litigation, the CIA has refused to adhere to its most
basic disclosure obligations.
"We can no longer allow the details of the calculated program of
torture inflicted on detainees within U.S. custody to remain secret,"
said CCR Staff Attorney Gitanjali Gutierrez. "Where convenient, the
U.S. government has acknowledged the use of specific torture
practices. Yet, the government continues to hide behind improper
classification arguments in this case. The public has a right to know
what is being done in our name."
The CIA also refused to confirm or deny the existence of cables between
the CIA and field operatives regarding the use of coercive
interrogation techniques on Abu Zubaydah and Mr. Mohammed. In addition,
the agency continues to deny communications between the United States
and the Yemeni government relating to other detainees-such as Yemeni
national Mohamed Bashmilah, who survived years of secret detention,
only to be released without any acknowledgment or explanation for his
treatment-despite the fact that the Yemeni government has itself
acknowledged such communications took place. The rights groups in the
case challenged as disingenuous the government's assertion that the
very acknowledgment that such records exist will cause any harm to
national security.
"The CIA's refusal to simply acknowledge the existence of documents
that have been widely reported on shows once again how it chooses
national security over human rights and smoke and mirrors over
transparency," said Jayne Huckerby, Research Director of CHRGJ. "In
the wake of the 2008 U.S. election, we are hopeful that this country's
renewed commitment to human rights will make the CIA's obfuscation a
relic of the past."
In response to the lawsuit brought jointly by AIUSA, CCR and NYU
IHRC/CHRGJ, the CIA admitted to having 10,000 documents relating to the
FOIA request. However, agency officials refused to release the vast
majority of those documents and failed to provide adequate explanation.
"It is essential that the U.S. public be able to see for itself the
shocking details of this government's torture policy and practices,"
said Curt Goering, AIUSA's Senior Deputy Executive Director. "Without
such a reckoning, the country can not, will not, and should not
relegate this dark chapter to the history books."
Background
AIUSA, CCR, and NYU IHRC/CHRGJ have filed FOIA requests with several
U.S. government agencies, including the CIA. They filed the lawsuit in
June of 2007. Morrison & Foerster LLP serves as co-counsel in the
case. The FOIA litigation seeks information about individuals who
are-or have been-held by the U.S. government or detained with U.S.
involvement, as part of the government's ghost detention, rendition,
and coercive interrogation program. The requests also sought
information about the government's legal justifications for its secret
detention and extraordinary rendition programs. Comprehensive
information about the identities and locations of prisoners in CIA
custody-as well as the conditions of their detention and the specific
interrogation methods used against them-has never been publicly
revealed. The rights groups charge that this lack of transparency
continues to prevent scrutiny by the public or the courts and leaves
detainees vulnerable to abuse and torture.
The CIA did release some documents in response to the FOIA
request-including communications between members of Congress and the
CIA, and documents related to congressional briefings. However, the
CIA and other government agencies have withheld thousands of pages of
records, hiding thousands of documents responsive to the requests
behind classification arguments.
In its legal filings, the CIA has acknowledged that this program "will
continue." Some prisoners have been transferred to prisons in other
countries for proxy detention where they face the risk of torture and
where they continue to be held secretly, without charge or trial.
Human rights reports indicate that the fate and whereabouts of at least
30 people believed to have been held in secret U.S. custody remain
unknown.
To learn more about this case, click here.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. CCR is committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.
(212) 614-6464LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular