March, 10 2022, 03:37pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Jennifer K. Falcon, Indigenous Environmental Network, Fossil Free Media, 218- 760-9958 , jennifer@ienearth.
Cassidy DiPaola, cassidy@fossilfree.media
Congress Introduces Windfall Profit Tax on Big Oil; Stop Big Oil War Profiteering and Use Revenue to Help Families and Consumers
Sen. Whitehouse and Rep. Khanna introduce a bill to put windfall profits tax on Big Oil and use the profits to send a check to every American.
WASHINGTON
Today, Senators Sheldon Whitehouse, Jeff Merkley, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Tammy Baldwin, Sherrod Brown, Ed Markey, Cory Booker, Bob Casey, Jack Reed, Michael Bennet and Richard Blumenthal and Representative Ro Khanna introduced new legislation that would levy a tax on the massive windfall profits made by fossil fuel companies because of the war in Ukraine.
In 2021 alone, Exxon Mobil, Shell, BP, and Chevron made a combined $75 billion in profits and they're currently raking in billions more. New data released today by Friends of the Earth and BailoutWatch shows that Big Oil CEOs have sold millions of dollars worth of shares, profiting a combined total of almost $99 million, in the weeks since President Biden said that he was certain Russia would invade Ukraine. Instead of using those profits to provide a stable supply of oil and gas or invest in climate solutions, Big Oil has spent a near record amount on billions of dollars worth of stock buybacks designed to enrich wealthy shareholders and their CEOs.
The proposed windfall tax legislation would tax the excess profit from barrels sold over the average Brent crude price between 2015-2019, roughly $66 a barrel. It's estimated this could raise around $35-40 billion a year that would be directly sent to consumers in the form of relief checks to help ease the burden of high fossil fuel prices.
Below are statements from leading climate, social justice, and environmental organizations:
"We applaud Senator Whitehouse and Representative Khanna for their leadership in putting a stop to Big Oil's profiteering at the expense of ordinary Americans" said Zorka Milin, Senior Advisor at Global Witness. "As the US' biggest fossil fuel companies report near-record profits and seek to exploit the war in Ukraine for political and economic gain, America is getting a wake-up call to end its reliance on volatile and destructive fossil fuels."
"As the former Director of Oil and Gas for the State of Alaska, I can assure you that the oil and gas industry must be forced to pay for the transition away from fossil fuels," said Kay Brown, Arctic Policy Director for Pacific Environment. "The federal government must manage the energy transition if we are to solve the climate crisis and stop the industry from price gouging American families - and that should include a windfall profits tax that captures Americans' fair share of revenues to scale clean energy and weather the climate storms to come."
"All-American oil oligarchs are profiteering off the war in Ukraine while sacrificing our communities and climate," said Lukas Ross, Program Manager at Friends of the Earth. "The windfall profits tax will require Big Oil to pay their fair share while putting billions of dollars back into the pockets of taxpayers."
"During the 2021 Winter Storm, the fossil fuel companies gouged Texans while people froze and died, now they are at it again during the war in Ukraine. They should not profit off of human misery! Windfall profits should aid people who are in need and fund new investments in an economy that weans us off of fossil fuels into a brighter, healthier future of reliable, stable clean energy. Three cheers for this legislation!" said Robin Schneider, Executive Director, Texas Campaign for the Environment
"The oil and gas industry got the world into this mess by lobbying and lying to keep us hooked on fossil fuels. Now they're using the war in Ukraine to distract us from the fact that they are ripping off hard working Americans with high gas prices as they reap record earnings" said Richard Wiles, president of the Center for Climate Integrity. "It's time we stop allowing Big Oil to use its record profits, earned on the backs of hard working American families, to reward wealthy shareholders and CEOs, and instead make them pay a fair share to lower the cost for consumers."
"Reimagining our Biosphere void of environmental violence will take brave spaces and restorative justice with the love and respect our future generations deserve," said Renee Millard-Chacon, Co Founder/Executive Director of Womxn from the Mountain, EJ Action Taskforce CDPHE
"Fossil fuel cartels right here in the United States have been profiting off of calamities they've engendered with impunity for too long. Environmental justice communities from the Gulf South to our Indigenous family in Alaska continue to be inured, dehumanized, and sacrificed by this industry in the same way innocent Ukranians are right now by a slicked up war over gas, oil and petroleum," offered Anthony Karefa Rogers-Wright, Director of Environmental Justice with New York Lawyers for the Public Interest. "The Windfall Profits Tax is a key weapon to instigate Big Oil's Waterloo and stop them from using the crisis in Europe to generate more blood money, while also ensuring EJ communities hit first and worst, and suffering from the highest energy burdens are given relief and retribution. We're flipping the script - instead of paying the pipers, we're finally going to make the pipers pay."
"Oil companies have been making record profits off of cascading crises that they are openly exploiting to gouge the public. This windfall tax bill will put that money back into the pockets of hard-working consumers. This is much-needed legislation that will begin to curb the profiteering that has helped drive steep price increases that are crushing American families," said Mitch Jones, Managing Director of Advocacy Programs and Policy, Food & Water Watch
"Silicon Valley applauds our own Representative Ro Khanna for sponsoring a windfall profits tax on oil companies' exploitative gains made at the expense of our future on this planet. Only the oil companies have the resources needed for adaptation, mitigation, and eventual reversal of ongoing harms to health, communities, and the environment. This tax is an essential first step along the long and painful road to recovery from the ravages of the fossil fuel economy," said Janet Cox, Legislation/Policy Director, 350 Silicon Valley
"This legislation will stop Big Oil's war profiteering and deliver much-needed relief to consumers," said Jamie Henn, Fossil Free Media director. "While families are feeling pain at the pump, oil executives are making record profits because of the devastating war in Ukraine. Big Oil doesn't deserve a single penny extra by profiting during a time of war and crisis they helped create - instead, these windfall profits for a handful of executives should be used to help the consumers, especially low-income families, who are paying all the costs. We are glad to see Congress putting families first - now it's time for Congress to pass this legislation that would help make Big Oil pay for a crisis they helped create at home and abroad."
"When it comes to Big Oil, our pain is their gain. This vital legislation exposes the fossil fuel industry's inherent greed problem and begins to make sure our government is working for the people, not the polluters," said Carla Skandier, Climate Program Manager, The Democracy Collaborative.
Established in 1990 within the United States, IEN was formed by grassroots Indigenous peoples and individuals to address environmental and economic justice issues (EJ). IEN's activities include building the capacity of Indigenous communities and tribal governments to develop mechanisms to protect our sacred sites, land, water, air, natural resources, health of both our people and all living things, and to build economically sustainable communities.
LATEST NEWS
House Dems Form Procedural 'Conga Line' to Block Medicaid and SNAP Cuts
"We're here to help people, not screw people over!" said Rep. Jim McGovern.
Jul 02, 2025
Democrats in the House of Representatives on Wednesday banded together in an attempt to gum up the works to block House Republicans from passing their massive budget bill that includes historic and devastating cuts to both Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program known as SNAP.
One by one, House Democrats moved in what Punchbowl News reporter Jake Sherman described as a "conga line" to make the exact same request for unanimous consent "to amend the rule to make an order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts to Medicaid and SNAP." Each time a Democrat would make the request, Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), holding the gavel in the chamber, informed them that "the unanimous consent request cannot be entertained."
At one point, Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) grew frustrated with his Republican colleagues for their insistence on passing the budget bill, which he noted would significantly cut taxes for the richest Americans while decimating safety net programs designed to help poor and working class Americans.
"We're here to help people, not screw people over!" McGovern fumed.
As of this writing, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R.La.) remained in his office, according to Punchbowlreporting, an apparent signal that a floor vote for Wednesday remained up in the air.
The United States Senate on Tuesday passed a budget package by the slimmest of margins that the Congressional Budget Office has estimated would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period and would slash SNAP spending by more than $250 billion over the same period.
Previous polling has shown that the budget package is broadly unpopular and a new poll from Data for Progress released Wednesday found that the Republican plan grows more unpopular the more voters learn about its provisions. In particular, voters expressed significant concern about the plan's impact on the national debt, cuts to CHIP and Medicaid, and attacks on clean energy programs.
Over 100 @HouseDemocrats lined up to ask for "unanimous consent to amend the rule and make in order the amendment at the desk that protects against any cuts to Medicaid & SNAP" pic.twitter.com/r5ktS9Uj0K
— Jahana Hayes (@RepJahanaHayes) July 2, 2025
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Cruel Betrayal': Educators Furious Over Trump Funding Freeze for School Programs
One Democratic senator called the move a "clear as day violation of federal law."
Jul 02, 2025
The Trump administration informed state education agencies on Monday that it would not release over $6 billion in previously approved federal funding for schools—sparking outcry from teachers unions, Democratic lawmakers, and education-focused groups who called the move harmful to students.
In an unsigned email, Education Department staff told states that they would not be dispersing any money from five programs that focus on issues including migrant education, before- and after-school programs, English learner services, and more.
"Given the change in administrations, the department is reviewing the FY 2025 funding for the [Title I-C, II-A, III-A, IV-A, IV-B] grant program(s), and decisions have not yet been made concerning submissions and awards for this upcoming year," according to the email, which was obtained by NPR.
Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, a group that promotes access to after-school programs for kids, called the funding loss "catastrophic," according to The New York Times.
Grant's organization is sounding the alarm that loss of funding for 21st Century Community Learning Centers, one of the programs targeted, could mean that 10,000 after-school and summer programs could close their doors for the 2025-26 school year. Over a million children are at risk of losing their programs as soon as this summer, according to the Afterschool Alliance.
The email came one day before the federal government was scheduled to disperse the money, on July 1. The funding had been previously approved by Congress in a continuing budget resolution that passed in March.
On Wednesday, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) called the move a "clear as day violation of federal law. The appropriations law passed by Congress requires this money to be spent."
Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, a teachers union, also called it unlawful. "This is another illegal usurpation of the authority of the Congress. Plus it directly harms the children in our nation," she said in a statement on Tuesday.
According to Education Week, a 2026 federal budget proposal from the White House unveiled last month seeks to eliminate all five of the education programs targeted in this week's funding freeze, meaning this move from the Trump administration is essentially the White House advancing its priorities early, without Congress' consideration.
"Withholding billions in promised federal education funding that students need—and states had planned to use to support children in their states—is a cruel betrayal of students, especially those who rely on critical support services," said Becky Pringle, president of the National Education Association, the nation's largest teachers union, in a statement on Tuesday.
"Sadly, this is part of a broader pattern by this administration of undermining public education—starving it of resources, sowing distrust, and pushing privatization at the expense of the nation's most vulnerable students," she added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Lawsuit Aims to End 'Systematic' Snatching of Brown-Skinned People by Trump Agents
"These guys are popping up, rampant all over the city, just taking people randomly, and we want that particular practice to end," one attorney in the case said of Department of Homeland Security agents.
Jul 02, 2025
Immigrant rights defenders in California on Wednesday sued the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, accusing the Trump administration of "abducting and disappearing community members using unlawful stop and arrest practices and confining individuals at a federal building in illegal conditions while denying them access to attorneys" as part of its mass deportation effort.
The lawsuit was brought by five individual workers, three advocacy groups, and a legal services provider: The Los Angeles Worker Center Network, United Farm Workers (UFW), the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), and Immigrant Defenders Law Center. Their complaint accuses DHS of unconstitutionally arresting and detaining people, according to the ACLU, which is assisting with the legal challenge, "in order to meet arbitrary arrest quotas set by the Trump administration."
According to the complaint:
The raids in this district follow a common, systematic pattern. Individuals with brown skin are approached or pulled aside by unidentified federal agents, suddenly and with a show of force, and made to answer questions about who they are and where they are from. If they hesitate, attempt to leave, or do not answer the questions to the satisfaction of the agents, they are detained, sometimes tackled, handcuffed, and/or taken into custody. In these interactions, agents typically have no prior information about the individual and no warrant of any kind. If agents make an arrest, contrary to federal law, they do not make any determination of whether a person poses a risk of flight before a warrant can be obtained. Also contrary to federal law, the agents do not identify themselves or explain why the individual is being arrested.
"DHS—at explicit direction from the Trump administration—has gone after day laborers, car wash workers, farm workers, street vendors, service workers, nannies, and others who form the lifeblood of communities across Southern California," said ACLU Foundation of Southern California senior staff attorney Mohammad Tajsar, who is representing plaintiffs in the case.ho "Everyone deserves to feel safe going about their daily lives. DHS must stop disappearing people from our communities."
Tajsar told the Los Angeles Times that "these guys are popping up, rampant all over the city, just taking people randomly, and we want that particular practice to end."
Alvaro M. Huerta, director of litigation and advocacy at Immigrant Defenders Law Center and a plaintiff's attorney in the suit, said in a statement that "the federal government is waging a campaign of terror across Southern California, abducting community members off the streets and warehousing them in deplorable conditions away from their loved ones, all while denying them access to legal counsel."
"It's blatantly unconstitutional, cruelly inhumane, and a violation of any common decency," Huerta added. "If the Trump administration insists on trampling Angelenos' rights, we'll see them in court."
Plaintiffs in the case—who are seeking to represent people subjected to random stops and arrests—are asking the court to certify the case as a class action. They have also requested preliminary and permanent injunctions barring further violations of constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures and self-incrimination, as enshrined in the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, respectively.
As the lawsuit notes, "one of the clearest patterns that have emerged in the raids in Southern California... has been stops and interrogations... on the basis of apparent race and ethnicity."
"These raids have targeted the most vulnerable members of our workforce, essential workers who are the backbone of our local economy," said Los Angeles Worker Center Network executive director Armando Gudino. "We cannot allow racial profiling, warrantless arrests, and denial of due process to become the standard operating procedure in our communities."
DHS has been holding arrested people in the basement of a federal building in downtown Los Angeles commonly referred to as B-18. The lockup has no beds, showers, or medical facilities, according to the ACLU of Southern California. Furthermore, B-18 is meant to hold only a small number of people on a temporary basis while they are processed.
"We have heard from over 100 families of Individuals taken to B-18 and other detention centers that attest to their loved ones being kept in overcrowded, cold, and inhumane conditions," said CHIRLA executive director Angelica Salas. "They are held in small windowless rooms with dozens or more other detainees, in extremely cramped quarters while being verbally humiliated and pressured into signing papers they don't understand."
The ACLU of Southern California said: "The ongoing raids have led to the disappearance of more than 1,500 people. The suit details how federal agents consistently refuse to identify themselves or what agency they are with when asked, using anonymity as a tactic to shield lawlessness."
UFW president Teresa Romero noted in a statement that "the raids in the greater Los Angeles area have not been limited to the urban center; we have also seen horrific instances of Border Patrol agents chasing down farm workers in the fields of Ventura County. The spouse of a UFW member was among those unjustly detained."
"Now the very workers who feed America go to work in fear," she added. "Their American-born children are scared not knowing if their parents will come home. Farm workers deserve better. We've seen these unconstitutional and un-American tactics before, with Border Patrol targeting random farm workers and anyone with brown skin in Kern County during their large sweep in January. We sued then and we are suing now."
While U.S. President Donald Trump, members of his administration, and Republican lawmakers and supporters claim the DHS crackdown is targeting dangerous criminals, critics have noted that people legally seeking asylum, families, relatives of American citizens, and even citizens themselves have been swept up in the mass deportation dragnet.
According to the libertarian Cato Institute, 65% of people taken by ICE had no criminal conviction whatsoever and 93% had no conviction for violent offenses.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular