

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Amnesty International is deeply concerned that the US government, at the request of the Canadian government, is considering altering an agreement that would make it more likely that refugees seeking asylum in Canada would be returned to the United States. This week, the Canadian government also introduced a bill that includes provisions that would bar individuals from making a refugee claim in Canada if they have made a prior asylum claim in certain countries, particularly the United States.
The request to renegotiate concerns a possible expansion of the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) between the two countries, which currently applies only at official ports of entry along the U.S.-Canada border. It requires individuals who arrive in Canada or the US to request protection in the first country in which they arrive. There are only limited exceptions.
Amnesty International has opposed the STCA since it was adopted in 2004 and has actively pressed the Canadian government to suspend the agreement since the Trump Administration came to power and initiated a range of measures violating the rights of refugees, refugee protection claimants and migrants in the United States.
"The STCA is premised on the notion that both countries are safe for refugees and have asylum or refugee status determination systems that respect their rights. Since January 2017, the US has stopped at nothing to prevent asylum-seekers from accessing safety here," said Margaret Huang, executive director of Amnesty International USA. "With the xenophobic immigration policies of the Trump Administration and the near-constant attacks on the right to seek refugee protection, many refugees are being forced to seek protection in Canada because they cannot receive it in the United States.
"The Canadian government has made it clear that it is interested in renegotiating the terms of the STCA to apply not just to ports of entry, but to the entire length of the border between the two countries. At a time when Donald Trump is seeking to build walls on his southern border, Canada needs to build bridges that ensure human rights are respected and protected on the northern border."
Furthermore, a provision buried within a recent omnibus budget implementation Bill blocks refugee claims in Canada from individuals who have previously made an asylum claim in the United States, further closing down prospects for protection in Canada for refugees who have come through the United States.
"The combined impact of these two developments is deeply troubling. If the agreement were expanded to include everyone who crosses anywhere, it would force refugee claimants to come into Canada at more remote locations at even greater risk," said Alex Neve, Secretary General of Amnesty International Canada. "Barring individuals from accessing refugee protection in Canada if they made a prior asylum claim in the US, despite all of the obvious serious shortcomings in that country's asylum system, is antithetical to the spirit of refugee protection."
"Extending the reach of the STCA and introducing this new bar on claims in Canada, would mean that growing numbers of refugees would likely opt to reside in Canada without status, rather than coming forward to make their claims for protection and risk being sent back to the United States. Not only is this approach impractical, it blatantly disregards human rights and refugee protection principles while making irregular border crossings more likely."
Amnesty International Canada and Amnesty International USA strongly urge the Canadian and U.S. governments to uphold their international obligations to provide refugee protection to those who need it by suspending - not expanding - the STCA immediately, so that refugees who cannot receive protection in the US may find it in Canada. The Canadian government must also withdraw the proposed amendments to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act in Bill C-97 which would bar individuals who have previously made asylum claims in the United States from being able to make refugee claims in Canada.
Background
Amnesty International submitted a brief, prepared jointly with the Canadian Council for Refugees (CCR), to the Government of Canada in June 2017 documenting serious shortcomings in the US refugee protection system, such as punitive and arbitrary detention as well as prosecution of refugee claimants. In July 2017, Amnesty International filed a lawsuit alongside CCR, the Canadian Council of Churches and individual refugee claimants, challenging the constitutional validity of the STCA. The Federal Court of Canada is currently scheduled to hear that legal challenge in September 2019.
Over the past two years, as a result of the agreement, thousands of refugee claimants have been forced to cross the U.S.-Canada border at unofficial crossings because they would be turned back at official ports of entry. Many do so at great personal risk. Seidu Mohammed and Razak Iyal lost all of their fingers to frostbite when they crossed the border into the province of Manitoba on foot in the winter of 2016. In the winter of 2017, 57-year old Mavis Otuteye died when she tried to cross into Canada irregularly. There have also been reports of refugee claimants being forced to pay upwards of US $2000 to be smuggled into Canada.
United Nations human rights bodies have also expressed concern about the STCA during recent reviews of Canada's human rights record, in particular the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (UN CERD) in August 2017 and the UN Committee Against Torture in November 2018. Notably, the UN CERD prioritized its recommendation that the STCA be suspended and asked Canada to report back on progress by August 2018. That report, submitted in March 2019, was six months overdue and simply stated that the Canadian government is of the view that the "U.S. continues to satisfy the criteria upon which it was designated as a safe third country." There is no analysis of the range of authoritative reports and court judgements documenting the rapid deterioration in refugee protection in the United States over the past two years.
Amnesty International released an in-depth report in 2018 documenting, among other things, illegal pushbacks of refugee claimants at the US-Mexico border and thousands of family separations inflicting extreme suffering on families constituting, at times, torture.
This statement can be found online at https://www.amnestyusa.org/press-releases/amnesty-international-us-and-canada-directors-condemn-proposals-to-restrict-refugee-protection-in-canada-for-claimants-coming-through-the-united-states/
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400"After bombing a school and massacring young girls, the war criminal in the White House is threatening genocide," said Rep. Rashida Tlaib.
US Rep. Rashida Tlaib on Tuesday urged President Donald Trump's Cabinet to immediately invoke the 25th Amendment and remove him from office following his genocidal threat to wipe out the "whole civilization" of Iran.
"After bombing a school and massacring young girls, the war criminal in the White House is threatening genocide," Tlaib (D-Mich.) wrote on social media. "It's time to invoke the 25th Amendment. This maniac should be removed from office."
Some of Tlaib's colleagues echoed her demand. Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) wrote that "Trump is too unhinged, dangerous, and deranged to have the nuclear codes."
"25th Amendment RIGHT NOW," Pocan added.
Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) said in response to Trump's openly genocidal Truth Social post Trump "just threatened to slaughter 100 million people."
"It's clear he's unfit to be president, the 25th Amendment must be invoked," wrote Thanedar. "If Vance, Rubio, and the others continue to be spineless cowards, Congress must do everything possible to stop Trump and this war."
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who led the push in the US House for a war powers resolution to stop Trump's illegal assault on Iran, told Common Dreams that he also thought the president should be removed.
"When an American president threatens the extinction of a civilization," said Khanna, "we should be looking to invoke the 25th and remove him if Congress is to have value and independence."
The 25th Amendment gives the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet—or a majority of a body established by Congress—to declare the president "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office" and remove him from the position, elevating the vice president to serve as acting president.
Given the composition of Trump's Cabinet—which is filled with sycophants who lavish the president with praise at every opportunity—any 25th Amendment push would likely be doomed to fail.
But Trump's Cabinet has nevertheless faced growing calls to use the tool since the president's Easter-morning outburst warning Iranian leaders to "open the Fuckin’ Strait [of Hormuz], you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell."
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, warned the president's Cabinet officials on Tuesday that "if you take any part in assisting this, you too will be guilty of the crime of genocide."
"Use the 25th Amendment now to lawfully remove Trump from office," Williams urged. "Congress: This is an impeachable offense. Come back to DC now ready to impeach and convict Trump."
The National Iranian American Council said in a statement that the president's "insane, genocidal" threat to wipe out the "whole civilization" of Iran must be "wholeheartedly condemned."
"Military leaders are not bound to follow unlawful orders, including but not limited to the destruction of civilian targets and making good on this outrageous threat," the group added. "We call on President Trump to recant this abominable threat against 92 million Iranians. If he does not, both Congress and his Cabinet must be prepared to remove him from office via lawful means."
This story has been updated with comment from Rep. Ro Khanna.
"I wish for the light of my own life to be extinguished before a more serious stage of infrastructural war turns off the lights of my country’s homes.”
Iranian composer and tar virtuoso Ali Ghamsari has stationed himself outside of the Damavand power plant in Tehran in defiance of US President Donald Trump's threats to commit war crimes by destroying Iran's entire energy infrastructure.
As Tehran Times reported on Tuesday, Ghamsari said in a message posted to social media that he wanted to sit at the plant and make music to "become a shield for the electricity of 40% of Tehran."
The musician referenced Trump's threats to bomb Iran "back to the Stone Age[s]," and said that his playing outside the plant was an act of symbolic resistance.
"In these days, we are facing irreparable attacks on our country's vital infrastructure, such as bridges and industrial factories," Ghamsari said. "An event that targets Iran and its people to push them back toward the Stone Age... I wish for the light of my own life to be extinguished before a more serious stage of infrastructural war turns off the lights of my country’s homes. I hope my eyes never see even an inch of our soil being separated."
Renowned Iranian composer, Ali Ghamsari and tar virtuoso, announced he will stay at the Damavand Combined Cycle Power Plant.
His plan: Create music there as a symbolic effort to shield Iran's infrastructure from attack. pic.twitter.com/rSHRK6Us4Y
— Iran Screenshot (@iranscreenshot) April 6, 2026
Trump on Tuesday morning issued his most bloodthirsty and genocidal threat to Iran yet, warning that "a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again,” unless Iran met his demands to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which has been closed for the last several weeks after Trump and Israel launched an unprovoked war.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the US-based Center for International Policy, argued that the president's threat "meets the threshold for intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national group as set forth in 18 US Code § 1091 prohibiting the crime of genocide," and said Trump could be prosecuted for war crimes should he follow through.
"If any Iranians are killed pursuant to this threat," said one expert, "President Trump will be guilty of genocide, as will those assisting him."
Just hours ahead of his self-imposed deadline for a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, US President Donald Trump threatened on Tuesday to permanently wipe out the "whole civilization" of Iran—remarks seen as a straightforward expression of genocidal intent.
"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. "I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS? We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World."
Brian Finucane, senior adviser to the US Program at the International Crisis Group, responded to Trump's threat by pointing to 18 US Code § 1091, which prohibits American nationals from committing genocide within the United States and abroad.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the US-based Center for International Policy, wrote that "this meets the threshold for intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national group as set forth in 18 US Code § 1091 prohibiting the crime of genocide."
"If any Iranians are killed pursuant to this threat," Williams added, "President Trump will be guilty of genocide, as will those assisting him."
One expert, former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth, noted that Trump's genocidal threat is itself unlawful.
"Trump is openly threatening collective punishment, targeting not the Iranian military but the Iranian people," Roth told NBC News, pointing to the Fourth Geneva Convention. "Attacking civilians is a war crime. So is making threats with the aim of terrorizing the civilian population."
"Soldiers must refuse unlawful orders. Members of Congress must call for impeachment and removal."
Trump published his comments as the US unleashed a wave of attacks on Kharg Island, Iran's key oil export hub. The US and Israel also reportedly targeted bridges across Iran overnight as part of a broader assault that has killed thousands of people since late February.
The US president set a deadline of 8 pm ET for Iran to reach a deal that fully reopens the Strait of Hormuz. Trump has threatened to order the obliteration of Iranian bridges and energy infrastructure if there's no agreement by his arbitrary deadline.
Adil Haque, a professor of law at Rutgers University, wrote Tuesday that the international community must intervene immediately to prevent Trump from launching a catastrophic and criminal assault on a country of more than 90 million people.
"Soldiers must refuse unlawful orders," Haque added. "Members of Congress must call for impeachment and removal. Every American who loves their country must speak out. Enough is enough."