January, 07 2011, 09:02am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
In New York: David Lerner (212) 260-5000 or (917) 612-5657 or
Jen Nessel (212) 614-6449
In Madrid: Gonzalo Boye + 34 (687) 95-34-45
Rights Groups Urge Spanish Judge to Subpoena Former Gtmo Commander for Role in Detainee Torture
Today, the U.S.-based Center for Constitutional Rights
(CCR) and the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) asked
a Spanish Judge to subpoena the former commanding officer at Guantanamo Bay to
explain his role in the torture of four former detainees. CCR and ECCHR
filed a 12-page dossier detailing the key role of Major General Geoffrey
Miller, who ran the island prison camp from November 2002 until April 2004, in
the torture and other serious abuse of detainees held there.
MADRID, Spain
Today, the U.S.-based Center for Constitutional Rights
(CCR) and the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) asked
a Spanish Judge to subpoena the former commanding officer at Guantanamo Bay to
explain his role in the torture of four former detainees. CCR and ECCHR
filed a 12-page dossier detailing the key role of Major General Geoffrey
Miller, who ran the island prison camp from November 2002 until April 2004, in
the torture and other serious abuse of detainees held there. In the dossier,
the rights groups detail acts of torture and other war crimes committed against
detainees, including the torture of CCR client Mohammed al Qahtani. Based
on his record in Guantanamo, Miller was sent to Iraq in 2003 to share
interrogation techniques from Guantanamo with U.S. counterparts in Iraq: Miller
is said to have wanted to "Gitmo-ize" Iraq and Abu Ghraib,
including by having guards "soften up" prisoners. Shortly after
Miller's visit, some of the most serious and notorious acts of torture at
Abu Ghraib occurred.
Much
of the documentation discussed in the dossier is drawn from U.S. government
reports.
Today's
filing comes in the investigation that was opened in April 2009 by Judge
Baltasar Garzon. Garzon initiated the inquiry into the torture of four
individuals, including a Spanish citizen and a Spanish resident, at Guantanamo
after an investigation against the men for their alleged role in
terrorism was dismissed because of a finding by the Spanish courts that the men
had been tortured at Guantanamo. Following the controversial suspension of Judge
Garzon, the case was assigned to Judge Pablo Rafael Ruz.
"There
is ample evidence - primarily from U.S. government sources - that
Geoffrey Miller played a central role in the torture of detainees at
Guantanamo, and later in Iraq," said Katherine Gallagher, senior staff
attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights. "It is time that he be
called before a court of law to explain his role in the torture of
detainees."
In
another move to ensure the accountability of senior former U.S. officials for their
role in torture, CCR filed a legal opinion in the case of the "Bush
Six," the lawyers, including John Yoo and Jay Bybee, who created the
legal rationale - or cover - for torture. A Spanish human
rights group filed a complaint before another Spanish Judge, Eloy Velasco, to
have the actions of these former Bush administration officials
investigated. Today's second filing lays out the legal basis, as
well as some key evidence, for pursuing that case.
"The Obama administration has
shown that they are unwilling to investigate and prosecute those responsible
for torture at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere," said Gavin Sullivan,
counterterrorism and human rights program director of ECCHR. "These
proceedings and today's submissions are a crucial means of resisting this
culture of impunity and ensuring that appropriate U.S. officials are made
accountable for the international crimes they have committed."
Today's
filings follow earlier submissions by CCR and ECCHR in Spain, most recently in
December, when the groups detailed the Obama administration's efforts to
ensure impunity, not accountability, for former U.S. officials, including by
exerting pressure on Spanish government officials to have these cases
dismissed. Recently released State Department cables detail
meetings between U.S. officials and Spanish officials from various ministries
as well as the Spanish Attorney General, in which the U.S. pressed to have
these cases dismissed. The cables also detail improper interventions by U.S.
officials in other cases involving the U.S. that are pending before the Spanish
judiciary.
Gonzalo
Boye, a Madrid-based lawyer who is representing CCR and ECCHR in these
proceedings added, "These submissions demonstrate that the cases against
the former U.S. officials are not "fraudulent," as the Spanish
Attorney General said when they were filed. They also seek to do what the
Attorney General and other Spanish officials assured the U.S. would not happen:
move these cases - and the efforts to hold those who are responsible for
torture and war crimes - forward."
For
more information on CCR's role see https://www.ccrjustice.org/ourcases/current-cases/spanish-investigation-us-torture.
CCR
has led the legal battle over Guantanamo for the last eight years -
sending the first ever habeas attorney to the base and sending the first
attorney to meet with an individual transferred from CIA "ghost
detention" to Guantanamo. CCR has been responsible for organizing
and coordinating more than 500 pro bono lawyers across the country to represent
the men at Guantanamo, ensuring that nearly all have the option of legal
representation. In addition, CCR has been working to resettle the approximately
30 men who remain at Guantanamo because they cannot return to their country of
origin for fear of persecution and torture.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. CCR is committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.
(212) 614-6464LATEST NEWS
Survivor of US Atomic Bombing Makes Plea to World With Nobel Acceptance Speech
"Let us all strive together to ensure that humanity is not destroyed by nuclear weapons, and to create a human society where there are no nuclear weapons and no war," said Terumi Tanaka.
Dec 11, 2024
Accepting the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of the grassroots Japanese anti-nuclear group he co-chairs, Terumi Tanaka warned on Tuesday night that the world is moving in the opposite direction than the one hibakusha—survivors of the U.S. bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki—have demanded for nearly seven decades.
Tanaka is a co-chair of Nihon Hidankyo, an organization founded in 1956 by survivors of the bombings that had killed an estimated 140,000 people in Hiroshima and 70,000 in Nagasaki, with the death toll continuing to rise in later years as people succumbed to the effects of radiation.
The group accepted the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, with the Nobel Committee honoring Nihon Hidankyo "for its efforts to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons."
The organization aims to maintain a taboo around the use of nuclear weapons, which have only been used in combat by the U.S. in Japan in 1945.
Tanaka warned that there are currently 12,000 nuclear warheads in the arsenals of the U.S., Russia, China, and six other countries, and 4,000 of those "could be launched immediately."
"This means that the damage that occurred in Hiroshima and Nagasaki could be multiplied by hundreds or even thousands," said Tanaka, who is 92. "Let us all strive together to ensure that humanity is not destroyed by nuclear weapons, and to create a human society where there are no nuclear weapons and no war."
"It is the heartfelt desire of the hibakusha that, rather than depending on the theory of nuclear deterrence, which assumes the possession and use of nuclear weapons, we must not allow the possession of a single nuclear weapon," he added.
"I hope that the belief that nuclear weapons cannot—and must not—co-exist with humanity will take firm hold among citizens of the nuclear weapon states and their allies, and that this will become a force for change in the nuclear policies of their governments."
Tanaka said that "the nuclear taboo threatens to be broken," as evidenced by Israeli Heritage Minister Amihay Eliyahu's recent comment that a nuclear attack on Gaza would be "one way" to defeat Hamas.
"I am infinitely saddened and angered" by such statements, said Tanaka.
He described his experience as a 13-year-old when the U.S. bombed Nagasaki, just a couple of miles away from his family's house, which was crushed by the impact.
He said he later found the charred body of one of his aunts and saw his grandfather close to death from the burns that covered his body.
"The deaths I witnessed at that time could hardly be described as human deaths," Tanaka said. "There were hundreds of people suffering in agony, unable to receive any kind of medical attention."
"I hope that the belief that nuclear weapons cannot—and must not—co-exist with humanity will take firm hold among citizens of the nuclear weapon states and their allies, and that this will become a force for change in the nuclear policies of their governments," said Tanaka.
The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) applauded Nihon Hidankyo and the hibakusha "for their resilience and willingness to share their stories over and over again, so that the world may learn and come together to say 'never again.'"
"It was their courage that enabled the [Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons] to be adopted, which represents the first progress on nuclear disarmament in decades," said Melissa Parke, executive director of ICAN, referring to the treaty that's been ratified by 73 countries.
"Listening to Mr. Tanaka describe the horrendous effects on his family and city when the Americans dropped their atomic bomb should convince world leaders they have to go beyond simply congratulating the hibakusha of Nihon Hidankyo for this award. They must honor them by doing what the hibakusha have long called for—urgently getting rid of nuclear weapons," said Parke. "That is the only way to ensure that what Mr. Tanaka and the other hibakusha have been through never happens to anyone ever again. As long as any nuclear weapons remain anywhere, they are bound one day to be used, whether by design or accident."
Jørgen Watne Frydnes, chair of the Nobel Committee, condemned the nine nuclear powers for "modernizing and building up their nuclear arsenals."
"It is naive to believe our civilization can survive a world order in which global security depends on nuclear weapons," Frydnes said. "The world is not meant to be a prison in which we await collective annihilation."
Keep ReadingShow Less
US Ambassador to UN Slammed Over 'Right to Food' Rhetoric as Israel Starves Gaza
"She is on a shamelessness tour," journalist Jeremy Scahill said of American diplomat Linda Thomas-Greenfield.
Dec 11, 2024
The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations is facing backlash after delivering a speech earlier this week touting the universal "right to food" as the Israeli military—armed to the teeth with American weaponry—fuels widespread and increasingly deadly hunger in the Gaza Strip.
In remarks Monday at a gathering of U.N. and civil society leaders focused on global food insecurity, Thomas-Greenfield called hunger, starvation, and famine "man-made tragedies" that "can be stopped by us."
"Let me be clear: Every human being, everywhere, has the right to food," she continued. "For the United States, this is a moral issue. And it's an economic and national security issue."
Thomas-Greenfield's speech sparked derision given the Biden administration's continued military support for an Israeli government that has been accused of wielding starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza, where—according to the latest U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization assessment—food aid has reached an all-time low under Israel's suffocating blockade.
"Hunger is a man-made tragedy that you helped make in Gaza."
Oxfam and other human rights groups have said that by arming the Israeli military as it obstructs humanitarian aid, the Biden administration is complicit in the starvation of Palestinians in Gaza and Israel's repeated attacks on aid workers attempting to feed the enclave's hungry.
"She is on a shamelessness tour in her final weeks as U.S. ambassador to the U.N.," journalist Jeremy Scahill wrote Wednesday in response to Thomas-Greenfield's speech. "She presided over numerous cease-fire vetoes as part of an administration that facilitated Israel's starvation policy against the Palestinians of Gaza. Listen to her remarks on 'hunger' in that context."
Yesterday, @USUN brought together humanitarian leaders to discuss solutions to the global food insecurity crisis.
Hunger is a man-made tragedy. But if it caused by man, that means it can be stopped by us, too.
Every human being, everywhere, has the right to food. pic.twitter.com/zczlerRHEc
— Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield (@USAmbUN) December 10, 2024
Middle East scholar and analyst Assal Rad, wrote that Thomas-Greenfield's vetoes at the U.N. "have helped Israel continue its genocide and deliberately starving people."
"Hunger is a man-made tragedy that you helped make in Gaza," Rad added.
Despite Thomas-Greenfield's insistence that addressing global food insecurity has long been a priority for the world's wealthiest and most powerful nation, the U.S. and Israel were the only two countries to vote against a U.N. committee draft on the right to food in 2021.
On Tuesday, the Biden administration welcomed to the White House former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who—along with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—is facing an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court for "the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare," among other crimes.
"Today is Human Rights Day—a date chosen to honor the UN’s adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948," the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project wrote Tuesday. "Biden's White House is dishonoring this day by hosting a confirmed war criminal who conducted a genocide, and starved and targeted Palestinian civilians."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Pick to Replace Lina Khan Vowed to End 'War on Mergers'
"Andrew Ferguson is a corporate shill who opposes banning noncompetes, opposes banning junk fees, and opposes enforcing the Anti-Merger Act," said one antitrust attorney.
Dec 11, 2024
President-elect Donald Trump's pick to lead the Federal Trade Commission vowed in his job pitch to end current chair Lina Khan's "war on mergers," a signal to an eager corporate America that the incoming administration intends to be far more lax on antitrust enforcement.
Andrew Ferguson was initially nominated by President Joe Biden to serve as a Republican commissioner on the bipartisan FTC, and his elevation to chair of the commission will not require Senate confirmation.
In a one-page document obtained by Punchbowl, Ferguson—who previously worked as chief counsel to Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)—pitched himself to Trump's team as the "pro-innovation choice" with "impeccable legal credentials" and "proven loyalty" to the president-elect.
Ferguson's top agenda priority, according to the document, is to "reverse Lina Khan's anti-business agenda" by rolling back "burdensome regulations," stopping her "war on mergers," halting the agency's "attempt to become an AI regulator," and ditching "novel and legally dubious consumer protection cases."
Trump announced Ferguson as the incoming administration's FTC chair as judges in Oregon and Washington state
blocked the proposed merger of Kroger and Albertsons, decisions that one antitrust advocate called a "fantastic culmination of the FTC's work to protect consumers and workers."
According to a recent
report by the American Economic Liberties Project, the Biden administration "brought to trial four times as many billion-dollar merger challenges as Trump-Pence or Obama-Biden enforcers did," thanks to "strong leaders at the FTC" and the Justice Department's Antitrust Division.
In a letter to Ferguson following Trump's announcement on Tuesday, FTC Commissioners Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter wrote that the document obtained and published by Punchbowl "raises questions" about his priorities at the agency mainly "because of what is not in it."
"Americans pay more for healthcare than anyone else in the developed world, yet they die younger," they wrote. "Medical bills bankrupt people. In fact, this is the main reason Americans go bankrupt. But the document does not mention the cost of healthcare or prescription medicine."
"If there was one takeaway from the election, it was that groceries are too expensive. So is gas," the commissioners continued. "Yet the document does not mention groceries, gas, or the cost of living. While you have said we're entering the 'most pro-worker administration in history,' the document does not mention labor, either. Americans are losing billions of dollars to fraud. Fraudsters are so brazen that they impersonate sitting FTC commissioners to steal money from retirees. The word 'fraud' does not appear in the document."
"The document does propose allowing more mergers, firing civil servants, and fighting something called 'the trans agenda,'" they added. "Is all of that more important than the cost of healthcare and groceries and gasoline? Or fighting fraud?"
As an FTC commissioner, Ferguson voted against rules banning anti-worker noncompete agreements and making it easier for consumers to cancel subscriptions. Ferguson was also the only FTC member to oppose an expansion of a rule to protect consumers from tech support scams that disproportionately impact older Americans.
"Andrew Ferguson is a corporate shill who opposes banning noncompetes, opposes banning junk fees, and opposes enforcing the Anti-Merger Act," said Basel Musharbash, principal attorney at Antimonopoly Counsel. "Appointing him to chair the FTC is an affront to the antitrust laws and a gift to the oligarchs and monopolies bleeding this country dry."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular