April, 02 2010, 01:55pm EDT
DHS Report Confirms Serious Civil Rights Problems With Local Immigration Enforcement Program
ACLU Calls For Immediate Termination Of ICE 287(g) Program
WASHINGTON
A report from the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) reveals
several critical problems surrounding Immigration and Customs
Enforcement's (ICE) 287(g) program, which allows certain state and local
law enforcement agencies to engage in federal immigration enforcement
activities.
The
American Civil Liberties Union has strongly opposed the 287(g) program,
believing it has led to illegal racial profiling and civil rights abuses
while diverting scarce resources from traditional local law enforcement
functions and distorting immigration enforcement priorities. The OIG
report affirms these concerns, and the ACLU calls for the immediate
termination of the 287(g) program.
American Civil Liberties Union has strongly opposed the 287(g) program,
believing it has led to illegal racial profiling and civil rights abuses
while diverting scarce resources from traditional local law enforcement
functions and distorting immigration enforcement priorities. The OIG
report affirms these concerns, and the ACLU calls for the immediate
termination of the 287(g) program.
"The
DHS OIG report confirms in detail what the ACLU has known for many years
- that the 287(g) program, fundamentally flawed and incompetently
administered, presents serious civil rights and civil liberties problems
for U.S. citizens and immigrants," said Joanne Lin, ACLU Legislative
Counsel. "ICE has completely shirked its legal duty to train and
supervise 287(g) officers and has instead unleashed a slew of
unmonitored state and local law officers across America - many of whom
are using federal immigration authority as a cloak to engage in racial
profiling. The program should be terminated and de-funded."
DHS OIG report confirms in detail what the ACLU has known for many years
- that the 287(g) program, fundamentally flawed and incompetently
administered, presents serious civil rights and civil liberties problems
for U.S. citizens and immigrants," said Joanne Lin, ACLU Legislative
Counsel. "ICE has completely shirked its legal duty to train and
supervise 287(g) officers and has instead unleashed a slew of
unmonitored state and local law officers across America - many of whom
are using federal immigration authority as a cloak to engage in racial
profiling. The program should be terminated and de-funded."
The
report finds lack of oversight, training and other failures in the
287(g) program and makes it clear that the program does not have
adequate safeguards against racial profiling and other civil rights
abuses. Many state and local agencies accepted for the program have a
documented history of serious allegations of constitutional violations.
report finds lack of oversight, training and other failures in the
287(g) program and makes it clear that the program does not have
adequate safeguards against racial profiling and other civil rights
abuses. Many state and local agencies accepted for the program have a
documented history of serious allegations of constitutional violations.
Under
the 287(g) program, ICE has failed to:
the 287(g) program, ICE has failed to:
- establish
appropriate performance measures and targets to determine whether
program results are aligned with program goals; - develop
guidance for supervising ICE officers; - provide
adequate 287(g) program oversight; - establish
a thorough review and selection process for law enforcement agencies
requesting to participate in the 287(g) program; - establish
data collection and reporting requirements to address civil rights and
civil liberties concerns; - provide
adequate 287(g) training programs; - provide
accurate and honest program information to Congress and the public; and - standardize
287(g) officers' access to DHS information systems.
"The
287(g) program, as this latest report confirms, all but abandons the
constitutional guarantees of fair treatment and due process, and
encourages racial and ethnic profiling. Immigration enforcement must
respect civil liberties, and it's clear the current 287(g) program does
not come close," said Laura W. Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington
Legislative Office. "The 287(g) program also undermines public safety by
exacerbating fear of the police in communities already distrustful of
law enforcement."
287(g) program, as this latest report confirms, all but abandons the
constitutional guarantees of fair treatment and due process, and
encourages racial and ethnic profiling. Immigration enforcement must
respect civil liberties, and it's clear the current 287(g) program does
not come close," said Laura W. Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington
Legislative Office. "The 287(g) program also undermines public safety by
exacerbating fear of the police in communities already distrustful of
law enforcement."
The
report outlines how local agencies exploited the 287(g) program's
defects to engage in systemic civil rights abuses. Although an ICE fact
sheet describes how the 287(g) program does not allow state and local
agencies to perform "random street operations," the OIG report describes
how one agency improperly engaged in "random street operations" to
target "minor offenses and violations of local ordinances," while
claiming to act under their 287(g) agreement. In addition, although
287(g) officers are only authorized to use federal immigration authority
to take people into custody as a result of violating state or local
criminal law, the OIG report found incidents of immigrants being
arrested for federal immigration violations without prior arrests on
state or local charges.
report outlines how local agencies exploited the 287(g) program's
defects to engage in systemic civil rights abuses. Although an ICE fact
sheet describes how the 287(g) program does not allow state and local
agencies to perform "random street operations," the OIG report describes
how one agency improperly engaged in "random street operations" to
target "minor offenses and violations of local ordinances," while
claiming to act under their 287(g) agreement. In addition, although
287(g) officers are only authorized to use federal immigration authority
to take people into custody as a result of violating state or local
criminal law, the OIG report found incidents of immigrants being
arrested for federal immigration violations without prior arrests on
state or local charges.
"The
OIG report's message is clear," said Cecillia Wang, managing attorney of
the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project. "ICE can no longer stand by idly
while local agencies use their 287(g) agreements as cover to engage in
the rampant abuse of people's constitutional rights. People in 287(g)
communities should have the right to go about their business without
being stopped for no other reason than that they 'look foreign' to a
police officer."
OIG report's message is clear," said Cecillia Wang, managing attorney of
the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project. "ICE can no longer stand by idly
while local agencies use their 287(g) agreements as cover to engage in
the rampant abuse of people's constitutional rights. People in 287(g)
communities should have the right to go about their business without
being stopped for no other reason than that they 'look foreign' to a
police officer."
The
Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General's report is
available at: www.dhs.gov/xoig/assets/mgmtrpts/OIG_10-63_Mar10.pdf
Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General's report is
available at: www.dhs.gov/xoig/assets/mgmtrpts/OIG_10-63_Mar10.pdf
The
ACLU's submitted testimony on the 287(g) program can be found at: www.aclu.org/immigrants/gen/39062leg20090304.html
ACLU's submitted testimony on the 287(g) program can be found at: www.aclu.org/immigrants/gen/39062leg20090304.html
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
House Democrat Calls GOP Budget a 'Blueprint for a Dystopian Hellscape'
Rep. Don Beyer warns the plan "would see unbridled benefits flowing to a wealthy and well-connected few while tens of millions of Americans lose healthcare, housing, retirement security, and food security."
Mar 27, 2024
As Republicans on Wednesday set their sights on a key seat opening up in the U.S. House of Representatives, the chamber's senior Democrat on the congressional Joint Economic Committee put out a blistering takedown of a top GOP budget proposal for the next fiscal year.
Congressman Don Beyer (D-Va.) took aim at the 180-page "Fiscal Sanity to Save America" plan released last week by the Republican Study Committee (RSC)—which includes about 80% of GOP House members—following proposals from Democratic President Joe Biden and House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas).
"The Republican Study Committee budget is a blueprint for a dystopian hellscape," he warned. "The vision offered by this group, which counts 4 in 5 House Republicans as members, would see unbridled benefits flowing to a wealthy and well-connected few while tens of millions of Americans lose healthcare, housing, retirement security, and food security."
RSC proposals to "dramatically weaken healthcare," Beyer noted, include turning Medicare into a voucher plan and rolling back Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) provisions that cut costs for seniors; repealing tax subsidies for the Affordable Care Act and the law's protections for people with preexisting conditions; and transforming Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program into block grants to states.
As Common Dreams has reported, in addition to seeking cuts to Medicare and Social Security—while claiming to do nothing of the sort—the RSC has also launched a full-fledged assault on reproductive healthcare and rights, promoting 42 bills that would ban abortions after 15 weeks or even earlier, require unnecessary ultrasounds and 24-hour waiting periods, prohibit the use of fetal stem cells for research, and threaten access to in vitro fertilization, among other restrictions.
In addition to attacking reproductive freedom and key programs for seniors and low-income families, Beyer highlighted, the RSC wants to "weaken public health, public safety, and environmental protections," while "cutting taxes for the wealthy, by a lot."
The RSC advocates ending green tax credits from the IRA and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act as well as slashing money for Community Oriented Policing Services and the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. The committee also calls for permanently lowering taxes for the ultrarich, indexing capital gains taxes to inflation, repealing the estate tax, rolling back the IRA's corporate alternative minimum tax, and eliminating funding intended to help the Internal Revenue Service catch wealthy tax cheats.
"Democrats believe there is a better way to get our fiscal house in order without betraying our values," said Beyer. "That starts with making smart investments in our people and our future while demanding that the rich and large corporations pay their fair share in taxes. The contrast between the Democratic approach and this Republican budget could not possibly be clearer."
Biden's budget blueprint—released as he prepares for an electoral rematch against former Republican President Donald Trump, who infamously cut taxes for rich people and corporations—proposes a 25% minimum tax for individuals with wealth of more than $100 million, along with ending capital income tax breaks and closing other loopholes.
Polling results released Tuesday by Morning Consult show that a majority of voters across party lines in key swing states support raising taxes on people who make more than $400,000 per year.
Biden and the divided Congress this past weekend narrowly avoided a government shutdown by passing a long-delayed spending package. Fiscal year 2025 is set to begin in October, setting up another election-year fight over funding.
In what's been
dubbed the "Great Resignation," a growing number of House Republicans have announced that they are not seeking reelection or even exited their seats early—shrinking the party's already slim majority in the lower chamber.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Troublemakers' Block Amazon HQ Over Plan to Link Data Centers With Gas Pipeline
"Amazon is breaking its Climate Pledge by powering new data centers with fracked gas," said one member of the new activist group. "So we came to demand that they honor the pledge."
Mar 27, 2024
A recently formed group of climate activists on Wednesday shut down entrances to Amazon's downtown Seattle headquarters to protest the tech titan's plans to link some of its data centers with an upgraded fracked gas pipeline.
Members of the Troublemakers—who describe themselves as "an ever-growing community of people who are committed to taking action for life on Earth"—blockaded the doors to the Day 1 Building on 7th Ave. in opposition to Amazon Web Services' (AWS) plan to connect three data centers near Boardman, Oregon to TC Energy's Gas Transmission Northwest (GTN) XPress Project.
As Common Dreamsreported last October, GTN XPress, which has been approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, would upgrade compressor stations in Kootenai County, Idaho; Sherman County, Oregon; and Walla Walla County, Washington. TC Energy plans to boost the 60-year-old pipeline's capacity by 150 million cubic feet of fracked gas by increasing the conduit's pressure.
"The decision to use fracked gas from the GTN XPress adds to Amazon's carbon emissions problems," the Troublemakers said in a statement. "Amazon's 2022 carbon emissions totaled 71.27 million metric tons, marking an 18% rise from 2020 and a 40% surge since 2019, the year Amazon unveiled its Climate Pledge. This alarming trend is in stark contrast to the global imperative to halve emissions by 2030."
The group wrote in a March 19 letter to Amazon CEO Andy Jassy:
Amazon prides itself on innovation. Using fossil fuel is not innovation... It is relying on a dying technology that is killing the planet. Utilizing GTN XPress would increase Amazon's carbon footprint and contribute greatly to climate change... We urge you to publicly commit to financing solar or wind projects to provide clean energy for Amazon's operations, and reject the GTN XPress.
The Troublemakers are calling on Amazon to:
- Publicly renounce the plan to connect to GTN XPress;
- Commit to not powering AWS data centers with fossil fuels; and
- Commit to using 100% renewable energy in each operation while funding wind and solar generation, storage, and distribution.
"We see Amazon's greenwashing every time we pass by Climate Pledge Arena," said Troublemaker Valerie Costa, who was referring to the home of the Seattle Kraken and Seattle Storm professional sports franchises. "Until Amazon drops its plan to buy fracked gas from GTN XPress, we'll keep showing up. Every fossil fuel project in the [Pacific Northwest] will be met with fierce resistance."
Leonard Sklar, a scientist and Troublemaker, asserted that "Amazon is breaking its Climate Pledge by powering new data centers with fracked gas. So we came to demand that they honor the pledge."
"We know they have the power to be 100% renewable energy," he added, "and that's what this moment requires."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Over Apple's Objections, Oregon Governor Signs Nation's Strongest Right to Repair Law
"Oregon becomes the first state to ban 'parts pairing,' which let companies like Apple decide when and how you replace parts."
Mar 27, 2024
In a move that advocates said will save Oregon residents money while supporting small businesses and reducing waste of electronic devices, Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek on Wednesday signed the Right to Repair Act, a law that passed earlier this month despite Apple's lobbying efforts.
The Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), applauded the signing of the bill, which requires manufacturers to provide Oregonians and small repair businesses with access to the parts, tools, and information needed to fix personal electronics and household appliances.
Manufacturers like Apple frequently require consumers to go to their stores or authorized service providers for repairs, making them expensive for customers and difficult to access for people who live far from the providers.
Charlie Fisher, state director of Oregon PIRG, said the law means Oregon is "moving forward on an innovation even more critical than a new gadget: the right to fix our electronic devices."
"By eliminating manufacturer restrictions, the right to repair will make it easier for Oregonians to keep their personal electronics running," said Fisher. "That will conserve precious natural resources and prevent waste. It's a refreshing alternative to a 'throwaway' system that treats everything as disposable."
The Right to Repair Act, which will go into effect on January 1, 2025, was supported by roughly 100 small businesses that provide repairs across the state, as well as recycling nonprofit organizations.
Apple testified against the bill, saying it opposed a provision against "parts pairing." The practice requires consumers or independent repair businesses to purchase parts from Apple and have them validated by the company.
John Perry, a senior security manager at Apple, told state senators that the provision would "undermine the security, safety, and privacy of Oregonians by forcing device manufacturers to allow the use of parts of unknown origin and consumer devices."
State Rep. Courtney Neron (D-26) cited a letter from the Federal Trade Commission when she told her colleagues that Apple's parts paring requirements "drive up the price that consumers must pay to fix a device and cause consumers to purchase a new device before the end of its useful life."
"Manufacturer repair restrictions also make it more challenging for small repair businesses to compete and contribute to unnecessary e-waste," she said.
Pro-labor media organization More Perfect Union called Kotek's signing of the bill "a major loss for Apple."
"Oregon has a proud history of passing forward thinking policies that help Oregonians steward and respect the resources that go into making the products we use everyday," said Celeste Meiffren-Swango, state director of Environment Oregon, "and we are building on that legacy with the Right to Repair Act."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular