March, 20 2009, 05:11pm EDT

ACLU to Present Oral Arguments in Case of Prominent Muslim Scholar Barred From US
Groups Say Tariq Ramadan Was Denied Entry on the Basis of His Political Views
NEW YORK
The
American Civil Liberties Union will present arguments before a federal
appeals court Tuesday in the case of a Swiss professor and leading
scholar of the Muslim world who was denied entry to the United States
based on his political views. Professor Tariq Ramadan was invited to
teach at the University of Notre Dame in 2004 but the U.S. government
revoked his visa, citing a statute that applies to those who have
"endorsed or espoused" terrorism. After the ACLU and other
organizations filed suit, the government abandoned its claim that
Ramadan had endorsed terrorism, but it continues to exclude him because
he made small donations to a Swiss charity that the government alleges
has given money to Hamas. The ACLU will argue that the government's
exclusion of Ramadan was motivated not by anything he did but by his
vocal criticism of U.S. foreign policy.
"By denying visas to prominent foreign scholars and writers simply
because they were critical of United States foreign policy, the Bush
administration used immigration laws to skew and stifle political
debate inside the U.S.," said Jameel Jaffer, Director of the ACLU
National Security Project, who will argue the case for the plaintiffs.
"While the government has an interest in excluding people who present a
threat to the country, it doesn't have any legitimate interest in
excluding foreign nationals simply because of their political views.
The Bush administration was wrong to revive this Cold War practice, and
the Obama administration should not defend it."
The appeal stems from a January 2006
lawsuit challenging Professor Ramadan's exclusion filed by the ACLU and
the New York Civil Liberties Union on behalf of the American Academy of
Religion, the American Association of University Professors and the PEN
American Center. A federal judge wrongly upheld the exclusion in
December 2007.
WHAT:
Oral arguments in American Academy of Religion v. Napolitano, a challenge to the exclusion of Professor Tariq Ramadan from the U.S. on the basis of his political views.
WHO:
Jaffer will argue the case before
Judges Wilfred Feinberg, Jon O. Newman and Reena Raggi of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Attorneys on the case are
Jaffer, Melissa Goodman, Lucas Guttentag and Judy Rabinovitz of the
ACLU, Arthur Eisenberg of the NYCLU, and New York immigration lawyer
Claudia Slovinsky. The lawsuit was originally brought against
then-Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and
then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
WHEN:
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
10:00 a.m. EDT
WHERE:
Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse
Ceremonial Courtroom, 9th Fl.
500 Pearl Street
New York, NY 10007
More information about the Ramadan
case, the history of ideological exclusion, and the ACLU's separate
lawsuit concerning the exclusion of South African scholar Adam Habib is
available online at: www.aclu.org/exclusion
The American Civil Liberties Union was founded in 1920 and is our nation's guardian of liberty. The ACLU works in the courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to all people in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States.
(212) 549-2666LATEST NEWS
63% of US Voters Oppose Attack on Venezuela as Trump's March to War Accelerates
The new poll comes as the US president openly plots to seize Venezuela’s oil supply.
Dec 18, 2025
President Donald Trump has taken increasingly aggressive actions against Venezuela in recent weeks, but a new poll released Wednesday shows US voters are not on board with a new war.
A new poll from Quinnipiac University found that 63% of voters oppose military operations inside Venezuela, with just 25% registering support.
What's more, a US military strike in Venezuela would draw significant opposition even from Republican voters, 33% of whom told Quinnipiac that they would oppose such an action. Eighty-nine percent of Democratic voters and 68% of independent voters said they were opposed to a US military campaign in Venezuela.
Trump's policy of bombing suspected drug trafficking boats in international waters, which many legal experts consider to be acts of murder, drew significantly less opposition in the new survey than a prospective attack on Venezuela, but it is still unpopular, with 42% in favor and 53% opposed.
A potential war is also unpopular with Venezuelans, as a recent survey from Caracas-based pollster Datanalisis found 55% opposed to a foreign military attack on their nation, with 23% in favor.
The Trump administration's boat strikes, which have now killed at least 99 people, have been just one aspect of its campaign of military aggression against Venezuela. The US military last week seized a Venezuelan oil tanker, and Trump has said that it's only a matter of time before the military launches strikes against targets inside the country.
Trump on Wednesday also said that one goal of his campaign against Venezuela would be to seize the country's oil supply.
“Getting land, oil rights, whatever we had—they took it away because we had a president that maybe wasn’t watching,” Trump said while talking to reporters. “But they’re not gonna do that. We want it back. They took our oil rights. We had a lot of oil there. They threw our companies out. And we want it back."
Venezuela first nationalized its oil industry in 1976, and the US has no legitimate claim to the nation's petroleum supply.
Keep ReadingShow Less
AOC Dismisses Premature 2028 Polls, But Says ‘I Would Stomp’ JD Vance
A survey this week showed the congresswoman leading the vice president 51-49 in a hypothetical presidential matchup.
Dec 18, 2025
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gave a cheeky reaction after a poll suggested that she'd slightly edge out Vice President JD Vance in a hypothetical presidential election in 2028.
The survey of over 1,500 registered voters, published Wednesday by The Argument/Verasight, showed Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) leading Vance 51-49 and winning back several key voting demographics that propelled Trump's return to the White House last year.
As she walked out of the Capitol building Wednesday evening, the Bronx congresswoman was asked about the poll by Pablo Manríquez, the editor of Migrant Insider.
She responded to the question with a laugh: "These polls three years out, they are what they are. But, let the record show I would stomp him! I would stomp him!" she said before getting into her car.
Neither Ocasio-Cortez nor Vance has officially announced a presidential run. But Vance is considered by many to be a natural successor to President Donald Trump. The president and his allies have suggested he could run for an unconstitutional third term.
Ocasio-Cortez, meanwhile, is reportedly mulling either a presidential run or a bid to take down the increasingly unpopular Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).
More than two years out from a Democratic primary, Ocasio-Cortez is considered a likely choice to fill the progressive lane in 2028, with support for increasingly popular, affordability-focused policies, including Medicare for All.
However, despite her strong support among young voters, early polls show her behind California Gov. Gavin Newsom and former Vice President Kamala Harris for the Democratic nomination.
Wednesday's poll showed that in a hypothetical contest against Vance, Newsom had a 53% to 47% edge, a margin only slightly larger than Ocasio-Cortez's.
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 13: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) speaks during a mark up meeting with the House Committee on Energy and Commerce committee on Capitol Hill on May 13, 2025 in Washington, DC. The committee met to discuss legislative recommendations for budget reconciliation. The committee room was surrounded by protesters fearing cuts or increased costs to medicaid.
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 13: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) speaks during a mark up meeting with the House Committee on Energy and Commerce committee on Capitol Hill on May 13, 2025 in Washington, DC. The committee met to discuss legislative recommendations for budget reconciliation. The committee room was surrounded by protesters fearing cuts or increased costs to medicaid.Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty ImagesKeep ReadingShow Less
4 More Killed in Pacific Boat Strike as White House Ramps Up Demands for Venezuelan Oil
President Donald Trump “wants to keep on blowing boats up until Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro cries uncle," said White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles in a recent interview.
Dec 18, 2025
Hours after US House Republicans voted down a war powers resolution Wednesday aimed stopping the Trump administration from continuing its attacks on "presidentially designated" terrorist organizations, the death toll of the Pentagon's continued boat strikes was brought to 99 with the latest bombing in the Pacific Ocean.
US Southern Command reported Wednesday night that at the direction of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, the military had killed four people in a "kinetic strike on a vessel operated by a Designated Terrorist Organization in international waters."
As with the rest of the more than two dozen bombings that the administration has carried out in the Caribbean and Pacific since September, the Pentagon said that intelligence had confirmed the boat was "engaged in narco-trafficking operations."
The White House has not released evidence that the boats it's targeted were carrying drugs. In the past, the US military has been involved in intercepting vessels suspected of drug trafficking and charging passengers with a criminal offense, but President Donald Trump has insisted the US is engaged in an armed conflict with drug cartels in the Western Hemisphere, including in Venezuela.
US and international intelligence agencies have not found Venezuela to be a significant source of drugs flowing into the US and have found the country to play virtually no role in the trafficking of fentanyl, the biggest cause of drug overdoses in the US.
The latest boat bombing came a day after Trump announced a "total and complete blockade" on oil tankers approaching and leaving Venezuela, accusing the country of stealing "Oil, Land, and other Assets" from the US.
Venezuela nationalized its petroleum sector in 1976, taking control of its own vast oil reserves. Previously, US-based companies had largely controlled the country's oil industry. In 2007, then-President Hugo Chavez further pushed out US oil giants such as Exxon Mobil when he nationalized foreign oil projects in Venezuela.
Stephen Miller, a top adviser to Trump, accused Venezuela's government of "theft" on Wednesday.
“American sweat, ingenuity, and toil created the oil industry in Venezuela,” Miller said in a social media post. “Its tyrannical expropriation was the largest recorded theft of American wealth and property. These pillaged assets were then used to fund terrorism and flood our streets with killers, mercenaries, and drugs.”
Regarding the blockade, Trump also said Wednesday that Venezuela "illegally took" US energy rights.
While the administration has insisted for months that its deadly boat strikes are aimed at stopping drug trafficking, comments from White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles in an extensive Vanity Fair interview released Tuesday further confirmed that the White House aims to take control of the South American country.
Trump “wants to keep on blowing boats up until Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro cries uncle," said Wiles.
Brian Finucane, senior adviser at the International Crisis Group, said Wednesday night's boat strike amounted to "more premeditated killing outside of armed conflict."
"There's a word for that," he said.
Legal experts have said the repeated, lethal bombings of boats have been part of a campaign of extrajudicial killings and have warned Hegseth and others involved in the attacks could be liable for murder.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


