

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Lindsay Meiman
Senior U.S. Communications Specialist
lindsay@350.org
us-comms@350.org
+1 347 460 9082
New York, USA
From October 29th to November 6th, 350.org and allies in every region of the globe will unleash a wave of over 120 coordinated actions in 26 countries targeting financial institutions that continue to prop up the fossil fuel industry. The actions express the public feeling of urgency and see people taking action into their own hands to stop the criminal funding of fossil fuels that is killing populations around the world right now, and to demand climate justice.
From Manila to New York, Sao Paulo to Nairobi, London to the Pacific and across Europe, thousands of people will be taking to the streets and protesting in front of some of the world's biggest banks and financial institutions to demand that they end all funding for fossil fuels and direct resources to finance a just energy transition, supporting the most vulnerable nations to tackle climate breakdown. Creative protests will include street murals and projections. Climate memorials will be held to remember those who have already lost their lives to the climate crisis.

Planned actions by region/country:
Africa: A series of actions are being planned across Africa, targeting Presidents, the COP26 country delegates, Africa Development Bank (AfDB), FMO, Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) and Total - including amongst other things: street actions in Ivory Coast, street art and twitter action in Togo, and delivery of a letter to the Senegal President to stop the Bargny coal plant.
Europe: In Europe, dozens of creative and disruptive actions will be taking place in several of the world's biggest financial centres - including London, Paris, Frankfurt, Zurich, Brussels and Amsterdam. This will include actions targeting the Bank of England, ABP, Deutsche Bank, Credit Suisse, Barclays, National Bank of Belgium, and French banks funding Total.
United States: Organizers around the US are gathering in person and virtually in over 20 actions to demand the Federal Reserve, Chase Bank and CitiBank to end fossil finance and account for climate risk.
Asia: Youth organizers around Asia are leading actions, both digital and offline, in 7 different countries. In Malaysia, there will be a webinar/panel discussion & film screening about indigenous women resilience & loss and damage.
Turkey: There will be photo opportunities led by volunteers and local groups on November 5th, and the plan also includes a letter to be shared with financial institutions to demand divesting from coal, and a specific action on Hunutlu coal power plant.
Pacific: The Pacific Climate Warriors will be taking the #Youth4Pacific Declaration on Climate Change to COP26, with a 7-day challenge that includes sign-making, TikTok, Instagram selfies, defund climate chaos online rally against Adani investors, and a youth empowerment training.
Latin America: Indigenous peoples and environmentalists will join forces in a creative direct action challenging the greenwashing narrative of a major bank in Latin America, that keeps claiming to be "green" while investing billions of USD in fossil fuels exploration expansion in the Brazilian Amazon and other key areas for the planet.
Quote Sheet
"The era of fossil fuels is over, and people are rallying against fossil finance and those who run it. We need decision-makers and financial institutions to seize the opportunity to speed up climate action and build healthier, more equitable societies and resilient economies. It is past time for rich countries and financial institutions to fund the energy transition we need fast and at scale." Farzana Faruk, climate justice activist from Fridays for Future Bangladesh, and member of the Most Affected Peoples and Areas (MAPA)
"I believe that the youth is a self-constituted historical actor, that will define its own future, and that we cannot expect anything from the others. Our expectations have already been disappointed. Time is running out, and we must act." Joaquin Herrero, Argentinean climate activist at Jovenes por el Clima
"With the support of leading financial institutions, the fossil fuel industry has continued to wreak havoc on the environment and local communities in Africa. Some of the countries in the continent that have contributed the least to climate change are suffering the most from its effects. Financial institutions should stop funding fossil fuels and instead channel those funds towards helping these vulnerable countries to adapt and transition into a sustainable future fuelled by clean energy." Landry Ninteretse, 350.org Africa Managing Director
"We call on world leaders meeting at COP26 to align with the interests of the world's majority, who are rising up to the challenge of thriving amidst the heating climate. Governments must act with true solutions and policies which include fair, ambitious and binding emissions reduction targets under their nationally determined contributions, not just zero carbon pledges that look good but provide inadequate action. This can only happen if economic stimulus is rerouted to renewable energy solutions, especially those that are locally-owned and controlled, and investments must also be put in place to ensure resilience for future crises." Chuck Baclagon, 350.org Asia Regional Finance Campaigner
"Urgent collective action is required especially for the most affected nations and communities. Financial institutions who run our economies, especially banks in developed countries, must do their part by halting all of their funding of climate chaos, and directing resources to climate finance for adaptation and mitigation. The Pacific has felt the impacts of climate breakdown over the past few years as tropical cyclones have become more frequent, destructive and unpredictable. COP26 will be a pivotal event, and failure to deliver on its goals means bringing literal disaster not just for Pacific Islanders but for communities across the world." Joseph Sikulu, 350.org Pacific Managing Director
"Many financial institutions including world's biggest banks are still directly funding fossil fuel assets, which means funding the climate crisis. At COP26, each and every actor shall make it loud: with just transition policies, the costs of transitioning to net zero targets are less than the disruptive impact of climate change on companies, banks and the economy. It is time especially for financial institutions to take the responsibility and to stop funding fossil fuel assets once and for all." Selen, Baycoll, 350.org Turkey Finance Campaigner
Activists in some of the world's biggest finance hubs - including London, Paris, Frankfurt and Zurich - are taking to the streets to demand that European banks stop profiting from destruction. By financing fossil fuel projects in countries such as Argentina, Uganda and Bangladesh, they're trampling on human rights and the environment, just so their wealthy shareholders and executives can get even richer. This is climate colonialism, and it has to stop. It's hypocritical for UK and EU leaders to present themselves as climate champions while their countries' biggest businesses and banks continue to wreak havoc around the world. Enough is enough. It's time to end fossil fuel finance." Tonny Nowshin, 350.org Germany Campaigner
"Ahead of the pivotal global climate convening COP26 in Glasgow, organizers around the United States gathered in person and virtually to demand our central bank, Federal Reserve, account for climate risk. We know that for decades, Big Oil has known and lied about the reality of the climate crisis. That's why we are targeting the Federal Reserve. The window of opportunity to tackle the climate crisis is nearing its close. If Biden is truly the Climate President he says he is, we demand he ensure consistent and bold climate legislation and choose a Climate Chair to head up the Fed." Brooke Harper, 350.org US Regional Campaign Strategist
"By continuing to support the expansion of gas and oil in the Amazon, banks are telling their clients that they just don't care about the risk of disasters, deforestation and the impacts on Indigenous Peoples. That's why several indigenous representatives and climate activists are coming together to prevent financial institutions from continuing to invest in the expansion of oil and gas in this region. Expanding these sectors in the world's largest tropical forest means opening a risk box, from which historic disasters can emerge. A strategy of unsustainable, irresponsible short-term profit is a shot in the foot of the banks themselves." Ilan Zugman, 350.org Latin America Managing Director
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
"Saying so privately to some big donors is very different than publicly calling for transparency from the DNC, which is badly needed," said Norman Solomon of RootsAction, which has led calls for the release.
Even former Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly "has no problem with a public airing" of the Democratic National Committee's internal "autopsy" report on her 2024 loss to Republican President Donald Trump—which the DNC has continued to conceal, despite mounting demands for transparency.
Harris' position was reported Thursday by NBC News, which noted that "while she indicated to donors that she had no issue with releasing it, Harris has not discussed the postmortem with DNC Chairman Ken Martin and did not know about his decision to keep it under wraps until it happened."
NBC cited "a person who has heard the conversations," one of multiple sources journalists Jonathan Allen and Natasha Korecki spoke with for their broader report exploring "turmoil over the Democratic Party’s future" and Harris' consideration of a 2028 run.
For months, Martin has resisted pressure to release the autopsy—which, as Axios revealed in February, found that the Biden administration's support for Israel's genocidal assault on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip contributed to Harris' defeat.
Citing a "person close to Harris," NBC also reported Thursday that the former VP "is signaling privately that she has more to say about the Middle East now that she is freed from the Biden White House policy," and "she is likely to do so after the midterm elections," either "from the perspective of a party elder or from the perspective of a candidate seeking votes."
While touring the country for the book she wrote after her loss, Harris has publicly acknowledged that she is weighing another White House run. Though the 2028 election is two and a half years away, she has led early polling. However, the party's potential primary field is incredibly crowded, featuring dozens of current or former governors and members of Congress.
Potential contenders include governors from the Trump 2.0 era—such as Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois, Andy Beshear of Kentucky, and Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan—as well as leading progressive voices in Congress, such as Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).
Norman Solomon, national director of RootsAction, which has spearheaded calls for publishing the full postmortem, wrote in a recent opinion piece for Common Dreams that "Martin's concealment of the autopsy report puts a thumb on the scale for one candidate: Kamala Harris."
Solomon highlighted the DNC's reported conclusion about the role of the Gaza genocide in the election result, and suggested that "renewed attention to the Harris 2024 finances would also be unwelcome."
In response to Harris' reported remarks to donors, Solomon said Thursday that "more than four months have passed since Martin announced he was reneging on his promise to release the autopsy.
"But Harris still hasn't made any public statement that she believes it should be released," he added. "Saying so privately to some big donors is very different than publicly calling for transparency from the DNC, which is badly needed."
"Although the FCC has the authority to ensure broadcasters operate in the public interest, it cannot serve as President Trump’s roving censor."
A group of Senate Democrats on Thursday told Federal Communications Chairman Brendan Carr to back off his threats to strip Disney-owned TV network ABC of its broadcast licenses.
In a letter addressed to Carr, the Democrats took Carr to task for ordering Disney to file early license renewals for eight ABC stations shortly after President Donald Trump demanded that the network fire late-night host Jimmy Kimmel.
Kimmel earned Trump's ire when he jokingly likened first lady Melania Trump to an "expectant widow" days before a gunman stormed into the White House Correspondents' Dinner in an alleged attempt to assassinate the president.
The senators called Carr's order an "extraordinary abuse of power" and "the latest and most extreme step in your use of the FCC’s licensing authority as a cudgel against broadcasters whose editorial choices displease the president."
The Democrats charged that the order "appears to penalize Disney for refusing to capitulate to Trump’s demands to fire Kimmel and to send a message to other broadcasters: Modify your speech to favor Trump or face the FCC’s wrath," while noting that the order was the first time in over 50 years that the commission had called on a broadcaster to apply for early renewal.
The day before the order to Disney, the FCC sent a similar order to a small station license holder called Bridge News.
Carr's order to Disney was also part of a broad pattern of Trump administration assaults on the free press, including calls to fire Kimmel last year after the comedian said Trump and his political allies were trying “to score political points" after the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.
"Although the FCC has the authority to ensure broadcasters operate in the public interest," they wrote, "it cannot serve as President Trump’s roving censor, threatening to revoke licenses against broadcasters whose editorial content—including a comedian’s jokes—displeases the president."
The Democrats concluded their letter by asking Carr to provide information about the timing and process by which the FCC decided to send Disney its early renewal order, including whether any FCC staff had communicated with the White House about the order before it was issued.
The letter was signed by Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Maria Cantwell (D-NM), Ben Ray Lujan (D-NM), John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), and Elizabethe Warren (D-Mass.).
"Performative dipshittery, wrapped in fictional jingoism, delivered by an incompetent drunk wearing the clothes of an adolescent boy," said one critic of Hegseth's video.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth drew instant ridicule on Thursday after he released a video touting President Donald Trump's proposed $1.5 trillion military budget as a fiscally responsible plan that is "putting the American taxpayer first."
At the start of the video, Hegseth accuses defense contractors of bilking the Pentagon for expenses such as factory construction, while also constantly charging more for cost overruns.
Hegseth then claims that Trump has brought together a group of private-sector negotiators whom he's labeled "Deal Team Six" to lay down the law on the defense industry and save the US taxpayer money.
Thanks to President Trump’s $1.5 trillion defense budget, this War Department has moved from bureaucracy to business.
This is a FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT in our Arsenal of Freedom—ensuring our military remains the most lethal fighting force in the world. pic.twitter.com/ykIfMw3kuU
— Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (@SecWar) May 7, 2026
Hegseth never explains how it is possible that the president and his "Deal Team Six" are saving US taxpayers money while at the same time asking US taxpayers to fund a $1.5 trillion military budget that would be over 50% more than the 2025 US defense budget and more than four times the money spent on defense by China, the world's second biggest defense spender.
Regardless, Hegseth wrote in a social media post that the $1.5 trillion budget would be "a FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT in our Arsenal of Freedom—ensuring our military remains the most lethal fighting force in the world."
Critics of the Trump administration erupted in mockery after seeing the Hegseth video.
"Spread this lame ass video everywhere," wrote Pod Save America co-host Tommy Vietor, a former National Security Council staffer under President Barack Obama. "I want every voter to know that Trump has requested a $1.5 TRILLION Pentagon budget. Shut up if you want better healthcare or for Social Security to remain solvent. All you get is more bombs to drop on Iranian schools."
Indigo Olivier, a reporter for The New Republic, said Democrats could make the proposed Trump budget a winning issue given how many other problems—including the rising costs of gasoline, groceries, and healthcare—that the Trump administration seemingly has no interest in addressing.
"I would love to hear Democrats talk about Pentagon price gouging with even half the energy they devote to Hasan Piker," she wrote. "The administration pushing a $1.5 trillion defense budget somehow becoming the face of anti-waste messaging is political malpractice."
Former Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) described Trump's proposed Pentagon budget as "hundreds of billions more in waste and fraud—at taxpayer expense."
"Remember when this administration pretended it was going to bring down the national debt?" Amash asked.
Former Republican political strategist Jeff Timmer delivered an even harsher assessment of Hegseth's video, which he labeled "performative dipshittery, wrapped in fictional jingoism, delivered by an incompetent drunk wearing the clothes of an adolescent boy."
Journalist Patrick Henningsen ripped Hegseth for delivering a "desperate, dumbed-down message" that he predicted would "go down in history as one of the biggest own-goals yet—and the worst pieces of war propaganda we’ve ever seen."
Steven Kosiak, nonresident fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, wrote an analysis last month of Trump's proposed $1.5 trillion military budget in which he said, "It is difficult to overstate just how massive an increase in defense spending this would represent, or how unhinged it seems to be from reality and sober policymaking."