SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A slowdown in the
sales of organic milk and dairy products, attributed in recent articles by the New
York Times and other media outlets to the weakened economy, has organic
dairy farmers from coast to coast at or near financial collapse. But a
worsening scandal in the industry might be doing more to economically injure
organic family farmers than the flattening of demand for organic dairy
products.
Since 2005, a handful of giant factory farms, each milking
thousands of cows, have been accused of skirting strict federal organic
regulations and creating a surplus of cheap "phony" organic milk
flooding the market and driving down profit margins for legitimate industry
participants. The Cornucopia Institute estimates that as much as 30-40%
of organic milk is now coming from giant industrial operations, milking as many
as 7000 cows each.
Last week, a judge in federal district court in St. Louis,
rejected 19 class-action lawsuits filed by consumers who are claiming fraud in
the sale of "organic" milk coming from one of the giant
operations. In 2007, federal investigators found the Aurora Dairy had
"willfully" violated 14 different federal organic regulations.
Consumers in 40 states sued, alleging fraud in the manufacture of organic milk
sold as storebrands in Wal-Mart, Target, Safeway, Costco and other national
chains served by Aurora.
Lawyers representing consumers
involved with the class-action lawsuits vow that they will appeal the
judge's initial ruling, especially in light of a recent Supreme Court
decision that clearly gives citizens the right to sue corporations that
allegedly act illegally even though federal regulatory agencies provide
statutory authority over certain industries.
According to Mark Kastel, the Senior Farm Policy Analyst for
The Cornucopia Institute, the dismissal was particularly distressing
"because Bush Administration officials had substantially softened USDA
penalties recommended by enforcement staff for Aurora's organic
transgressions." Cornucopia first alerted the USDA to
Aurora's violations by filing formal legal complaints with the agency.
"The very essence of the checks and balances system in
our three branches of government provides for citizens to seek remedy, when
regulatory agencies fail to enforce laws passed by Congress," said Gary
Cox, a Columbus, Ohio-based attorney with experience in the organic industry.
"It is our contention that a judicial review of the alleged
misconduct by these giant corporations, and the lack of enforcement by the
USDA, is not only appropriate but imperative."
The outcome of the pending suits will not only impact
consumers but many organic dairy farmers whose livelihoods are now threatened
by the giant corporate dairy marketers. A glut of organic milk on the
market now has the nation's organic processors attempting to reduce their
supply and cutting prices paid to farmers. Dean Foods, the nation's
largest milk processor, and owner of the Horizon Organic brand, and H. P. Hood,
a giant Boston-based milk bottler, that controls the Stonyfield milk label,
have both terminated contracts with farmers or allegedly attempted to strong
arm some of them out of business.
"I have invested my life in building this dairy farm,
and Hood encouraged many dairy producers to make major investments and ramp-up
for organic production, now my entire livelihood and the financial future of my
family is at risk," said Kevin Poetker who milks 200 cows near Waterloo,
IL, 24 miles SE of St. Louis.
Even Organic Valley, the farmer-owned cooperative that is
second only to Dean Foods in organic milk sales, has cut prices to their
members and asked them to reduce their milk production by 7%.
"Farmers who build their herds make long-term financial and management
decisions, and just shutting off even 7% of their milk is no easy task,"
Kastel said.
Thousands of letters, mostly from organic farmers, have been
sent to president Obama and USDA secretary Tom Vilsack asking them to
immediately intervene and undertake aggressive enforcement of organic
regulations, something lacking during the past administration.
The USDA's handling of the Aurora violations is not
the only instance where its enforcement actions have gone awry. Other
alleged violations have gone uninvestigated by agency staff. Cornucopia
has filed several additional complaints, based upon direct observation of
practices employed on other huge feedlot dairies owned by Aurora and Dean
Foods.
"Either the USDA refused to investigate or, when they
actually found violations, they have allowed illegal activities to
continue," Kastel lamented. "We are now appealing to the Obama
administration for a more ethical approach to enforcement in these
matters. Congress gave the USDA the responsibility of overseeing the
organic industry and now we are happy that some on Capitol Hill are considering
launching an investigation into, seemingly, favorable treatment for some corporate
players."
If there is good news for
consumers, it's that they have alternatives in the marketplace.
"Consumers seeking authentic, nutritionally superior organic milk have
many choices and we hope they will support the family farmers, the heroes who
built the organic industry," stated Ronnie Cummins of the Organic
Consumers Association.
A multi-year research study by The Cornucopia Institute
created a scorecard, posted on its website (www.cornucopia.org),
rating all 110 organic brands based on their ethical and legal approach to milk
production. The study indicates that 90% of organic milk, cheese, butter
and yogurt marketers are clearly subscribing to both the "spirit and
letter of the organic regulations."
"These giant factory farms are a bad aberration.
Unfortunately they are associated with a couple of the largest participants in
the industry. We need consumers to step up and make careful choices in
the supermarket so they reward the true heroes in this industry and send a
strong message to the bad actors," Kastel said. "Some organic
farmers out there desperately need the help and support of consumers."
- 30 -
A copy of the judge's decision, from the US District Court,
Eastern Division of Missouri, in St. Louis, can be obtained by contacting The
Cornucopia Institute.
The organic dairy products scorecard can be viewed at:
https://www.cornucopia.org/2008/01/dairy-report-and-scorecard/
The Cornucopia Institute website is:
The USDA's National Organic Program website is:
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
"We urge everyone to join this effort in their own communities," said the Maine Coalition for Palestine. "Our tax money should not be spent killing women and children in Palestine."
Lawmakers in Portland, Maine voted unanimously on Wednesday to divest public funds from "all entities complicit" in Israel's assault on the Gaza Strip, making the city the first on the U.S. East Coast to take such a step.
Sponsored by the Maine Coalition for Palestine and the Maine chapter of Jewish Voices for Peace (JVP), the newly approved resolution contains a "divestment list" of more than 85 companies, from U.S.-based Chevron, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing to Israel-based Elbit Systems. The list also includes public entities such as Israel Bonds and state-owned Israel Aerospace Industries.
"The city of Portland recognizes the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza and seeks to avoid economically supporting this crisis through the city's financial investments," the resolution states. "The city council urges that the city manager divest the city of Portland from all entities complicit in the current and ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza and occupation of Palestine, including, without limitation, all entities on the divestment list when it is feasible and carries no financial penalty to the city."
Additionally, the resolution "urges the city manager to not make any future directly held general fund investment in any entities complicit in the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and occupation of Palestine."
The Maine Coalition for Palestine said Wednesday's vote makes Portland the fourth U.S. city to adopt an Israel divestment resolution. Two California cities—Hayward and Richmond—and Hamtramck, Michigan passed similar divestment resolutions earlier this year.
"Just as the people of the world spoke to end South African apartheid with economic pressure, we must do the same for Israeli apartheid and genocide."
In a statement, the Maine coalition called out the state's congressional delegation and the Biden administration for supporting Israel's destruction of Gaza, whose population is facing mass starvation and disease—including the reemergence of polio.
"Generations of families are being decimated by U.S. bombs supplied to Israel," the coalition said. "Maine Senators [Susan] Collins and [Angus] King, and Representative [Jared] Golden, accept significant campaign contributions from the Israel lobby, and they have refused to listen to their constituents' demands."
"Americans overwhelmingly want a cease-fire and an arms embargo," the group continued. "Divestment sends a clear message that current U.S. policy towards Palestinians is morally unacceptable and does not serve the interests of our country. We urge everyone to join this effort in their own communities. Our tax money should not be spent killing women and children in Palestine."
Sarah Snyder, a spokesperson for the Maine chapter of JVP, said that "as Jews in Portland, we have immense gratitude for the Portland City Council's resolution to divest municipal funds from the Israeli government and corporations complicit in the ongoing genocide of Palestinians."
"We are outraged and grief-stricken by the continued atrocities perpetrated by Israel," Snyder added, "and fully support our city heeding the call to divest. Just as the people of the world spoke to end South African apartheid with economic pressure, we must do the same for Israeli apartheid and genocide."
"Harris seems to be making a policy choice based on the disproven, failed ideology of trickle-down economics, and giving petulant billionaires a gift in the process," said one progressive advocacy group.
Democratic nominee Kamala Harris broke with President Joe Biden on Wednesday by proposing a smaller capital gains tax increase for wealthy Americans, a decision that one progressive advocacy group decried as a "baffling capitulation to Wall Street billionaires" who have vocally complained about the vice president's embrace of higher taxes on the ultra-rich.
Harris said at a campaign event in New Hampshire on Wednesday that "if you earn a million dollars a year or more, the tax rate on your long-term capital gains will be 28% under my plan," broadly confirming earlier reporting by The Wall Street Journal.
"We know when the government encourages investment, it leads to broad-based economic growth and it creates jobs, which makes our economy stronger," said Harris, who previously signaled support for Biden's tax agenda.
A 28% top tax rate on long-term capital gains—profits from the sale of an asset held for more than a year—would be significantly lower than the 39.6% rate that Biden proposed in his most recent budget.
The Patriotic Millionaires, a group of rich Americans that advocates for a more progressive tax system, said it was "appalled" by Harris' decision to pare back Biden's proposed capital gains tax increase.
"Vice President Harris is making a catastrophic mistake by capitulating to the petulant whining of the billionaire class," said Morris Pearl, the group's chair. "Harris seems to be making a policy choice based on the disproven, failed ideology of trickle-down economics, and giving petulant billionaires a gift in the process."
"Both on the economics and on the politics, this is a serious unforced error."
Details of Harris' capital gains tax plan began to emerge days after ultra-rich investors and other major donors to the vice president's 2024 campaign took to the pages of The New York Times to express concerns about Harris' support for Biden's tax agenda, which also calls for taxing the unrealized capital gains of households worth over $100 million.
The Financial Timesdescribed Harris' break with Biden on long-term capital gains as "an olive branch to Wall Street"; The New York Times similarly characterized the move as a message to the business community that she is "friendlier than Biden."
But Pearl of the Patriotic Millionaires warned that the policy shift "demonstrates a concerning lack of commitment to reversing destabilizing economic inequality."
"Both on the economics and on the politics, this is a serious unforced error," said Pearl, the former managing director at the investment behemoth BlackRock. "You don't need my years of experience on Wall Street to grasp the obvious. Big investors invest to make serious money, not to save a few percentage points on their tax bill. No one has ever made a lucrative investment decision based on a preferential tax rate. The incentive to invest is making money, not lowering tax rates."
"This ill-advised, destructive policy is a giveaway to the ultra-rich," he added. "We hope Vice President Harris will reconsider her position."
Even with a smaller proposed capital gains tax increase, Harris' tax agenda stands in stark contrast to that of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, who has called for massive additional tax cuts for the rich and large corporations while attacking Harris' support for progressive—and widely popular—tax proposals.
While Trump has not yet outlined a capital gains proposal during the 2024 campaign, the former president said in the final year of his first term that he would propose cutting the top capital gains rate to 15% in a second term.
Steve Wamhoff of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy noted at the time that 99% of the benefits of such a cut "would go to the richest 1% of taxpayers."
"It is time for Dr. de la Torre to get off of his $40 million yacht and explain to the American people how much he has gained financially while bankrupting the hospitals he manages."
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday blasted Dr. Ralph de la Torre—the CEO of a bankrupt health services company "who has made hundreds of millions of dollars ripping off patients and healthcare providers"—for refusing to comply with a bipartisan subpoena compelling him to testify about his company's insolvency.
"Perhaps more than anyone else in America, Dr. de la Torre is the poster child for the type of outrageous corporate greed that is permeating through our for-profit healthcare system," said Sanders (I-Vt.), who chairs the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP).
"Working with private equity vultures, he became obscenely wealthy by loading up hospitals across the country with billions in debt and selling the land underneath these hospitals to real estate executives who charge unsustainably high rent," the senator added. "As a result, Steward Health Care, and the more than 30 hospitals it owns in eight states, were forced to declare bankruptcy with some $9 billion in debt."
Steward is trying to sell all 31 of its hospitals in order to pay down its debt.
As Common Dreamsreported on July 25, the HELP committee, which includes 10 Republicans, voted 20-1 to investigate Steward Health Care's bankruptcy, and 16-4 to subpoena de la Torre.
"I am now working with members of the HELP committee to determine the best path forward," Sanders said on Wednesday. "But let me be clear: We will not accept this postponement. Congress will hold Dr. de la Torre accountable for his greed and for the damage he has caused to hospitals and patients throughout America. This committee intends to move forward aggressively to compel Dr. de la Torre to testify to the gross mismanagement of Steward Health Care."
"It is time for Dr. de la Torre to get off of his $40 million yacht and explain to the American people how much he has gained financially while bankrupting the hospitals he manages," Sanders added, referring to the 190-foot megayacht the CEO purchased as Steward hospitals failed to pay their bills.
Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.)—a HELP committee member—and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) also slammed de la Torre on Wednesday, calling his failure to appear before the panel "outrageous."
"De la Torre used hospitals as his personal piggy bank and lived in luxury while gutting Steward hospitals," the senators said. "De la Torre is as cowardly as he is cruel. He owes the public and Congress answers for his appalling greed—and de la Torre must be held in contempt if he fails to appear before the committee."
De la Torre's attorney, Alexander Merton, lashed out against the Senate subpoena Wednesday in a letter
accusing HELP committee members of being "determined to turn the hearing into a pseudo-criminal proceeding in which they use the time, not to gather facts, but to convict Dr. de la Torre in the eyes of public opinion."
The same day the HELP Committee voted to probe Steward and subpoena de la Torre, Markey and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus, introduced the Health Over Wealth Act, which would increase the powers of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to block private equity deals in the healthcare industry.
Last month, Markey and Warren expressed concerns over the proposed $245 million sale of Steward Health Care's nationwide physician network to a private equity firm.
"Two Massachusetts hospitals are closing and communities are suffering because of private equity's looting of Steward," said Warren. "Selling Massachusetts doctors to another private equity firm could be a disaster. We can't make the same mistake again. Regulators must scrutinize this deal."