February, 20 2025,  04:35pm EDT

271,500 Workers Went on Strike in 2024
271,500 workers were involved in major strikes in 2024, according to an EPI analysis of data released this morning from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This marks a 41% decrease compared with 2023 but remains significantly higher than average strike activity over the past two decades.
These strikes included workers across the country—from health care workers in California to public school teachers in Massachusetts to telecommunications workers in the South. Of the 31 total major work stoppages in 2024, 21 of them (68%) took place in the private sector. Major work stoppages took place in 18 states in 2024. The five states with the most stoppages were California (10), Oregon (5), Washington (5), Illinois (3), and New York (3).
Crucially, the BLS data do not capture all strike activity because they only include strikes involving 1,000 or more workers lasting at least one full shift. For example, the 2024 data did not capture an eight-day strike involving 600 New York Times Games and Cooking workers because it did not meet the size limitations of the BLS.
Hundreds of thousands of workers went on strike despite decades of federal policy and court decisions that have curtailed workers’ right to strike. Further, millions of workers—including public-sector, agricultural, and domestic workers—either have limited or no right to strike because they remain excluded from federal labor law protections. Workers are also not eligible for unemployment insurance, except in two states (New Jersey and New York) that have passed such legislation.
“Strikes provide critical leverage to workers seeking better pay and working conditions at a time when employers routinely violate labor law or refuse to recognize unions. Federal and state policy action is needed to strengthen the right to strike,” said Margaret Poydock, EPI senior policy analyst.
EPI is an independent, nonprofit think tank that researches the impact of economic trends and policies on working people in the United States. EPI's research helps policymakers, opinion leaders, advocates, journalists, and the public understand the bread-and-butter issues affecting ordinary Americans.
(202) 775-8810LATEST NEWS
Demand for Trump's Social Security Chief Bisignano to Resign After $30 Billion Implosion of Former Company
"Bisignano is in charge of the American people’s hard-earned Social Security benefits, as well as the collection of our taxes," said one advocate. "If he engaged in wrongdoing, the people need to know."
Oct 30, 2025
The new CEO of the financial services technology company Fiserv said Wednesday that the firm's financial outlook was grim, sending its stock collapsing by more than 40% and erasing $30 billion in market value—and laid the blame squarely with a Trump administration appointee whom the president has praised as "amazing."
When nominating former Fiserv CEO Frank Bisignano as Social Security administrator earlier this year, President Donald Trump said the executive frequently "takes troubled entities and turns them around."
With current Fiserv chief Mike Lyons warning on Wednesday that Bisignano had made major missteps as CEO, overinflating its sales projections and relying on short-term cost-cutting before selling his stock for $500 million, the advocacy group Social Security Works said beneficiaries of the government's anti-poverty program for senior citizens should be alarmed that the former executive is now in charge of their crucial benefits.
"Fiserv lost 40% of its value because the former CEO, Frank Bisignano, is a liar," said SSW. "But Bisignano is Trump's buddy, so he can only fail up. He's now in charge of your Social Security."
Lyons told analysts and investors that when Bisignano was leading Fiserv from 2020 until earlier this year, the company made sales projections that "would have been objectively difficult to achieve even with the right investment and strong execution."
He added that Bisignano made "decisions to defer certain investments and cut certain costs [which] improved margins in the short term but are now limiting our ability to serve clients in a world-class way, execute product launches to our standards and grow revenue to our full potential.”
Translating Lyons' comment, Brett Arends wrote at MarketWatch that "under Bisignano, the company made forecasts it could not plausibly have achieved" and that the former CEO "was chasing short-term quarterly results, not building the business."
"Did Bisignano know that Fiserv’s stock was about to tank, and ask his friend Donald Trump for a life raft?"
Lyons broke the news to investors weeks after a police pension fund sued Fiserv and Bisignano, as well as the new CEO, for "artificially inflating [Fiserv’s] growth numbers."
But along with causing his former company's value to plummet, emphasized SSW president Nancy Altman on Thursday, Bisignano personally benefited from overestimating his firm's performance—selling more than three million shares after he was appointed Social Security administrator for at least $500 million.
"That sale saved him $300 million (and counting) in stock value," said Altman. "Did Bisignano know that Fiserv’s stock was about to tank, and ask his friend Donald Trump for a life raft?"
Altman demanded that Bisignano "resign immediately" from his roles at the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service, where he was also named the first-ever CEO earlier this month.
"Bisignano is in charge of the American people’s hard-earned Social Security benefits, as well as the collection of our taxes—despite his total lack of expertise, or even basic knowledge, of either," said Altman. "He infamously admitted that he had to Google ‘Social Security’ when Trump offered him the job. If he engaged in wrongdoing, the people need to know."
Altman called on the US Department of Justice and Congress to launch "immediate" investigations into Bisignano's conduct as CEO of Fiserv, but noted that with Republican allies of Trump running the government, the former executive is unlikely to be held accountable."
"The only recourse," said Altman, "is for Democrats to win control of Congress and make investigating Bisignano a top priority.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Even During Shutdown, Senate GOP Does Big Oil's Bidding With Vote to Gut Arctic Protections
"This vote will authorize the fossil fuel industry's continued destruction of habitat and landscapes that are critical for wildlife to survive."
Oct 30, 2025
The Republican-controlled US Senate voted Thursday to scrap a Biden-era policy that protected millions of acres in the Alaskan Arctic from fossil fuel drilling, even as the government shutdown continued with no end in sight.
The final vote on the resolution, led by Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), was 52-45, almost entirely along party lines. Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) was the only Democrat to join Republicans in voting for the measure, which aims to use the Congressional Review Act to revoke a 2022 Biden administration decision protecting swaths of the Western Arctic.
The resolution still must pass the House, which is also controlled by Republicans.
Athan Manuel, director of the Sierra Club's Lands Protection Program, said the vote shows that President Donald Trump and his Republican allies are "exploiting" the prolonged shutdown to "hand over our public lands and wild places to corporate polluters."
"Donald Trump's government shutdown has dragged on for nearly five weeks, and what is the top priority for Congressional Republicans? Opening up the western Arctic to oil and gas drilling, not funding services or making sure our military is paid?" said Manuel. "It's shameful."
Robert Dewey, vice president of government relations at Defenders of Wildlife, warned that "this vote will authorize the fossil fuel industry's continued destruction of habitat and landscapes that are critical for wildlife to survive."
"The Trump administration and its allies in Congress are prioritizing profits for oil executives and billionaires over the basic needs of hardworking Americans."
The Senate vote comes days after Trump's Interior Department, led by billionaire drilling enthusiast Doug Burgum, wrenched open all 1.56 million acres of the Coastal Plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas leasing.
Trump campaigned on a pledge to accelerate climate-destroying fossil fuel drilling and openly promised oil and gas executives that he would move swiftly to gut regulations in exchange for their financial support in the election.
One estimate released in the wake of the election found that oil and gas interests spent nearly $450 million to boost Trump and Republican candidates and bolster their legislative priorities on Capitol Hill.
Andy Moderow, senior director of policy at the Alaska Wilderness League, said in a statement that Thursday's vote "is yet another reminder that the Trump administration and its allies in Congress are prioritizing profits for oil executives and billionaires over the basic needs of hardworking Americans."
Keep ReadingShow Less
States in Emergency Mode as Trump GOP Refuses to Fund Food Aid for Poor Americans
While governors provide temporary relief, "people all over the country, particularly rural families who will be the ones disproportionately harmed by Trump's cruel games, are speaking out," noted one petition organizer.
Oct 30, 2025
As the Trump administration refuses to use existing federal funds for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, governors are stepping up to help the 42 million low-income Americans nationwide who are set to miss their collective $8 billion in monthly SNAP benefits, as long as the US government shutdown over healthcare continues in November.
Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul on Thursday declared a state of emergency and committed an additional $65 million in new state funds for food assistance, bringing the total she's announced in recent days to $106 million.
"The Trump administration is cutting food assistance off for 3 million New Yorkers, leaving our state to face an unprecedented public health crisis and hurting our grocers, bodegas, and farmers along the way," she said in a statement. "Unlike Washington Republicans, I won't sit idly by as families struggle to put food on the table."
While Hochul's funding for food banks and pantries has won her praise, Citizen Action of NY, Hunger Free America, and VOCAL-NY are calling on her to go even further. They said in a joint statement that "we agree that the federal government is illegally, immorally, and senselessly denying food assistance to 42 million people," but "the facts don't support Gov. Hochul's claim that no state can fund SNAP benefits to their residents."
"We urge her to use state funds to pay for all or some of November SNAP benefits, just as multiple other states have already done," the groups said. They noted that Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin and Democratic Delaware Gov. Matt Meyer "committed to funding SNAP benefits for the entire month of November," while Democratic New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham made a similar commitment for the first 10 days of the month, at which point the state government will revisit the situation.
Other governors are taking action more in line with Hochul. As the New York Times detailed: "California is releasing $80 million to bolster food banks in the state. Connecticut is allocating $3 million for that purpose, and Minnesota $4 million. On Thursday, Illinois set aside $20 million—$10 million from a new emergency reserve fund and $10 million from the state’s Department of Human Services—for seven food banks."
"In Hawaii, Gov. Josh Green, a Democrat, is diverting a $100 million surplus from the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program to help families with children pay their housing and utility bills, freeing up money in the family budget to be spent on food instead," according to the Times.
Arizona Mirror reported that Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs "announced Wednesday that she would disburse $1.5 million in leftover American Rescue Plan Act Covid relief funds to Arizona food banks, and that she would put another $300,000 toward an emergency fresh food program called Food Bucks Now."
BREAKING: Democrats just tried to pass a standalone bill to fund WIC & SNAP to make sure families don't go hungry during the Republican shutdown. Republicans BLOCKED it. So Trump won't use emergency funds to keep SNAP running, and Republicans won't let any bills pass. Shameful.
— Senator Patty Murray (@murray.senate.gov) October 29, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Over two dozen Democrat-led states are also suing the Trump administration over the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) refusing to use a contingency fund to at least partly cover November SNAP benefits. A federal judge appointed to the District of Massachusetts by former President Barack Obama began hearing arguments in the case on Thursday morning.
US District Judge Indira Talwani "appeared skeptical of arguments by Justice Department attorney Jason Altabet that the contingency funds could not be used to fund SNAP benefits during the shutdown," Reuters reported. During the hearing in Boston, Talwani told the government's lawyer, "You have money that was appropriated that could be used during this fiscal year."
A coalition of charitable and faith-based nonprofits, local governments, small businesses, and workers' rights groups filed a similar lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of Rhode Island on Thursday. The complaint, filed by Democracy Forward, declared that the Trump administration has "needlessly plunged SNAP into crisis" and asked the court to "immediately grant temporary relief to ensure that millions of Americans can continue to receive essential SNAP benefits."
The USDA has a contingency plan to keep SNAP running during a government shutdown — but the document laying out that plan has been deleted from the agency’s website.www.notus.org/trump-white-...
[image or embed]
— More Perfect Union (@moreperfectunion.bsky.social) October 30, 2025 at 10:25 AM
President Donald Trump and USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins are under similar pressure from the more than 50,000 people who have signed a MoveOn Civic Action petition, launched Wednesday night in partnership with Rural Organizing.
"Donald Trump is holding food for families hostage to force huge cuts to healthcare," said Rural Organizing's Shawn Sebastian. The government shutdown began at the start of the month because the White House and congressional Republicans wanted to maintain their funding plans, while Democrats pushed legislation to undo the GOP's recent Medicaid cuts and extend Affordable Care Act subsidies. Americans who get health insurance on ACA marketplaces are facing an imminent premium surge.
Sebastian said that "people all over the country, particularly rural families who will be the ones disproportionately harmed by Trump's cruel games, are speaking out for themselves and for their neighbors, by demanding USDA Secretary Rollins meet her responsibilities to the American people, follow precedent, and continue food assistance programs during the shutdown."
Trump is willingly withholding SNAP benefits from over 40 million Americans because he would rather use hunger as a bargaining chip than tap into emergency funding.It is a government’s job to protect its citizens, not use them as pawns.
— MoveOn (@moveon.org) October 29, 2025 at 8:15 PM
Two New York Democrats on Capitol Hill, Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Josh Riley, made a similar demand in a Thursday letter to Trump and Rollins signed by the state's entire Democratic congressional delegation, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries.
"With less than two days before benefits are halted, we urge USDA to use SNAP's available contingency funds to pay out November benefits, which would cover more than two-thirds of all benefits," they wrote. "USDA can then use its transfer authority, as it did for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), to cover the remaining gap and ensure benefits remain uninterrupted."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


