November, 17 2022, 10:08am EDT
Government Watchdog Urges Justice Department to Address Trump's Obstruction of Justice
In a letter released Thursday, the nonpartisan legal advocacy nonprofit, Free Speech For People, urges the Department to prosecute criminal offenses identified in the Mueller report, citing "disturbing precedent" set by the Department's refusal to prosecute these crimes since Trump left office.
WASHINGTON
Free Speech For People today issued a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Department of Justice, calling for action on multiple counts of obstruction of justice committed by former President Trump. The letter takes issue with the Department's handling of findings from the Mueller report in 2019, especially in contrast with the subsequent investigation led by Trump-backed Special Counsel John Durham.
The Mueller report found "substantial evidence" that President Trump had attempted to obstruct justice as the investigation into Russia's election interference in 2016 and coordination with the Trump campaign was underway. Examples include firing former FBI Director James Comey, attempting to fire Mueller and curtail the investigation, and encouraging his associates not to cooperate with the government. In declining to prosecute Trump for these crimes, Mueller relied on a controversial Department policy that a sitting president cannot be charged with a federal crime while in office. But as Mueller himself noted, that policy does not apply after the president leaves office and Trump may now be prosecuted for the obstruction of justice offenses identified in Mueller's report. Yet Attorney General Garland has yet to take any discernible action with respect to the evidence presented in the Mueller report.
Meanwhile, the letter describes the recent investigation by Special Counsel John Durham as "one of the most corrupt and politically-motivated investigations in Department history." Durham's investigation, ordered by former Attorney General William Barr, seeks to discredit persons who provided evidence in connection with the original inquiry into Russian election interference. Durham has failed to find any evidence warranting a conviction in the past three years. Two individuals, an attorney and an analyst, were prosecuted and later acquitted on all charges due to insufficient evidence.
In other words, the Mueller investigation found that Trump had obstructed justice in attempting to block the Russia inquiry--but the Department has taken no action on those findings, while allowing the Durham investigation into the Russia inquiry to continue for three years on fruitless and abusive investigations and prosecutions.
Noting the stark contrast in the Department of Justice's actions in these two investigations, Free Speech For People remarked:
"The Department's approach sets a disturbing precedent. Now, any president of the United States can commit federal crimes, including obstruction of justice, and (1) enjoy complete immunity against prosecution during his term in office (by virtue of official Department policy), (2) enjoy complete immunity from prosecution after he has left office (by dint of the precedent that you are now setting); and (3) 'investigate the investigators' with flawed prosecutions, based on 'speaking indictments' consisting largely of irrelevant and inadmissible material intended for political showmanship purposes."
"Mueller identified multiple instances where Trump obstructed justice, but he felt constrained by Department policy regarding prosecuting a sitting president. Well, Trump isn't a sitting president anymore," said Ron Fein, Legal Director for Free Speech For People. "The Department's response to these investigations effectively makes it riskier to tell the government truthfully that the president may have been connected to a crime than it is to be the president who actually committed a crime."
As the letter notes, some of the instances of obstruction of justice cited in the Mueller report have reached their statute of limitations, but many remain actionable and are backed by substantial evidence. The letter also notes that Trump's recent announcement that he intends to run for president in 2024 is no reason to decline prosecution of these obstruction of justice charges, nor to assign them to yet another special counsel.
"The American public spent nearly two years waiting for Special Counsel Mueller to release his findings, and those findings detailed how Donald Trump sought to obstruct his investigation at nearly every turn," said John Bonifaz, President of Free Speech For People. "It would be inexcusable for Trump not to be held accountable for the obstruction of justice that he committed to undermine the Mueller investigation. Attorney General Garland and the Department of Justice have a responsibility to act on the evidence in their possession and file charges against Donald Trump as a private citizen."
"American democracy is undergoing a crisis of confidence, in no small part due to corrupt and unlawful actions taken and directed by Trump, coupled with a public fear that Trump and his associates will not be held accountable for illegally attempting to subvert our democracy and government. The lack of accountability during his presidency led Trump and his allies to take even more drastic steps to undermine our democracy, including the effort to falsify election results in Georgia and the insurrectionist attempt to block the peaceful transfer of power on January 6th, 2021," said Ben Clements, Free Speech For People Chairman and Senior Legal Advisor, and a former federal prosecutor. "To preserve the rule of law and the future of our democracy, the Justice Department must take action to hold Trump accountable for these clearly established federal crimes."
Read the letter here.
Free Speech For People is a national non-partisan non-profit organization founded on the day of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. FEC that works to defend our democracy and our Constitution.
LATEST NEWS
UN Chief Warns of Israel's Syria Invasion and Land Seizures
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres stressed the "urgent need" for Israel to "de-escalate violence on all fronts."
Dec 12, 2024
United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Thursday that he is "deeply concerned" by Israel's "recent and extensive violations of Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity," including a ground invasion and airstrikes carried out by the Israel Defense Forces in the war-torn Mideastern nation.
Guterres "is particularly concerned over the hundreds of Israeli airstrikes on several locations in Syria" and has stressed the "urgent need to de-escalate violence on all fronts throughout the country," said U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric.
Israel claims its invasion and bombardment of Syria—which come as the United States and Turkey have also violated Syrian sovereignty with air and ground attacks—are meant to create a security buffer along the countries' shared border in the wake of last week's fall of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and amid the IDF's ongoing assault on Gaza, which has killed or wounded more than 162,000 Palestinians and is the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case.
While Israel argues that its invasion of Syria does not violate a 1974 armistice agreement between the two countries because the Assad dynasty no longer rules the neighboring nation, Dujarric said Guterres maintains that Israel must uphold its obligations under the deal, "including by ending all unauthorized presence in the area of separation and refraining from any action that would undermine the cease-fire and stability in Golan."
Israel conquered the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights in 1967 and has illegally occupied it ever since, annexing the seized lands in 1981.
Other countries including France, Russia, and Saudi Arabia have criticized Israel's invasion, while the United States defended the move.
"The Syrian army abandoned its positions in the area... which potentially creates a vacuum that could have been filled by terrorist organizations," U.S. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said at a press briefing earlier this week. "Israel has said that these actions are temporary to defend its borders. These are not permanent actions... We support all sides upholding the 1974 disengagement agreement."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says 'Political Movement,' Not Murder, Is the Path to Medicare for All
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," he said. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together."
Dec 12, 2024
Addressing the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and conversations it has sparked about the country's for-profit system, longtime Medicare for All advocate Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday condemned the murder and stressed that getting to universal coverage will require a movement challenging corporate money in politics.
"Look, when we talk about the healthcare crisis, in my view, and I think the view of a majority of Americans, the current system is broken, it is dysfunctional, it is cruel, and it is wildly inefficient—far too expensive," said Sanders (I-Vt.), whose position is backed up by various polls.
"The reason we have not joined virtually every other major country on Earth in guaranteeing healthcare to all people as a human right is the political power and financial power of the insurance industry and drug companies," he told Jacobin. "It will take a political revolution in this country to get Congress to say, 'You know what, we're here to represent ordinary people, to provide quality care to ordinary people as a human right,' and not to worry about the profits of insurance and drug companies."
Asked about Thompson's alleged killer—26-year-old Luigi Mangione, whose reported manifesto railed against the nation's expensive healthcare system and low life expectancy—Sanders said: "You don't kill people. It's abhorrent. I condemn it wholeheartedly. It was a terrible act. But what it did show online is that many, many people are furious at the health insurance companies who make huge profits denying them and their families the healthcare that they desperately need."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system."
"What you're seeing, the outpouring of anger at the insurance companies, is a reflection of how people feel about the current healthcare system," he continued, noting the tens of thousands of Americans who die each year because they can't get to a doctor.
"Killing people is not the way we're going to reform our healthcare system," Sanders added. "The way we're going to reform our healthcare system is having people come together and understanding that it is the right of every American to be able to walk into a doctor's office when they need to and not have to take out their wallet."
"The way we're going to bring about the kind of fundamental changes we need in healthcare is, in fact, by a political movement which understands the government has got to represent all of us, not just the 1%," the senator told Jacobin.
The 83-year-old Vermonter, who was just reelected to what he says is likely his last six-year term, is an Independent but caucuses with Democrats and sought their presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020. He has urged the Democratic Party to recognize why some working-class voters have abandoned it since Republicans won the White House and both chambers of Congress last month. A refusal to take on insurance and drug companies and overhaul the healthcare system, he argues, is one reason.
Sanders—one of the few members of Congress who regularly talks about Medicare for All—isn't alone in suggesting that unsympathetic responses to Thompson's murder can be explained by a privatized healthcare system that fails so many people.
In addition to highlighting Sanders' interview on social media, Congressman Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) pointed out to Business Insider on Wednesday that "you've got thousands of people that are sharing their stories of frustration" in the wake of Thompson's death.
Khanna—a co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Act, led in the House of Representatives by Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)—made the case that you can recognize those stories without accepting the assassination.
"You condemn the murder of an insurance executive who was a father of two kids," he said. "At the same time, you say there's obviously an outpouring behavior of people whose claims are being denied, and we need to reform the system."
Two other Medicare for All advocates, Reps. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), also made clear to Business Insider that they oppose Thompson's murder but understand some of the responses to it.
"Of course, we don't want to see the chaos that vigilantism presents," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We also don't want to see the extreme suffering that millions of Americans confront when your life changes overnight from a horrific diagnosis, and people are led to just some of the worst, not just health events, but the worst financial events of their and their family's lives."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)—a co-sponsor of Sanders' Medicare for All Act—similarly toldHuffPost in a Tuesday interview, "The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system."
"Violence is never the answer, but people can be pushed only so far," she continued. "This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the healthcare to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone."
After facing some criticism for those comments, Warren added Wednesday: "Violence is never the answer. Period... I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Reports Target Israeli Army for 'Unprecedented Massacre' of Gaza Journalists
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of Reporters Without Borders.
Dec 12, 2024
Reports released this week from two organizations that advocate for journalists underscore just how deadly Gaza has become for media workers.
Reporters Without Borders' (RSF) 2024 roundup, which was published Thursday, found that at least 54 journalists were killed on the job or in connection with their work this year, and 18 of them were killed by Israeli armed forces (16 in Palestine, and two in Lebanon).
The organization has also filed four complaints with the International Criminal Court "for war crimes committed by the Israeli army against journalists," according to the roundup, which includes stats from January 1 through December 1.
"In Gaza, the scale of the tragedy is incomprehensible," wrote Thibaut Bruttin, director general of RSF, in the introduction to the report. Since October 2023, 145 journalists have been killed in Gaza, "including at least 35 who were very likely targeted or killed while working."
Bruttin added that "many of these reporters were clearly identifiable as journalists and protected by this status, yet they were shot or killed in Israeli strikes that blatantly disregarded international law. This was compounded by a deliberate media blackout and a block on foreign journalists entering the strip."
When counting the number of journalists killed by the Israeli army since October 2023 in both Gaza and Lebanon, the tally comes to 155—"an unprecedented massacre," according to the roundup.
Multiple journalists were also killed in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Mexico, Sudan, Myanmar, Colombia, and Ukraine, according to the report, and hundreds more were detained and are now behind bars in countries including Israel, China, and Russia.
Meanwhile, in a statement released Thursday, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) announced that at least 139 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed since the war in Gaza began in 2023, and in a statement released Wednesday, IFJ announced that 104 journalists had perished worldwide this year (which includes deaths from January 1 through December 10). IFJ's number for all of 2024 appears to be higher than RSF because RSF is only counting deaths that occurred "on the job or in connection with their work."
IFJ lists out each of the slain journalists in its 139 count, which includes the journalist Hamza Al-Dahdouh, the son of Al Jazeera's Gaza bureau chief, Wael Al-Dahdouh, who was killed with journalist Mustafa Thuraya when Israeli forces targeted their car while they were in northern Rafah in January 2024.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular