August, 12 2021, 01:03pm EDT
The IRC Urges EU Countries to Urgently Stop Deportations to Afghanistan
As the humanitarian situation in Afghanistan continues to deteriorate, the IRC urges other EU countries to follow the latest decision by Germany and the Netherlands to halt all deportations to the country.
WASHINGTON
As the humanitarian situation in Afghanistan continues to deteriorate, the IRC urges other EU countries to follow the latest decision by Germany and the Netherlands to halt all deportations to the country.
Afghanistan is currently experiencing one of the fastest-growing humanitarian crises in the world. Some 18.4 million people - almost half of the country's population - currently require humanitarian assistance, while around 400,000 people have been internally displaced this year. Meanwhile, civilian casualties continue to rise; If this trend is not addressed, 2021 is likely to be the deadliest year for Afghan civilians in over a decade.
Given this rapidly deteriorating humanitarian and security situation, the IRC is extremely concerned that some EU member states have been pressing the EU to continue deporting Afghan people whose asylum applications have been unsuccessful. These included Germany, Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark and Greece. Any return at this time puts people's lives and wellbeing in grave danger, and also goes against the Afghan Government's July request to cease deportations to the country for at least three months.
This week, two of the six countries involved - the Netherlands and Germany - have reversed their positions, and announced a moratorium on returns to Afghanistan. They join a group of other countries, including France, Finland, Sweden in addition to Norway and Switzerland. This is an encouraging development. However, it remains critical that all member states immediately halt deportations to the war torn country. The European Commission must not only step up and recommend that all EU countries suspend returns, but also ensure a coherent EU response in terms of both humanitarian support and migration approach.
As part of this effort, it's imperative that the EU border agency, Frontex, ensures the suspension of charter flights for return operations to Afghanistan. Meanwhile, EU countries should re-examine all final negative decisions for Afghan asylum seekers still present in European countries in light of the current situation and the very real risk of future persecution. The EU must also increase resettlement of vulnerable Afghan refugees from the region, so that people have a lifeline to safety and neighbouring countries like Iran and Pakistan do not shoulder the protection responsibilities alone.
In addition to urgently suspending returns, the IRC is also calling on the EU and its member states to use their full diplomatic, political and funding power to prevent a further escalation of violence inside Afghanistan. It should push for inclusive peace negotiations and increase humanitarian assistance, not only within Afghanistan, but also to countries in the region.
Vicki Aken, IRC Country Director for Afghanistan said:
"The situation is growing increasingly untenable for civilians, who are at an ever-increasing risk of being caught in the crossfire. Already this year, civilian casualties have dramatically increased, with an 80% increase in casualties compared to the first six months of 2020. Women and children are increasingly bearing the brunt of this violence; Afghanistan has been the deadliest place for children for the past six years.
"In other words, now is not the time to even be contemplating deportation to Afghanistan. Instead, leaders should focus on doubling efforts to mitigate the humanitarian crisis that is being witnessed. They should use their power to push for peace negotiations and to increase humanitarian assistance, rather than prioritise the return of people into active conflict."
Niamh Nic Carthaigh, IRC Director of EU Policy & Advocacy, said:
"It should be unthinkable for any EU country to continue returning people back to Afghanistan - a country facing escalating conflict and humanitarian catastrophe, where their lives are clearly in grave danger. This year, the EU has boosted its aid commitment to the UN's Humanitarian Response Plan in Afghanistan by 12% in recognition of the increasingly dire situation unfolding in the country. Now it's time for its approach to migration to follow suit.
It is important to recognise that the vast majority of people who manage to flee conflict and persecution in Afghanistan will be hosted in neighbouring countries, such as Iran and Pakistan. The EU needs to urgently scale up refugee resettlement to support vulnerable Afghans trapped in the region, as well as making sure that the small proportion who reach Europe in search of safety are protected and their rights upheld."
The IRC began work in Afghanistan in 1988, launching relief programs for people displaced by the invasion of the Soviet Union. We now work with thousands of villages across nine provinces, with Afghans making up more than 99% of IRC staff in the country. As Afghanistan struggles to recover from ongoing conflict and natural disasters, the IRC: works with local communities to identify, plan and manage their own development projects, provides safe learning spaces in rural areas, community based education, cash distribution provides uprooted families with tents, clean water, sanitation and other basic necessities, and helps people find livelihood opportunities as well as extensive resilience programming.
The International Rescue Committee responds to the world's worst humanitarian crises and helps people whose lives and livelihoods are shattered by conflict and disaster to survive, recover, and gain control of their future.
LATEST NEWS
After Mamdani Victory, Progressives Call for Primary Challenges to Democratic Establishment
"The establishment has never been more weak than they are now," one advocate told potential progressive candidates. "You need to run."
Jun 25, 2025
New York state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani's victory over disgraced former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary was quickly dismissed by some commentators as one that likely wouldn't be replicated in federal elections and that said little about the views of Democratic voters at large.
But the news that Cuomo had conceded on Tuesday night left many progressives eager to continue the momentum started by Mamdani's campaign—one characterized by a laser-sharp focus on making life more affordable for working people, a rejection of the outsized influence of billionaires and corporations on elections, and a demand for the Democratic Party to end its insistence that popular economic justice proposals are impossible to achieve in the United States.
Instead of viewing Mamdani's victory as an aberration, said journalist and organizer Daniel Denvir, the left should treat it as "an earthquake" that threatens the entire Democratic establishment—and its prioritizing of wealthy donors over the needs of ordinary voters.
"The left everywhere must dedicate itself to an insurgency against Democratic incumbents," said Denvir. "The Democratic establishment has lost credibility with its base in the face of a fascist threat. The base is looking leftward for new leadership. We are the opposition party."
Several progressive observers urged potential primary challengers to look to other upcoming races in New York, with several expressing hope that New York City Comptroller Brad Lander—another mayoral candidate who was widely praised for boosting Mamdani's campaign by cross-endorsing with him—will continue his political career by fighting for a U.S. Senate or House seat.
New York Democratic centrists including U.S. Rep. Dan Goldman and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer were named as lawmakers Lander could challenge in a primary. Goldman is up for reelection in 2026, and Schumer could face a primary in 2028.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), who has angered progressive advocates during President Donald Trump's second term by complaining about their demands for the Democrats to act as an opposition party, and Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.), a vehement supporter of Israel who attacked Mamdani and accused him of antisemitism when he spoke out in support of Palestinian rights, were also mentioned as incumbents who should be challenged.
Mamdani won both Jeffries' and Goldman's House district, according to political analyst Armin Thomas.
Organizer Aaron Regunberg pointed to an article published by Politico last week detailing how 40% of Cuomo's endorsements came from lawmakers who had previously called for his resignation when he was accused of sexually harassing more than a dozen women.
"Politico ran this very convenient piece listing out every New York Democrat who needs to get primaried!" said Regunberg.
All the centrists named would likely have vast financial resources at their fingertips should a progressive vie for their seats, with powerful groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) liable to spend heavily on their campaigns—but so did Cuomo, who benefited from a super political action committee that raised $25 million, including from right-wing billionaires.
"But if all of Cuomo's advantages led to a thorough election thrashing, perhaps they weren't advantages," wrote Jeet Heer at The Nation on Wednesday. "Mamdani proved to be a superb campaigner with a message about affordability that resonated with voters... Mamdani's victory is a sign that the Democratic Party establishment is in trouble, and the party is ready for a wider revolt. The next move of progressive Democrats is to start running insurgent candidates in primaries to harness the anger of the moment."
CNN political analyst Harry Enten also acknowledged that "the Democratic establishment" will likely feel threatened by Mamdani's victory, which follows "poll after poll showing Democratic voters fed up with their leaders in Washington."
In his victory speech, Mamdani himself suggested broader lessons should be taken from his campaign, during which he walked the length of Manhattan to talk directly to New Yorkers, spoke to Trump voters in the outer boroughs about their concerns over the cost of living, and advocated for fare-free buses and no-cost universal childcare.
"This is a victory for every New Yorker who has been told they don't have a voice," Mamdani said in his victory speech. "It's proof that organized people can beat organized money."
In a column at Common Dreams Wednesday, writer David Andersson wrote that "Mamdani's win signals a seismic shift in the balance of power between entrenched political institutions and a new generation demanding change. The sheer scale of resources the establishment mobilized—and still fell short—reveals the depth of their fear of losing control over the city's financial and political machinery."
"New York City, and perhaps the nation, is at a turning point," he added.
David Hogg, the anti-gun violence activist who was recently pushed out of his position as vice chair of the Democratic National Committee after he advocated for primary challenges to "asleep-at-the-wheel" Democrats in blue districts, urged young progressives to consider launching their own campaigns.
"It has never been more clear—the establishment has never been more weak than they are now," he said. "You need to run."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Alarm as Trump Reportedly Plans to Send Tens of Millions to Israel-Backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation
"People have been killed almost daily while trying to get food," said one top U.N. official.
Jun 25, 2025
The anti-poverty group Oxfam America has issued a forceful response to reporting that the Trump administration plans to give tens of millions dollars to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an Israeli-backed aid organization which uses private U.S. military firms and whose rollout the United Nations and international aid groups have strongly objected to.
Reuters was first to report on Tuesday that the Trump administration plans to give $30 million to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). A document reviewed by the outlet shows that the amount was authorized last week under a "priority directive" from the White House and the U.S. Department of State. Per Reuters, $7 million has already been dispersed. Sources told the outlet that the administration may approve separate monthly grants for the entity.
Oxfam America president and CEO Abby Maxman said in a statement on Tuesday that the Trump administration is poised to shell out for an aid organization "formed to distribute food parcels without any grounding in the reality of the crisis in Gaza."
Maxman accused GHF of delivering only a fraction of the number of meals that the population needs and alleged the group is distributing food that families can't prepare without fuel and clean water. She also said the organization has pushed aid further out of reach for the vulnerable populations who can't walk long distances to its distribution sites.
"We urge the Trump administration and Congress to instead put its full support behind funding and ensuring safe access for established humanitarian organizations to do the work that is proven to save lives," added Maxman.
She also highlighted that the distribution sites have been marred by violence.
The U.N.'s human rights office said on Tuesday that at least 410 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces "while trying to fetch from controversial new aid hubs in Gaza—a likely war crime," according to a U.N. News article posted that same day.
Jonathan Whittall, the head of U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, told journalists on Monday that since Israel's total blockade was partially lifted in late May, "people have been killed almost daily while trying to get food."
In a statement shared with CBS on Tuesday, GHF pushed back on what it called "false allegations of attacks near aid distributions sites." The group also said that the "Hamas-affiliated Gaza Health Ministry is not a credible source of information, as it fails to report any U.N. convoys or distribution sites that are linked to violent incidents," according to CBS, whose story focused on comments from the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East commissioner general decrying GHF.
In that same story, CBSreported that the Gaza Ministry of Health said 79 people had been killed in Gaza over the last day. Fifty-one of those people had died near GHF sites, per CBS, citing the Gaza Ministry of Health.
And on Monday, over a dozen human rights organizations sent a letter to GHF calling for an end to the "privatized, militarized" GHF aid model and urging any parties involved with GHF and the international community in general to press for aid to be distributed through established international relief operations.
"Individuals and corporate entities involved in the planning, financing, or execution of the GHF scheme may incur criminal liability—including under universal jurisdiction statutes—for aiding and abetting war crimes such as the forcible displacement of civilians, starvation as a method of warfare, and denial of humanitarian access," the letter warned.
The groups behind the letter include the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the Center for Applied Legal Studies, and others.
Keep ReadingShow Less
GOP Bill Would Strip Healthcare From 19 People for Every Millionaire Getting a Tax Cut: Sanders Report
"The reconciliation bill that Republicans are attempting to ram through the Senate this week would be a death sentence for working-class and low-income Americans," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Jun 25, 2025
The GOP budget legislation currently before the U.S. Senate would strip health coverage from 19 Americans for every millionaire household it gives a tax break, according to a report that Sen. Bernie Sanders released Wednesday as he worked to highlight and build public opposition to President Donald Trump and the Republican Party's draconian assault on the nation's social safety net.
The report integrates alarming testimony from healthcare providers who warn that the Republican legislation would have devastating impacts on their patients and the broader U.S. healthcare system—stripping insurance from millions, raising costs, and shuttering rural hospitals.
"If Medicaid is cut, my patients will die," Louisiana-based doctor Helen Pope told Sanders' team. "I realize I am being dramatic. It is a dramatic situation. They are humans who are doing their best. Please don't allow them to suffer more."
Farhan Malik, a pediatric critical care specialist based in Florida, echoed that warning, saying that "children will die as a result of these cuts."
"Hospitals will cut back on ICU doctors, doctors will leave because of salary cuts, critical ancillary services will be reduced, more medical students will avoid going into pediatric residencies," said Malik.
The report comes as Republican lawmakers continue to debate just how far they want to go with their proposed cuts to Medicaid, which—under both the House and Senate versions of their legislation—would be the largest in U.S. history.
Last week, Senate Republicans called for even more aggressive cuts than those approved by the House GOP, which voted in May for a plan that would kick roughly 11 million Americans off their health insurance—or 16 million when accounting for the party's refusal to extend Affordable Care Act tax credits that are set to expire at the end of the year.
Meanwhile, an estimated 800,000 millionaire households would receive a tax cut under the Republican legislation.
"Children will die as a result of these cuts." —Farhan Malik, Florida-based pediatric critical care specialist
Sanders (I-Vt.), the ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, has focused closely on the legislation's potentially catastrophic healthcare impacts. Earlier this month, a Sanders-commissioned report estimated that around 51,000 additional Americans would die unnecessarily each year if the Republican budget reconciliation bill becomes law.
In a statement on Wednesday, Sanders said his new report "makes it abundantly clear that the reconciliation bill that Republicans are attempting to ram through the Senate this week would be a death sentence for working-class and low-income Americans throughout the country."
"Not only would this disastrous and deeply immoral bill throw 16 million people off of their healthcare and lead to over 50,000 unnecessary deaths every year, it would create a national healthcare emergency in America," said Sanders. "It would devastate rural hospitals, community health centers, and nursing homes throughout our country and cause a massive spike in uninsured rates in red states and blue states alike."
"That's not Bernie Sanders talking," the senator added. "That is precisely what doctors, healthcare providers, and hospitals have told us."
Sanders' new report was accompanied by a breakdown of how much the uninsured rate would rise over the next decade if the House-passed reconciliation bill becomes law. At least 16 states would see their uninsured rates jump by more than 70% under the Republican bill.
"We cannot allow Republicans to take healthcare away from 16 million Americans in order to pay for more tax breaks to billionaires," Sanders said Wednesday. "As the ranking member of the HELP Committee, I will do everything that I can to see that it is defeated. Healthcare must be a human right for all, not a privilege for the wealthy few."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular