September, 16 2010, 12:05pm EDT
Why Would Republican Senators Oppose the Bi-Partisan DREAM Act?
As President Obama and the CHC Unite Behind DREAM, Some Republicans Choose Partisan Politics over National Interest
WASHINGTON
Last evening, President Obama
capped a momentous day for immigration reform by pledging to fight for
the DREAM Act and reiterating his commitment to pursue comprehensive
immigration reform. At the same time, rather than rally around what has
been a bi-partisan bill, the DREAM Act, many Republicans were circling
their partisan wagons and pledging to oppose its inclusion in the
Department of Defense Authorization bill.
According
to Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America's Voice, "The fight to
fix our broken immigration system shouldn't be a partisan battle, but
clearly Republicans in the Senate don't agree. The idea that an
amendment that would allow more talented young people to serve in our
nation's armed forces is somehow 'extraneous' to the Department of
Defense Authorization bill is ludicrous. Republicans blocked action on
comprehensive immigration reform earlier this year, and now they are
balking at DREAM. When will they realize that their job is to solve
problems, not preserve the broken status quo?"
Already,
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senators David Vitter, Orrin Hatch,
Lindsey Graham and John McCain are lashing out at the prospect of a
DREAM Act amendment to the Defense bill. Sharry said: "Hypocrisy is
thick in the air. Senator Vitter's attitude is not surprising, but the
rest should know better. When it comes to improving our economic
prospects, bolstering our military, and living up to core American
values of opportunity and advancement, the DREAM Act is a no-brainer.
It makes little to no sense for Republicans to oppose these bright,
talented young people. The DREAM Act would be a significant step
forward toward fixing the broken immigration system, something lawmakers
in both parties should embrace."
At a gala for the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute, President Obama stated,
"I will do whatever it takes to support the Congressional Hispanic
Caucus' efforts to pass [the DREAM Act] so that I can sign it into law
on behalf of students seeking a college education and those who wish to
serve in our country's uniform. It's the right thing to do. We should
get it done." The President also highlighted Republican
obstructionism to efforts to fix the broken immigration system, saying
"Today, the folks who yell the loudest about the federal government's
long failure to fix this problem are some of the same folks standing in
the way of good faith efforts to fix it."
Indeed, despite DREAM's bipartisan pedigree and clear benefits
to military recruitment and economic competitiveness, numerous
Republicans are voicing their objections to the legislation - including
many who were previous champions and supporters. In the 108th
Congress, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 16-3 in favor of the
DREAM Act with support from current Republican Senators Orrin Hatch
(R-UT) (who helped draft the legislation), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Jon
Kyl (R-AZ), and John Cornyn (R-TX). The DREAM Act was also included in
comprehensive immigration reform legislation in 2006, as an amendment
from Senator Graham in the Judiciary Committee. Twenty-three Republican
Senators voted for the comprehensive bill that year, but many of them
and their Senate colleagues are now succumbing to group think, uniting
as a party to oppose DREAM despite the compelling reasons it should
become law.
For example, Senator David Vitter (R-LA), made the misplaced assertion
that the bill will only "exacerbate the problem of illegal
immigration"; Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) referred to the bill as "extraneous"; and Senators John McCain (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) attacked Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) for bringing DREAM forward, saying,
"Obviously it's about politics"--an interesting charge given McCain's
evolution on the issue during recent election battles.
On
the other side of the aisle, Democrats seem to be uniting on behalf of
DREAM. President Obama spoke up forcefully and clearly on behalf of
DREAM last night. This afternoon, Obama will meet
with Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Representative Luis Gutierrez
(D-IL), and Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) Chairwoman Nydia
Velazquez (D-NY) to discuss immigration reform. The three congressional
leaders yesterday announced
a strategy on behalf of immigration reform over the coming months,
focused on passing DREAM, introducing a broader legislative package of
immigration reforms to fix the entirety of the system, and reforming
enforcement policies that have had dangerous consequences for community
policing and public safety.
According
to Sharry, "We applaud the leadership demonstrated by President Obama
and congressional leaders on DREAM's behalf, and hope that Republicans
will do the right thing so that the DREAM Act can become a rare example
of smart policy triumphing over election year politics."
to Sharry, "We applaud the leadership demonstrated by President Obama
and congressional leaders on DREAM's behalf, and hope that Republicans
will do the right thing so that the DREAM Act can become a rare example
of smart policy triumphing over election year politics."
America's Voice -- Harnessing the power of American voices and American values to win common sense immigration reform. The mission of America's Voice is to realize the promise of workable and humane comprehensive immigration reform. Our goal is to build the public support and create the political momentum for reforms that will transform a dysfunctional immigration system that does not work into a regulatory system that does.
LATEST NEWS
'Unprecedented': Belgian Police Blast Climate Defenders With Water Cannon
"The fact that national governments are subsidizing fossil fuels is akin to a crime against humanity," said one Extinction Rebellion organizer.
May 05, 2024
The climate action group Extinction Rebellion Belgium on Saturday decried what it called "disproportionate police violence" against nonviolent demonstrators who were blasted with a water cannon during a protest in Brussels demanding an end to fossil fuel subsidies.
Hundreds of Extinction Rebellion-led climate defenders blocked Rue Belliard in the European Quarter, the de facto European Union capital, during EU Open Day, when agencies of the 27-nation bloc open their doors to the public. In what Extinction Rebellion called an "unprecedented police response," officers used a truck-mounted water cannon on the protesters, some of whom were also allegedly struck with batons.
Brussels police said 132 activists—some of whom glued themselves to the ground—were arrested.
"This police behavior toward nonviolent protesters exercising their freedom of assembly is illegal and authoritarian," Extinction Rebellion Belgium said in a statement Saturday.
"The use of water cannons against peaceful demonstrators is of great concern," the group added. "We call on the police to exercise restraint and respect the right to demonstrate peacefully and without violence."
The activists are calling on European governments to stop subsidizing fossil fuels amid a worsening planetary crisis. They're also demanding the declaration of a climate emergency.
"National and European governments are spending at least €405 billion each year subsidizing major fossil fuel corporations," protest spokesperson Bertina Maes toldThe Brussels Times. "That's ten times more than what's spent on climate policy."
Maes said the Belgian government alone spent as much as €20 billion ($21.5 billion) on fossil fuel subsidies in 2020, more than 2% of the country's gross domestic product.
"The fact that national governments are subsidizing fossil fuels is akin to a crime against humanity," she asserted.
This weekend's demonstration and arrests come a month before E.U. parliamentary elections. According to an April Eurobarometer survey conducted by the European Parliament, climate action is the fifth-most important issue to voters, after poverty and social exclusion, health, jobs, and defense and security.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Israel Bans Al Jazeera in 'Assault on Freedom of the Press'
"Rather than trying to silence reporting on its atrocities in Gaza, the Israeli government should stop committing them," said one observer.
May 05, 2024
The Jerusalem offices of Al Jazeera were raided Sunday after Israel's far-right Cabinet banned the Qatar-based satellite news network—the sole international media outlet providing 24/7 live coverage from Gaza—from operating in the country.
"If you're watching this… then Al Jazeera has been banned in Israel," correspondent Imran Khan said in a pre-recorded report from occupied East Jerusalem preempting the Israeli Cabinet's unanimous vote to shutter the network.
The order—which does not affect Al Jazeera's ability to operate in Gaza or the illegally occupied Palestinian territories—is believed to be the first of its kind targeting a foreign media outlet operating in Israel. It comes after the Knesset, Israel's parliament, recently voted 71-10 in favor of a law empowering the Israeli communications minister to ban foreign news organizations from working in Israel and to confiscate their equipment.
"The time has come to eject Hamas' mouthpiece from our country," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a televised address.
Ofir Gendelman, Netanyahu's Arab media spokesperson, said Sunday that the closure would be "implemented immediately."
Gendelman said that the network's "broadcast equipment will be confiscated, the channel's correspondents will be prevented from working, the channel will be removed from cable and satellite television companies, and Al Jazeera's websites will be blocked on the internet."
In a statement, Al Jazeera vowed to "pursue all available legal channels through international legal institutions in its quest to protect both its rights and journalists, as well as the public's right to information."
"Israel's ongoing suppression of the free press, seen as an effort to conceal its actions in the Gaza Strip, stands in contravention of international and humanitarian law," the network added. "Israel's direct targeting and killing of journalists, arrests, intimidation, and threats will not deter Al Jazeera."
The New York-based Foreign Press Association issued a statement slamming the move and saying it "should be a cause for concern for all supporters of a free press."
"With this decision, Israel joins a dubious club of authoritarian governments to ban the station," the group said. "This is a dark day for the media. This is a dark day for democracy."
Human Rights Watch Israel and Palestine director Omar Shakir called the order "an assault on freedom of the press."
"Rather than trying to silence reporting on its atrocities in Gaza, the Israeli government should stop committing them," he added.
Al Jazeera is the only international news network providing nonstop on-the-ground coverage of Israel's war on Gaza, often being the first to report Israeli atrocities in what many experts worldwide say is a genocidal campaign in the besieged, starving strip.
Its correspondents and other media professionals work under constant risk to life and limb. More than 100 journalists, the vast majority of them Palestinians, have been killed by Israeli forces since October 7 in what the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and others say are often intentional targetings of not only media workers but also their families.
In December, Israeli forces killedAl Jazeera cameraman Samer Abudaqa as he reported on the war in southern Gaza, an attack that also wounded Al Jazeera Gaza bureau chief Wael Dahdouh—whose wife, son, daughter, and grandson were killed in a separate Israeli strike.
Previous probes—like the investigation into Israeli troops' 2022 killing of renowned Palestinian American Al Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh—have confirmed that Israel has deliberately targeted journalists.
Last May, CPJ published Deadly Pattern, a report that found Israeli troops had killed at least 20 journalists over the past 22 years with utter impunity. While some of the slain journalists have been foreigners—including Italian Associated Press reporter Simone Camilli and British cameraman and filmmaker James Miller—the vast majority of victims have been Palestinian.
Israeli forces have also attacked newsrooms in every major assault on Gaza, including in May 2021 when the 11-story al-Jalaa Tower, which housed offices of Al Jazeera, The Associated Press, and other media outlets, was completely destroyed in an airstrike.
On Friday—World Press Freedom Day—Palestinian journalists covering the war on Gaza were awarded this year's UNESCO/Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize after being recommended by an international jury of media professionals.
Keep ReadingShow Less
On Kent State Massacre Anniversary, Progressives Decry Repression of Student Protests
"The militarized repression of young people speaking out against a terrible war was shameful then and it's shameful now," said one state lawmaker.
May 04, 2024
As U.S. Republicans push for the deployment of National Guard troops to quell nationwide student demonstrations against the Gaza genocide, progressive lawmakers marked the anniversary of the 1970 Kent State Massacre by condemning police repression of peaceful protesters and reaffirming the power of dissent.
"On the 54th anniversary of the Kent State Massacre, students across our country are being brutalized for standing up to endless war," Congresswoman Cori Bush (D-Mo.) said on social media. "Our country must learn to actually uphold the rights of free speech and assembly upon which it was founded."
Fellow "Squad" member Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said that "54 years ago, the Ohio National Guard opened fire on unarmed students at Kent State."
"Students have a right to speak out, organize, and protest systemic wrongs," she added. "We can't silence those expressing dissent, no matter how uncomfortable their protests may be to those in power."
On May 4, 1970, 28 Ohio National Guard troops fired 67 live rounds into a crowd of unarmed Kent State students rallying against the expansion of the U.S.-led war in Vietnam into Cambodia. They murdered students Allison Krause, Jeffrey Glenn Miller, Sandra Lee Scheuer, and William Knox Schroeder—all aged 19 or 20. Nine other students were wounded, including one who was permanently paralyzed.
"The militarized repression of young people speaking out against a terrible war was shameful then and it's shameful now," New York state Assemblywoman Emily Gallagher (D-50) said on Saturday.
Protests against Israel's assault on Gaza—which according to Palestinian and international officials has killed, maimed, or left missing more than 123,000 Gazans—have spread to dozens of campuses across the U.S. and around the world. Police have been called in to break up protest encampments at numerous schools. Hundreds of students, faculty, and journalists have been arrested, sometimes violently.
At the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), police stood by this week as a pro-Israel mob attacked a campus protest encampment before officers arrested peaceful protesters and supporters.
As law enforcement officials have tried to justify the crackdown by claiming "outside agitators" are behind the protests, some observers noted historical parallels.
"Watching what is happening at UCLA," Virginia state Sen. Mamie Locke (D-2) said on social media. "Old enough to remember Kent State, Jackson State, South Carolina State, and the dog whistles of 'law and order,' 'outside agitators.' So reminiscent of 1968."
On February 8, 1968, police shot 31 students—most of them in the back—at a protest against Jim Crow segregation at South Carolina State University in Orangeburg, murdering three young Black men: Samuel Hammond Jr., Delano Middleton, and Henry Smith.
Eleven days after Kent State, police opened fire on a crowd of Black students protesting the bombing of Cambodia at Jackson State College in Jackson, Mississippi, killing Phillip Lafayette Gibbs and James Earl Green and injuring 12 others.
"Our institutions must learn from these past mistakes to not use militarized responses against unarmed, peaceful student protesters by calling in the National Guard, bringing in state troopers, or deploying police in riot gear," Laurel Krause, the sister of slain Kent State protester Allison Krause, said in a statement marking the ignominious anniversary.
"We must not repeat the horrors of Kent State 54 years later," she added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular