

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Mark Kastel, 608-625-2042
An
investigation by the USDA's National Organic Program has determined that Target
Corporation wrongly used the image of a certified organic product when
promoting the sale of a conventional product to consumers. The
investigation was triggered by a complaint filed by The Cornucopia Institute, a
farm policy group and organic watchdog based in Wisconsin.
The violation at Target came after Dean Foods switched almost all their
category-leading Silk soymilk from organic to conventional soybeans earlier
this year. The specific problem involved Target using an image of a Silk
organic product, in advertising flyers, when the retailer was really selling
Silk's reformulated "natural" version (not organic,
but made with conventional soybeans). Target made a commitment to the
USDA to review their procedures to "prevent future errors of this
nature."
And now, over eight months after Dean Foods stealthily switched its
core Silk product line to cheaper conventional soybeans, while, until recently,
retaining the same packaging appearance. Now the giant dairy
processor's WhiteWave division has been found itself to also be
misrepresenting the product as organic on one of their own websites. A new
legal complaint has been filed in an attempt to protect consumers from what
Cornucopia calls, "fraudulent misrepresentation."
"It should not take the judicious oversight of an industry
watchdog to cause these giant corporations to simply comply with the
law," said Mark Kastel,
Cornucopia's Senior Farm Policy Analyst. "Target and Dean are
trying to do organics on the cheap and have not invested in the kind of
management expertise necessary to prevent problems of this nature from
occurring," added Kastel. "And after widespread media
condemnation, it's hard to believe that Dean Foods hasn't even cleaned up its
own websites."
Since the NOP investigation, and Target's pledge to review their
practices, unlike Dean Foods, Cornucopia has not observed additional problems
with the retailer's advertising.
The meteoric rise in consumer interest in healthy, environmentally
sound and humane farming practices has catapulted organics into a $24 billion
industry. Along the way, major agribusinesses , like General Mills, Dean
Foods and Kraft have gobbled up many pioneering companies that helped build the
industry through a series of acquisitions. Today, most processed organic
food is produced and controlled by the same type of companies that bring us
International Delight imitation coffee creamer, Cheetos, Ding Dongs and Cap'n
Crunch.
No longer controlled by industry visionaries, corporate managers now
seek to squeeze extra profits out by sometimes switching established organic
brands to "natural" labeling, using cheaper conventionally grown and
processed ingredients.
That's a far cry from when the organic food and farming movement first
started enjoying widespread commercial success in the 1980s. In its
inception, the industry was dominated by a number of family businesses,
entrepreneurial enterprises and farmer-owned cooperatives, where building a
profitable brand was most often married with the owner's values.
"Big is not necessarily bad in the organic industry," said Mark Kastel, codirector of The Cornucopia
Institute. "As an organic watchdog we are much more concerned with
'corporate ethics' than we are with 'corporate
scale.'"
Dean Foods, the largest dairy processor in the United States, has apparently
acquiesced and finally changed
the packaging for their Silk brand of soymilk. Cornucopia had sparked
widespread media scrutiny, and associated consumer backlash, against Dean for
quietly shifting their core silk product line from organic to conventional
soybeans-while keeping essentially the same packaging and UPC (scanner)
barcodes. "This change [new packaging] should have happened right as
they shifted to conventional soybeans, not after the fact," said Kastel.
"For the better part of this past
year, consumers and retailers both have repeatedly reported that they were
deceived and ended up unknowingly buying Silk products with conventional
soybeans," stated Kastel. With both their new and old packaging
still in the marketplace, Cornucopia is concerned that consumers will be misled
by advertising on websites representing the product as organic.
Silk is manufactured and distributed by Dean Foods' WhiteWave-MorningStar
division headquartered in Longmont,
Colorado. Like many other
massive agribusiness corporations, the Dean name never appears on the packaging
for its soy foods or its Horizon
dairy label-just as consumers will never see the name General Mills on a
package of Cascadian Farms frozen
vegetables, Kraft on Back to Nature
brand crackers or Kellogg's on Kashi
cereal.
Dean/WhiteWave spokesperson Sara Loveday denied the corporation
intentionally misled their customers, telling the East Bay Express in a November interview, "The company
was not trying take advantage of consumer confusion over organic and
'natural.'"
"These corporate food giants know that many organic consumers are
looking for an alternative to our current food production system," said Will Fantle, who heads up Cornucopia's research
staff. "Upon acquiring a number of the leading organic pioneers,
they have kept their subsidiary names upfront on packaging to create a facade
"hiding" the true corporate ownership," Fantle noted.
Cornucopia maintains a chart, Who
Owns Organics, created by Michigan
State University
professor Philip Howard, on its website that lifts the veil, enabling consumers
to know who is producing their favorite organic brands (https://www.cornucopia.org/who-owns-organic/).
Roy Beard, who has operated Roy's
Natural Market in Dallas
for 41 years, told the Fort Worth
Star-Telegram, in their November 8 coverage surrounding the Silk
controversy, that he hadn't realized there was a product change until
contacted by a reporter. He said retaining the same bar code "was
troubling." Most retailers were never informed of the Silk
switch to conventional soybeans.
Dean/WhiteWave has also received heat in the organic food and
agriculture community for choosing to convert some of their Horizon dairy products, the leading
organic label in terms of sales volume, to cheaper "natural"
(conventional) ingredients.
"This really hit a nerve because one of these new Horizon products,
Little Blends yogurt, is aimed
specifically at toddlers, at an early stage of development, where the
nutritional superiority of organic food, and its benefit of avoiding chemical
residues in our food, is so critically important," Kastel explained.
"This starkly undermines the propaganda on the Horizon website proclaiming
how dedicated they are to the organic movement-this is all about profit,
not values!"
The media blow up on the Silk switcheroo included a front-page story in
the Chicago Tribune in July that
outlined a consumer survey indicating the public was unclear about the
difference between natural and organic labels and that some corporations,
particularly Dean Foods, were taking advantage of the confusion in the
marketplace.
"Dean has only added to the marketplace confusion between
'natural' and 'organic,' as they definitely do not mean the same
thing, and 'natural' requires no verification whatsoever," Urvashi
Rangan, a senior scientist at Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer
Reports, also told Barry Shlachter of the Star-Telegram.
The Cornucopia's Kastel likes to identify corporate giant Heinz
as a company doing organics right. "They helped fund California tomato
growers who switched to organic production, and they brought in a highly reputable
organic certifier, produced the product in their own plant, and finally put the
Heinz name on the label," Kastel stated. "I think their ethical
approach to organic production is what consumers expect and is being rewarded
in the marketplace by virtue of the success they're having with their organic
ketchup."
Cornucopia also cites Stonyfield yogurt, which was acquired by group
Danone of France, as another example of a large public corporation continuing
to uphold organic values. Stonyfield remains committed to buying all of
their milk from family-scale organic farmers, unlike Dean Foods that is
increasingly relying on factory farms for its Horizon milk supply.
"The independently owned organizations, although they are fewer,
have not totally gone away," observed Fantle. Eden Foods,
Nature's Path and Organic Valley, among others, are still independently
owned even though they each do as much as $500 million of business every
year."
The new legal complaint filed against Dean Foods, for representing their
conventional Silk soymilk as organic on one of their websites, was filed with
the USDA's National Organic Program. "We fully expect the NOP to
send a cease and desist order to Dean Foods," said Kastel. If Dean,
a $12 billion a year public corporation, is found to have willfully violated
the federal law governing organic commerce, it could be subject to fines and
other penalties.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
"The very purpose of this biased and politically motivated text, which was pushed by the Israeli regime and the United States, is clear: to reverse the roles of victim and aggressor," said Iran's ambassador to the UN.
The United Nations Security Council on Wednesday adopted a resolution condemning Iran's retaliatory attacks on Gulf nations without denouncing—or even mentioning—the illegal US and Israeli bombing campaign that started the war, which has hurled the region into conflict and destabilized the global economy.
The resolution, sponsored by council member and US ally Bahrain, "condemns in the strongest terms the egregious attacks by the Islamic Republic of Iran against the territories of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Jordan," nations that host US military bases. The text calls Iranian strikes "a breach of international law and a serious threat to international peace and security," but contains no mention of the US or Israel, nations that have been accused of grave war crimes.
The council adopted Bahrain's measure by a vote of 13-0, with two abstentions—China and Russia. Both nations have veto power but declined to use it. Neither Iran nor Israel is currently a member of the Security Council.
The UN body also voted on a competing resolution, sponsored by Russia, that would have implored "all parties"—without naming any of them—to stop their military operations and avoid escalating the conflict. The resolution did not receive the nine votes necessary for adoption, with the US and Latvia voting against it and Bahrain, Colombia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, France, Greece, Liberia, Panama, and the United Kingdom abstaining.
Amir Saeid Iravani, Iran's ambassador to the UN, said the body's adoption of Bahrain's resolution marks "a serious setback to the council’s credibility and leaves a lasting stain on its record."
"Today’s action represents a blatant misuse of the Security Council’s mandate in pursuit of the political agendas of certain members," said Iravani. "The very state responsible for this brutal war of aggression against my country—the regime of the United States—sits on the other side of this chamber as president of the council, abusing its position while obstructing every effort to bring an end to this barbaric war against the Iranian people and preventing the Council from fulfilling its Charter-based responsibilities."
"This resolution is a manifest injustice against my country, the main victim of a clear act of aggression. It distorts the realities on the ground and deliberately ignores the root causes of the current crisis," he continued. "The very purpose of this biased and politically motivated text, which was pushed by the Israeli regime and the United States, is clear: to reverse the roles of victim and aggressor. It rewards the regimes of the United States and Israel, which have violated the UN Charter and committed acts of aggression. In doing so, it establishes impunity and sends a wrong message to the international community—emboldening the aggressors to commit further crimes."
"The UN and International Criminal Court were created for moments like this, when the most powerful decide the rules do not apply to them."
Ahead of the vote on Bahrain's resolution, which accuses Iran of "deliberate targeting of civilians and civilian objects," Iravani said US-Israeli bombing has killed more than 1,300 civilians in Iran and destroyed nearly 10,000 civilian structures across the country, including around 8,000 homes and dozens of schools and healthcare facilities.
Earlier on Wednesday, the New York Times reported that the Pentagon has reached the preliminary conclusion that US forces were responsible for the February 28 bombing of an Iranian elementary school, an attack that killed around 175 people—mostly young children.
DAWN, a nonprofit that supports human rights and democracy in the Middle East, said Wednesday that "mounting evidence" shows US and Israeli forces "have committed multiple war crimes" in Iran and Lebanon—which is facing a rapidly worsening humanitarian disaster due to Israeli attacks.
"In mere days, US and Israel forces have launched a war of choice, killed hundreds of civilians, displaced hundreds of thousands, bombed scores of schools, health facilities, and fuel depots, and dropped white phosphorus on civilian communities," Omar Shakir, DAWN's executive director, said in a statement. "The international community's failure to act when the most fundamental norms of international law are being challenged risks plunging the world further into a lawless era in which civilians across the globe are at risk."
"The UN and International Criminal Court were created for moments like this, when the most powerful decide the rules do not apply to them," said Shakir. "Governments unwilling to invoke international law when their allies commit crimes have no credibility when they invoke it against rivals."
"In less than two weeks, Israel has killed 570 people and displaced 750,000—over 10% of the entire country," the senator said of Lebanon. "Residential buildings are being bombed with no warning."
Just a day after tearing into US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for "unraveling international law, the Geneva Conventions, and the legitimacy of the United Nations" with their illegal war on Iran, Sen. Bernie Sanders stressed that "it's not just Iran."
"It's Lebanon," Sanders (I-Vt.) said on social media Wednesday. Since Trump and Netanyahu began bombing Iran a dozen days ago, Israel has also ramped up attacks against its northern neighbor—claiming to target the Lebanese political and paramilitary group Hezbollah—despite a November 2024 ceasefire deal.
That agreement to protect the Lebanese people was struck just over a year into Israel's retaliation for the October 2023 Hamas-led attack, which has also left the Gaza Strip in ruins. Despite the Lebanon truce, and another for Gaza reached this past October, Israeli forces have continued to slaughter civilians in both places.
In Lebanon, Sanders noted Wednesday, "in less than two weeks, Israel has killed 570 people and displaced 750,000—over 10% of the entire country. Residential buildings are being bombed with no warning."
"The US cannot continue to be complicit in Netanyahu's wars," declared the senator. His comments came after the White House tried to walk back Secretary of State Marco Rubio's suggestion last week that Trump followed the Israeli prime minister's lead on Iran.
Sanders has also criticized and even attempted to curb US complicity in Netanyahu's genocidal assault on Palestinians in Gaza—under the Biden and Trump administrations—by forcing unsuccessful votes to cut off some weapons to Israel.
The Israeli government has used the operation against Iran—which experts argue violates the US Constitution and UN Charter—to again cut off necessary humanitarian aid to Gaza, claiming last week that "the existing stock is expected to suffice for an extended period."
Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, called the move "a new chokehold on Gaza," adding that "after more than two years of unspeakable suffering and a spreading man-made famine, people still lack the most basic supplies, despite increases in aid since the ceasefire.
As for Lebanon, Axios reported Monday that "the Lebanese government proposed direct negotiations with Israel—through the Trump administration—aimed at ending the war and reaching a peace agreement."
However, the Financial Times reported Tuesday that "Israel has rejected diplomatic overtures by Lebanon," with one unnamed source saying that the Lebanese "are ready to talk to Israel, but under the condition of a cessation of fire. Not a ceasefire, but a cessation... so talks can get going in Cyprus."
"Israel has so far refused and says it will only negotiate 'under fire,'" according to that unnamed source.
Trump's ambassador to the United Nations, Mike Waltz, made US support for Israel's bombing of Lebanon clear in his Wednesday remarks to the UN Security Council.
"The United States condemns the attacks that Hezbollah, a long-time proxy of the Iranian regime, has launched against Israel. Hezbollah has yet again made it clear that it does not represent nor does it defend the people of Lebanon. It defends the interests of the Iranian regime," Waltz said, stressing Israel's "right to defend itself."
Waltz also welcomed the Lebanese Council of Ministers' recent decision "to immediately prohibit Hezbollah’s military and security activities," and declared that "now is the time for the government of Lebanon to take back control of the entirety of its country."
Meanwhile, Tom Fletcher, United Nations under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs and emergency relief coordinator, noted to the Security Council that UN Secretary-General António Guterres "has insisted... we need the protection of civilians, de-escalation, an immediate cessation of hostilities, and genuine dialogue and negotiations towards a peaceful settlement, in line with the charter."
Fletcher concluded his comments at the briefing on Lebanon with calls for the protection of "all civilians throughout the region," "generous funding for a principled, scaled-up humanitarian response," and "a revival of strategic, calm, rational, hopeful diplomacy."
"Lebanon is exhausted by other people's wars," he said. "It is not asking for help, but for oxygen. Its people can defy the history, the geography, even the politics. They can be stronger than the forces pulling them apart. But they can only do that if Iran and Israel stop fighting their war in Lebanon."
"This new law is part of a relentless campaign by anti-abortion extremists who continue to push restrictions regardless of settled law, patient safety, or basic compassion," said one critic.
A reproductive rights group coalition that recently got two anti-abortion laws overturned in Wyoming's Supreme Court filed a legal challenge on Tuesday against the insidiously named "fetal heartbeat" legislation signed earlier this week by the state's Republican governor.
The advocacy groups Chelsea's Fund and Just the Pill; Wellspring Health Access, Wyoming's only abortion clinic; and three physicians filed a motion seeking to block HB 0126, the so-called Human Heartbeat Act, which was signed Monday by Gov. Mark Gordon.
The law bans abortion when there is a "detectable fetal heartbeat." Critics note that the term "fetal heartbeat" is medically inaccurate and misleading, as what can be detected with a transvaginal ultrasound at around six weeks of gestation is not an actual heartbeat, but rather electrical activity in fetal tissue that later develops into a heart.
The legislation contains an exception to “preserve the woman from an imminent peril that substantially endangers her life or health, according to appropriate medical judgment," but forces victims of rape and incest to carry their abusers' fetus to term.
The “uNfOrTuNaTe fLaW” he's referring to is that the state's abortion ban has no rape or incest exception. 🤬But this is no accident; these policies are DESIGNED to violate our basic human rights. For the extremists who champion these violent laws, this is a feature, not a bug.
[image or embed]
— Center for Reproductive Rights (@reprorights.org) March 11, 2026 at 7:51 AM
Gordon called the glaring lack of exceptions for rape or incest "an unfortunate flaw."
Wyoming's Republican-dominated Legislature passed the law after the state Supreme Court struck down two other pieces of forced-birth legislation in January.
One of the overturned laws outlawed abortion in nearly all cases, except when the pregnant patient’s life is in danger or for victims of rape or incest. The other banned abortion pills. Both laws were passed after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, reversing half a century of federal abortion rights.
In striking down the laws, the state's high court ruled that they violated residents' ability to make their own healthcare decisions—a right enshrined in the Wyoming Constitution.
The groups challenging the new law echoed the ruling in their motion, arguing the legislation "transgresses the constitutional guarantee of plaintiffs’ and individuals’ to make healthcare decisions without interference from the government."
Chelsea's Fund executive director Janean Forsyth expressed dismay over state lawmakers' relentless attacks on healthcare.
“I'm thinking about everyone from the 15-year-old that we supported, whose grandmother actually reached out, a victim of sexual assault,” Forsyth told Wyoming Public Radio on Wednesday. “I'm thinking about a family with a very wanted pregnancy that we supported in eventually seeking an abortion for a severe fetal anomaly.”
"It's not only affecting access to abortion care, it's affecting reproductive healthcare access generally for parents and children, which is really unfortunate,” she added, referring to medical professionals who are leaving the state for fear of prosecution.
On Wednesday, Brittany Fonteno, president and CEO of the National Abortion Federation (NAF), said in a statement:
A mere two months after two abortion bans were struck down by the state’s Supreme Court, Wyoming’s anti-abortion leaders have enacted yet another ban despite clear judicial rulings and public support for the constitutional right to make personal healthcare decisions. This new law is part of a relentless campaign by anti-abortion extremists who continue to push restrictions regardless of settled law, patient safety, or basic compassion.
“But as they have before, providers are standing firm and fighting back," Fonteno added. "NAF is proud to support Wellspring Health Access and the advocates challenging this ban, and we remain committed to ensuring abortion care is not only legal, but accessible and protected for every person, in every state.”
Abortion access has been tenuous in Wyoming in recent years, with bans and a 2022 arson attack on the Wellspring Health Access clinic in Casper—the state's only full-service abortion facility—causing uncertainty and delays.
Lawmakers in Wyoming considered putting the issue before voters in a referendum but decided against doing so, as such ballot measures have repeatedly resulted in the protection of abortion rights—even in deep "red" and conservative-leaning states including Arizona, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, and Ohio.
Wyoming is the fifth state to ban abortion at around six weeks, joining Florida, Georgia, Iowa, and South Carolina.
According to the Guttmacher Institute, 13 states currently have near-total abortion bans, while 28 other states restrict the procedure. Numerous forced-birth bills are pending across the nation, and—while unlikely to pass—the most severe proposals including punishing the medical procedure with lengthy imprisonment and even the death penalty for healthcare providers and patients.
Wyoming’s governor signed into law a so-called “fetal heartbeat” ban. Abortion is now banned in the state when “cardiac activity” is detected, around 6 wks of pregnancy. WY now shifts from “Restrictive” to “Very Restrictive” on our interactive map. Learn more: https://gu.tt/4985P4S#AbortionAccess
[image or embed]
— Guttmacher (@guttmacher.org) March 11, 2026 at 6:00 AM
On Monday, the Center for Reproductive Rights published a report examining the human and economic toll of abortion bans, which a separate study last year by the Population Reference Bureau has linked to 478 excess infant deaths and 59 excess deaths of pregnant people since Roe was struck down nearly four years ago.
It's not only state-level bans that harm patients. Republicans' so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law by President Donald Trump last year, contains the biggest cuts to Medicaid in the program's 60-year history. Dramatically decreased Medicaid funding has resulted in the closure of at least 50 Planned Parenthood clinics nationwide, and the reduction of services at many others.