February, 25 2009, 11:03am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Lara Tessaro, Staff
Lawyer, Ecojustice Canada, cell (604) 313-3132
Lawsuit Forces Canada to Protect Endangered Killer Whales
Stunning policy reversal could mark turning point for 85 remaining whales
WASHINGTON
After
British Columbians celebrated the unexpected arrival of two newborn killer
whales last week, there is another new cause for hope for BC's imperilled killer
whale populations. This week, the federal government issued an Order that will
provide legal protection for the endangered species' habitat - a stunning policy
reversal after a lawsuit was launched by environmentalists last year.
The lawsuit was filed by
Ecojustice, formerly Sierra Legal Defence Fund, on behalf of nine of Canada and
BC's leading environmental organizations. It alleged that the
Department of Fisheries
and Oceans had failed to require much-needed legal protection for the killer
whales' critical habitat. DFO had claimed instead that existing laws and
unenforceable guidelines were sufficient to protect the orcas' habitat from
serious threats like toxic contamination, acoustic degradation and declining
salmon stocks.
"To recover, killer
whales need more than the status quo from the federal government and so we're
thrilled our lawsuit forced it to issue this habitat protection Order,"
said
Ecojustice lawyer Lara
Tessaro. "Now we'll be pushing to ensure this Order leads to action."
The federal government's
complete turnaround marks a victory for BC's most iconic species and for the
environmental groups behind the lawsuit: Dogwood Initiative,
Environmental Defence,
David Suzuki Foundation, Raincoast Conservation Society, Sierra Club of BC,
International Fund for Animal Welfare, Greenpeace, Georgia Strait Alliance and
Wilderness Committee. It also marks the first time that Canada has ever issued
an Order under its Species at Risk Act to protect critical habitat.
However, the Order does
not reference threats to critical habitat documented by scientists in the
government's Resident Killer Whale Recovery Strategy.
"We know we need to
change the way we care for our marine environment to protect killer whales and
their habitat," said Kathy Heise, Marine Scientist with Raincoast Conservation.
"We hope to work with DFO to incorporate the needs of killer whales' into the
management of our salmon fisheries."
"To give this Order
teeth, DFO must keep killer whales' critical habitat free of tanker traffic and
the risk of catastrophic oil spills," said Will Horter of Dogwood
Initiative.
Killer whales face many
serious threats throughout their habitat on the west coast such as declining
salmon stocks, increased boat traffic, toxic contamination, and acoustic impacts
from dredging, seismic testing and military sonar. DFO is scheduled to release
an action plan within the next four years, but still has not created an action
planning team with independent killer whale scientists.
"Each time we think the
government has finally given these ailing populations greater legal protection,
they find a way to avoid meaningful change. Is this another hollow promise or
will the federal government do the right thing and prohibit harmful activities
in the orcas' critical habitat?" asked Sarah King of Greenpeace.
Kim Elmslie of the
International Fund for Animal Welfare stated, "We will continue to monitor DFO
to ensure that every effort is made to protect this critically endangered
species for future generations."
"This is one landmark
victory on the long road to killer whale recovery. We're relieved to see the
government using the Species At Risk Act and we look forward to seeing similar
habitat protection Orders for other endangered species," said Aaron Freeman of
Environmental Defence.
-30-
For more information,
please visit www.ecojustice.ca or contact:
Lara Tessaro, Staff
Lawyer, Ecojustice Canada, cell (604) 313-3132
Aaron Freeman, Policy
Director, Environmental Defence, (613) 564-0007, cell (613) 697-
7281
Chris Genovali,
Executive Director, Raincoast Conservation Society, (250) 655-1229,
cell (250)
888-3579
Christianne Wilhelmson,
Georgia Strait Alliance, (250) 539-2424
Colin R. Campbell,
Sierra Club BC, cell (250) 361-6476, office 250 386-5255 ext. 236
Gwen Barlee, Policy
Director, Wilderness Committee, (604)683-8220, cell (604) 202-
0322
Matt Takuch, Dogwood
Initiative, (250) 370 9930 ext. 21
Rob Rosenfeld,
Communications Manager, IFAW Canada, (613) 241-3982 ext. 221
Sarah King, Oceans
Campaigner, Greenpeace Canada, (778) 227-6458
Sutton Eaves, Marine
Communications Specialist, David Suzuki Foundation, (416) 854-
3265
For further scientific
information about Resident Killer Whales, please
contact:
Dr. Lance
Barrett-Lennard, Co-Chair of the Killer Whale Recovery Team, Vancouver Aquarium
at (604) 659-3752
To obtain video footage or
audio of the BC's killer whales, please contact Laura Hendrick, Ecojustice
Communications Coordinator at (604) 685-5618 ext. 242.
As Canada's only national environmental law charity, Ecojustice is building the case for a better earth.
LATEST NEWS
Mike Johnson Touts $901 Billion Military Budget Plan After Gutting Medicaid, SNAP
"At such a time, bipartisan agreement to provide additional funds to the Pentagon would deliver a cruel message to the American public," advocacy groups warned.
Dec 08, 2025
Republican congressional leaders unveiled a sprawling military policy bill late Sunday that would authorize $901 billion in US military spending for the coming fiscal year, just months after GOP lawmakers and President Donald Trump pushed through the largest-ever cuts to Medicaid and federal nutrition assistance.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who aggressively pushed cuts to Medicaid by peddling false claims of large-scale fraud, touted the 3,086-page National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) as legislation that would "ensure our military forces remain the most lethal in the world."
The bill, a compromise between House and Senate versions of the annual legislation, would authorize $8 billion more in US military spending than Trump asked for in his 2026 budget request.
If passed, the 2026 NDAA would pump billions of dollars more into the Pentagon, a cesspool of the kinds of waste, fraud, and abuse that Johnson and other Republicans claim to be targeting when they cut safety net programs, stripping health insurance and food aid from millions. The Pentagon has never passed an independent audit and continues to have "significant fraud exposure," the Government Accountability Office said earlier this year.
"The surge in Pentagon spending stands in sharp contrast to the drastic cuts in healthcare and food assistance programs imposed by the reconciliation package."
Final passage of the NDAA would push total military spending authorized by Congress this year above $1 trillion, including the $150 billion in Pentagon funds included in the Trump-GOP budget law enacted over the summer.
Last month, as Common Dreams reported, a coalition of watchdog and anti-war groups implored Congress not to approve any funding above the originally requested $892.6 billion, warning that additional money for the Pentagon would enable the Trump administration's lawless use of the military in US streets and overseas.
The groups also noted that "the surge in Pentagon spending stands in sharp contrast to the drastic cuts in healthcare and food assistance programs imposed by the reconciliation package."
"At such a time," they wrote in a letter to lawmakers, "bipartisan agreement to provide additional funds to the Pentagon would deliver a cruel message to the American public, one out of step with Democratic messaging over healthcare, reconciliation, and the shutdown."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Billionaire Palantir Co-Founder Pushes Return of Public Hangings as Part of 'Masculine Leadership' Initiative
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," said one critic in response.
Dec 07, 2025
Venture capitalist Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of data platform company Palantir, is calling for the return of public hangings as part of a broader push to restore what he describes as "masculine leadership" to the US.
In a statement posted on X Friday, Lonsdale said that he supported changing the so-called "three strikes" anti-crime law to ensure that anyone who is convicted of three violent crimes gets publicly executed, rather than simply sent to prison for life.
"If I’m in charge later, we won’t just have a three strikes law," he wrote. "We will quickly try and hang men after three violent crimes. And yes, we will do it in public to deter others."
Lonsdale then added that "our society needs balance," and said that "it's time to bring back masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable."
Lonsdale's views on public hangings being necessary to restore "masculine leadership" drew swift criticism.
Gil Durán, a journalist who documents the increasingly authoritarian politics of Silicon Valley in his newsletter "The Nerd Reich," argued in a Saturday post that Lonsdale's call for public hangings showed that US tech elites are "entering a more dangerous and desperate phase of radicalization."
"For months, Peter Thiel guru Curtis Yarvin has been squawking about the need for more severe measures to cement Trump's authoritarian rule," Durán explained. "Peter Thiel is ranting about the Antichrist in a global tour. And now Lonsdale—a Thiel protégé—is fantasizing about a future in which he will have the power to unleash state violence at mass scale."
Taulby Edmondson, an adjunct professor of history, religion, and culture at Virginia Tech, wrote in a post on Bluesky that the rhetoric Lonsdale uses to justify the return of public hangings has even darker intonations than calls for state-backed violence.
"A point of nuance here: 'masculine leadership to protect our most vulnerable' is how lynch mobs are described, not state-sanctioned executions," he observed.
Theoretical physicist Sean Carroll argued that Lonsdale's remarks were symbolic of a kind of performative masculinity that has infected US culture.
"Immaturity masquerading as strength is the defining personal characteristic of our age," he wrote.
Tech entrepreneur Anil Dash warned Lonsdale that his call for public hangings could have unintended consequences for members of the Silicon Valley elite.
"Well, Joe, Mark Zuckerberg has sole control over Facebook, which directly enabled the Rohingya genocide," he wrote. "So let’s have the conversation."
And Columbia Journalism School professor Bill Grueskin noted that Lonsdale has been a major backer of the University of Austin, an unaccredited liberal arts college that has been pitched as an alternative to left-wing university education with the goal of preparing "thoughtful and ethical innovators, builders, leaders, public servants and citizens through open inquiry and civil discourse."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Hegseth Defends Boat Bombings as New Details Further Undermine Administration's Justifications
The boat targeted in the infamous September 2 "double-tap" strike was not even headed for the US, Adm. Frank Bradley revealed to lawmakers.
Dec 07, 2025
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday defended the Trump administration's policy of bombing suspected drug-trafficking vessels even as new details further undermined the administration's stated justifications for the policy.
According to the Guardian, Hegseth told a gathering at the Ronald Reagan presidential library that the boat bombings, which so far have killed at least 87 people, are necessary to protect Americans from illegal drugs being shipped to the US.
"If you’re working for a designated terrorist organization and you bring drugs to this country in a boat, we will find you and we will sink you," Hegseth said. "Let there be no doubt about it."
However, leaked details about a classified briefing delivered to lawmakers last week by Adm. Frank Bradley about a September 2 boat strike cast new doubts on Hegseth's justifications.
CNN reported on Friday that Bradley told lawmakers that the boat taken out by the September 2 attack was not even headed toward the US, but was going "to link up with another, larger vessel that was bound for Suriname," a small nation in the northeast of South America.
While Bradley acknowledged that the boat was not heading toward the US, he told lawmakers that the strike on it was justified because the drugs it was carrying could have theoretically wound up in the US at some point.
Additionally, NBC News reported on Saturday that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth had ordered all 11 men who were on the boat targeted by the September 2 strike to be killed because "they were on an internal list of narco-terrorists who US intelligence and military officials determined could be lethally targeted."
This is relevant because the US military launched a second strike during the September 2 operation to kill two men who had survived the initial strike on their vessel, which many legal experts consider to be either a war crime or an act of murder under domestic law.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, watched video of the September 2 double-tap attack last week, and he described the footage as “one of the most troubling things I’ve seen in my time in public service.”
“Any American who sees the video that I saw will see its military attacking shipwrecked sailors,” Himes explained. “Now, there’s a whole set of contextual items that the admiral explained. Yes, they were carrying drugs. They were not in position to continue their mission in any way... People will someday see this video and they will see that that video shows, if you don’t have the broader context, an attack on shipwrecked sailors.”
While there has been much discussion about the legality of the September 2 double-tap strike in recent days, some critics have warned that fixating on this particular aspect of the administration's policy risks taking the focus off the illegality of the boat-bombing campaign as a whole.
Daphne Eviatar, director for security and human rights for Amnesty International USA, said on Friday that the entire boat-bombing campaign has been "illegal under both domestic and international law."
"All of them constitute murder because none of the victims, whether or not they were smuggling illegal narcotics, posed an imminent threat to life," she said. "Congress must take action now to stop the US military from murdering more people in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular