

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

As U.S. toy imports hit record levels this year, U.S.
trade policy and outdated consumer safety protections expose America's
children to a flood of unsafe toys, according to a study Public Citizen
released today. "Closing Santa's Sweatshop" also documents campaign
pledges on import safety made by President-elect Obama and new members
of Congress - 34 of whom replace congressional supporters of the failed
trade-policy status quo generating the import safety crisis.
The United States is expected to import $23 billion in
toys in 2008, 90 percent of that from China. Imports this year
represent 90 percent of U.S. toys, which is the highest toy import
level and share on record. Many nations producing our children's toys
have extremely lax safety standards and enforcement. Yet, while toy
imports exploded by 562 percent from 1980 to 2008, the budget of the
agency responsible for toy safety, the Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC), was cut by 23 percent, with staffing cut nearly 60
percent during the same period.
"While production of our children's toys has become
globalized, our consumer safety system and its protections against
injury and death have not," said Lori Wallach, director of Public
Citizen's Global Trade Watch division. "Our trade agreements contain
foreign investor protections that promote a 'low-road' strategy of
offshoring toy production to nations with lax safety standards and low
wages, while simultaneously imposing limits on the safety standards and
inspections we can apply to imports."
Unfortunately, the threat of toy safety improvements
being attacked as "illegal trade barriers" under current U.S. trade
agreements is no longer only hypothetical. The report describes actions
taken by China in 2008 invoking two U.S. safety initiatives relating to
state-level bans on lead and bisphenol A (BPA) in toys that China
claims violate World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. U.S. laws
challenged at the WTO have been ruled against more than 80 percent of
the time.
"The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 represented a real step forward on product safety but it failed
to thoroughly address import-specific concerns," said Todd Tucker,
research director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch division and
author of the report. "Simply put, the new law does not adequately
update U.S. import safety policies for the 21st century reality that
many products are produced offshore."
As of 2007, the CPSC had no full-time staff at any of
326 U.S. ports and mostly focused part-time energies on Los Angeles and
New York, leaving 324 ports virtually unchecked, according to the CPSC.
In 2008, the CPSC claims to be monitoring at least nine of America's
326 ports, but could not confirm if there were any full-time safety
inspectors at any U.S. port. Moreover, even once the new law's
increases in CPSC staffing and budget levels are fully phased in, the
agency's staffing levels will actually be down 49 percent relative to 1980 levels.
The report concludes that to bring U.S. product
safety policy up to date with the realities of globalized production
and thus effectively remedy the imported product safety crisis,
Congress and the Obama administration must:
"Fortunately, both President-elect Obama and 71 members
of Congress elected in 2006 and 2008 campaigned on fair trade,
including strengthened imported product safety," Wallach said. "These
policymakers replaced predecessors who did not prioritize import safety
and other fair-trade policies. Consumers expect these officials to
honor their campaign pledges."
The Public Citizen report highlights candidate
commitments based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 130 races
with an updated appendix summarizing the import safety and fair
trade-related commitments and campaign ads of more than 260 candidates.
For instance, Obama said: "As president, I'll work with
China to keep harmful toys off our shelves ... and will ban "toys that
contain more than a trace level of lead, coming from China or anywhere
else." He also said, "We should amend NAFTA (the North American Free
Trade Agreement) to make clear that fair laws and regulations written
to protect citizens in any of the three countries cannot be overridden
simply at the request of foreign investors." Obama's commitments became
part of the Democratic platform, which contained a trade reform agenda
not seen in past platforms, including that no future bilateral trade
pacts "will stop the government from protecting the environment, food
safety, or the health of its citizens; [or] give greater rights to
foreign investors than to U.S. investors."
In the 2008 elections, Obama was joined by 34 new fair
traders in the House and Senate who replaced members of Congress who
had supported NAFTA, the WTO, current China trade policy and other
anti-fair trade measures. These new fair traders came from both parties
and all regions of the country - especially outside the Rust Belt,
which Beltway pundits have considered the only place trade issues
resonate - and included Rep.-elect Jared Polis (D-Colo.),
Sen.-elect Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Rep.-elect Bobby Bright (D-Ala.),
Sen.-elect Mark Begich (D-Alaska) and Rep.-elect Kathy Dahlkemper
(D-Pa.), among others highlighted in the report. These new members will
be joining a growing bloc of fair traders in Congress who will be
seeking to remedy the problem cited so clearly by Polis, who said: "The
Bush administration is asleep at the wheel while multinational
corporations are putting profits before safety and products that harm
kids are entering our country from China and other nations with poor
safety records ... We need to make sure that defects are identified and
addressed before products reach the shelves and get in the hands of our children."
READ the report.
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000"Withholding reimbursements only further hurts patients, strains providers, and drives up costs," said one Democratic congresswoman. "We will fight this with everything we’ve got."
"Political retribution, plain and simple," was how US Sen. Alex Padilla described an announcement by Vice President JD Vance late Wednesday regarding the White House's decision to withhold $1.3 billion in Medicaid reimbursement payments to California.
Vance and Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, claimed the state's Medicaid records have generated "red flags" and demanded officials clarify $630 million in billing, $500 million that's been spent on home health services, and $200 million in what Oz called "questionable expenditures," which he claimed had been used to provide coverage for undocumented immigrants, who are not eligible for Medicaid.
The announcement came a month after Vance's federal anti-fraud task force suspended the licenses of nearly 450 hospice care facilities and 23 home health agencies in the Los Angeles area, accusing them of fraud.
Vance also warned that all 50 states could soon see federal funding for their Medicaid Fraud Control Units frozen if they fail to "aggressively prosecute Medicaid fraud."
"We can turn off other resources within their state Medicaid programs as well," said the vice president.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has frequently sparred with the Trump administration, said Vance and Oz were "attacking programs that keep seniors and people with disabilities OUT of nursing homes," which are far more expensive to run than home healthcare agencies.
Newsom said the growth of the state's In-Home Supportive Services program has saved taxpayers "$107,000 per person" by reducing reliance on nursing homes.
"MAGA hates in-home support programs—which help people stay out of costly institutional settings like nursing homes and get the care they deserve, typically from loved ones," said Newsom.
Newsom also said the Trump administration had informed state officials that the deadline to review California's Medicaid records "before deciding whether to defer funding" would be later in the month.
Democratic members of Congress warned that their constituents rely heavily on Medicaid, with seven out of 10 of the congressional districts with the highest Medicaid enrollment located in California.
Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Calif.) said that 56% of her constituents rely on "this lifesaving program," and many have already been harmed by the Republican Party's slashing of Medicaid funding in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last year.
"Withholding reimbursements only further hurts patients, strains providers, and drives up costs," said Kamlager-Dove. "We will fight this with everything we’ve got."
Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif.) said more than 120,000 people in his district depend on the federal healthcare program for low-income households and people with disabilities.
"This administration needs to stop playing politics with people’s health and lives," said Panetta. "When people commit fraud, they should be punished accordingly. However, this administration continues to punish California for political purposes, including penalizing innocent people by taking their healthcare away."
State Attorney General Rob Bonta noted that California has "not hesitated to challenge unlawful actions by the Trump administration," and suggested the state could file a legal challenge against the withholding of Medicaid funds.
He also accused the administration of targeting the heavily Democratic state "for political reasons."
The anti-fraud task force led by Vance has so far exclusively focused on rooting out alleged fraud in federal programs in blue states. The White House suspended $259 million in federal payments to Minnesota earlier this year after a scandal regarding the state's social services system.
"The Trump administration is attacking California over claims that they can't back up," said Padilla. "Let's be real, this isn't about fraud—it's about punishing a state that didn't vote for" President Donald Trump.
"The interim decision by the US judge gives me respite," said United Nations special rapporteur Francesca Albanese. "But the battle is not over."
A federal judge in Washington, DC on Wednesday temporarily blocked Trump administration sanctions targeting United Nations Palestine expert Francesca Albanese, ruling that the punitive measures violated her First Amendment rights.
"Albanese has done nothing more than speak!" wrote US District Judge Richard Leon, a George W. Bush appointee, in his 26-page decision granting a preliminary injunction against the sanctions, which US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced last summer. Rubio said the sanctions, which barred the UN expert from entering the US and banking in the country, were justified because "Albanese has directly engaged with the International Criminal Court (ICC) in efforts to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute nationals of the United States or Israel, without the consent of those two countries."
But Leon wrote in his ruling that "it is undisputed that her recommendations have no binding effect on the ICC's actions—they are nothing more than her opinion."
The decision came in response to a lawsuit filed in February by Albanese's husband and her daughter, who is a US citizen. They argued the US sanctions against Albanese were "effectively debanking her and making it nearly impossible to meet the needs of her daily life."
Albanese is an Italian national who currently lives with family in Tunisia. Leon wrote in his ruling that "while the speech at issue occurred outside the United States, defendants have responded by taking action against Albanese's extensive connections to the United States—including Albanese's property within the United States and her ability to maintain professional and personal connections within the United States—because of her speech."
"Accordingly, Albanese (or plaintiffs standing in her shoes) may claim the protection of the First Amendment to challenge defendants' actions," the judge continued.
Albanese, who has vocally condemned Israel's genocide in Gaza and the countries and private corporations that have been complicit, welcomed Leon's ruling, writing in a social media post that "the interim decision by the US judge gives me respite."
"But the battle is not over," she added. "ICC judges and Palestinian NGOs remain sanctioned with no recourse to justice. The stakes are incredibly high."
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the US-based Center for International Policy, called Leon's ruling "the right decision" and said Albanese "was wrongly sanctioned for constitutionally protected speech."
"War criminals should be held accountable for their crimes," Williams wrote on social media. "Making it a crime to say that is what is illegal. We must not sacrifice our rights or the rule of law for Israel."
"The United States cannot continue to be complicit in abuses abroad. There must be accountability," said Rep. Chuy García, who co-led a letter to the Pentagon.
Backed by anti-war and human rights organizations, 20 "deeply concerned" progressives in the US House of Representatives sent a letter to the Pentagon on Wednesday demanding answers about "reports of serious human rights violations and the bombing of what appear to have been civilian facilities during joint US-Ecuador military operations conducted in northern Ecuador."
While bombing Iran and boats allegedly running illegal drugs through the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, President Donald Trump deployed US troops to Ecuador in March for a joint campaign combating "narco-terrorists" in the South American country.
Led by Democratic Reps. Greg Casar (Texas), Jesús "Chuy" García (Ill.), and Sara Jacobs (Calif.), the lawmakers called for "an explanation of the administration's legal justification for the involvement of US armed forces in these operations, which have not been authorized by Congress," as well as their immediate suspension "until these incidents are fully investigated."
The Democrats' letter to US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth cites reporting that one target "appears to have been a civilian dairy and cattle farm with no known links to armed groups or drug trafficking," where witnesses said "Ecuadorian military personnel interrogated and assaulted unarmed civilians, burned homes and infrastructure, and subjected detainees to torture."
"Beyond these recent incidents, we are concerned that our military is deepening its ties with the government of Ecuador, even as it undergoes an alarming authoritarian and anti-democratic drift," the Democrats wrote, pointing out that "President Daniel Noboa has overseen the violent repression of Indigenous-led protests, publicly threatened the Constitutional Court, and frozen the bank accounts of civil society organizations."
Noboa's allies "have also pursued questionable cases against his political opponents," as "Ecuadorians have endured more than two years of a prolonged state of emergency, marked by the military's domestic deployment to combat so-called 'narco-terrorists," the letter continues. "With investigative reporting now linking President Noboa's family business to drug trafficking and the same illicit networks he claims to be fighting, an independent and transparent investigation into these allegations is warranted."
The letter stresses that "if US forces provide new or continued security assistance to units that engaged in acts such as torture, extrajudicial killings, or enforced disappearances, and there is no credible investigation or prosecution underway, this would constitute a violation of the Leahy Laws, which prohibit assistance to foreign security forces credibly implicated in gross human rights violations without effective steps to bring those responsible to justice."
The Democrats—supported by Amnesty International USA, Center for Civilians in Conflict, Center for Economic and Policy Research, Friends Committee on National Legislation, Human Rights First, Latin American Working Group, Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns, StoptheDrugWar.org, Washington Office on Latin America, and Win Without War—demanded "a prompt and complete response" to their list of questions by May 22.
"The United States cannot continue to be complicit in abuses abroad. There must be accountability," García said on social media.
As El País reported Wednesday, the letter was made public as Noboa began a two-day trip to Washington, DC, during which he is set to meeting with US Vice President JD Vance and Organization of American States Secretary General Albert Ramdin.