

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

As U.S. toy imports hit record levels this year, U.S.
trade policy and outdated consumer safety protections expose America's
children to a flood of unsafe toys, according to a study Public Citizen
released today. "Closing Santa's Sweatshop" also documents campaign
pledges on import safety made by President-elect Obama and new members
of Congress - 34 of whom replace congressional supporters of the failed
trade-policy status quo generating the import safety crisis.
The United States is expected to import $23 billion in
toys in 2008, 90 percent of that from China. Imports this year
represent 90 percent of U.S. toys, which is the highest toy import
level and share on record. Many nations producing our children's toys
have extremely lax safety standards and enforcement. Yet, while toy
imports exploded by 562 percent from 1980 to 2008, the budget of the
agency responsible for toy safety, the Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC), was cut by 23 percent, with staffing cut nearly 60
percent during the same period.
"While production of our children's toys has become
globalized, our consumer safety system and its protections against
injury and death have not," said Lori Wallach, director of Public
Citizen's Global Trade Watch division. "Our trade agreements contain
foreign investor protections that promote a 'low-road' strategy of
offshoring toy production to nations with lax safety standards and low
wages, while simultaneously imposing limits on the safety standards and
inspections we can apply to imports."
Unfortunately, the threat of toy safety improvements
being attacked as "illegal trade barriers" under current U.S. trade
agreements is no longer only hypothetical. The report describes actions
taken by China in 2008 invoking two U.S. safety initiatives relating to
state-level bans on lead and bisphenol A (BPA) in toys that China
claims violate World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. U.S. laws
challenged at the WTO have been ruled against more than 80 percent of
the time.
"The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 represented a real step forward on product safety but it failed
to thoroughly address import-specific concerns," said Todd Tucker,
research director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch division and
author of the report. "Simply put, the new law does not adequately
update U.S. import safety policies for the 21st century reality that
many products are produced offshore."
As of 2007, the CPSC had no full-time staff at any of
326 U.S. ports and mostly focused part-time energies on Los Angeles and
New York, leaving 324 ports virtually unchecked, according to the CPSC.
In 2008, the CPSC claims to be monitoring at least nine of America's
326 ports, but could not confirm if there were any full-time safety
inspectors at any U.S. port. Moreover, even once the new law's
increases in CPSC staffing and budget levels are fully phased in, the
agency's staffing levels will actually be down 49 percent relative to 1980 levels.
The report concludes that to bring U.S. product
safety policy up to date with the realities of globalized production
and thus effectively remedy the imported product safety crisis,
Congress and the Obama administration must:
"Fortunately, both President-elect Obama and 71 members
of Congress elected in 2006 and 2008 campaigned on fair trade,
including strengthened imported product safety," Wallach said. "These
policymakers replaced predecessors who did not prioritize import safety
and other fair-trade policies. Consumers expect these officials to
honor their campaign pledges."
The Public Citizen report highlights candidate
commitments based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 130 races
with an updated appendix summarizing the import safety and fair
trade-related commitments and campaign ads of more than 260 candidates.
For instance, Obama said: "As president, I'll work with
China to keep harmful toys off our shelves ... and will ban "toys that
contain more than a trace level of lead, coming from China or anywhere
else." He also said, "We should amend NAFTA (the North American Free
Trade Agreement) to make clear that fair laws and regulations written
to protect citizens in any of the three countries cannot be overridden
simply at the request of foreign investors." Obama's commitments became
part of the Democratic platform, which contained a trade reform agenda
not seen in past platforms, including that no future bilateral trade
pacts "will stop the government from protecting the environment, food
safety, or the health of its citizens; [or] give greater rights to
foreign investors than to U.S. investors."
In the 2008 elections, Obama was joined by 34 new fair
traders in the House and Senate who replaced members of Congress who
had supported NAFTA, the WTO, current China trade policy and other
anti-fair trade measures. These new fair traders came from both parties
and all regions of the country - especially outside the Rust Belt,
which Beltway pundits have considered the only place trade issues
resonate - and included Rep.-elect Jared Polis (D-Colo.),
Sen.-elect Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Rep.-elect Bobby Bright (D-Ala.),
Sen.-elect Mark Begich (D-Alaska) and Rep.-elect Kathy Dahlkemper
(D-Pa.), among others highlighted in the report. These new members will
be joining a growing bloc of fair traders in Congress who will be
seeking to remedy the problem cited so clearly by Polis, who said: "The
Bush administration is asleep at the wheel while multinational
corporations are putting profits before safety and products that harm
kids are entering our country from China and other nations with poor
safety records ... We need to make sure that defects are identified and
addressed before products reach the shelves and get in the hands of our children."
READ the report.
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000"It is outrageous that the US government would target people for bringing humanitarian aid... But even more disturbing is the cruel and deeply immoral policy the United States continues to impose on Cuba."
The antiwar group CodePink it has yet to be served with any subpoenas after it was reported over the weekend that the Trump administration has opened an investigation into a recent humanitarian trip it helped organize to Cuba, but vehemently denied wrongdoing and said any government probe, if there is one, would only show that "this administration is beyond grotesque."
"Taking medical supplies to pediatric hospitals in Cuba is now a crime?" asked co-founder Medea Benjamin on social media on Saturday after Fox News reported that organizers had been served subpoenas. "Saving the lives of babies is a crime?"
Fox reported that Benjamin and left-wing commentator Hasan Piker had been subpoenaed by federal investigators two months after they were among 40 Americans who sailed to Havana on the Nuestra America Convoy, which carried 20 tons of humanitarian aid to the island nation.
The Fox reporting claimed the subpoenas issued to Benjamin and Piker seek to obtain financial, logistical, and communications information related to the trip, which was organized in response to the Trump administration's decision in late January to threaten to impose tariffs on any country that provided Cuba with oil.
The administration cut off Cuba's main source of fuel at the beginning of the year when it sent US troops into Venezuela to abduct President Nicolás Maduro and took control of the country's vast oil supply.
White House officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the son of Cuban immigrants, have long desired regime change in the communist country, and rights advocates have warned the administration appears to be moving toward just that as it strangles the island's oil supply—causing frequent blackouts and impacting the healthcare and food systems—and claims the Cuban government poses a threat to the US.
In organizing the Nuestra America Convoy, said Benjamin on Sunday, the advocates were acting "as moral US citizens trying to bring some relief to a population being deliberately starved by the cruel policies of our own government."
"This policy has contributed to catastrophic shortages of medicine and electricity, massive blackouts, transportation collapse, and a public health crisis that has hurt the most vulnerable, especially children and the elderly," said Benjamin. "It is a policy that is, literally, killing babies, as we have seen in the recent tragic doubling of the infant mortality rate. This is why we focused our donations on medical supplies for pediatric hospitals."
The blockade is compounding the suffering caused by the trade embargo the US has imposed for decades, said Benjamin.
The Cuban Assets Control Regulations law prohibits US citizens from conducting unlicensed travel-related transations with Cuba, but the law makes exceptions for humanitarian endeavors and other activities aimed at supporting the Cuban people.
"We traveled to Cuba under the US government-authorized category of providing humanitarian aid to the Cuban people. We brought desperately needed medicines and medical supplies at a time when Cuba is suffering catastrophic shortages caused by the crippling US blockade," said Benjamin.
Benjamin, Piker, and Drop Site News co-founder Ryan Grim emphasized that the group stayed in Spanish-owned hotels that are "explicitly permitted under" the US law—while right-wing influencer Nick Shirley allegedly stayed in a sanctioned hotel on a recent trip to Cuba.
"It is outrageous that the US government would target people for bringing humanitarian aid to suffering Cuban children," Benjamin said. "But even more disturbing is the cruel and deeply immoral policy the United States continues to impose on Cuba—a policy designed to strangle the island economically, deprive people of food, fuel, medicine, and basic necessities, and make daily life unbearable."
Piker said the reports of the investigation indicate that "the American government would rather try to criminalize delivering aid to a country we’ve starved, than punish the Epstein class."
Benjamin emphasized that the reports of the probe come as the administration intensified its threats against Cuba, having indicted former President Raúl Castro last week on charges related to the shooting down of a plane operated by Cuban-American exiles in the 1990s. Trump and his allies have repeatedly mused about invading the country following his military attacks on Venezuela and Iran.
"President Trump already has his hands full trying to disentangle himself from the disastrous US war with Iran," said Benjamin. "He should not start another one in Cuba. The American people are tired of endless wars, interventions, sanctions, and suffering imposed in our name."
"The pursuit of greater profits cannot justify choices that systematically sacrifice jobs, because the human person is an end, not a means."
Pope Leo XIV on Monday released a 42,000-word encyclical calling for government regulation of artificial intelligence and implored world leaders to ensure the burgeoning technology is used for the benefit of all humankind—not concentrated in the hands of a powerful, profit-seeking few.
Leo warned in the first major theological document of his papacy that unrestrained AI and its potentially far-reaching impacts—including mass job loss, environmental degradation, and increasingly catastrophic warfare—heightens the "risk of dehumanization," subjugating much of humanity in the name of "greater efficiency" and technological advancement.
"As with every major technological shift, AI tends to amplify the power of those who already possess economic resources, expertise, and access to data," Leo wrote in the document, titled Magnifica Humanitas. "In light of the common good and the universal destination of goods, this raises serious concerns, since small but highly influential groups can shape information and consumption patterns, influence democratic processes, and steer economic dynamics to their own advantage, undermining social justice and solidarity among peoples."
Leo warned that eliminating jobs en masse by replacing human beings with robots—an aim of some of the most powerful companies in the world, including the e-commerce behemoth Amazon—without adequate protections and compensation for impacted workers would be morally obscene and calamitous to social order.
"A society that guarantees employment to only a small fraction of the population, despite having a high level of technical development, risks exposing many to forced inactivity, a lack of responsibility, and the absence of daily tasks and stimuli, resulting in human and cultural impoverishment," the pope wrote. "This creates a paradox of material progress and anthropological regression that undermines the foundations of a just and stable social peace."
In the era of #ArtificialIntelligence, when human dignity is threatened by new forms of dehumanization, ours is the pressing duty to remain profoundly human. We must lovingly safeguard the grandeur of humanity bestowed upon us and revealed in its fullness in Christ, the splendor…
— Pope Leo XIV (@Pontifex) May 25, 2026
Leo cautioned against the growing use of AI in military conflict, a warning delivered alongside the CEO of the artificial intelligence firm Anthropic, which was embroiled in a tense and public dispute with the Trump administration earlier this year over the use of the company's technology for military purposes and mass surveillance. The pontiff has also clashed with the Trump administration, which has attacked Leo for publicly criticizing the US-Israeli war on Iran.
"No algorithm can make war morally acceptable," reads the pope's encyclical. "AI does not remove the intrinsic inhumanity of conflict; indeed it can only bring about conflict more quickly and render it more impersonal, lowering the threshold for resorting to violence, transforming defense into threat prediction and thus reducing victims to data. In this way, it will accustom us to the idea that violence is inevitable and needs only to be optimized."
Leo, whose warnings about the implications of rapid advancements in AI technology echoed concerns expressed by progressive lawmakers in the US and around the world, made clear that he doesn't view new technology, including AI, as inherently "antagonistic to humanity," noting that "technological development has significantly improved the living conditions of humanity."
"At the same time, each phase of progress has also revealed the ambiguity of tools that can cause harm when not oriented toward the good," Leo wrote. "It is necessary to establish adequate regulatory tools capable of upholding justice and curbing the distorting effects of technological power."
"Crucial questions impose themselves on our conscience," he added, "and can no longer be avoided: Where are we going? Toward what goal do we wish to orient ourselves? What direction should we choose as a people and as a human community?"
"We will defeat the oligarchy and the political system that it maintains," said Graham Platner. "The politics of Susan Collins."
US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday rallied in Orono, Maine with progressive Senate candidate Graham Platner, who called for transformative political change to reclaim the wealth that has been "stolen by corrupt politicians and the corporations that bought them."
Platner, who effectively locked up the Maine's US Senate Democratic primary after Gov. Janet Mills exited the race last month, placed five-term incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins among the corrupt lawmakers who have sold out workers and advanced the interests of the billionaire class, which is shelling out millions to protect Collins' seat.
"We will not just fight the oligarchy," Platner told an audience of 1,400 gathered at the University of Maine, the location of the 40th stop of Sanders' (I-Vt.) nationwide "Fighting Oligarchy" tour. "We will defeat the oligarchy and the political system that it maintains... The politics of Susan Collins. A politics that turns politicians into millionaires but tells you to be grateful for crumbs. It is a lie."
Platner declared that "we need a political revolution," something he said Sanders "has been fighting for for 60 years."
"When we beat back fascism, when we defend our democracy and our freedom, let it be a different kind of freedom," said Platner. "A freedom to not be condemned to scraps and struggle, but to live with the dignity and fulfillment that gives us the society we deserve."
Watch the full rally:
Sanders, who became the first US senator to endorse Platner last August when he was widely seen as a long shot to win the Democratic nomination, said that "what we're talking about"—from Medicare for All to a living wage to union rights for all workers—"is not radical."
"What is radical is when so few have so much," said Sanders. "What is radical is when billionaires control our political system."
Sunday's "Fight Oligarchy" rally came days after a survey showed Platner leading Collins—who has held her seat for nearly three decades—by seven percentage points among likely voters, who appear unfazed by an intensifying wave of attacks on Platner from pro-Collins super PACs and the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
"Susan Collins is spineless and corrupt," Platner wrote on social media ahead of the rally. "And in 163 days, we will defeat her."