December, 17 2008, 01:02pm EDT
Closing Santa's Sweatshop: How to Deliver on Obama's and Congress' Toy Safety and Fair-Trade Promises
New Report Documents Record 2008 Toy Import Levels and Safety-Policy Failures
WASHINGTON
As U.S. toy imports hit record levels this year, U.S.
trade policy and outdated consumer safety protections expose America's
children to a flood of unsafe toys, according to a study Public Citizen
released today. "Closing Santa's Sweatshop" also documents campaign
pledges on import safety made by President-elect Obama and new members
of Congress - 34 of whom replace congressional supporters of the failed
trade-policy status quo generating the import safety crisis.
The United States is expected to import $23 billion in
toys in 2008, 90 percent of that from China. Imports this year
represent 90 percent of U.S. toys, which is the highest toy import
level and share on record. Many nations producing our children's toys
have extremely lax safety standards and enforcement. Yet, while toy
imports exploded by 562 percent from 1980 to 2008, the budget of the
agency responsible for toy safety, the Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC), was cut by 23 percent, with staffing cut nearly 60
percent during the same period.
"While production of our children's toys has become
globalized, our consumer safety system and its protections against
injury and death have not," said Lori Wallach, director of Public
Citizen's Global Trade Watch division. "Our trade agreements contain
foreign investor protections that promote a 'low-road' strategy of
offshoring toy production to nations with lax safety standards and low
wages, while simultaneously imposing limits on the safety standards and
inspections we can apply to imports."
Unfortunately, the threat of toy safety improvements
being attacked as "illegal trade barriers" under current U.S. trade
agreements is no longer only hypothetical. The report describes actions
taken by China in 2008 invoking two U.S. safety initiatives relating to
state-level bans on lead and bisphenol A (BPA) in toys that China
claims violate World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. U.S. laws
challenged at the WTO have been ruled against more than 80 percent of
the time.
"The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 represented a real step forward on product safety but it failed
to thoroughly address import-specific concerns," said Todd Tucker,
research director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch division and
author of the report. "Simply put, the new law does not adequately
update U.S. import safety policies for the 21st century reality that
many products are produced offshore."
As of 2007, the CPSC had no full-time staff at any of
326 U.S. ports and mostly focused part-time energies on Los Angeles and
New York, leaving 324 ports virtually unchecked, according to the CPSC.
In 2008, the CPSC claims to be monitoring at least nine of America's
326 ports, but could not confirm if there were any full-time safety
inspectors at any U.S. port. Moreover, even once the new law's
increases in CPSC staffing and budget levels are fully phased in, the
agency's staffing levels will actually be down 49 percent relative to 1980 levels.
The report concludes that to bring U.S. product
safety policy up to date with the realities of globalized production
and thus effectively remedy the imported product safety crisis,
Congress and the Obama administration must:
- Alter various provisions of U.S. trade agreements
that currently encourage the offshoring of manufacturing and limit
border inspection and imported product safety standards; - Provide domestic agencies responsible for product
safety with new authority to inspect products and facilities overseas
such that a nation's failure to cooperate with inspections would result
in imports from that nation being halted (as is U.S. policy for
imported meat and poultry); - Temporarily halt suspicious imports via a "hot button" prior to a hearing;
- Generate funding to ensure inspection of goods produced offshore; and
- Require import bonding to fund recalls.
"Fortunately, both President-elect Obama and 71 members
of Congress elected in 2006 and 2008 campaigned on fair trade,
including strengthened imported product safety," Wallach said. "These
policymakers replaced predecessors who did not prioritize import safety
and other fair-trade policies. Consumers expect these officials to
honor their campaign pledges."
The Public Citizen report highlights candidate
commitments based on a comprehensive analysis of more than 130 races
with an updated appendix summarizing the import safety and fair
trade-related commitments and campaign ads of more than 260 candidates.
For instance, Obama said: "As president, I'll work with
China to keep harmful toys off our shelves ... and will ban "toys that
contain more than a trace level of lead, coming from China or anywhere
else." He also said, "We should amend NAFTA (the North American Free
Trade Agreement) to make clear that fair laws and regulations written
to protect citizens in any of the three countries cannot be overridden
simply at the request of foreign investors." Obama's commitments became
part of the Democratic platform, which contained a trade reform agenda
not seen in past platforms, including that no future bilateral trade
pacts "will stop the government from protecting the environment, food
safety, or the health of its citizens; [or] give greater rights to
foreign investors than to U.S. investors."
In the 2008 elections, Obama was joined by 34 new fair
traders in the House and Senate who replaced members of Congress who
had supported NAFTA, the WTO, current China trade policy and other
anti-fair trade measures. These new fair traders came from both parties
and all regions of the country - especially outside the Rust Belt,
which Beltway pundits have considered the only place trade issues
resonate - and included Rep.-elect Jared Polis (D-Colo.),
Sen.-elect Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Rep.-elect Bobby Bright (D-Ala.),
Sen.-elect Mark Begich (D-Alaska) and Rep.-elect Kathy Dahlkemper
(D-Pa.), among others highlighted in the report. These new members will
be joining a growing bloc of fair traders in Congress who will be
seeking to remedy the problem cited so clearly by Polis, who said: "The
Bush administration is asleep at the wheel while multinational
corporations are putting profits before safety and products that harm
kids are entering our country from China and other nations with poor
safety records ... We need to make sure that defects are identified and
addressed before products reach the shelves and get in the hands of our children."
READ the report.
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000LATEST NEWS
Amid Spying Fight, House Passes Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," said one advocate.
Apr 17, 2024
While applauding the U.S. House of Representatives' bipartisan passage of a bill to ensure that "law enforcement and intelligence agencies can't do an end-run around the Constitution by buying information from data brokers" on Wednesday, privacy advocates highlighted that Congress is trying to extend and expand a long-abused government spying program.
The House voted 219-199 for Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (FANFSA), which won support from 96 Democrats and 123 Republicans, including the lead sponsor, Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio). Named for the constitutional amendment that protects against unreasonable searches and seizures, H.R. 4639 would close what campaigners call the data broker loophole.
"The privacy violations that flow from law enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression, and our ability to control what happens to our data," said Free Press Action policy counsel Jenna Ruddock. "These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites—even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations."
"We're grateful that the House passed these vital and popular protections," she added. "The bill would prevent flagrant abuses of our privacy by government authorities in league with unscrupulous third-party data brokers. Making this legislation into law with Senate passage too would be a decisive and long-overdue action against government misuse of this clandestine business sector that traffics in our personal data for profit."
Wednesday's vote followed the House sending the Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act to the Senate. H.R. 7888 would reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which allows for warrantless spying on noncitizens abroad but also sweeps up Americans' data.
The House notably included an amendment forcing a wide range of individuals and businesses to cooperate with government spying operations but rejected an amendment that would have added a warrant requirement to the bill, which the Senate could vote on as soon as Thursday.
Noting those decisions on the FISA reauthorization legislation, Ruddock stressed that "today's vote is a victory but follows a recent loss and ongoing threat as that Section 702 bill moves to the Senate this week too."
"As FANFSA and the 702 reauthorization move to the Senate, lawmakers in that chamber need to take a stand for the rights of people in the United States," she argued. "That means passing FANFSA and reforming Section 702 authority—and prioritizing everyone's First and Fourth Amendment rights."
Jeramie Scott, senior counsel and director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Project on Surveillance Oversight, also praised the House's FANFSA passage on Wednesday.
"The passage of the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale underscores the extent to which reining in abusive warrantless surveillance is a bipartisan issue," Scott said. "We urge the Senate to take up this measure and close the data broker loophole."
Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel at ACLU, similarly said Wednesday that "the bipartisan passage of this bill is a flashing warning sign to the government that if it wants our data, it must get a warrant."
Hamadanchy added that "we hope this vote puts a fire under the Senate to protect their constituents and rein in the government's warrantless surveillance of Americans, once and for all."
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a critic of the pending 702 bill and FANFSA's lead sponsor in the upper chamber, called the the House's Wednesday vote "a huge win for privacy" and said that "now it's time for the Senate to follow suit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Leaked Cables Show Biden Pressuring Nations to Oppose Palestine's UN Membership
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," said one former Lebanese diplomat.
Apr 17, 2024
As the United Nations Security Council prepares to vote Thursday on Palestine's bid to become a full U.N. member, the Biden administration—which claims to support Palestinian statehood—is lobbying UNSC nations in an effort to wrangle enough "no" votes so that the United States can avoid resorting to a veto.
Leaked cables obtained by The Intercept show U.S. pressure on Security Council members including Malta—which currently presides over the body—and Ecuador.
While claiming that President Joe Biden backs "Palestinian aspirations for statehood," one of the cables asserts that "it remains the U.S. view that the most expeditious path toward a political horizon for the Palestinian people is in the context of a normalization agreement between Israel and its neighbors."
"We therefore urge you not to support any potential Security Council resolution recommending the admission of 'Palestine' as a U.N. member state, should such a resolution be presented to the Security Council for a decision in the coming days and weeks," the document advises.
The U.S. argument essentially is that the U.N. should not create an independent Palestinian state by fiat—even though that's precisely how the world body voted in 1947 to establish the modern state of Israel.
The renewed push for Palestine's U.N. membership comes as Israel wages a genocidal war on the Gaza Strip. The Palestinian Authority, which hasn't controlled Gaza for nearly two decades, rejected the Biden administration's requests to hold off on seeking full membership.
"We wanted the U.S. to provide a substantive alternative to U.N. recognition. They didn't," one unnamed Palestinian official toldAxios on Wednesday. "We believe full membership in the U.N. for Palestine is way overdue. We have waited more than 12 years since our initial request."
As The Intercept's Ken Klippenstein and Daniel Boguslaw noted:
Since 2011, the U.N. Security Council has rejected the Palestinian Authority's request for full member status. On April 2, the Palestinian Observer Mission to the U.N. requested that the council once again take up consideration of its membership application. According to the first State Department cable, U.N. meetings since the beginning of April suggest that Algeria, China, Guyana, Mozambique, Russia, Slovenia, Sierra Leone, and Malta support granting Palestine full membership to the U.N. It also says that France, Japan, and Korea are undecided, while the United Kingdom will likely abstain from a vote.
Along with the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom are permanent members of the UNSC, so they also have veto power.
Ahead of Thursday's planned vote, Spain has been doing its own lobbying in Europe to build greater support for Palestinian statehood. At a joint Tuesday press conference with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, Slovenian Prime Minister Robert Golob said the question is "when, not if, but when is the best moment to recognize Palestine."
Belgium—which is seeking economic sanctions against Israel in response to its genocidal war on Gaza—is expected to join Spain's push for Palestinian statehood after the country's European Union presidency expires in June.
Currently, 139 of the U.N.'s 193 member states recognize Palestine as an independent state.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—who has also claimed to support a so-called "two-state solution"—has alternately boasted about thwarting Palestinian statehood.
Critics pointed to the leaked cables as more proof of U.S. duplicity and double standards on the Israel-Palestine issue.
"This is the evidence that President Biden's talk about a two-state solution is nothing but idle talk," Massoud Maalouf, a former Lebanese ambassador to Canada, Chile, and Poland, said on social media.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Database Exposes 'Illicit Network Undermining Democracy Around the World'
Yanis Varoufakis hailed the effort as "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
Apr 17, 2024
"Coups. Assassinations. Riots. Detentions. Disinformation. We know the tactics that have been deployed to undermine our democracies. But who is behind them?"
Progressive International (PI) asks and answers this and other questions with an extensive new database published Wednesday that connects the dots in what the leftist group calls the "Reactionary International"—a loose global network of right-wing leaders and organizations working to subvert democratic institutions.
PI calls it an "illicit network undermining democracy around the world."
"Today is a mask-off moment for the Reactionary International and the parties, politicians, judges, journalists, foundations, think tanks, tech platforms, NGOs, activists, financiers, and entrepreneurs that comprise it," PI said.
"After a year of preparation, we finally open the doors to our new research consortium, exposing the global network of reactionary forces that corrode our democracies, destroy our planet, and drive us closer to world war," the group added.
"The twin insurrections at the U.S. Capitol in 2021 and Brasília's Three Powers Plaza in 2023 left no doubt about the international coordination of reactionary forces," PI argued. "Yet far too little is known about the entities of this network, their sources of financing, and their institutional allies operating inside our political systems."
Ultimately, PI aims to "support democratic systems to become more resilient to their insidious tactics."
From leaders like Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and former U.S. President Donald Trump—the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee—to evangelical Christian groups influencing laws in African countries criminalizing LGBTQ+ people and tech companies empowering ubiquitous state surveillance, Reactionary International is a who's-who of the world's right-wing forces.
A cursory search of the database's contents shows users can:
- Learn about Israel's NSO, Rayzone, and Team Jorge, and how a team of Tel Aviv tech entrepreneurs fuel unrest in Latin America;
- Meet the Grey Wolves, Turkey's roving death squad with links to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the ethno-nationalists in his governing coalition; and
- Explore the global network of the Falun Gong, its Trump-connected media outlet The Epoch Times, and its traveling dance troupe known as Shen Yun.
Yanis Varoufakis, a PI member and secretary-general of the left-wing Democracy in Europe Movement 2025, called the database "a treasure chest of well-researched reports on how the reactionaries of the world unite."
PI invites the public to contribute to the database.
"Together, we will not only name, shame, and expose the forces of the far right—but also dismantle their network of complicity," the group said.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular