

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Conservation groups filed a motion to intervene in two lawsuits challenging President Biden's restoration of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments today. The suits, led by the state of Utah, also attack the Antiquities Act itself as unlawful. Nearly five years ago, former President Trump controversially -- and without lawful authority -- shrunk the boundaries of Bears Ears by 85% and Grand Staircase-Escalante by 47%, stripping protection for world-renowned dinosaur fossils, remarkable geologic features, and important Native American cultural sites.
The Hopi Tribe, Navajo Nation, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, and the Pueblo of Zuni also moved to intervene in the suits last week.
"These lawsuits seek to destroy the Antiquities Act with a flawed argument that presidents may only designate small monuments," said Heidi McIntosh, Earthjustice managing attorney representing the conservation groups. "The Supreme Court has recognized for one hundred years that the Antiquities Act gives the president broad authority to designate national monuments commensurate in size to the 'objects' that need protection. Lower courts have consistently followed suit. Without the Antiquities Act, we would not have some of our most beloved national parks, including Grand Canyon, Grand Teton, Olympic, Zion, and Acadia. We will fight alongside our partners and clients to ensure the Antiquities Act is preserved for future generations to experience our most beloved and historic places."
In 1920, the Supreme Court upheld President Teddy Roosevelt's use of the Antiquities Act to protect 800,000 acres in Arizona when he declared the Grand Canyon a national monument. Presidents since have routinely designated monuments of a million acres or more. Courts have consistently found that culturally and scientifically rich landscapes, even large ones, are eligible for protection under the Act. In their motion to intervene, the conservation groups signaled their opposition to Utah's erroneous claim that a president can designate only small monuments centered on specific sites.
"The State of Utah tried essentially this exact same lawsuit in 2004 against Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, represented by none other than William Perry Pendley, and the judge handed them a decisive defeat," said Erik Molvar, executive director of Western Watersheds Project. "Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante are so packed with Indigenous cultural sites, fossil deposits, and scientifically important ecological features that it is beyond question that the President has the authority to protect these lands under the Antiquities Act for the benefit of all Americans."
"Utahns and Americans overwhelmingly support national monument protections for Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante, but that hasn't stopped Utah's attorney general and governor from trying to destroy both of these monuments and the law that makes it possible for presidents to create national monuments," said Tim Peterson, Cultural Landscapes director for the Grand Canyon Trust. "State leaders claim to value natural heritage and love the outdoors, but this lawsuit says otherwise."
"The remarkable Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments are the crown jewels of America's public lands," said Stephen Bloch, legal director for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. "It's terribly disappointing that, rather than embrace these monuments as the very best our state has to offer the world, Utah Governor Cox has attacked them and hopes to see the monuments undone. We're going to work to stop that from happening. Without the protections that come with being preserved as national monuments, the sacred sites, fossils, and ecosystems found within are at risk of being lost forever to reckless off-road vehicle use, wildcat mining and drilling, and rampant tourism."
Conservation groups, along with Tribes who urged the Obama administration to establish the Bears Ears National Monument, previously challenged President Trump's 2017 dismantling of the monuments. That case remains pending in the District of Columbia.
"This radical effort to dismantle the Antiquities Act and revoke protections for the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments defies the overwhelming public support for protecting these cherished lands, contradicts more than a century of settled law, and ignores the immense scientific and cultural values throughout these landscapes," said Jamie Williams, president of The Wilderness Society. "We look forward to working with Tribal governments and our partners to ensure these grand national monuments remain protected and cherished for generations to come."
"Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante are national treasures," said Sharon Buccino, senior attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council. "They protect irreplaceable cultural sites, scientific resources, and natural areas that are key to our survival as the climate changes. President Biden needed to protect them and had the authority to do so."
"These efforts are blatant attempts to undermine the Antiquities Act and those who have fought for nearly 120 years to defend this critical conservation law and all it safeguards," said Theresa Pierno, president and CEO for National Parks Conservation Association. "National parks like Acadia and the Grand Canyon were protected because of this vital law. Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments are no different. They are sacred, living landscapes for many Indigenous Tribes and hold extraordinary archaeological and cultural resources that tell the stories of our shared history and heritage. Millions of people have spoken out in support of protecting these treasured places, and this last-ditch effort to disregard those voices will not prevail."
Grand Staircase-Escalante is often described as a "dinosaur Shangri-la," as it is home to dinosaur fossils not found anywhere else in the world. It was established as a national monument in 1996 and in the two decades since it was protected, paleontologists have unearthed fossils from 21 previously undiscovered dinosaur species.
"Utah leaders remain shortsighted. Our state is facing extraordinary challenges regarding climate and growth, and communities bear the burden," said Carly Ferro, Sierra Club Utah Chapter Director. "State leaders' most recent attempt to undermine public lands seeks to dismantle unparalleled landscapes that drive incredible economic value for Utah while nurturing critical cultural and ecological resources. We have and will continue to defend against the state's efforts to disparage the Antiquities Act state-side and federally. Bears Ears and Grand-Staircase National Monuments will persevere. We look forward to continuing collaborations to protect these monuments and continue to bring opportunities to ensure a healthy future for everyone here in Utah."
"Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments must stay fully intact to preserve the extensive cultural, scientific, and natural features they hold," said Sara Husby, executive director for Great Old Broads for Wilderness. "These monuments exemplify the intended use of the Antiquities Act to protect our country's rich heritage. The Act is a critical conservation tool, and the attempts by Utah officials to weaken it must be stopped."
"At root, Utah believes that it, rather than the federal government, should be managing Bears Ears, Grand Staircase-Escalante, and all other public lands in the state," said Chris Krupp of WildEarth Guardians. "Its lawsuit is intended to chip away at the fundamental principle that all Americans get to determine how public lands are managed. If Utah were to manage these places, profit-driven resource exploitation would take precedence over conservation and protection."
"It's beyond disappointing that Utah leaders want to gut one of the most important and popular conservation laws ever passed by Congress," said Randi Spivak, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's public lands program. "Two-thirds of Utahn's strongly support creating new national monuments, parks and wildlife refuges and 60% agree protecting Bears Ears is good for the state. We're fighting this reckless lawsuit because the law is clear. A monument should be as large as it needs to be to protect whatever needs protection."
Earthjustice represents The Wilderness Society, Grand Canyon Trust, WildEarth Guardians, Western Watersheds Project, Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, National Parks Conservation Association, and Great Old Broads for Wilderness in the intervention. They are co-counseling with the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.
Photos of Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears National Monuments are available here.
The motion to intervene for both suits can be found here and here.
Additional information on the Tribes' work to protect Bears Ears is available here. Media requests on the Tribes' efforts can be directed to media@narf.org.
Western Watersheds Project is an environmental conservation group working to protect and restore watersheds and wildlife through.
"He’s the Jim Cramer of Iran war predictions," said one critic.
Conservative commentator Dave Rubin, who for months has been a top booster of President Donald Trump's illegal war with Iran, was inundated with mockery on Sunday after a viral video exposed months' worth of his failed predictions about the conflict.
The video, which was posted on social media Saturday, begins with Rubin telling viewers to not listen to any of the prognostications being made by critics of the war, which Trump launched in late February without any authorization from Congress.
"I'm pretty good with predictions," Rubin says. "And my prediction here is that everything the media is now going to say about Iran—it's going to close the Strait of Hormuz, and energy prices are going to go crazy—none of this is going to come to pass."
Iran war: greatest hits from the last 12 weeks pic.twitter.com/9pgXyvmsgF
— Dave Rubin Clips II (Parody) - Retired Jan.20/2025 (@DaveClips) May 24, 2026
The video then cuts to Rubin wrongly predicting that gas prices during the conflict "will continue to come down," before switching to claims that Iran lacks the military capability to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed in the face of US military power.
"If the United States wants to keep the Strait of Hormuz open, which it does," says Rubin, "and Donald Trump says we'll escort ships through if we have to, it's going to stay open."
From there, the video shows Rubin hyping of the prospect of Iranian dissident Reza Pahlavi swooping in to take over the country after the war, and then getting fooled by a fake artificial intelligence-generated video of Iranians giving thanks to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for bombing their country.
The video compilation of Rubin's failed predictions drew immediate ridicule from critics.
"He’s the Jim Cramer of Iran war predictions," joked Krystal Ball.
Commentator Adam Mockler wrote of Rubin that "it’s brutal watching him make failed predictions week after week."
Journalist Glenn Greenwald argued that the video should be the last nail in the coffin of whatever credibility Rubin had left.
"Imagine having sat through and listened to all of this Israeli propaganda, which turned out to be (predictably and completely) false," commented Greenwald, "and then thinking there was some value in continuing to listen to this person."
The Bulwark's Tim Miller said that while he knew Rubin was "a smooth-brained hack," he still "couldn’t even fathom how bad these war takes would be."
Political analyst Omar Baddar, meanwhile, said the video should erase any doubt that Rubin is "the dumbest man on the internet."
The Trump administration last week sued Minnesota after it passed a law banning prediction markets from operating in the state.
A Sunday report in The New York Times revealed how the Trump administration is using a key government agency to shut down any efforts to regulate online betting markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket.
According to the Times, the administration has stacked the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) with industry insiders who have systematically "mowed down" staffers at the agency who have expressed interest in providing oversight on prediction markets.
Among other things, the report documented how multiple officials at CTFC have been put on leave simply for asking questions about the betting markets' ties to members of President Donald Trump's family or for having past experience enforcing regulations related to cryptocurrencies.
What's more, the Times found that even being an industry insider isn't enough to guarantee good standing in the agency. Brian Quintenz, who was tapped by Trump to lead CTFC last year, saw his nomination withdrawn after he drew the ire of Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss for refusing to support their cryptocurrency exchange's complaint against the agency.
Revelations about industry insiders rolling over regulators at CTFC come as the Trump administration is fighting any attempts by states to regulate prediction markets.
As explained in a Thursday report from CNBC, the Trump administration is "fighting a multi-front battle to stop the state actions and assert its regulatory authority," with CTFC arguing that it is "the only entity that can regulate" betting platforms.
16 different states are engaged in legal proceedings against the platforms, and Minnesota last week passed a law to ban them outright, which immediately drew a lawsuit from the administration.
The new Minnesota law, which is scheduled to take effect in August, bans prediction markets "from hosting, creating or advertising in the state," according to ABC News.
In an interview with ABC, Minnesota state Rep. Emma Greenman (D-63B) said she authored the legislation because she has grown increasingly concerned about young people in the state seeing their finances drained from placing online bets.
"We're seeing studies come out that say [the companies] are targeting 18- to 21-year-olds," said Greenman, "and we are seeing gambling starting younger and younger."
CFTC Chair Michael Selig last month warned states against trying to regulate prediction markets, which he said would "circumvent the clear directive of Congress."
"Our message to Wisconsin is the same as to New York, Arizona, and others," said Selig. "If you interfere with the operation of federal law in regulating financial markets, we will sue you."
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz," said one critic of the war.
President Donald Trump revealed on Saturday that he is mulling a deal that would end his illegal war with Iran, and some hawks within the Republican Party are expressing alarm.
According to a Sunday report in The New York Times, many details of the agreement to end the war remain murky, with the fate of Iran's enriched uranium up in the air. US and Iranian officials have also given contradictory messages about the proposed deal's contents, suggesting there is much work still to be done before any agreement is finalized.
Regardless, three hawkish GOP senators on Saturday raised major concerns about the contents of the deal, warning against accepting any agreement that will leave Iran in a stronger position than before Trump illegally launched a war against it without any authorization from Congress in late February.
"If it is perceived in the region that a deal with Iran allows the regime to survive and become more powerful over time, we will have poured gasoline on the conflicts in Lebanon and Iraq," wrote Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who lobbied Trump to attack Iran repeatedly before the start of the war. "A deal that is perceived to allow Iran to survive and possess the ability to control the [Strait of Hormuz] in the future will put Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Shia militias in Iraq on steroids.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), another longtime Iran hawk, said he was "deeply concerned" about what he's been hearing about the deal and expressed particular worry about Iran getting relief from US sanctions while still maintaining the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz.
"If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant 'death to America'—now receiving billions of dollars," Cruz wrote, "being able to enrich uranium and develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake."
Sen. Roger Wicker (D-Miss.) was even blunter in his condemnation of the reported agreement.
"The rumored 60-day ceasefire—with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith—would be a disaster," Wicker wrote. "Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!"
Ben Rhodes, a former deputy national security adviser for President Barack Obama, challenged Wicker's claims that Trump's illegal war had achieved anything of value.
"Nothing was accomplished by Operation Epic Fury," Rhodes wrote, "except putting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in charge of Iran and the Strait of Hormuz."
Rhodes' criticism was echoed by Stephen Wertheim, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who wrote that "everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury is already for naught."
Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, accused the Iran hawks of being delusional for thinking further bombing would force Iran to capitulate.
"DC's Iran hawks got two wars, nearly every conceivable sanction designation, a blockade, threw a wrench in global economy," Vaez wrote, "and will still claim that just a little more pressure and a touch more bombing will magically yield the concessions they still won't be satisfied with."