November, 22 2022, 12:13pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Perry Wheeler, Earthjustice, 202-792-6211, pwheeler@earthjustice.orgÂ
Erik Molvar, Western Watersheds Project, 307-399-7910, emolvar@westernwatersheds.orgÂ
Stephen Bloch, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 801-428-3981, steve@suwa.orgÂ
Conservation Groups Intervene to Protect Utah Monuments, Antiquities Act
WASHINGTON
Conservation groups filed a motion to intervene in two lawsuits challenging President Biden's restoration of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments today. The suits, led by the state of Utah, also attack the Antiquities Act itself as unlawful. Nearly five years ago, former President Trump controversially -- and without lawful authority -- shrunk the boundaries of Bears Ears by 85% and Grand Staircase-Escalante by 47%, stripping protection for world-renowned dinosaur fossils, remarkable geologic features, and important Native American cultural sites.
The Hopi Tribe, Navajo Nation, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, and the Pueblo of Zuni also moved to intervene in the suits last week.
"These lawsuits seek to destroy the Antiquities Act with a flawed argument that presidents may only designate small monuments," said Heidi McIntosh, Earthjustice managing attorney representing the conservation groups. "The Supreme Court has recognized for one hundred years that the Antiquities Act gives the president broad authority to designate national monuments commensurate in size to the 'objects' that need protection. Lower courts have consistently followed suit. Without the Antiquities Act, we would not have some of our most beloved national parks, including Grand Canyon, Grand Teton, Olympic, Zion, and Acadia. We will fight alongside our partners and clients to ensure the Antiquities Act is preserved for future generations to experience our most beloved and historic places."
In 1920, the Supreme Court upheld President Teddy Roosevelt's use of the Antiquities Act to protect 800,000 acres in Arizona when he declared the Grand Canyon a national monument. Presidents since have routinely designated monuments of a million acres or more. Courts have consistently found that culturally and scientifically rich landscapes, even large ones, are eligible for protection under the Act. In their motion to intervene, the conservation groups signaled their opposition to Utah's erroneous claim that a president can designate only small monuments centered on specific sites.
"The State of Utah tried essentially this exact same lawsuit in 2004 against Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, represented by none other than William Perry Pendley, and the judge handed them a decisive defeat," said Erik Molvar, executive director of Western Watersheds Project. "Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante are so packed with Indigenous cultural sites, fossil deposits, and scientifically important ecological features that it is beyond question that the President has the authority to protect these lands under the Antiquities Act for the benefit of all Americans."
"Utahns and Americans overwhelmingly support national monument protections for Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante, but that hasn't stopped Utah's attorney general and governor from trying to destroy both of these monuments and the law that makes it possible for presidents to create national monuments," said Tim Peterson, Cultural Landscapes director for the Grand Canyon Trust. "State leaders claim to value natural heritage and love the outdoors, but this lawsuit says otherwise."
"The remarkable Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments are the crown jewels of America's public lands," said Stephen Bloch, legal director for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. "It's terribly disappointing that, rather than embrace these monuments as the very best our state has to offer the world, Utah Governor Cox has attacked them and hopes to see the monuments undone. We're going to work to stop that from happening. Without the protections that come with being preserved as national monuments, the sacred sites, fossils, and ecosystems found within are at risk of being lost forever to reckless off-road vehicle use, wildcat mining and drilling, and rampant tourism."
Conservation groups, along with Tribes who urged the Obama administration to establish the Bears Ears National Monument, previously challenged President Trump's 2017 dismantling of the monuments. That case remains pending in the District of Columbia.
"This radical effort to dismantle the Antiquities Act and revoke protections for the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments defies the overwhelming public support for protecting these cherished lands, contradicts more than a century of settled law, and ignores the immense scientific and cultural values throughout these landscapes," said Jamie Williams, president of The Wilderness Society. "We look forward to working with Tribal governments and our partners to ensure these grand national monuments remain protected and cherished for generations to come."
"Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante are national treasures," said Sharon Buccino, senior attorney with the Natural Resources Defense Council. "They protect irreplaceable cultural sites, scientific resources, and natural areas that are key to our survival as the climate changes. President Biden needed to protect them and had the authority to do so."
"These efforts are blatant attempts to undermine the Antiquities Act and those who have fought for nearly 120 years to defend this critical conservation law and all it safeguards," said Theresa Pierno, president and CEO for National Parks Conservation Association. "National parks like Acadia and the Grand Canyon were protected because of this vital law. Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments are no different. They are sacred, living landscapes for many Indigenous Tribes and hold extraordinary archaeological and cultural resources that tell the stories of our shared history and heritage. Millions of people have spoken out in support of protecting these treasured places, and this last-ditch effort to disregard those voices will not prevail."
Bears Ears National Monument is home to ancient cliff dwellings, over 100,000 Native American cultural sites, innumerable historic landmarks, and iconic wildlife such as bears, bighorn sheep, and mountain lions. Tribes continue to visit the lands to hold ceremonies and connect with their ancestors. The monument designation included a historic plan for co-management of this unique landscape by federal agencies and the five Tribes with sacred cultural interests in the lands.
Grand Staircase-Escalante is often described as a "dinosaur Shangri-la," as it is home to dinosaur fossils not found anywhere else in the world. It was established as a national monument in 1996 and in the two decades since it was protected, paleontologists have unearthed fossils from 21 previously undiscovered dinosaur species.
"Utah leaders remain shortsighted. Our state is facing extraordinary challenges regarding climate and growth, and communities bear the burden," said Carly Ferro, Sierra Club Utah Chapter Director. "State leaders' most recent attempt to undermine public lands seeks to dismantle unparalleled landscapes that drive incredible economic value for Utah while nurturing critical cultural and ecological resources. We have and will continue to defend against the state's efforts to disparage the Antiquities Act state-side and federally. Bears Ears and Grand-Staircase National Monuments will persevere. We look forward to continuing collaborations to protect these monuments and continue to bring opportunities to ensure a healthy future for everyone here in Utah."
"Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments must stay fully intact to preserve the extensive cultural, scientific, and natural features they hold," said Sara Husby, executive director for Great Old Broads for Wilderness. "These monuments exemplify the intended use of the Antiquities Act to protect our country's rich heritage. The Act is a critical conservation tool, and the attempts by Utah officials to weaken it must be stopped."
"At root, Utah believes that it, rather than the federal government, should be managing Bears Ears, Grand Staircase-Escalante, and all other public lands in the state," said Chris Krupp of WildEarth Guardians. "Its lawsuit is intended to chip away at the fundamental principle that all Americans get to determine how public lands are managed. If Utah were to manage these places, profit-driven resource exploitation would take precedence over conservation and protection."
"It's beyond disappointing that Utah leaders want to gut one of the most important and popular conservation laws ever passed by Congress," said Randi Spivak, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's public lands program. "Two-thirds of Utahn's strongly support creating new national monuments, parks and wildlife refuges and 60% agree protecting Bears Ears is good for the state. We're fighting this reckless lawsuit because the law is clear. A monument should be as large as it needs to be to protect whatever needs protection."
Earthjustice represents The Wilderness Society, Grand Canyon Trust, WildEarth Guardians, Western Watersheds Project, Sierra Club, Center for Biological Diversity, National Parks Conservation Association, and Great Old Broads for Wilderness in the intervention. They are co-counseling with the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance.
Photos of Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears National Monuments are available here.
The motion to intervene for both suits can be found here and here.
Additional information on the Tribes' work to protect Bears Ears is available here. Media requests on the Tribes' efforts can be directed to media@narf.org.
Western Watersheds Project is an environmental conservation group working to protect and restore watersheds and wildlife through.
LATEST NEWS
Nebraska Women Gets Two Years in Prison After Giving Abortion Pills to Teen Daughter
"In this particular case, here's the audacity: Self-managed abortion is not even a crime in fucking Nebraska," said one rights advocate.
Sep 22, 2023
Amid a wave of right-wing efforts to quash abortion rights across the United States, a Nebraska judge on Friday sentenced Jessica Burgess to two years in prison after helping her teenage daughter end her pregnancy and bury the remains in early 2022.
Police have said that over two years ago, then-17-year-old Celeste Burgess took abortion pills—provided by her mother—at approximately 29 weeks pregnant and gave birth to a stillborn fetus, which the pair burned and buried in Norfolk, Nebraska.
Celeste Burgess was sentenced to 90 days behind bars and released earlier this month. Tanner Barnhill, who pleaded no contest to attempting to conceal a death for helping with the burial, was sentenced to nine months of probation and 40 hours of community service.
Jessica Burgess, who took a plea deal, faced up to five years in prison. She pleaded guilty to providing an abortion after 20 weeks of gestation, tampering with human remains, and false reporting. As Jezebelnoted, the 42-year-old was charged even though the state's 20-week ban that was in effect at the time applied to "licensed abortion providers, not people self-managing their own terminations."
As Rafa Kidvai, director of If/When/How's Repro Legal Defense Fund—which is not representing Jessica Burgess—put it to Jezebel, "In this particular case, here's the audacity: Self-managed abortion is not even a crime in fucking Nebraska."
"None of this is about justice or safety or someone's health or society being better or kinder or safer—this is about control from the state," Kidvai argued. "Everything is a distraction, including conversations around gestational age... They're distracting you constantly by telling you that your individual choices are the problem, not the systems that keep you oppressed."
The Appeal reported Friday that "abortions after 21 weeks rarely occur within the United States, accounting for just 1% of all abortions. It is unclear when Celeste first knew she was pregnant. Police say Celeste, then 17, got an ultrasound showing she was 23 weeks pregnant on March 8, 2022."
"That same month, police say Jessica Burgess ordered abortion pills online. But the medication took about six weeks to arrive," the outlet added. "[Celeste] Burgess stated in court that she wanted to end her pregnancy because she was in an abusive relationship and did not want to share a child with the man who impregnated her."
While Celeste Burgess' stillbirth occurred a couple of months before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, abortion rights advocates have connected the Nebraska mother and daughter's cases to a broader assault on reproductive freedom since the right-wing justices' Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organizationdecision.
Nebraska is among several states that have tightened abortion restrictions since June 2022. In May, Republican Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen signed a bill banning abortion at 12 weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for rape, incest, and to save the life of the pregnant person—a measure which has taken effect but that rights group are fighting in state court.
The Burgesses' cases have also heightened concerns about digital communications, given that police obtained and Facebook parent company Meta complied with a search warrant for their private messages. Further, there are rising fears that U.S. law enforcement may eventually try to use new laboratory methods allegedly developed by researchers in Poland—which has outlawed most abortions—to detect medication commonly used to end pregnancies in biological specimens.
Across the United States from 2000 to 2020, "at least 61 people were criminally investigated or arrested for ending their own pregnancies or helping someone else do so," according to a report released this month by Pregnancy Justice and other groups. From 2006 to 2020, "more than 1,300 people were arrested in relation to their conduct during pregnancy," including people who experienced miscarriages and stillbirths but were suspected of self-managing abortions.
Emma Roth, senior staff attorney at Pregnancy Justice, told The Appeal that "even if the state's law does not criminalize abortion itself, prosecutors will still seek other creative ways to try to incarcerate, shame, or make a case out of that person."
"Prosecutors will charge anything that they can think of when what they're actually trying to criminalize is what they view as immoral conduct," Roth stressed. With the Burgesses, she said, "the prosecutor's whole case was about shaming somebody for being a young teenager and having an abortion later on in pregnancy. These prosecutions create a culture of fear."
Nebraska is one of multiple U.S. states where reproductive rights advocates are currently working to put a question on 2024 ballots regarding an amendment to the state constitution that would protect the right to abortion.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Biden to 'Join the Picket Line and Stand in Solidarity' With Striking Autoworkers
"This is unprecedented: a sitting president showing up on the picket lines with workers," said Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal.
Sep 22, 2023
In a historic move, U.S. President Joe Biden vowed Friday to travel to Michigan next week and stand with striking United Auto Workers members, an announcement that came just hours after union autoworkers widened their strike to include all U.S. General Motors and Stellantis parts distribution centers.
"Tuesday, I'll go to Michigan to join the picket line and stand in solidarity with the men and women of UAW as they fight for a fair share of the value they helped create," Biden said on social media. "It's time for a win-win agreement that keeps American auto manufacturing thriving with well-paid UAW jobs."
Last Friday, Biden called on automakers to share more of their windfall with UAW workers, who are seeking better pay and benefits.
"Auto companies have seen record profits... They have not been shared fairly with workers," the president said. "I understand the workers' frustration. Over generations, autoworkers have sacrificed so much to keep the industry alive and strong, especially during the economic crisis and the pandemic."
"The companies have made some significant offers," Biden added. "But I believe they should go further to ensure that record corporate profits mean record contracts for the UAW."
Biden—who is seeking reelection next year—is a self-described "pro-labor president" but his response to the UAW is notably different from last year, when he came under fire for signing legislation to block a nationwide rail strike.
At noon Eastern time this Friday, workers at all 38 GM and Stellantis parts distribution facilities across the U.S. walked off the job as the UAW escalated its strike.
"We will shut down parts distribution until those two companies come to their senses and come to the table with a serious offer," UAW president Shawn Fain said in a video update. "The plants that are already on strike will remain on strike."
Fain said Ford was spared the escalation because UAW and company negotiators were making "real progress" at the bargaining table.
While some striking workers said they'd prefer the president didn't join them, others welcomed the solidarity.
"Me personally, I wouldn't mind if Biden stepped up and showed some support," 55-year-old Laura Zielinski of Toledo, Ohio, toldReuters earlier this week, recalling 2010, when he was vice president and visited her city's Stellantis assembly plant.
"Support like that would put a spotlight on the talks—kind of give a nudge to the companies," she added.
Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said Friday on social media that it was "unprecedented" for a sitting U.S. president to join striking workers on a picket line.
Jeremi Suri, a historian and presidential scholar at the University of Texas at Austin, toldReuters the last time it happened was probably in 1902, when then-President Theodore Roosevelt invited striking coal miners to the White House.
"This would be a major, major shift for Biden to identify the presidency with striking workers," said Suri, "rather than siding with industry or staying above the fray."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Netanyahu Shows Map of 'New Middle East'—Without Palestine—to UN General Assembly
"Netanyahu made clear with his little map today what normalization really seeks: eliminating Palestine... from the region and legitimizing greater Israel, all with the blessing of Arab regimes," one critic said.
Sep 22, 2023
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu angered Palestinians and their defenders Friday after presenting a map of "The New Middle East" without Palestine during his speech to the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
Speaking to a largely empty chamber, Netanyahu—whose far-right government is widely considered the most extreme in Israeli history—showed a series of maps, including one that did not show the West Bank, East Jerusalem, or Gaza. These Palestinian territories have been illegally occupied by Israel since 1967, with the exception of Gaza—from which Israeli forces withdrew in 2005, while maintaining an economic stranglehold over the densely populated coastal strip.
Middle East Eyereported Netanyahu also held up a map of "Israel in 1948"—the year the modern Jewish state was established, largely through the ethnic cleansing of more than 750,000 Arabs—that erroneously included the Palestinian territories as part of Israel.
Palestinian Ambassador to Germany Laith Arafeh said on social media that there is "no greater insult to every foundational principle of the United Nations than seeing Netanyahu display before the UNGA a 'map of Israel' that straddles the entire land from the river to the sea, negating Palestine and its people, then attempting to spin the audience with rhetoric about 'peace' in the region, all the while entrenching the longest ongoing belligerent occupation in today's world."
As Middle East Eye noted:
The inclusion of Palestinian lands (and sometimes land belonging to Syria and Lebanon) in Israeli maps is common among believers of the concept of Eretz Yisrael—Greater Israel—a key part of ultra-nationalist Zionism that claims all of these lands belong to a Zionist state.
Earlier this year, Netanyahu's finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, spoke from a podium adorned with a map that also included Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria as part of Greater Israel. In the same event, he said there was "no such thing as Palestinians."
The use of such maps by Israeli officials comes at a time when Netanyahu's ultra-nationalist government has taken steps that experts say amount to the "de jure annexation" of the occupied West Bank.
Netanyahu used the maps in an attempt to illustrate the increasing number of Arab countries normalizing relations with Israel under the Abraham Accords brokered by the administration of former U.S. President Donald Trump.
"There's no question the Abraham Accords heralded the dawn of a new age of peace," the Israeli prime minister said. "But I believe that we are at the cusp of an even more dramatic breakthrough, an historic peace between Israel and Saudi Arabia. Peace between Israel and Saudi Arabia will truly create a new Middle East."
Critics have countered that peace between apartheid Israel and Arab dictatorships has come at the cost of advancing Palestinian rights. In the case of Morocco, the United States recognized the North African nation's illegal annexation and brutal occupation of Western Sahara in exchange for normalization with Israel.
Netanyahu's props on Friday reminded numerous observers of the time during his 2012 General Assembly speech when he used a cartoon drawing of a bomb to illustrate Iran's progress on advancing a nuclear weapons program that both U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies said did not exist.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular
Independent, nonprofit journalism needs your help.
Please Pitch In
Today!
Today!