April, 14 2021, 12:00am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich, Western Environmental Law Center, (575) 770-1295, eriksg@westernlaw.org
Taylor McKinnon, Center for Biological Diversity, (801) 300-2414, tmckinnon@biologicaldiversity.org
Virginia Cramer, Sierra Club, (804) 519-8449, virginia.cramer@sierraclub.org
Jeremy Nichols, WildEarth Guardians, (303) 437-7663, jnichols@wildearthguardians.org
Landon Newell, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, (801) 428-3991, landon@suwa.org
WASHINGTON
Hundreds of climate, Native American, religious, business and conservation organizations today called on the Biden administration to do a comprehensive environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act and other laws to align federal fossil fuel programs with U.S. climate goals to curb global warming.
The letter asks the Interior Department to evaluate a legal finding of climate harm from fossil fuel expansion. It describes how the administration can use existing laws to end new fossil fuel leasing onshore and offshore and manage a just, orderly decline of production consistent with its goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
The letter also calls for the fair and meaningful involvement of communities vulnerable to climate change, affected by or dependent upon the federal fossil fuel program.
In February the Biden administration issued an executive order pausing oil and gas leasing onshore and offshore pending a climate review of federal fossil fuel programs. In June the Interior Department will issue an interim report describing findings from a March online forum and public comments being solicited through April 15.
In January, 574 conservation, Native American, religious and business groups sent the then president-elect text for a proposed executive order to ban new fossil fuel leasing and permitting on federal public lands and waters.
Today's letter, authored by Western Environmental Law Center, the Center for Biological Diversity, WildEarth Guardians and Sierra Club, was signed by organizations from across the United States, many with members who live on the front lines of fossil fuel pollution and in communities harmed by climate change.
Quotes From Organizations
"The comprehensive review of the federal fossil fuels programs is a long-needed step in the right direction," said Erik Schlenker-Goodrich, executive director of the Taos, N.M.-based Western Environmental Law Center. "Done right and coupled with investments in workers and frontline communities, it can spark a long-needed transition away from fossil fuels and toward a just, equitable and climate-resilient economy where public lands serve as a cornerstone of climate resilience and conservation, not exploitation."
"Runaway pollution from the federal fossil fuel programs has been worsening climate chaos for decades," said Taylor McKinnon, a senior campaigner at the Center for Biological Diversity. "The Biden administration must do a comprehensive review and make frontline communities a part of this process. This will inevitably show the need for a ban on new leasing and a just, orderly decline of oil and gas extraction on public lands and waters."
"The climate crisis requires immediate action. The BLM must put a halt to all new leasing of public lands if there is any chance of avoiding the most severe impacts of a changing climate," said Landon Newell, a staff attorney with the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. "For far too long the BLM has wrongly elevated oil and gas leasing and development as the primary use of our nation's public lands, threatening our climate, wildlife, cultural treasures and wild places. This unbalanced approach must stop now."
"The writing on the wall is clear. The long-term health of our communities, economies and our climate requires phasing out fossil fuel leasing on public lands," said Eric Huber, managing attorney for Sierra Club's Environmental Law Program.
"We cannot afford to close our eyes to the dangers of inaction; we need bold action now to halt new leasing and to diversify economies in ways that allow everyone to benefit."
"It's time to put public lands and waters to work for our climate and justice, not for fossil fuels," said Jeremy Nichols, climate and energy program director at WildEarth Guardians. "We're counting on President Biden and Interior Secretary Deb Haaland to boldly reform federal oil and gas management to ensure we keep fossil fuels in the ground and our nation on track for climate progress."
"Together our groups represent millions of people across the country all urging the Biden administration to put the health and safety of our communities and our climate before oil and gas profits," said Nicole Ghio, senior fossil fuels program manager at Friends of the Earth. "The Department of the Interior must meaningfully engage with the public and start managing our lands and waters for the public good instead of selling out future generations to prop up the fossil fuel industry. This starts with permanently halting new leases on public lands and waters."
"As mothers and grandmothers, we want to know that future generations have clean air, clean water and a climate-resilient economy," said Shelley Silbert, executive director of Great Old Broads for Wilderness. "Our best use of public lands is to ensure the safety and health of America's communities and our land, water and wildlife. The fossil fuel industry has for too long put profit above all else. The leasing pause is a valuable way to review impacts and align priorities toward a livable future."
"Winding down federal oil and gas leasing and permitting programs is critical to saving the West," said Natasha Leger, executive director of Citizens for a Healthy Community. "The largest climate hotspot in the U.S. is over the 15 water-producing counties for seven states in the West and Mexico, where we're experiencing extreme drought. We cannot expect to adapt our way out of the climate, ecological and health crises exacerbated by oil and gas extraction."
Background
Fossil fuel production on public lands causes about a quarter of U.S. greenhouse gas pollution. Peer-reviewed science estimates that a nationwide federal fossil fuel leasing ban would reduce carbon emissions by 280 million tons per year, ranking it among the most ambitious federal climate-policy proposals in recent years.
Oil, gas and coal extraction uses mines, well pads, gas lines, roads and other infrastructure that destroys habitat for wildlife, including threatened and endangered species. Oil spills and other harms from offshore drilling have done immense damage to ocean wildlife and coastal communities. Fracking and mining also pollute watersheds and waterways that provide drinking water to millions of people.
Federal fossil fuels that have not been leased to industry contain up to 450 billion tons of potential climate pollution; those already leased to industry contain up to 43 billion tons. Pollution from the world's already producing oil and gas fields, if fully developed, would push global warming well past 1.5 degrees Celsius.
Signing Organizations:
Alabama Interfaith Power & Light, Alliance for Climate Education (ACE), Amigos Bravos, Animal Welfare Institute, Animals Are Sentient Beings, Inc, Animas Valley Institute, Anthropocene Alliance, Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, Athens County's Future Action Network aka Athens County Fracking Action Network, Audubon Society, Aytzim: Ecological Judaism, Azul, Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Breast Cancer Action, Bronx Jewish Earth Alliance, Bucks County Concerned Citizens Against the Pipelines, Bucks Environmental Action, Businesses for a Livable Climate, California League of Conservation Voters, Californians for Western Wilderness, Call to Action CO, CatholicNetwork.US, CELL, Center for Civic Policy, Center for International Environmental Law, Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT), Central Bergen Circle of GreenFaith, Central Colorado Wilderness Coalition, Chaco Alliance, Church Women United in New York State, Citizens' Environmental Coalition, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Climable, Inc., Climate Action Now Western Mass, Climate Advocates Voces Unidas, Climate Advocates Voces Unidas (CAVU), Climate First: Replacing Oil & Gas (CFROG), Climate Hawks Vote, Climate Hawks Vote, Climate Health Now, Coalition for Outreach, Policy & Education, Colorado Rising, Common Ground Rising, Community for Sustainable Energy, Community Health, Conservation Voters New Mexico, Cooperative Energy Futures, Corporate Ethics International, Corvallis Interfaith Climate Justice Committee / Corvallis Carbon Offset Fund, Defend Our Future, Defenders of Wildlife, Defiende Nuestra Tierra, Dine C.A.R.E., Earth Action, Earth Action, Inc, Earth Action, Inc., Earth Day.org, Earthworks, EcoFlight, Endangered Habitats League, Endangered Habitats League, Endangered Species Coalition, Environmental Protection Information Center, Environmental Protection Information Center, Extinction Rebellion San Francisco Bay Area, First United Methodist Church, Environmental Care Team, Food & Water Watch, Fossil Free California, Foundation Earth, FracTracker Alliance, FreshWater Accountability Project, Friends of the Earth, Gas Free Seneca, GASP, Georgia Conservation Voters, Geos Institute, Golden Egg Permaculture, Grassroots Coalition, Great Egg Harbor Watershed Association, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, GreenFaith, Greenpeace USA, Gullah/Geechee Fishing Association, Gullah/Geechee Sea Island Coalition, HealthLink, Inc, Healthy Gulf, Heartwood, High Country Conservation Advocates, Idle No More Michigan, Indigenous Environmental Network, Inspiration of Sedona, Interfaith Earthkeepers of Eugene/Springfield, International Marine Mammal Project of Earth Island Institute, JewishClimateAction-MA, John Muir Project of Earth Island Institute, Kickapoo Peace Circle, Klamath Forest Alliance, KyotoUSA, Lifelong Medical, Los Padres ForestWatch, Lynn Canal Conservation, Malach Consulting, Massachusetts Forest Watch, MassAmerican Energy LLC, Mid-Missouri Peaceworks, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Mining Impact Coalition of Wisconsin, Mission Blue, Montana Environmental Information Center, MountainTrue, Native American Caucus, New Mexico Sportsmen, New Mexico Wild, New Hampshire Audubon, New Mexico Environmental Law Center, No Coal In Richmond, Nobody Leaves Mid-Hudson, North Carolina Council of Churches, North Range Concerned Citizens, Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Northern Arizona Climate Change Alliance, NY4WHALES, Oasis Earth, Ocean Conservation Research, Oceanic Preservation Society, Oil Change International, Oregon Wild, Our Climate Education Fund, Our Revolution Michigan, Patagonia, Pelican Media, People's Party, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Physicians for Social Responsibility Arizona Chapter, Physicians for Social Responsibility Florida Chapter, Physicians for Social Responsibility Pennsylvania Chapter,PNM Shareholders for a Responsible Future, ProgressNow New Mexico, Public Lands Project, Pueblo Action Alliance, Rachel Carson Council, RapidShift Network, Raptors Are The Solution, Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, Resource Renewal Institute, Rio Arriba Concerned Citizens, Rio Grande Indivisible, NM, River Guardian Foundation, RootsAction.org, Safe Energy Now/North County, San Francisco Bay Physicians for Social Responsibility, Santa Barbara County Action Network, Santa Barbara Standing Rock Coalition, Santa Barbara Urban Creeks Council, Santa Fe Green Chamber of Commerce, Save Our Shores, SAVE THE FROGS!, Seaside Sustainability, Seneca Lake Guardian, A Waterkeeper Alliance Affiliate, Seventh Generation, Sisters of Charity Federation, Sisters of St. Dominic of Blauvelt, New York, Social Eco Education (SEE-LA), Soda Mountain Wilderness Council, Southern Oregon Climate Action Now, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Spottswoode Winery, Inc., Sunflower Alliance, Sungage Financial LLC, Sunrise Corvallis, Syracuse Cultural Workers, System Change Not Climate Change, Tennessee Riverkeeper, The Climate Center, The Enviro Show, The Forest Foundation, Inc., The Samuel Lawrence Foundation, To Nizhoni Ani, Toxics Information Project (TIP), Turner Endangered Species Fund, Turtle Island Restoration Network, Unite North Metro Denver, United for Action (based in NYC), Upper Green River Alliance, Upper Peninsula Environmental Coalition, V & T Ventures, LLC, Vote Climate, Wall of Women, Wasatch Clean Air Coalition, WATCH, Inc, Waterkeeper Alliance, Waterkeepers Chesapeake, WCCUSD, WESPAC Foundation, Inc., Western Colorado Alliance, Western Watersheds Project, Wild Connections, Wilderness Workshop, Women's Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN), Wyoming Sierra Club, 2degrees Northampton, 350 Colorado, 350 Conejo/San Fernando Valley, 350 Everett, WA, 350 Hawaii, 350 Humboldt, 350 Mass Metro North Node, 350 New Orleans, 350 Seattle, 350 Silicon Valley, 350.org. 350.org New Mexico, 350Corvallis, 350Kishwaukee, 7 Directions of Service
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252LATEST NEWS
Amazon Won't Display Tariff Costs After Trump Whines to Bezos
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said all companies should be "displaying how much tariffs contribute to the total price of products."
Apr 29, 2025
Amazon said Tuesday that it would not display tariff costs next to products on its website after U.S. President Donald Trump called the e-commerce giant's billionaire founder, Jeff Bezos, to complain about the reported plan.
Citing an unnamed person familiar with Amazon's supposed plan, Punchbowl Newsreported that "the shopping site will display how much of an item's cost is derived from tariffs—right next to the product's total listed price."
Many Amazon products come from China. While U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed Sunday that "there is a path" to a tariff deal with the Chinese government, Trump has recently caused global economic alarm by hitting the country with a 145% tax and imposing a 10% minimum for other nations.
According toCNN, which spoke with two senior White House officials on Tuesday, Trump's call to Bezos "came shortly after one of the senior officials phoned the president to inform him of the story" from Punchbowl.
"Of course he was pissed," one officials said of Trump. "Why should a multibillion-dollar company pass off costs to consumers?"
Asked about how the call with Bezos went, Trump told reporters: "Great. Jeff Bezos was very nice. He was terrific. He solved the problem very quickly, and he did the right thing, and he's a good guy."
Earlier Tuesday, during a briefing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called Amazon's reported plan "a hostile and political act," and said that "this is another reason why Americans should buy American."
Leavitt also asked why Amazon didn't have such displays during the Biden administration and held up a printed version of a 2021 Reutersreport about the company's "compliance with the Chinese government edict" to stop allowing customer ratings and reviews in China, allegedly prompted by negative feedback left on a collection President Xi Jinping's speeches and writings.
Asked whether Bezos is "still a Trump supporter," Leavitt said that she "will not speak to" the president's relationship with him.
As CNBCdetailed Tuesday:
Less than two hours after the press briefing, an Amazon spokesperson told CNBC that the company was only ever considering listing tariff charges on some products for Amazon Haul, its budget-focused shopping section.
"The team that runs our ultra low cost Amazon Haul store has considered listing import charges on certain products," the spokesperson said. "This was never a consideration for the main Amazon site and nothing has been implemented on any Amazon properties."
But in a follow-up statement an hour after that one, the spokesperson clarified that the plan to show tariff surcharges was "never approved" and is "not going to happen."
In response to Bloomberg also reporting on Amazon's claim that tariff displays were never under consideration for the company's main site, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wrote on social media Tuesday, "Good move."
Before Amazon publicly killed any plans for showing consumers the costs from Trump's import taxes, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on the chamber's floor Tuesday that companies should be "displaying how much tariffs contribute to the total price of products."
"I urge more companies, particularly national retailers that compete with Amazon, to adopt this practice. If Amazon has the courage to display why prices are going up because of tariffs, so should all of our other national retailers who compete with them. And I am calling on them to do it now," he said.
Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Casar (D-Texas) on Tuesday framed the whole incident as an example of how "Trump has created a government by and for the billionaires," declaring: "If anyone ever doubted that Trump, and Musk, and Bezos, and the billionaires are all [on] one team, just look at what happened at Amazon today. Bezos immediately caved and walked back a plan to tell Americans how much Trump's tariffs are costing them."
Casar also claimed Bezos wants "big tax cuts and sweatheart deals," and pointed to Amazon's Prime Video paying $40 million to license a documentary about the life of First Lady Melania Trump. In addition to the film agreement, Bezos has come under fire for Amazon's $1 million donation to the president's inauguration fund.
As the owner of
The Washington Post, Bezos—the world's second-richest person, after Trump adviser Elon Musk—also faced intense criticism for blocking the newspaper's planned endorsement of the president's 2024 Democratic challenger, Kamala Harris, and demanding its opinion page advocate for "personal liberties and free markets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Medicare for All, Says Sanders, Would Show American People 'Government Is Listening to Them'
"The goal of the current administration and their billionaire buddies is to pile on endless cuts," said one nurse and union leader. "Even on our hardest days, we won't stop fighting for Medicare for All."
Apr 29, 2025
On Tuesday, Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Democratic Reps. Pramila Jayapal of Washington and Debbie Dingell of Michigan reintroduced the Medicare for All Act, re-upping the legislative quest to enact a single-payer healthcare system even as the bill faces little chance of advancing in the GOP-controlled House of Representatives or Senate.
Hundreds of nurses, healthcare providers, and workers from across the country joined the lawmakers for a press conference focused on the bill's reintroduction in front of the Capitol on Tuesday.
"We have the radical idea of putting healthcare dollars into healthcare, not into profiteering or bureaucracy," said Sanders during the press conference. "A simple healthcare system, which is what we are talking about, substantially reduces administrative costs, but it would also make life a lot easier, not just for patients, but for nurses" and other healthcare providers, he continued.
"So let us stand together," Sanders told the crowd. "Let us do what the American people want and let us transform this country. And when we pass Medicare for All, it's not only about improving healthcare for all our people—it's doing something else. It's telling the American people that, finally, the American government is listening to them."
Under Medicare for All, the government would pay for all healthcare services, including dental, vision, prescription drugs, and other care.
"It is a travesty when 85 million people are uninsured or underinsured and millions more are drowning in medical debt in the richest nation on Earth," said Jayapal in a statement on Tuesday.
In 2020, a study in the peer-reviewed medical journal The Lancet found that a single-payer program like Medicare for All would save Americans more than $450 billion and would likely prevent 68,000 deaths every year. That same year, the Congressional Budget Office found that a single-payer system that resembles Medicare for All would yield some $650 billion in savings in 2030.
Members of National Nurses United (NNU), the nation's largest union of registered nurses, were also at the press conference on Tuesday.
In a statement, the group highlighted that the bill comes at a critical time, given GOP-led threats to programs like Medicaid.
"The goal of the current administration and their billionaire buddies is to pile on endless cuts and attacks so that we become too demoralized and overwhelmed to move forward," said Bonnie Castillo, registered nurse and executive director of NNU. "Even on our hardest days, we won't stop fighting for Medicare for All."
Per Sanders' office, the legislation has 104 co-sponsors in the House and 16 in the Senate, which is an increase from the previous Congress.
A poll from Gallup released in 2023 found that 7 in 10 Democrats support a government-run healthcare system. The poll also found that across the political spectrum, 57% of respondents believe the government should ensure all people have healthcare coverage.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Advocates Warn GOP Just Unveiled 'Most Dangerous Higher Ed Bill in US History'
"This is the boldest attempt we've seen in recent history to segregate higher education along racial and class lines," said the Debt Collective.
Apr 29, 2025
At a markup session held by a U.S. House committee on the Republican Party's recently unveiled higher education reform bill Tuesday, one Democratic lawmaker had a succinct description for the legislation.
"This bill is a dream-killer," said Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.) of the so-called Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan, which was introduced by Education and Workforce Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) as part of an effort to find $330 billion in education programs to offset President Donald Trump's tax plan.
Tasked with helping to make $4.5 trillion in tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans possible, Walberg on Monday proposed changes to the Pell Grant program, which has provided financial aid to more than 80 million low-income students since it began in 1972. The bill would allocate more funding to the program but would also reduce the number of students who are eligible for the grants, changing the definition of a "full-time" student to one enrolled in at least 30 semester hours each academic year—up from 12 hours. Students would be cut off from the financial assistance entirely if they are enrolled less than six hours per semester.
David Baime, senior vice president for government relations for the American Association of Community Colleges, suggested the legislation doesn't account for the realities faced by many students who benefit from Pell Grants.
"These students are almost always working a substantial number of hours each week and often have family responsibilities. Pell Grants help them meet the cost of tuition and required fees," Baime toldInside Higher Ed. "We commend the committee for identifying substantial additional resources to help finance Pell, but it should not come at the cost of undermining the ability of low-income working students to enroll at a community college."
The draft bill would also end subsidized loans, which don't accrue interest when a student is still in college and gives borrowers a six-month grace period after graduation, starting in July 2026. More than 30 million borrowers currently have subsidized loans.
The proposal would also reduce the number of student loan repayment options from those offered by the Biden administration to just two, with borrowers given the option for a fixed monthly amount paid over a certain period of time or an income-based plan.
At the markup session on Tuesday, Bonamici pointed to her own experience of paying for college and law school "through a combination of grants and loans and work study and food stamps," and noted that her Republican colleagues on the committee also "graduated from college."
"And more than half of them have gone on to earn advanced degrees," said the congresswoman. "And yet those same individuals who benefited so much from accessing higher education are supporting a bill that will prevent others from doing so."
“In a time when higher ed is being attacked, this bill is another assault,” @RepBonamici calls out committee leaders for wanting to gut financial aid.
“With this bill, they will be taking that opportunity [of higher ed] away from others. This bill is a dream killer.” pic.twitter.com/UjTYvnOEKv
— Student Borrower Protection Center (@theSBPC) April 29, 2025
Democrats on the committee also spoke out against provisions that would cap loans a student can take out for graduate programs at $100,000; the Grad PLUS program has allowed students to borrow up to the cost of attendance.
The Parent PLUS program, which has been found to provide crucial help to Black families accessing higher education, would also be restricted.
"Black students, brown students, first-generation college students, first-generation Americans, will not have access to college," said Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.).
“We cannot take away access to loans, and not replace it with anything else, not make the system better. We know the outcome here—Black, brown, and poor students will not figure it out. Instead, only elite students from the 1% will continue to access education.”@RepSummerLee🙇 pic.twitter.com/oGbRH154Ed
— Student Borrower Protection Center (@theSBPC) April 29, 2025
As the Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC) warned last week, eliminating the Grad PLUS program without also lowering the cost of graduate programs would "subject millions of future borrowers to an unregulated and predatory private student loan market, while doing little to reduce overall student debt and the need to borrow."
Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director for SBPC, told The Hill that the draft bill is "an attack on students and working families with student loan debt."
"We've seen an array of really problematic proposals that are on the table for congressional Republicans," Canchola Bañez said. "Many of these would cause massive spikes for families with monthly student loan payments."
With the proposal, which Republicans hope to pass through reconciliation with a simple majority, the party would be "restructuring higher education for the worse," said the Debt Collective.
"It's the most dangerous higher ed bill in U.S. history," said the student loan borrowers union. "It strips the Department of Education of virtually every authority to cancel student debt. Eliminates every repayment program. Abolishes subsidized loans."
"This is the boldest attempt we've seen in recent history to segregate higher education along racial and class lines," the group added. "We have to push back."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular