

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Civilians in Syria's southern Daraa province are facing death and destruction as the government ramps up a merciless campaign of indiscriminate artillery shelling and air strikes that include repeated attacks on hospitals, Amnesty International said today. The organization has urged the Jordanian government to open its borders to people seeking to flee the area, beginning with those who are sick and injured.
Civilians in Syria's southern Daraa province are facing death and destruction as the government ramps up a merciless campaign of indiscriminate artillery shelling and air strikes that include repeated attacks on hospitals, Amnesty International said today. The organization has urged the Jordanian government to open its borders to people seeking to flee the area, beginning with those who are sick and injured.
According to the Syrian Network for Human Rights, more than 198,000 people in Daraa have been displaced since 19 June after the Syrian government, supported by Russia, escalated attacks on densely-populated villages and towns in the area in a drive to oust rebel groups.
On Saturday and Sunday (30 June and 1 July), residents pleaded in despair with the international community for protection as the Syrian government - with the support of Russia - escalated attacks after negotiations with the armed groups faltered. Some told Amnesty International that they remain at risk of bombardments even if they fled their homes, as the focus of the attacks shifted to the areas hosting newly-displaced people.
"Daraa residents are effectively trapped - many of those who are displaced are living in makeshift tents in the searing heat with insufficient food, water or medical care, and with the constant fear of being exposed to attacks at any given point. Jordan's border is their only gateway to safety," said Lynn Maalouf, Amnesty International's Middle East Research Director.
"Among other horrors, we have evidence that Syrian government forces, supported by Russia, have repeatedly targeted hospitals especially in the areas people fled to - a strategy that has been repeated throughout the conflict. Such attacks are flagrant violations of international law, and cause suffering beyond comprehension.
"It is not too late to save lives. We are urging all parties to the conflict to allow safe passage to civilians wishing to flee the fighting, and calling on the Jordanian government to open its borders to all civilians fleeing southern Syria. It is also vital that humanitarian organizations be given unfettered access to Daraa, so that life-saving aid can be delivered."
Hospitals destroyed
Medical workers told Amnesty International that the field hospitals in al-Harak, Busr al-Harir, Mseifra, Seida and al-Jiza were among the first targets of the government's bombing. The number of displaced people is increasing the pressure on the remaining hospitals in Daraa, which are already operating in desperate conditions.
A nurse from the town of Nawa spoke to Amnesty International on 27 June, and described how the field hospital where he works is only partially operating because of daily attacks and the high number of displaced people. He said: "I am in the hospital now but we can't provide services because of the ongoing attacks. It is not safe for us especially that hospitals are the government's primary target."
A doctor who was also working in Nawa described how barriers to aid had left hospitals lacking even basic equipment. He said: "Currently, a lot of medical supplies are not available, such as anaesthesia medicine and gauze. We have scarcity of equipment used for bone surgery, and even material for local anaesthesia. As for aid in recent times, it has become very scarce. Some four to five months pass in between medical convoys."
A nurse described how indiscriminate shelling had destroyed the hospital in al-Jiza on 27 June where he was working. He said: "After noon prayers, shelling was close to the hospital, 10 to 20 metres from the hospital and we had wounded patients... Then, they targeted the hospital, destroying the northern section of the hospital. We kept working, leaving wounded people downstairs, and we were hiding in the radiology section so we don't get hit. Then, the area directly surrounding the hospital was targeted, and so the northern section of the hospital was destroyed (the wall collapsed), exposing us. We couldn't do anything, we left the patients and ran away."
'Raining bombs'
Amnesty International spoke to 10 people, who described attacks with barrel bombs, air-dropped bombs and rockets.
A resident who fled Mseifra on Friday night [29 June] told Amnesty International:
"My family and I left as soon as the ceasefire agreement was announced because it was too risky to leave while the attacks were ongoing. I heard that that some families were killed in air strike attacks as they fled towards the Jordanian border. I preferred to stay but the attacks were unbearable in the few days before we left. We have seen what happened in Eastern Ghouta, so we know that the government will not stop until they gain control of every part of Daraa."
Another resident described on 27 June how he had been displaced twice, and said that the government appeared to be deliberately targeting towns and villages where people had sought refuge after leaving the eastern part of Daraa. He said: "I moved with my family to Mseifra but then the Syrian government began indiscriminately attacking the town which is already hosting thousands of people... The attacks on Mseifra started four days ago but yesterday it was hell, that is why I left. It was raining bombs above our heads."
A journalist who lives in Jordan told Amnesty International on 26 June that his 83-year-old mother and his brother who has learning disabilities fled the eastern town of al-Harak last week. He said: "They have nowhere to go, so they are now living in an informal tent that my mother managed to put together in a field. I feel helpless for not being able to help them. The Jordanian border is closed so there is no way for them to come live with me...They don't have access to any humanitarian aid and are relying on what food people give them. It is too hot outside."
Amnesty International recommendations
Amnesty International is urging Syrian government forces and Russia to end all their attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure, and indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks immediately. Disproportionate or otherwise indiscriminate attacks that kill or injure civilians, and direct attacks deliberately targeting civilians, amount to war crimes under international law.
Amnesty International urges all parties to the conflict to allow safe passage to civilians wishing to flee the fighting, and to provide humanitarian organizations unfettered access to Daraa.
Amnesty International is also calling on the government of Jordan to allow civilians fleeing the conflict to seek protection in Jordan; it further reiterates its call on the international community to provide full and meaningful support to Jordan and other countries in the region that are hosting large numbers of refugees who have fled from Syria.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400The vote came after an emotional debate in which some Republican lawmakers detailed threats and harassment they'd received for opposing the president's redistricting scheme.
President Donald Trump's push to get Indiana Republicans to redraw their congressional map ahead of the 2026 midterm elections went down in overwhelming defeat in the Indiana state Senate on Thursday.
As reported by Punchbowl News' Jake Sherman, the proposal to support a mid-decade gerrymander in Indiana was rejected by a vote of 19 in favor to 31 opposed, with 21 Republican state senators crossing the aisle to vote with all 10 Democrats to torpedo the measure, which would have changed the projected balance of Indiana's current congressional makeup from seven Republicans and two Democrats to a 9-0 map in favor of the GOP.
The Senate vote came after the state House's approval of the bill and an emotional debate in which some Indiana Republicans opposed to the president's plan detailed violent threats they'd received from his supporters.
According to a report published in the Atlantic on Thursday, Republican Indiana state Sen. Greg Walker (41) this week detailed having heavily armed police come to his home as the result of a false emergency call, a practice commonly known as swatting.
Walker said that he refused to be intimated by such tactics, and added that "I fear for all states if we allow threats and intimidation to become the norm."
Indiana's rejection of the effort is a major blow to Trump’s unprecedented mid-decade redistricting crusade, which began in Texas and subsequently spread to Missouri and North Carolina.
Christina Harvey, executive director for Stand Up America, said that the Indiana state Senate's rejection of the Trump plan was an "important victory for democracy."
"For weeks, Indiana residents have been pleading with their state leaders to stop mid-decade redistricting and the Senate listened," Harvey said. “Despite threats to themselves and their families, a majority of Indiana senators were steadfast in rejecting this gerrymandered map."
John Bisognano, president of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, praised the Republicans who rejected the president's scheme despite enduring threats and harassment.
"Threats of violence are never acceptable, and no lawmakers should face violent threats for simply standing up for their constituents," Bisognano said. "Republicans in other states who are facing a similar choice—whether to listen to their constituents or follow orders from Washington—should follow Indiana’s lead in rejecting this charade and finally put an end to the national gerrymandering crisis."
The lawmakers accused the Social Security Administration of "a slash-first, think-later approach," for which "beneficiaries will pay the price."
Leading Senate Democrats and Independent US Sen. Bernie Sanders this week pressed the Trump administration for answers following reports that the Social Security Administration is planning to dramatically reduce visits to its field offices.
"We write with concerns regarding recent reports that the Social Security Administration is reorganizing its field office operations, and has established a goal of cutting the number of field office visits in half—amounting to 15 million fewer visits annually," Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), and Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote in a letter to SSA Administrator Frank Bisignano.
"Given that beneficiaries are already waiting months for field office appointments, and the agency has not shared with Congress or the public on how it plans to achieve this goal, we are concerned that these efforts are in fact part of a plan to 'quietly kill field offices,' implementing a backdoor cut in benefits by making it harder for Americans to access the Social Security customer services they need," the senators said.
"The Trump administration has relentlessly attacked Social Security."
Earlier this month, Nextgov/FCW revealed that the Social Security Administration said in internal documents that it wants “no more than 15 million total” in-person visits to its field offices in fiscal year 2026—or about half the current number of such visits. An anonymous SSA staffer told the outlet that senior agency officials are aiming for “fewer people in the front door" and for "all work that doesn’t require direct customer interactions to be centralized.”
As Warren's office noted Thursday:
The Trump administration has relentlessly attacked Social Security. Under Commissioner Bisignano, the administration has implemented policy changes that make it harder for Americans to get their benefits, including by implementing burdensome in-person and bug-prone identification processes that force millions more beneficiaries to visit field offices each year—at the same time they are slashing SSA’s workforce by around 7,000 and closing regional offices.
Instead of staffing up to meet these needs, SSA’s field office capacity has significantly declined. Beneficiaries are being forced to wait hours to get help—only to be told they will need to call to schedule an appointment.
"We are concerned that your plan is to force beneficiaries onto SSA’s bug-prone website or push them into customer service phone tree 'doom-loops'—which will almost certainly result in delayed or missed benefits for some individuals," the letter adds. "Once again, you seem to have adopted a slash-first, think-later approach to 'modernizing' SSA, and beneficiaries will pay the price."
The senators are asking Bisignano if the reports of proposed SSA office visit reductions are accurate, and if so, how and when the plan will be implemented, how the agency will "provide services to beneficiaries that would otherwise go to field offices," and how the reductions will affect already lengthy wait times and service online users and callers to the agency's 1-800 number.
The lawmakers' letter comes as Republican senators on Thursday voted down a proposed three-year extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies, a move that is expected to result, on average, in a doubling of health insurance premiums for around 22 million people. Critics said the vote underscores the need for single-payer healthcare legislation like the Medicare for All Act reintroduced by Sanders and Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) earlier this year.
The trade deficit has grown and the US has lost manufacturing jobs during the first nine months of Trump's second term.
A new analysis from the Economic Policy Institute claims that the signature trade deal from President Donald Trump's first term has actually "created more problems than it fixed."
The report, published Thursday, notes that the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), signed into law by Trump in 2020, has completely failed to fulfill Trump's stated goal of lowering the US trade deficit with Canada and Mexico, which has grown from a combined $125 billion in 2020 to $263 billion in 2025.
This increased trade deficit was particularly notable when it comes to the auto industry, says the report, written by EPI senior economist Adam S. Hersh.
"In the critical automotive industry that Trump said he wanted to reshore, imports of motor vehicles and parts from Mexico nearly doubled following USMCA, rising to $274 billion in 2024, up from $196 billion in 2019," the report explains. "Light-duty vehicles imports from Mexico rose 36% while imports of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles increased a whopping 256%."
The report also finds that the trade deal "left a gaping loophole for Chinese manufacturers to exploit duty-free access to North American markets without reciprocal market access for US manufacturers," the result of which was "Chinese firms expanded their direct investment footprint in Mexico by as much as 288% through 2023."
The bottom line, says the report, is "Trump’s USMCA created more problems than it fixed," and that "today the pressure on manufacturing jobs and deterioration in the trade balance with Mexico are worse than before USMCA."
However, the report also says that the US, Canada, and Mexico have an opportunity to significantly improve on USMCA given that the deal is up for review next year.
Among other things, the report recommends closing the loopholes that have allowed Chinese manufacturers to rapidly expand their footprint in Mexico; expanding the the Rapid Response Labor Mechanism that "has helped improve wages and working conditions in a number of specific workplaces"; and slashing intellectual property rights provisions that "currently allow companies to preempt local laws addressing negative externalities from digital service provision."
The EPI report came on the same day that American Economic Liberties Project's Rethink Trade program released an analysis showing that Trump so far has failed to live up to his pledge to reduce the US trade deficit and revive domestic manufacturing.
In all, Rethink Trade found that the US trade deficit increased more during the first nine months of 2025 than it did during the first nine months of 2024. Additionally, the group found that the US has actually lost 49,000 manufacturing jobs since the start of Trump's second term.
Lori Wallach, director of the Rethink Trade program, said that "the nine-month data show outcomes that are the opposite of President Trump’s promises to cut the trade deficit and create more American manufacturing jobs."
She noted that Trump's trade deals so far "seem to prioritize the demands of Big Tech, Big Oil, Big Pharma, and other usual beneficiaries of decades of failed US trade policy instead of fixing the root causes of our huge trade deficit to help American manufacturing workers and firms as he promised."