

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Civilians in Syria's southern Daraa province are facing death and destruction as the government ramps up a merciless campaign of indiscriminate artillery shelling and air strikes that include repeated attacks on hospitals, Amnesty International said today. The organization has urged the Jordanian government to open its borders to people seeking to flee the area, beginning with those who are sick and injured.
Civilians in Syria's southern Daraa province are facing death and destruction as the government ramps up a merciless campaign of indiscriminate artillery shelling and air strikes that include repeated attacks on hospitals, Amnesty International said today. The organization has urged the Jordanian government to open its borders to people seeking to flee the area, beginning with those who are sick and injured.
According to the Syrian Network for Human Rights, more than 198,000 people in Daraa have been displaced since 19 June after the Syrian government, supported by Russia, escalated attacks on densely-populated villages and towns in the area in a drive to oust rebel groups.
On Saturday and Sunday (30 June and 1 July), residents pleaded in despair with the international community for protection as the Syrian government - with the support of Russia - escalated attacks after negotiations with the armed groups faltered. Some told Amnesty International that they remain at risk of bombardments even if they fled their homes, as the focus of the attacks shifted to the areas hosting newly-displaced people.
"Daraa residents are effectively trapped - many of those who are displaced are living in makeshift tents in the searing heat with insufficient food, water or medical care, and with the constant fear of being exposed to attacks at any given point. Jordan's border is their only gateway to safety," said Lynn Maalouf, Amnesty International's Middle East Research Director.
"Among other horrors, we have evidence that Syrian government forces, supported by Russia, have repeatedly targeted hospitals especially in the areas people fled to - a strategy that has been repeated throughout the conflict. Such attacks are flagrant violations of international law, and cause suffering beyond comprehension.
"It is not too late to save lives. We are urging all parties to the conflict to allow safe passage to civilians wishing to flee the fighting, and calling on the Jordanian government to open its borders to all civilians fleeing southern Syria. It is also vital that humanitarian organizations be given unfettered access to Daraa, so that life-saving aid can be delivered."
Hospitals destroyed
Medical workers told Amnesty International that the field hospitals in al-Harak, Busr al-Harir, Mseifra, Seida and al-Jiza were among the first targets of the government's bombing. The number of displaced people is increasing the pressure on the remaining hospitals in Daraa, which are already operating in desperate conditions.
A nurse from the town of Nawa spoke to Amnesty International on 27 June, and described how the field hospital where he works is only partially operating because of daily attacks and the high number of displaced people. He said: "I am in the hospital now but we can't provide services because of the ongoing attacks. It is not safe for us especially that hospitals are the government's primary target."
A doctor who was also working in Nawa described how barriers to aid had left hospitals lacking even basic equipment. He said: "Currently, a lot of medical supplies are not available, such as anaesthesia medicine and gauze. We have scarcity of equipment used for bone surgery, and even material for local anaesthesia. As for aid in recent times, it has become very scarce. Some four to five months pass in between medical convoys."
A nurse described how indiscriminate shelling had destroyed the hospital in al-Jiza on 27 June where he was working. He said: "After noon prayers, shelling was close to the hospital, 10 to 20 metres from the hospital and we had wounded patients... Then, they targeted the hospital, destroying the northern section of the hospital. We kept working, leaving wounded people downstairs, and we were hiding in the radiology section so we don't get hit. Then, the area directly surrounding the hospital was targeted, and so the northern section of the hospital was destroyed (the wall collapsed), exposing us. We couldn't do anything, we left the patients and ran away."
'Raining bombs'
Amnesty International spoke to 10 people, who described attacks with barrel bombs, air-dropped bombs and rockets.
A resident who fled Mseifra on Friday night [29 June] told Amnesty International:
"My family and I left as soon as the ceasefire agreement was announced because it was too risky to leave while the attacks were ongoing. I heard that that some families were killed in air strike attacks as they fled towards the Jordanian border. I preferred to stay but the attacks were unbearable in the few days before we left. We have seen what happened in Eastern Ghouta, so we know that the government will not stop until they gain control of every part of Daraa."
Another resident described on 27 June how he had been displaced twice, and said that the government appeared to be deliberately targeting towns and villages where people had sought refuge after leaving the eastern part of Daraa. He said: "I moved with my family to Mseifra but then the Syrian government began indiscriminately attacking the town which is already hosting thousands of people... The attacks on Mseifra started four days ago but yesterday it was hell, that is why I left. It was raining bombs above our heads."
A journalist who lives in Jordan told Amnesty International on 26 June that his 83-year-old mother and his brother who has learning disabilities fled the eastern town of al-Harak last week. He said: "They have nowhere to go, so they are now living in an informal tent that my mother managed to put together in a field. I feel helpless for not being able to help them. The Jordanian border is closed so there is no way for them to come live with me...They don't have access to any humanitarian aid and are relying on what food people give them. It is too hot outside."
Amnesty International recommendations
Amnesty International is urging Syrian government forces and Russia to end all their attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure, and indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks immediately. Disproportionate or otherwise indiscriminate attacks that kill or injure civilians, and direct attacks deliberately targeting civilians, amount to war crimes under international law.
Amnesty International urges all parties to the conflict to allow safe passage to civilians wishing to flee the fighting, and to provide humanitarian organizations unfettered access to Daraa.
Amnesty International is also calling on the government of Jordan to allow civilians fleeing the conflict to seek protection in Jordan; it further reiterates its call on the international community to provide full and meaningful support to Jordan and other countries in the region that are hosting large numbers of refugees who have fled from Syria.
Amnesty International is a global movement of millions of people demanding human rights for all people - no matter who they are or where they are. We are the world's largest grassroots human rights organization.
(212) 807-8400"This move undermines the integrity of nonpartisan election administration," said Arizona's secretary of state.
US President Donald Trump late Thursday forced out the remaining three members of an independent, bipartisan commission that assists state election officials across the country, a move that critics condemned as a "pathetic power grab" ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The two Democratic members of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), Benjamin Hovland and Thomas Hicks, were fired, and Republican Commissioner Christy McCormick resigned at the White House's request, according to ProPublica. The agency, established by Congress more than two decades ago, now lacks leadership and any ability to make decisions, just months before the 2026 elections.
The EAC, as its website states, is "an independent, bipartisan commission whose mission is to help election officials improve the administration of elections and help Americans participate in the voting process." In an executive order last year, Trump ordered the EAC to implement proof-of-citizenship requirements in the federal voter registration process, along with other changes. The president's effort to impose his policy demands on the EAC was mostly blocked in federal court.
Trump, who has said he wants his administration to "take over" voting nationwide ahead of the 2026 midterms, has since taken other steps that watchdogs and Democratic lawmakers say amount to an attempt to preemptively subvert the coming elections, including a sweeping assault on mail-in voting—which is also facing legal challenges. Legislatively, Trump is pushing Republicans to pass the SAVE America Act, a bill that experts say would prevent millions of Americans from voting.
Michael Waldman, president and CEO of the Brennan Center for Justice, said Thursday's EAC firings "are deeply concerning in light of President Trump’s relentless efforts to try to interfere in elections."
"These removals leave the agency without leadership and unable to carry out its major responsibilities," said Waldman. "The guardrails Congress placed on this agency are clear and must be followed: The Election Assistance Commission was designed to be bipartisan with four members, no more than two of which can be from the same political party. The agency cannot make any significant decisions or take any significant actions unless three confirmed commissioners agree. Until bipartisan replacements are confirmed, the agency cannot lawfully make any decisions that affect how Americans vote."
Lisa Gilbert, co-president of Public Citizen, said Trump's termination of EAC commissioners underscores that "he’s scared of the voting power of the American people."
"This move is another pathetic attempt to sow doubt in our elections, which are safely and expertly run by states and localities," said Gilbert. "This agency deserves a steady hand and expert leadership. That said, it is important for voters to know that states and localities, not the EAC, run our elections. Even more importantly, it is the voters who decide who takes office."
The EAC firings came less than two weeks after the conservative-dominated US Supreme Court handed Trump the power to purge independent agencies at will with its Trump v. Slaughter ruling, erasing around 90 years of precedent.
Election law expert Rick Hasen warned in a blog post on Thursday that Trump "could try to direct the commissioner-less EAC to do his bidding, for example by stating that the EAC must amend the federal voter registration form that states must accept for federal elections to include documentary proof of citizenship."
"Trump’s first voting-related EO tried to do this, and he was stymied. But that was acting through the commissioners and before the Slaughter case," Hasen noted. "If he tries anything like this, it will be high-profile and very important litigation that will end up at the Supreme Court on the emergency docket over the summer."
Adrian Fontes, Arizona’s Democratic secretary of state, said in a statement late Thursday that the EAC purge was "irresponsible and dangerous," accusing the administration of remaining "dead set on causing chaos for our election officials across this country."
"This move undermines the integrity of nonpartisan election administration," Fontes added.
Salgado "called Houston home for 35 years," said New York's democratic socialist mayor. "On Tuesday, an ICE agent shot and killed him."
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani on Thursday renewed his call to "abolish ICE" after a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent fatally shot a man in Texas earlier this week.
"Lorenzo Salgado Araujo called Houston home for 35 years. On Tuesday, an ICE agent shot and killed him," Mamdani said on social media. "His family learned of his death from a video before anyone bothered to knock on their door."
"New York City stands with the Salgado family in demanding a full, independent investigation and real accountability," the mayor added. "To the Salgado family and any immigrant family in this city living in fear: We grieve with you, and we will continue to stand beside you in the pursuit of justice."
More than 1,000 people gathered in Houston's East End on Wednesday evening to denounce ICE and remember Salgado, a 52-year-old married father of three originally from Mexico who, according to relatives, was in the process of legalizing his status in the United States.
Salgado's son, school teacher Ronaldo Salgado, said that his father had "dedicated his life to giving his family the American dream."
Salgado was driving in the Magnolia Park neighborhood to pick up his construction crew on Tuesday morning when an unidentified ICE agent fatally shot him during an enforcement operation. ICE claimed that Salgado tried to evade arrest and threatened agents with his vehicle, but his family, civil rights advocates, and community leaders strongly dispute that account, pointing to surveillance footage and eyewitness accounts that they argue undermine the agency's narrative.
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told The New York Times late on Thursday that neither Salgado nor any of his three passengers were the targets of ICE enforcement, but that they drew agents' attention because one of them resembled a wanted man from Guatemala.
Democratic lawmakers and civil rights groups have joined Salgado's relatives in demanding an independent investigation of his killing.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum announced Thursday that her government plans to file criminal complaints in the United States in connection with 14 Mexican nationals who died in ICE custody. Sheinbaum added that Salgado's killing "is not only sad and regrettable, but also appears to have been targeted."
On-duty officers from ICE and other Department of Homeland Security agencies have fatally shot at least four other people during President Donald Trump's deadly second-term crackdown on undocumented immigrants: Silverio Villegas González of Mexico and US citizens Ruben Ray Martinez, Renee Good, and Alex Pretti.
At least dozens of people have also died in ICE custody or shortly after being released during Trump's second term. Last month, ICE announced that it was rescinding a 2021 Biden administration policy requiring congressional notification and an investigation whenever a detainee died within 30 days of their release.
“Consumers are getting really screwed by all of this,” said one critic.
Political appointees installed by President Donald Trump are overruling career attorneys inside the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, intervening to weaken or halt investigations into major corporate mergers in a way never seen before, MS NOW reported Thursday.
Three unnamed sources told the outlet "that DOJ staff have privately complained that the Trump administration is essentially deciding not to enforce antitrust laws that are critical to keeping companies from becoming single-source providers and being able to charge enormous sums for their product or service."
According to MS NOW:
The two mergers that DOJ leaders are ramming through include two low-cost Mexican air carriers, Viva Aerobus and Volaris, who announced their plans to merge last year, and the proposed merger of the Italian firm Saipem and UK firm Subsea7, who together control a sizable portion of sales for equipment used for subsea oil operations. Major oil companies, including ExxonMobil, Petrobras and TotalEnergies, have filed formal objections with federal regulators about the latter merger, arguing to antitrust regulators that the combined firms will create a subsea monopoly that will increase costs, delay critical projects and force clients into expensive, long-term contracts.
Experts say the aforementioned mergers are likely to drive up prices US consumers pay for airfare to Mexico and at the gas pump, yet again giving the lie to Trump's "America First" pledge.
Current and former DOJ officials described Trump's interference as without precedent.
“It’s unilateral surrender on antitrust enforcement; it’s absolutely unprecedented,” Bill Baer, the former assistant attorney general for the antitrust division during the Obama administration. “It’s definitely going to hurt consumers. It means prices will go up, concentration is going to increase—and quality often diminishes when you have only a few firms operating in the same market.”
The DOJ Antitrust Division was originally launched more than a century ago during the tail-end of the Progressive Era to combat monopolies and enforce antitrust legislation like the Clayton Antitrust Act and the Gilded Age-era Sherman Act. It was formally created during the Great Depression following weak enforcement of the Sherman and Clayton acts, as the Franklin D. Roosevelt administration viewed concentrated corporate power as a threat not only to consumers but to democracy itself.
While the postwar decades saw relatively aggressive antitrust enforcement by presidents of both major parties, the Reagan administration adopted a much more permissive merger philosophy that laid the groundwork for decades of consolidation across industries that has continued to this day, despite limited antitrust revivals during the Obama and Biden administrations.
Biden-era Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan and DOJ officials pursued a more aggressive antitrust agenda that Trump has been rolling back in favor of deregulation. Critics have pointed out that Trump has sometimes used antitrust mechanisms selectively, targeting certain media or technology companies for political reasons rather than consistently applying a broad anti-monopoly approach.
According to an article published last month in The Wall Street Journal, Stanley Woodward, the senior DOJ official now overseeing antitrust enforcement, has told department lawyers that he favors resolving cases through settlements rather than taking corporations to trial. Some antitrust attorneys interpreted the remarks as a directive to avoid litigation and seek settlements in ongoing and future cases. Critics say Woodward’s posture could weaken the DOJ's ability to challenge monopolistic mergers in favor of fast-tracked settlements.
"He's taking litigation off the table, and you don’t get a settlement absent a litigation threat,” one person with knowledge of Woodward's actions told MS NOW. “I can’t think of an administration in history that would want to run antitrust policy like this.”
“Consumers are getting really screwed by all of this,” the person continued. “We’re talking 10 years of consumer harm that can’t be undone.”