SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) depart a press conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on January 8, 2026.
(Photo by Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
As Trump Marches US Toward Iran War, Critics Ask: Where's the 'Pushback' From Dems and Media?
"It's astonishing that we're building up for a significant military clash, and Congress isn't involved, no real case is being made to the public, and the average American has no clue."
Feb 18, 2026
Amid reports that President Donald Trump is pushing the US toward a "massive" war in Iran, critics have found themselves shocked by the lack of "pushback" from top Democrats and mainstream media institutions.
Barak Ravid reported for Axios on Wednesday that, with a deal between the US and Iran appearing increasingly out of sight, "the Trump administration is closer to a major war in the Middle East than most Americans realize" and "It could begin very soon."
Sources told the outlet that "A US military operation in Iran would likely be a massive, weeks-long campaign that would look more like full-fledged war than last month's pinpoint operation in Venezuela."
"Such a war would have a dramatic influence on the entire region and major implications for the remaining three years of the Trump presidency," Ravid wrote.
However, with Congress on recess and the media largely distracted by a whirlwind of other issues, he noted, "there is little public debate about what could be the most consequential US military intervention in the Middle East in at least a decade."
As columnist Adam Johnson pointed out on social media, Trump's sabre-rattling toward Iran was underway well before Congress left town.
Despite this, Johnson said, the "two most powerful Democrats in the country," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), "have once again not leveled a single word of substantive pushback," as was the case when Trump conducted strikes against Iran over the summer.
He said the top Democrats have only acknowledged Trump's threats "when asked by reporters" and have made only "process criticisms" rather than criticizing the merits of the war itself.
Last month, as Trump threatened to carry out massive strikes in retaliation for Iran's brutalization of protesters, Schumer limited his criticism to the fact that Trump had not consulted Congress.
“It has to be debated by Congress. Something like that, the War Powers Act, the Constitution, requires a discussion in Congress. We’ve had no reach-out from the administration at this point,” he told reporters.
More recently, Jeffries—a member of Congress who is briefed on national security matters—was asked on CBS's Face the Nation what he knew about the war plans or what he would want to know.
He did not answer that question, but vaguely lamented that Trump "has been slow to provide information... to the Gang of Eight members of Congress" and "hasn't provided a significant amount of information to Congress in general."
"When it comes to sanctions, perma-war, and bombings, we do not have an opposition party," Johnson said. "We have sleepy AIPAC-funded hall monitors paid to get wedgies and vaguely object after the craters are smoking in the ground."
New York Times columnist David French agreed: "It's astonishing that we're building up for a significant military clash, and Congress isn't involved, no real case is being made to the public, and the average American has no clue. If this gets serious, it will be a shock for lots of people."
There is little hunger in the American public for a war with Iran. A YouGov survey from early February found that 48% said they strongly or somewhat opposed military action in Iran, compared with just 28% who supported it and 24% who weren't sure.
Trita Parsi, the executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said in an interview with Democracy Now! on Wednesday that, despite the public's broadly anti-interventionist attitudes, "their voices are more or less not being heard in the mainstream media."
"We’re seeing exactly what we saw during the Iraq War, in which a large number of pro-intervention Iraqi voices were paraded through mainstream media in order to give the impression that not only is this something that is supported by the overwhelming majority of the Iraqi society, but also that this is the morally right thing to do," Parsi said.
Drop Site News founder Ryan Grim said that when compared with the invasion of Iraq, which was built up over the course of more than a year through persistent propaganda to get the public on board, the Trump administration's effort to sell a war with Iran is laughable.
"We don’t even get the respect of being lied into war anymore," he said. "He’s just going to do it."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Amid reports that President Donald Trump is pushing the US toward a "massive" war in Iran, critics have found themselves shocked by the lack of "pushback" from top Democrats and mainstream media institutions.
Barak Ravid reported for Axios on Wednesday that, with a deal between the US and Iran appearing increasingly out of sight, "the Trump administration is closer to a major war in the Middle East than most Americans realize" and "It could begin very soon."
Sources told the outlet that "A US military operation in Iran would likely be a massive, weeks-long campaign that would look more like full-fledged war than last month's pinpoint operation in Venezuela."
"Such a war would have a dramatic influence on the entire region and major implications for the remaining three years of the Trump presidency," Ravid wrote.
However, with Congress on recess and the media largely distracted by a whirlwind of other issues, he noted, "there is little public debate about what could be the most consequential US military intervention in the Middle East in at least a decade."
As columnist Adam Johnson pointed out on social media, Trump's sabre-rattling toward Iran was underway well before Congress left town.
Despite this, Johnson said, the "two most powerful Democrats in the country," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), "have once again not leveled a single word of substantive pushback," as was the case when Trump conducted strikes against Iran over the summer.
He said the top Democrats have only acknowledged Trump's threats "when asked by reporters" and have made only "process criticisms" rather than criticizing the merits of the war itself.
Last month, as Trump threatened to carry out massive strikes in retaliation for Iran's brutalization of protesters, Schumer limited his criticism to the fact that Trump had not consulted Congress.
“It has to be debated by Congress. Something like that, the War Powers Act, the Constitution, requires a discussion in Congress. We’ve had no reach-out from the administration at this point,” he told reporters.
More recently, Jeffries—a member of Congress who is briefed on national security matters—was asked on CBS's Face the Nation what he knew about the war plans or what he would want to know.
He did not answer that question, but vaguely lamented that Trump "has been slow to provide information... to the Gang of Eight members of Congress" and "hasn't provided a significant amount of information to Congress in general."
"When it comes to sanctions, perma-war, and bombings, we do not have an opposition party," Johnson said. "We have sleepy AIPAC-funded hall monitors paid to get wedgies and vaguely object after the craters are smoking in the ground."
New York Times columnist David French agreed: "It's astonishing that we're building up for a significant military clash, and Congress isn't involved, no real case is being made to the public, and the average American has no clue. If this gets serious, it will be a shock for lots of people."
There is little hunger in the American public for a war with Iran. A YouGov survey from early February found that 48% said they strongly or somewhat opposed military action in Iran, compared with just 28% who supported it and 24% who weren't sure.
Trita Parsi, the executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said in an interview with Democracy Now! on Wednesday that, despite the public's broadly anti-interventionist attitudes, "their voices are more or less not being heard in the mainstream media."
"We’re seeing exactly what we saw during the Iraq War, in which a large number of pro-intervention Iraqi voices were paraded through mainstream media in order to give the impression that not only is this something that is supported by the overwhelming majority of the Iraqi society, but also that this is the morally right thing to do," Parsi said.
Drop Site News founder Ryan Grim said that when compared with the invasion of Iraq, which was built up over the course of more than a year through persistent propaganda to get the public on board, the Trump administration's effort to sell a war with Iran is laughable.
"We don’t even get the respect of being lied into war anymore," he said. "He’s just going to do it."
From Your Site Articles
Amid reports that President Donald Trump is pushing the US toward a "massive" war in Iran, critics have found themselves shocked by the lack of "pushback" from top Democrats and mainstream media institutions.
Barak Ravid reported for Axios on Wednesday that, with a deal between the US and Iran appearing increasingly out of sight, "the Trump administration is closer to a major war in the Middle East than most Americans realize" and "It could begin very soon."
Sources told the outlet that "A US military operation in Iran would likely be a massive, weeks-long campaign that would look more like full-fledged war than last month's pinpoint operation in Venezuela."
"Such a war would have a dramatic influence on the entire region and major implications for the remaining three years of the Trump presidency," Ravid wrote.
However, with Congress on recess and the media largely distracted by a whirlwind of other issues, he noted, "there is little public debate about what could be the most consequential US military intervention in the Middle East in at least a decade."
As columnist Adam Johnson pointed out on social media, Trump's sabre-rattling toward Iran was underway well before Congress left town.
Despite this, Johnson said, the "two most powerful Democrats in the country," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), "have once again not leveled a single word of substantive pushback," as was the case when Trump conducted strikes against Iran over the summer.
He said the top Democrats have only acknowledged Trump's threats "when asked by reporters" and have made only "process criticisms" rather than criticizing the merits of the war itself.
Last month, as Trump threatened to carry out massive strikes in retaliation for Iran's brutalization of protesters, Schumer limited his criticism to the fact that Trump had not consulted Congress.
“It has to be debated by Congress. Something like that, the War Powers Act, the Constitution, requires a discussion in Congress. We’ve had no reach-out from the administration at this point,” he told reporters.
More recently, Jeffries—a member of Congress who is briefed on national security matters—was asked on CBS's Face the Nation what he knew about the war plans or what he would want to know.
He did not answer that question, but vaguely lamented that Trump "has been slow to provide information... to the Gang of Eight members of Congress" and "hasn't provided a significant amount of information to Congress in general."
"When it comes to sanctions, perma-war, and bombings, we do not have an opposition party," Johnson said. "We have sleepy AIPAC-funded hall monitors paid to get wedgies and vaguely object after the craters are smoking in the ground."
New York Times columnist David French agreed: "It's astonishing that we're building up for a significant military clash, and Congress isn't involved, no real case is being made to the public, and the average American has no clue. If this gets serious, it will be a shock for lots of people."
There is little hunger in the American public for a war with Iran. A YouGov survey from early February found that 48% said they strongly or somewhat opposed military action in Iran, compared with just 28% who supported it and 24% who weren't sure.
Trita Parsi, the executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said in an interview with Democracy Now! on Wednesday that, despite the public's broadly anti-interventionist attitudes, "their voices are more or less not being heard in the mainstream media."
"We’re seeing exactly what we saw during the Iraq War, in which a large number of pro-intervention Iraqi voices were paraded through mainstream media in order to give the impression that not only is this something that is supported by the overwhelming majority of the Iraqi society, but also that this is the morally right thing to do," Parsi said.
Drop Site News founder Ryan Grim said that when compared with the invasion of Iraq, which was built up over the course of more than a year through persistent propaganda to get the public on board, the Trump administration's effort to sell a war with Iran is laughable.
"We don’t even get the respect of being lied into war anymore," he said. "He’s just going to do it."
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.