

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Expert contact: Lisa Archer, (510) 900-3145, larcher@foe.org
Communications contact: Kate Colwell, (202) 783-0744, kcolwell@foe.org
U.S. Representatives Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) and G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.) will introduce legislation this afternoon, dubbed by critics the "Deny Americans the Right to Know (DARK) Act," that would block states from requiring labels for foods made with genetically-engineered ingredients. The bill would also restrict the Food and Drug Administration's ability to mandate national GMO labeling and replace the independent Non-GMO Project certification with a far weaker, federal, non-GMO labeling standard.
U.S. Representatives Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) and G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.) will introduce legislation this afternoon, dubbed by critics the "Deny Americans the Right to Know (DARK) Act," that would block states from requiring labels for foods made with genetically-engineered ingredients. The bill would also restrict the Food and Drug Administration's ability to mandate national GMO labeling and replace the independent Non-GMO Project certification with a far weaker, federal, non-GMO labeling standard.
"This chemical and junk food industry dream bill does nothing to achieve what more than 93 percent of Americans want -- labeling of GMOs -- and is a blatant attack on states' ability to ensure our right to know what we are feeding our families," said Lisa Archer, Food and Technology program director with Friends of the Earth. "This bill would set in stone the current, voluntary labeling system that has failed consumers and would replace strong, independent, non-GMO certification with a weak federal program; adding more confusion for consumers who have a right to know what's in their food."
The bill is backed by the Grocery Manufacturers Association, PepsiCo, biotech giant Monsanto and Koch Industries. Rep. Pompeo has been the single largest recipient of campaign funds from Koch Industries in recent elections.
New health concerns about GMOs are raising the stakes for labeling initiatives. Last week, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer listed glyphosate -- the key ingredient in the world's most widely used herbicide -- as a probable human carcinogen.
A study published yesterday by the American Society of Microbiology's Journal mBio links three of the most ubiquitous herbicides -- glyphosate, 2,4-D and Dicamba, all of which are used with herbicide tolerant GMOs -- to antibiotic resistance. The chemicals 2,4-D and Dicamba have also been linked to cancer, reproductive and developmental harm and other health problems.
"The evidence is mounting that Monsanto's glyphosate and other chemicals used on genetically-engineered crops may be harming our health. Americans have more reason than ever to want to know whether they are eating GMOs," Archer continued.
Last month, Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) reintroduced the bipartisan Genetically Engineered Food Right-to-Know Act, which would direct the FDA to require labeling of GMOs.
"We call on Congress to stand up to Big Food and chemical corporations by opposing the DARK Act, and stand with the majority of Americans who want mandatory GMO labeling," Archer said.
Friends of the Earth fights for a more healthy and just world. Together we speak truth to power and expose those who endanger the health of people and the planet for corporate profit. We organize to build long-term political power and campaign to change the rules of our economic and political systems that create injustice and destroy nature.
(202) 783-7400Since 2021, top Wall Street banks have committed more than $124 billion in investments to the nine companies set to profit most from the toppling of Venezuela's government.
As oil industry giants are being set up to profit from President Donald Trump's invasion of Venezuela, a new analysis shows the ample backing those companies have received from Wall Street's top financial institutions.
Last week, Bloomberg reported that stock traders and tycoons were "pouncing" after Trump's kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro earlier this month, after having pressured the Trump administration to "create a more favorable business environment in Venezuela."
A dataset compiled by the international environmental advocacy group Stand.earth shows the extent to which these interests are intertwined.
Stand.earth found that since 2021, banks—including JPMorgan Chase, HSBC, TD, RBC, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America—have committed more than $124 billion in investments to the nine companies set to profit most from the toppling of Venezuela's government.
More than a third of that financing, $42 billion, came in 2025 alone, when Trump launched his aggressive campaign against Venezuela.

Among the companies expected to profit most immediately are refiners like Valero, PBF Energy, Citgo, and Phillips 66, which have large operations on the Gulf Coast that can process the heavy crude Venezuela is known to produce. These four companies have received $41 billion from major banks over the past five years.
Chevron, which also operates many heavy-crude facilities, benefits from being the only US company that operated in Venezuela under the Maduro regime, where it exported more than 140,000 barrels of oil per day last quarter.
At a White House gathering with top oil executives on Friday, the company's vice chair, Mark Nelson, told Trump the company could double its exports "effective immediately."
According to Jason Gabelman, an analyst at TD Cowen, the company could increase its annual cash flow by $400 million to $700 million as a result of Trump's takeover of Venezuelan oil resources.
Chevron was also by far the number-one recipient of investments in 2025, with more than $11 billion in total coming from the banks listed in the report—including $1.78 billion from Barclays, another $1.78 billion from Bank of America, and $1.32 billion from Citigroup.
According to Bloomberg, just weeks before Maduro's removal, analysts at Citigroup predicted 60% gains on the nation's more than $60 billion in bonds if he were replaced.
Even ExxonMobil, whose CEO Darren Woods dumped cold water on Trump's calls to set up operations in Venezuela on Friday, calling the nation "uninvestable," potentially has something major to gain from Maduro's overthrow.
Exxon and ConocoPhillips each have outstanding arbitration cases against Venezuela over the government's 2007 nationalization of oil assets, which could award them $20 billion and $12 billion, respectively.
The report found that in 2025, ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips received a combined total of more than $12.8 billion in investment from major financial institutions, which vastly exceeded that from previous years.
Data on these staggering investments comes as oil companies face increased scrutiny surrounding possible foreknowledge of Trump's attack on Venezuela.
Last week, US Senate Democrats launched a formal investigation into “communications between major US oil and oilfield services companies and the Trump administration surrounding last week’s military action in Venezuela and efforts to exploit Venezuelan oil resources.”
Richard Brooks, Stand.earth's climate finance director, said the role of the financial institutions underwriting those oil companies should not be overlooked either.
"Without financial support from big banks and investors, the likes of Chevron, Exxon, ConocoPhillips, and Valero would not have the power that they do to start wars, overthrow governments, or slow the pace of climate action," he said. "Banks and investors need to choose if they are on the side of peace, or of warmongering oil companies.”
"Noem and her rogue agents are the ones terrorizing our communities, and she is breaking the law to do so," said Rep. Robin Kelly.
Citing the deadly "reign of terror" unleashed by President Donald Trump's immigration enforcers against both migrants and US citizens, a Democratic congresswoman on Wednesday formally introduced articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
Rep. Robin Kelly of Illinois filed three articles of impeachment against Noem for alleged obstruction of justice, violation of public trust, and self-dealing. The move—which Kelly first announced on January 7— followed last week's killing of Renee Nicole Good, an American citizen, by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer Jonathan Ross in Minneapolis.
"Secretary Noem has brought her reign of terror to the Chicagoland area, LA, New Orleans, Charlotte, Durham, and communities north to south to east to west,” Kelly told reporters at a Wednesday press conference. “She needs to be held accountable for her actions."
Speaking on the House floor earlier, Kelly said that "Operation Midway Blitz has torn apart the Chicagoland area."
🚨 BREAKING: Robin Kelly just announced she is moving to impeach DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.
“Secretary Noem has violated the Constitution and must be held accountable for terrorizing our communities.”
This is what accountability looks like. pic.twitter.com/4BYgLZzoin
— Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) January 13, 2026
During the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) operation, ICE agents shot and killed Silverio Villegas González and then allegedly lied about the victim's behavior in a bid to justify the killing. Federal enforcers have attacked protesters and bystanders with tear gas, pepper balls, flash-bang grenades, and other weapons during Midway Blitz and other operations across the country.
"President Trump declared war on Chicago and then he brought violence and destruction to our city and our suburbs in the form of immigration enforcement," Kelly said.
"In my district, federal agents rappelled down from Blackhawk helicopters and burst into an apartment building in the South Shore area," the congresswoman continued. "The dragged US citizens and noncitizens alike out of their beds in the middle of the night."
"They claim the apartment was infiltrated by members of a Venezuelan gang. I don't understand this president's obsession with Venezuela, but they did not arrest a single member from that gang," she added, alluding to Trump's illegal attacks on the South American country and abduction of its president and his wife.
Moving on to Minneapolis, Kelly said that "an ICE officer shot and killed Renee Nicole Good in cold blood."
"Without knowing any of the facts or an investigation, Secretary Noem lied about what happened," the congresswoman said. "She called a beloved 37-year-old mom a 'domestic terrorist.' Secretary Noem and her rogue agents are the ones terrorizing our communities, and she is breaking the law to do so. I will hold her accountable."
Kelly's articles of impeachment accuse Noem of:
"These are not policy disagreements," Kelly said during her House floor remarks. "These are violations of her oath of office, and she must answer for her impeachable actions."
As of late Wednesday morning, more than 70 House Democrats had signed on as co-sponsors of the effort.
"I’ve signed on to impeach Secretary Noem," Rep. John Larson of Connecticut said on X. "She must be held accountable for her corruption and her attacks on the Constitution. She’s hypercharged ICE’s lawlessness and cheered as it has terrorized our communities. She has to go."
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman of New Jersey, who also joined the impeachment effort, said that Noem's "malicious and incompetent leadership has led to chaos across the nation."
Rep. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania said on X: "People are being hunted. Families torn apart. A woman was just shot in the face. And DHS seem to think it's acceptable. It's past time to impeach Kristi Noem."
A DHS spokesperson called the impeachment effort "silly."
"As ICE officers are facing a 1,300% increase in assaults against them, Rep. Kelly is more focused on showmanship and fundraising clicks than actually cleaning up her crime-ridden Chicago district,” the spokesperson said. “We hope she would get serious about doing her job to protect American people, which is what this department is doing under Sec. Noem.”
The effort to impeach Noem came after state and city officials in Minnesota and Illinois on Monday sued the Trump administration in a bid to block federal forces “from conducting civil immigration enforcement” without “express congressional authorization.”
“People are being racially profiled, harassed, terrorized, and assaulted,” Democratic Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said earlier this week. “Schools have gone into lockdown. Businesses have been forced to close. Minnesota police are spending countless hours dealing with the chaos ICE is causing. This federal invasion of the Twin Cities has to stop, so today I am suing DHS to bring it to an end.”
"So much for Make America Healthy Again and saving Americans from addiction and suicide," said US Sen. Patty Murray.
The Trump administration, which has claimed its illegal boat bombing spree in international waters and assault on Venezuela were motivated by a deep desire to combat the drug overdose crisis in the US, moved late Tuesday to eliminate up to $2 billion worth of federal grants supporting mental health and addiction services across the country.
Organizations that provide street-level support to people experiencing mental health crises, homelessness, and addiction said they were notified of the cuts overnight in the form of emailed grant termination letters.
NPR first reported the cuts by the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), which is overseen by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The estimated $2 billion in cuts represents roughly a quarter of SAMHSA's budget.
Ryan Hampton, founder of the nonprofit Mobilize Recovery, told NPR that his group is out $500,000 because of the Trump administration's move, which could impact thousands of organizations nationwide.
"Waking up to nearly $2 billion in grant cancellations means front-line providers are forced to cease overdose prevention, naloxone distribution, and peer recovery services immediately, leaving our communities defenseless against a raging crisis," Hampton said. "This cruelty will be measured in lives lost, as recovery centers shutter and the safety net we built is slashed overnight. We are witnessing the dismantling of our recovery infrastructure in real-time, and the administration will have blood on its hands for every preventable death that follows."
Jonathan Cohn of The Bulwark reported that impacted organizations "had applied for these grants, had them approved, and were operating with the funds—and then, on Tuesday night, received notices that those grants had been terminated."
"The affected programs include ones that provide services like housing and peer support for people who are in recovery, as well as ones that train substance abuse professionals," Cohn observed.
Yngvild Olsen, a national adviser at Manatt Health and former director of SAMHA’s Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, told Cohn that the cuts mean "tens of thousands of people" will "lose access to services" and many providers will "lose access to their training and technical assistance resources."
"These organizations are going to have to lay off staff," Olsen warned. "They don't have high margins and other sources of funding that they can necessarily turn to. I heard from one grantee that said she doesn't know how she's going to pay staff and bills.”
News outlets that reviewed the grant termination emails sent out late Tuesday reported that the administration characterized the funding as out of step with its priorities, even as the White House claims it is waging a righteous war on the drug overdose crisis.
"Every boat that we knock out, we save 25,000 American lives," President Donald Trump claimed, without evidence, during an October press conference. "So when you think of it that way, what we're doing is actually an act of kindness."
US Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said in a statement Wednesday that, in light of the massive grant cuts to mental health and addiction-related grants, "this administration’s claims about taking on the opioid crisis couldn’t be more hollow."
“So much for Make America Healthy Again and saving Americans from addiction and suicide," said Murray. "This decision is going to mean real people in Washington state and every part of the country do not get the care and treatment they are counting on—and that could save their life. Republicans must join me in demanding these cuts be reversed.”