

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Jeremy
Nichols, WildEarth Guardians, (303) 573-4898 x 1303
Kassie
Siegel, Center for Biological Diversity, (760) 366-2232 x 302,
Ginny
Cramer, Sierra Club, (804) 225-9113 x 102
Ted Zukoski,
Earthjustice, (303) 996-9622
A
coalition of environmental groups today called on the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency to put public health and safety first, and to
establish, for
the first time ever, limits on air pollution from coal mines throughout
the
United
States.
"It's time
to finally hold coal mines accountable to our health, safety and
environment,"
said Jeremy Nichols, climate and energy program director for WildEarth
Guardians. "With mines spewing methane, dust, toxic orange clouds and
other
dangerous gases, we need a national response that puts clean air before
coal."
In a
petition to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, Earthjustice, WildEarth
Guardians,
the Center for Biological Diversity, the Environmental Integrity Project
and the
Sierra Club called for the agency to exercise its authority under the
Clean Air
Act to both list coal mines as a source of harmful air pollution and
ensure the
best systems of emission reduction are used to keep this pollution in
check.
Such standards have been adopted for gravel mines, coal-fired power
plants,
coal-processing plants and dozens of other sources, but currently no
national
limits exist on air pollution from coal mines.
"Coal mines
have gotten a free pass for far too long," said Kassie Siegel with the
Center
for Biological Diversity. "It's essential to establish these
common-sense rules
to reduce air pollution from coal mines -- including closed mines no
longer
producing coal -- while we transition as rapidly as possible away from
reliance
on dirty, dangerous, coal-fired power."
The petition
comes as attention increasingly focuses on methane emissions from coal
mines.
Methane is major a safety hazard, contributing to a number of mine
catastrophes
over the years, including the most recent Upper Big Branch Mine disaster
in West
Virginia. Methane is also a potent greenhouse gas. The EPA has
determined that
methane, with more than 20 times the heat-trapping ability of carbon
dioxide, endangers public health
and welfare. It also contributes to ground-level ozone pollution, the
key
ingredient of smog. Nationally, coal mines are responsible for 10
percent of all
human-caused methane emissions, yet no standards exist to control these
emissions.
Already,
the EPA has established national limits on methane emissions from
municipal
solid waste landfills, and the agency's own reports show methane
controls at
coal mines can be exceptionally cost effective. Overall, the EPA
estimates more
than 85 percent of all U.S. coal-mine methane emissions can be
eliminated at a
cost of $15/ton; with health benefits factored in, the payback could be
as much
as $240/ton of methane reduced.
"Methane
is a dangerous gas, but it's probably the most cost effective to
control," said
Aaron Isherwood with the Sierra Club. "The health, safety and climate
benefits
of reducing methane from coal mines are simply too important to
ignore."
The
petition also calls on the EPA administrator to adopt strict limits on
other
dangerous air pollutants released from coal mines, including particulate
matter,
nitrogen oxide gases and volatile organic compounds -- all toxic air
pollutants
under the Clean Air Act.
Nitrogen
oxides are an especially visible example of the problem. Blasting at
strip
mines, such as those in the Powder River Basin of northeastern Wyoming,
produce
dense, orange clouds of nitrogen oxides. No standards currently limit
such
pollution from coal mines. Instead, signs posted along public highways
warn of
orange clouds, advising people to "Avoid Contact."
"Other
industries are already required to do their part to protect the air we
breathe,"
said Ted Zukoski, a staff attorney with Earthjustice. "It's time for the
EPA to
hold the coal industry accountable for its air pollution
too."
The groups
are asking the EPA to respond to the petition within 180 days.
To read the
petition, click here.
For images
of methane venting at the West Elk Coal Mine in Western
Colorado, see https://picasaweb.google.com/TZactivist/WellPadsAtWestElk?authkey=Gv1sRgCKqS0sv3yL3nGQ&feat=directlink#).
For
images of orange clouds and warning signs in the Powder River Basin of
Wyoming,
see https://picasaweb.google.com/WildEarthClimate/PowderRiverBasinCoalMining#).
WildEarth
Guardians is a Western U.S.-based nonprofit dedicated to protecting and
restoring the wildlife, wild places, and wild rivers of the American
West.
The Center for
Biological
Diversity is a national, nonprofit conservation organization with more
than
255,000 members and online activists dedicated to the protection of
endangered
species and wild places.
The Environmental
Integrity Project combines research, reporting, media outreach, and the
litigation to ensure that environmental laws are enforced, are
effective, and
inform and empower the public.
The Sierra
Club is a national nonprofit organization of approximately 1.3 million
members
and supporters dedicated to exploring, enjoying, and protecting the wild
places
of the earth; to practicing and promoting the responsible use of the
earth's
ecosystems and resources; to educating and enlisting humanity to protect
and
restore the quality of the natural and human environment; and to using
all
lawful means to carry out these objectives.
Earthjustice
is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the
magnificent
places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending
the
right of all people to a healthy environment.
"Medicare shouldn’t have premiums... or copays or deductibles," said US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed. "Medicare should cover vision, dental, and hearing. And Medicare should cover everyone."
With much of the nation's focus on skyrocketing Affordable Care Act costs, the Trump administration recently announced a Medicare Part B premium increase of nearly 10% for next year—an amount that will swallow a significant chunk of Social Security recipients' already paltry cost-of-living boost.
The monthly premium for recipients of Medicare Part B, the insurance portion of the program, will be $202.90 next year—a $17.90 increase compared to 2025. The increase will push the monthly premium above $200 for the first time in the program's history.
Jeanne Lambrew, director of healthcare reform at The Century Foundation, wrote in an analysis last week that the $17.90-per-month Medicare premium increase will effectively wipe out 33% of next year's Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), which was 2.8%—or $53.76 monthly.
"This is the greatest erosion of the COLA in nearly a decade," Lambrew observed. "The Medicare premium increase is the highest in four years, the projected employer-sponsored insurance increase is the highest in fifteen years, and the health insurance marketplace premium increase for 2026 is the highest out-of-pocket cost increase for all types of coverage in history."
To proponents of Medicare for All—a proposal that would provide comprehensive health coverage to everyone in the US for free at the point of service, for a lower overall cost than the status quo—rising premiums across the for-profit US healthcare system provide yet another reason for urgent, transformational change.
"Medicare shouldn’t have premiums... or copays or deductibles," Michigan US Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed wrote in a social media post on Tuesday. "Medicare should cover vision, dental, and hearing. And Medicare should cover everyone."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), the lead sponsor of the Medicare for All Act in the Senate, bashed Republicans for their willingness to entertain a range of healthcare proposals "except one."
"They will never acknowledge that healthcare is a human right—to be guaranteed to ALL," the senator wrote on Monday, the day President Donald Trump was expected to unveil a patchwork healthcare proposal aimed at averting an Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidy disaster of the GOP's making.
But the White House postponed the rollout as the plan—which reportedly would have extended the ACA tax credits for two years while imposing new limits on the program—faced pushback from Republicans on Capitol Hill. The president's proposal also reportedly included a scheme to push Americans into higher-deductible plans.
"Trump, facing collapsing polling and a potential riot-inducing scenario on health insurance, might have backed off temporarily on the longstanding Republican tendency to ruin the healthcare system so rich people can have more tax cuts," The American Prospect's David Dayen and Ryan Cooper wrote Tuesday. "But he’s still ruining the healthcare system, make no mistake, just a bit more stealthily. This has always been the GOP approach to healthcare, and it’s not going anywhere."
"TikTok must make its platform safe for children and young people to socialize, learn and access information and not be harmed."
A group of digital activists is set to deliver a message to social media giant TikTok on Tuesday to clean up its "toxic and addictive" business model.
The petition, which has more than 170,000 signatures and is being circulated by human rights watchdog Amnesty International, will be delivered to TikTok's office in Dublin, Ireland by activists Mary Kate Harten and Trinity Kendi of Ireland; Abril Perazzini of Argentina; and Noe Hamon of France.
In the petition, Amnesty accuses TikTok of becoming "a space that is more and more toxic and addictive," and can potentially harm the "self-image, mental health, well-being of younger users."
Amnesty International campaigner Zahra Asif Razvi said that the petition is demanding that TikTok completely redo its business model to be built around user safety.
"These signatures represent a global demand for TikTok to replace its current business model of an app that is addictive by design with one that is safe by design," she said. "TikTok must make its platform safe for children and young people to socialize, learn and access information and not be harmed."
The human rights group says that its own research released last month shows that TikTok prioritizes user engagement over safety, and will often send young users to videos featuring "depression, self-harm and suicide content" on its platform.
Lisa Dittmer, Amnesty International's researcher on children and young people's digital rights, explained that teen users who express interest in content related to mental health can be pulled into "toxic rabbit holes" that glorify self-harm.
"Within just three to four hours of engaging with TikTok’s ‘For You’ feed, teenage test accounts were exposed to videos that romanticized suicide or showed young people expressing intentions to end their lives, including information on suicide methods," she explained. "The testimonies of young people and bereaved parents in France reveal how TikTok normalized and exacerbated self-harm and suicidal ideation up to the point of recommending content on 'suicide challenges.'"
Amnesty's petition comes one week after the American Psychological Association (APA) published research that accumulated data collected in more than 70 other studies and found that excessive use of short-form video apps such as TikTok and Instagram "is associated with poorer cognitive and mental health in both youths and adults."
The research's findings were particularly troublesome concerning the impacts on young people's cognitive development, as they found that "repeated exposure to highly stimulating, fast-paced content may contribute to habituation, in which users become desensitized to slower, more effortful cognitive tasks such as reading, problem solving, or deep learning."
The APA's study found that having the ability to swipe away from videos that don't offer instant gratification "could support a pattern of rapid disengagement from stimuli that do not provide immediate novelty or excitement," and thus "may diminish attentional control and reduce the capacity for sustained cognitive engagement, as cognitive processing becomes increasingly oriented toward brief, high-reward interactions rather than extended, goal-directed tasks."
"What's next, 'Russell Vought Tells CFPB Examiners to Serve Tea to Their Wall Street Masters in Tiny French Maid Aprons'?"
“Why is Russell Vought showing the world his weird, creepy pledge of allegiance to big corporations? Have some dignity, Russell."
That's what Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Union member Alexis Goldstein said on Monday about the CFPB acting director's new "humility pledge" that examiners with the agency's Supervision Division will be forced to read to financial institutions before conducting reviews next year.
Several other CFPB Union members joined Goldstein in blasting Vought's pledge, including treasurer Gabe Hopkins, who said that "whoever wrote this has never even spoken to an examiner before, only been wined and dined by industry lobbyists."
The lengthy pledge states in part that the CFPB's "goal is to work collaboratively with the entities to review entities' processes
for compliance and/or remedy existing problems," and the agency "is doing so by encouraging self-reporting and resolving issues in Supervision, where feasible, instead of via Enforcement."
CFPB Union president Cat Farman inquired: "Is this fan fiction I'm reading? What's next, 'Russell Vought Tells CFPB Examiners to Serve Tea to Their Wall Street Masters in Tiny French Maid Aprons'?"
"Instead of traumatizing CFPB workers with his roleplay fantasies," Farman argued, "Vought should resign so we can finally do our jobs protecting Americans from Wall Street fraud again."
CFPB Workers don’t consent to Vought’s creepy “Humility Pledge” fantasy. nteu335.org/2025/11/24/c...
[image or embed]
— CFPB Union (@nteu335.bsky.social) November 24, 2025 at 11:17 AM
Vought—also the Senate-confirmed director of the Office of Management and Budget, a role he previously held during President Donald Trump's first term—has unsuccessfully tried to shutter the CFPB completely this year.
As the New York Times reported Monday:
The new pledge is, for now, mostly symbolic. Mr. Vought halted nearly all work at the bureau shortly after his arrival in February, and bank examinations have not resumed. The agency's hundreds of examiners have been told to spend their time closing out all open matters; they are currently barred from initiating new ones.
And Mr. Vought has refused to request money for the consumer bureau from the Federal Reserve, which funds its operations. The bureau warned in court filings that it would run out of operating cash early next year.
In a Friday statement announcing the pledge, the Vought-led agency claimed that under the Biden administration, the Supervision Division "was the weaponized arm of the CFPB."
The agency added that "where these exams were previously done with unnecessary personnel, outrageous travel expenses, and with the thuggery pervasive in prior leadership, they will now be done respectfully, promptly, professionally, and under budget."
Given that Vought "stopped all supervision exams in 2025, refuses to fund CFPB, and says he's shutting us down by 2026," CFPB Union member Doug Wilson asked: "So how will we supervise banks in 2026 if CFPB is closed? How can bank exams be 'under budget' if there is no budget?"
Ripping Vought's pledge and press release as "incredibly disrespectful to Supervision's dedicated workers," fellow CFPB Union member Tyler Creighton said that the pair of documents also "misunderstands or misconstrues Supervision's prior work."
"Supervision's workers have always conducted examinations professionally, efficiently, conscientiously, and with a focus on remedying consumer harm," Creighton said. "We will continue to do so as soon as Donald Trump and Vought end their 10-month suspension of examinations and let us get back to work for the American people."
Another CFPB Union member, Steve Wheeler, highlighted that "they're trying to make it sound like it’s groundbreaking to send notifications of exams ahead of time and keep data pulls relevant to the examined area, when those are things we already do."
Originally proposed by now-Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), the CFPB was created in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis via the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signed in 2010 by then-President Barack Obama.
Warren joined the CFPB Union members in calling out the new pledge, declaring that "Donald Trump is Wall Street first."
Union member Ravisha "Avi" Kumar pointed out that "under previous administrations, CFPB examiners protected consumers from banks, like Wells Fargo, that incentivized their employees to cut corners and overlook consumer harm. CFPB forced the banks to return that stolen money to consumers."
"Ironically, under this administration, Vought says he will incentivize examiners to rush jobs (cut corners) and stick to the surface (overlook consumer harm)," Kumar added. "How is that still consumer financial protection?"
The pledge announcement came a day after CFPB officials told staff that much of the agency workforce will be furloughed at the end of the year and that remaining consumer litigation will be sent to the US Department of Justice (DOJ).
"This is Russ Vought's latest illegal power grab in his ongoing plan to shut down the CFPB and protect CEOs instead of consumers," said Farman. "CFPB attorneys are afraid DOJ will dismiss these cases."
"Vought's already helped Wall Street swindle $18 billion from Americans this year," the union leader continued. "If Vought is going to keep refusing to fund CFPB in order to illegally dismantle the agency, while he wastes over $5 million of CFPB's dwindling budget on personal bodyguards, then it's time for Congress to impeach and remove Russell Vought from power."