October, 08 2009, 02:45pm EDT
Laser Uranium Enrichment Undermines US Nuclear Non-Proliferation Efforts
WASHINGTON
Experts last week warned that a
proposed uranium enrichment nuclear facility in Wilmington,
NC would undermine U.S. efforts to prevent the spread
of nuclear weapons and materials in other countries.
In a letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the experts
noted that the planned Global Laser Enrichment Commercial Facility would
complicate diplomatic efforts to discourage the use of this technology in other
countries. They explained that, "Should
the United States be seen to embrace the use of laser isotope enrichment as a
commercially viable technology, there can be little question that other states
will be strongly encouraged to follow this lead and develop such technology for
their own use," and that, "Given the great difficulty of detecting laser isotope enrichment
facilities, their spread could undermine U.S. nonproliferation efforts and the
ability of the International Atomic Energy Agency to confirm the absence of
undeclared nuclear activities in nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT)
non-nuclear-weapon states."
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering a license request
by General Electric-Hitachi for its planned Global Laser Enrichment Commercial
Facility.
Laser technology would be used as an alternative to centrifuge or
gaseous diffusion to enrich uranium for nuclear fuel. The use of this
uranium enrichment technology could detract from U.S. and international security
efforts to detect and monitor nuclear programs worldwide as global interest in
nuclear power grows. If enriched to a concentration of 20% uranium 235 or
higher, enriched uranium can be used to make nuclear weapons.
A covert enrichment facility using laser technology would be harder to
detect because it would use less energy and be of smaller size, and thereby be
easier to hide.
A laser uranium research program in Iran escaped detection in
2002. Another laser enrichment research experiment was also detected in South Korea
in 2004 after several years. The discovery of undeclared centrifuges
enrichment facilities in Iran, at Natanz in 2002 and more recently at Qom,
underscore the importance of being able to detect covert facilities that could
be used to make nuclear weapons-usable material.
The full text of the letter is below and available
online. The attachments referred to in the letter are "Nuclear
Power, Disarmament and Technological Restraint" by James Acton, Survival, Vol 51 No. 4, August-September
2009, pp.101-126, and "Laser Enrichment: Separation Anxiety," by
Jack Boureston and Charles D. Ferguson,
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 61, no. 2, March-
April 2005, pp. 14-18, available
online.
September 30, 2009
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington,
DC
Dear Members of the Commission:
We believe the potential demonstration effect on other states from
licensing the General Electric-Hitachi Global Laser Enrichment Commercial
Facility (Docket No. 70-7016) in Wilmington,
North Carolina raises significant
proliferation issues. Should the United States be seen to embrace the use
of laser isotope enrichment as a commercially viable technology, there can be
little question that other states will be strongly encouraged to follow this
lead and develop such technology for their own use. Given the great
difficulty of detecting laser isotope enrichment facilities, their spread could
undermine U.S.
nonproliferation efforts and the ability of the International Atomic Energy
Agency to confirm the absence of undeclared nuclear activities in nuclear
Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) non-nuclear-weapon states. The rationale
for such concerns is set forth in greater detail in the attached articles by
two of the signers.
Accordingly, we request (1) that the Commission makes the potential of
this facility to contribute to the spread of laser isotope enrichment
technology-and thus to the increased risk of nuclear
proliferation-an explicit factor in its decision, and (2) that the
Commission prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement on the
licensing of laser isotope separation facilities that includes specific
consideration of the demonstration effect of such U.S. action on international
proliferation risks.
Dr. James Acton, Nonproliferation Associate
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
David Albright, President
Institute for Science and International Security
Thomas B. Cochran, Senior Scientist,
Natural Resources Defense Council
Dr. Charles Ferguson, Senior Fellow for Science and Technology
Council on Foreign Relations
John Isaacs, Executive
Director
Council for a Livable World
Daryl Kimball, Executive Director
Arms Control Association
Miles A. Pomper, Senior
Research Associate
James Martin
Center for
Nonproliferation Studies
Monterey Institute of International Studies
Leonard S. Spector, Deputy Director
James
Martin Center
for Nonproliferation Studies
Monterey Institute of International Studies
*Institutional affiliations are for identification purposes only
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation is a Washington, D.C.-based 501(c)3 non-profit, non-partisan research organization dedicated to enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century. The Center is funded by grants from private foundations and the generosity of thousands of individual donors.
LATEST NEWS
'The Billionaire Bailout': FDIC Chair Says the Biggest Deposit Accounts at SVB Held $13 Billion
"The bailout really did protect billionaires from taking a modest haircut," one observer wrote in response to the FDIC chief.
Mar 28, 2023
In prepared testimony for a Senate Banking Committee hearing slated for Tuesday morning, the chair of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation reveals that the 10 largest deposit accounts at Silicon Valley Bank held a combined $13.3 billion, a detail that's likely to intensify criticism of federal regulators' intervention in the firm's recent collapse.
When SVB was spiraling earlier this month, the FDIC, Treasury Department, and Federal Reserve rushed in to backstop the financial system and make all depositors at the California bank whole, including those with accounts over $250,000—the total amount typically covered by FDIC insurance.
"At SVB, the depositors protected by the guarantee of uninsured depositors included not only small and mid-size business customers but also customers with very large account balances," FDIC chief Martin Gruenberg writes in his prepared testimony. "The ten largest deposit accounts at SVB held $13.3 billion, in the aggregate."
Gruenberg goes on to estimate that the FDIC's $125 billion Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF)—which is financed primarily by assessments on insured banks and "backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government"—took a $20 billion hit as a result of the SVB intervention.
According to Gruenberg, nearly 90%—$18 billion—of the DIF loss stemming from SVB is "attributable to the cost of covering uninsured deposits." He added that the DIF absorbed a roughly $1.6 billion cost to cover uninsured deposits at Signature Bank, which failed shortly after SVB.
The FDIC chair's testimony comes as federal regulators continue to face scrutiny for glaring oversight failures in the lead-up to the collapse and backlash over the emergency response, which many have characterized as a bailout for the wealthy and well-connected given SVB's role as a major lender to venture capital and tech startups.
Billionaire Peter Thiel, whose firm was accused of helping spark a bank run by advising clients to pull their money from SVB, told the Financial Times that he had $50 million in a personal account at the bank when it failed earlier this month.
"The bailout really did protect billionaires from taking a modest haircut," Matt Stoller of the American Economic Liberties Project tweeted in response to Gruenberg's testimony.
Writing for The American Prospect on Monday, Revolving Door Project researcher Dylan Gyauch-Lewis called the federal government's swift action in the wake of SVB's failure "a good illustration of the enormous class bias in American policymaking."
"As soon as corporations and the wealthy run into trouble, elites trip over themselves, discarding both law and precedent, to rescue them," Gyauch-Lewis wrote, noting that federal regulators had to classify SVB's collapse as a "systemic risk" to the financial system—a disputed characterization—in order to legally guarantee deposits over $250,000.
For contrast, Gyauch-Lewis added, "consider student loan forgiveness. The legal justification is clear as day, and the authority itself is used regularly. According to the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003, the Education Department can forgive student loans as it sees fit in a national emergency."
"At bottom, the core reason SVB's depositors got bailed out had little to do with morals or even financial risk," Gyauch-Lewis argued. "It happened because they had rich and powerful friends with the ear of the president's chief of staff. Broke students don't. The students have to organize and campaign for decades to get something far worse than what they wanted, and for that to hang in the balance at the Supreme Court. The SVB depositors just had to whine on Twitter and make a few calls."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Tlaib Leads Call for $1.2 Billion in Humanitarian Aid for War-Torn Yemen
"Without a significant increase in American assistance... we fear that 2023 will be a heartbreakingly deadly year for everyday Yemenis," Tlaib and 23 other House Democrats wrote.
Mar 27, 2023
U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib on Monday led two dozen House Democrats in urging Congress to allocate at least $1.2 billion in humanitarian aid for Yemen—whose people have suffered eight years of U.S.-backed Saudi war—in next year's budget.
"As we approach the 8th anniversary of the Yemen war, the country remains stuck in a devastating cycle of conflict and humanitarian crisis that has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives," Tlaib (D-Mich.) and 23 other lawmakers wrote in a letter to House Subcommittee on State and Foreign Relations Chair Mario Díaz-Balart (R-Fla.) and Ranking Member Barbara Lee (D-Calif.).
"Yemen has the grim title of the world's worst humanitarian crisis, with over 4 million Yemenis displaced and an estimated 80% of the country's 30 million people reliant upon some form of assistance for their survival," the letter, which was first sent last week, asserts.
The letter's authors lament that "international appeals for assistance for Yemen have consistently [fallen] short of their goals by large margins" and that "the continuous reduction in funding has greatly exacerbated the humanitarian suffering."
The United Nations "has had to close over 75% of its lifesaving programs, and the World Food Program has been forced to cut or reduce food distribution to 8 million people, increasing the number of areas at risk of famine," the letter notes.
"Without a significant increase in American assistance (which we believe would incentivize foreign nations to increase their support in turn), we fear that 2023 will be a heartbreakingly deadly year for everyday Yemenis," the signers assert.
The lawmakers urge Congress to include at least $1.2 billion "for humanitarian relief and reconstruction efforts in Yemen" in the budget for fiscal year 2024. They also ask the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development "to develop programming that directly invests in sustainably developing long-term economic opportunities for Yemenis."
Tlaib is one of four dozen bipartisan House lawmakers who last June introduced a War Powers Resolution to end "unauthorized" United States military involvement in the Saudi-led intervention in Yemen's civil war.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), along with Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), introduced a similar measure in the Senate. Last December, Sanders withdrew the resolution just before it was slated for a floor vote, while vowing to work with the Biden administration on ending U.S. involvement in the war.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Aren't You Guys Tired of Covering This?' Illinois Mass Shooting Survivor Speaks Out in Nashville
"How is this still happening? Why are our children still dying and why are we failing them?"
Mar 27, 2023
A gun control activist who survived last year's massacre at an Illinois July 4th parade spoke out at a police press conference on Monday's mass shooting at a Nashville elementary school to make an impassioned plea for gun control legislation.
"Aren't you guys tired of covering this? Aren't you guys tired of being here and having to cover all these mass shootings?" asked Ashbey Beasley. "I'm from Highland Park, Illinois. My son and I survived a mass shooting over the summer. I am in Tennessee on a family vacation with my son visiting my sister-in-law."
Beasley's comments came as TV news crews were wrapping up coverage of a Metro Nashville Police press conference after authorities announced the murder of six people—three staff members and three 9-year-old children—at the Covenant School by a 28-year-old former student armed with two semi-automatic rifles and a handgun.
"I have been lobbying in D.C. since we survived a mass shooting in July," Beasley continued. "I have met with over 130 lawmakers. How is this still happening? Why are our children still dying and why are we failing them?"
"We have to do something. We all have to call our lawmakers and we all have to make our lawmakers make change now," she added. "Or this is gonna keep happening and it's gonna be your kid, and your kid, and your kid, and your kid next."
In a separate interview on CNN, Beasley said that "this is just unacceptable. It's only in America can somebody survive a mass shooting and then go on vacation to visit another person they met through fighting for gun safety and find themselves near another mass shooting."
"Only in America does this happen where we keep seeing this again and again and again," she added, calling for stricter background checks on gun buyers and a ban on assault-style semi-automatic weapons.
Common Dreamsrecently reported on Jackie Matthews, a student during both the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Newtown, Connecticut and the February Michigan State shooting.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular
SUPPORT OUR WORK.
We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100%
reader supported.
reader supported.