February, 03 2009, 02:30pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Jenny Powers, NRDC, 212-727-4566
Toxic Chromium Clean-Up Battle in Jersey City Heads to Federal Court
Lawsuit Against PPG Follows Successful $400 Million Case Against Honeywell
WASHINGTON
After 25 years of negligence, the largest remaining Jersey City
site riddled with cancer-causing hexavalent chromium is the focus of a
citizen's lawsuit filed today by the Natural Resources Defense Council
(NRDC) and the Interfaith Community Organization (ICO). The suit calls
for PPG Industries, a Pittsburgh-based corporation responsible for the
toxic contamination, to clean up the 16.6-acre site and surrounding
contaminated areas located in a densely populated area along Garfield
Avenue.
NRDC and ICO filed the
lawsuit today in federal district court in Newark under the citizens'
suit provisions of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA). This lawsuit comes on the heels of a recent ICO win that
forced Honeywell International Corporation to commit $400 million to
clean up a 34-acre Jersey City site, where the company's predecessors
dumped the same toxic chromium waste.
lawsuit today in federal district court in Newark under the citizens'
suit provisions of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA). This lawsuit comes on the heels of a recent ICO win that
forced Honeywell International Corporation to commit $400 million to
clean up a 34-acre Jersey City site, where the company's predecessors
dumped the same toxic chromium waste.
"After
25 years of stalling, it's time for PPG to take responsibility and
clean up this toxic mess," said Nancy Marks, NRDC senior attorney.
"For a quarter of a century, PPG has knowingly endangered the health of
countless residents, commuters and school children, who pass by this
contaminated site every day. The Garfield Avenue community has been
poisoned by indifference. This willful negligence must end."
25 years of stalling, it's time for PPG to take responsibility and
clean up this toxic mess," said Nancy Marks, NRDC senior attorney.
"For a quarter of a century, PPG has knowingly endangered the health of
countless residents, commuters and school children, who pass by this
contaminated site every day. The Garfield Avenue community has been
poisoned by indifference. This willful negligence must end."
PPG
first began investigating the chromium contamination in 1982. The New
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) began enforcement
efforts at the PPG complex soon thereafter, and in 1990 reached an
agreement requiring PPG to clean up dozens of sites the DEP believed
they had contaminated. Those clean-up efforts should have been
completed by the late 1990s, but PPG has yet to engage in the chromium
removal project and the DEP has failed to enforce a clean-up.
first began investigating the chromium contamination in 1982. The New
Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) began enforcement
efforts at the PPG complex soon thereafter, and in 1990 reached an
agreement requiring PPG to clean up dozens of sites the DEP believed
they had contaminated. Those clean-up efforts should have been
completed by the late 1990s, but PPG has yet to engage in the chromium
removal project and the DEP has failed to enforce a clean-up.
"We've
tried everything else," said Ellen Wright, a leader of ICO who has
lived in the area of the former PPG complex for 43 years. "We've asked
every governor and every Department of Environmental Protection
commissioner since 1989 to get this site cleaned up. We've asked PPG
Industries directly to clean up the wasteland they created and protect
the health of the people who live and work in this community. But so
far none of the people with the power to clean up this site have been
able to feel the same sense of urgency that I feel living blocks away
from it. So ICO and NRDC are asking the federal court to get the job
done."
tried everything else," said Ellen Wright, a leader of ICO who has
lived in the area of the former PPG complex for 43 years. "We've asked
every governor and every Department of Environmental Protection
commissioner since 1989 to get this site cleaned up. We've asked PPG
Industries directly to clean up the wasteland they created and protect
the health of the people who live and work in this community. But so
far none of the people with the power to clean up this site have been
able to feel the same sense of urgency that I feel living blocks away
from it. So ICO and NRDC are asking the federal court to get the job
done."
A byproduct of the
chromate chemical production facility housed on the site 50 years ago,
hexavalent chromium is toxic to humans and animals. PPG itself sampled
soil and groundwater and reported elevated levels - some more than
2,500 times the state clean-up standard - of the toxic chemical
throughout the site. Tests also reveal that chromium contamination has
migrated off the site to surrounding areas, including inside homes, and
schools in the densely populated African American and Latino community.
It will continue to spread until the site is cleaned up.
chromate chemical production facility housed on the site 50 years ago,
hexavalent chromium is toxic to humans and animals. PPG itself sampled
soil and groundwater and reported elevated levels - some more than
2,500 times the state clean-up standard - of the toxic chemical
throughout the site. Tests also reveal that chromium contamination has
migrated off the site to surrounding areas, including inside homes, and
schools in the densely populated African American and Latino community.
It will continue to spread until the site is cleaned up.
"This
is a community like any other, where people live, work and raise
families," Al Huang, NRDC environmental justice director. "Polluters
should not be allowed to treat it like a toxic waste dump. Instead PPG
should begin an immediate clean-up, which will not only protect
people's health, but also create jobs in this burdened neighborhood."
is a community like any other, where people live, work and raise
families," Al Huang, NRDC environmental justice director. "Polluters
should not be allowed to treat it like a toxic waste dump. Instead PPG
should begin an immediate clean-up, which will not only protect
people's health, but also create jobs in this burdened neighborhood."
Exposure
to this type of chromium has been found, in human and animal studies,
to cause cancer, respiratory problems, kidney and liver damage,
chromium ulcers, and nasal septum perforations, as well as pregnancy
and delivery complications for women. A study found that Jersey City
residents living closer to contaminated sites have significantly higher
incidence of lung cancer than those who live further away.
to this type of chromium has been found, in human and animal studies,
to cause cancer, respiratory problems, kidney and liver damage,
chromium ulcers, and nasal septum perforations, as well as pregnancy
and delivery complications for women. A study found that Jersey City
residents living closer to contaminated sites have significantly higher
incidence of lung cancer than those who live further away.
"Hexavalent
chromium is an extremely dangerous chemical and should not be allowed
anywhere near a residential neighborhood," said Jennifer Sass, NRDC
senior scientist. "The fact that many people in this community have
been exposed to it for their entire lives is reckless and unnecessary.
PPG must do the right thing and completely, promptly and permanently
remove this toxic chemical from the community."
chromium is an extremely dangerous chemical and should not be allowed
anywhere near a residential neighborhood," said Jennifer Sass, NRDC
senior scientist. "The fact that many people in this community have
been exposed to it for their entire lives is reckless and unnecessary.
PPG must do the right thing and completely, promptly and permanently
remove this toxic chemical from the community."
NRDC works to safeguard the earth--its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. We combine the power of more than three million members and online activists with the expertise of some 700 scientists, lawyers, and policy advocates across the globe to ensure the rights of all people to the air, the water, and the wild.
(212) 727-2700LATEST NEWS
Biden National Security Adviser Among Those Crafting 'Project 2029' Policy Agenda for Democrats
"Jake Sullivan's been a critical decision-maker in every Democratic catastrophe of the last decade," said one observer. "Why is he still in the inner circle?"
Jun 30, 2025
Amid the latest battle over the direction the Democratic Party should move in, a number of strategists and political advisers from across the center-left's ideological spectrum are assembling a committee to determine the policy agenda they hope will be taken up by a Democratic successor to President Donald Trump.
Some of the names on the list of people crafting the agenda—named Project 2029, an echo of the far-right Project 2025 blueprint Trump is currently enacting—left progressives with deepened concerns that party insiders have "learnt nothing" and "forgotten nothing" from the president's electoral victories against centrist Democratic candidates over the past decade, as one economist said.
The project is being assembled by former Democratic speechwriter Andrei Cherny, now co-founder of the policy journal Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, and includes Jake Sullivan, a former national security adviser under the Biden administration; Jim Kessler, founder of the centrist think tank Third Way; and Neera Tanden, president of the Center for American Progress and longtime adviser to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Progressives on the advisory board for the project include economist Justin Wolfers and former Roosevelt Institute president Felicia Wong, but antitrust expert Hal Singer said any policy agenda aimed at securing a Democratic victory in the 2028 election "needs way more progressives."
As The New York Times noted in its reporting on Project 2029, the panel is being convened amid extensive infighting regarding how the Democratic Party can win back control of the White House and Congress.
After democratic socialist and state Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani's (D-36) surprise win against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo last week in New York City's mayoral primary election—following a campaign with a clear-eyed focus on making childcare, rent, public transit, and groceries more affordable—New York City has emerged as a battleground in the fight. Influential Democrats including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) have so far refused to endorse him and attacked him for his unequivocal support for Palestinian rights.
Progressives have called on party leaders to back Mamdani, pointing to his popularity with young voters, and accept that his clear message about making life more affordable for working families resonated with Democratic constituents.
But speaking to the Times, Democratic pollster Celinda Lake exemplified how many of the party's strategists have insisted that candidates only need to package their messages to voters differently—not change the messages to match the political priorities of Mamdani and other popular progressives like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).
"We didn't lack policies," Lake told the Times of recent national elections. "But we lacked a functioning narrative to communicate those policies."
Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have drawn crowds of thousands in red districts this year at Sanders' Fighting Oligarchy rallies—another sign, progressives say, that voters are responding to politicians who focus on billionaires' outsized control over the U.S. political system and on economic justice.
Project 2029's inclusion of strategists like Kessler, who declared economic populism "a dead end for Democrats" in 2013, demonstrates "the whole problem [with Democratic leadership] in a nutshell," said Jonathan Cohn of Progressive Mass—as does Sullivan's seat on the advisory board.
As national security adviser to President Joe Biden, Sullivan played a key role in the administration's defense and funding of Israel's assault on Gaza, which international experts and human rights groups have said is a genocide.
"Jake Sullivan's been a critical decision-maker in every Democratic catastrophe of the last decade: Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign, the withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Israel/Gaza War, and the 2024 Joe Biden campaign," said Nick Field of the Pennsylvania Capital-Star. "Why is he still in the inner circle?"
"Jake Sullivan is shaping domestic policy for the next Democratic administration," he added. "Who is happy with the Biden foreign policy legacy?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Rick Scott Pushes Amendment to GOP Budget Bill That Could Kick Millions More Off Medicaid
Scott's proposal for more draconian cuts has renewed scrutiny regarding his past as a hospital executive, where he oversaw the "largest government fraud settlement ever," which included stealing from Medicaid.
Jun 30, 2025
Sen. Rick Scott has introduced an amendment to the Republican budget bill that would slash another $313 million from Medicaid and kick off millions more recipients.
The latest analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found that 17 million people could lose their health insurance by 2034 as the result of the bill as it already exists.
According to a preliminary estimate by the Democrats on the Joint Congressional Economic Committee, that number could balloon up to anywhere from 20 to 29 million if Scott's (R-Fla.) amendment passes.
The amendment will be voted on as part of the Senate's vote-a-rama, which is expected to run deep into Monday night and possibly into Tuesday morning.
"If Sen. Rick Scott's amendment gets put forward, this would be a self-inflicted healthcare crisis," said Tahra Hoops, director of economic analysis at Chamber of Progress.
The existing GOP reconciliation package contains onerous new restrictions, including new work requirements and administrative hurdles, that will make it harder for poor recipients to claim Medicaid benefits.
Scott's amendment targets funding for the program by ending the federal government's 90% cost sharing for recipients who join Medicaid after 2030. Those who enroll after that date would have their medical care reimbursed by the federal government at a lower rate of 50%.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) introduced the increased rate in 2010 to incentivize states to expand Medicaid, allowing more people to be covered.
Scott has said his program would "grandfather" in those who had already been receiving the 90% reimbursement rate.
However, Medicaid is run through the states, which will have to spend more money to keep covering those who need the program after 2030.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimated that this provision "would shift an additional $93 billion in federal Medicaid funding to states from 2031 through 2034 on top of the cuts already in the Senate bill."
This will almost certainly result in states having to cut back, by introducing their stricter requirements or paperwork hurdles.
Additionally, nine states have "trigger laws" that are set to end the program immediately if the federal matching rate is reduced: Arizona, Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Utah, and Virginia.
The Joint Congressional Economic Committee estimated Tuesday that around 2.5 million more people will lose their insurance as a result of those cuts.
If all the states with statutory Medicaid expansion ended it as a result of Scott's cuts, as many as 12.5 million could lose their insurance. Combined with the rest of the bill, that's potentially 29 million people losing health insurance coverage, the committee said.
A chart shows how many people are estimated to lose healthcare coverage with each possible version of the GOP bill.(Chart: Congressional Joint Economic Committee Democrats)
There are enough Republicans in the Senate to pass the bill with Scott's amendment. However, they can afford no more than three defections. According to Politico, Sens. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) have signaled they will vote against the amendment.
Sen. Jim Justice (R-W.V.) also said he'd "have a hard time" voting yes on the bill if Scott's amendment passed. His state of West Virginia has the second-highest rate of people using federal medical assistance of any state in the country, behind only Mississippi.
Critics have called out Scott for lying to justify this line of cuts. In a recent Fox News appearance, Scott claimed that his new restrictions were necessary to stop Democrats who want to "give illegal aliens Medicaid benefits," even though they are not eligible for the program.
Scott's proposal has also brought renewed scrutiny to his past as a healthcare executive.
"Ironically enough, some of the claims against Scott's old hospital company revolved around exploiting Medicaid, and billing for services that patients didn't need," wrote Andrew Perez in Rolling Stone Monday.
In 2000, Scott's hospital company, HCA, was forced to pay $840 million in fines, penalties, and damages to resolve claims of unlawful billing practices in what was called the "largest government fraud settlement ever." Among the charges were that during Scott's tenure, the company overbilled Medicare and Medicaid by pretending patients were sicker than they actually were.
The company entered an additional settlement in 2003, paying out another $631 million to compensate for the money stolen from these and other government programs.
Scott himself was never criminally charged, but resigned in 1997 as the Department of Justice began to probe his company's activities. Despite the scandal, Scott not only became a U.S. senator, but is the wealthiest man in Congress, with a net worth of more than half a billion dollars.
The irony of this was not lost on Perez, who wrote: "A few decades later, Scott is now trying to extract a huge amount of money from state Medicaid funds to help finance Trump's latest round of tax cuts for the rich."
Keep ReadingShow Less
As Historic Heatwave Grips Europe, Coalition Says 'No to a Climate Law for Polluters'
"Will the European Commission propose a climate law that ends fossil fuel use and reflects the E.U.'s fair share of climate responsibility? Or will it choose political convenience?"
Jun 30, 2025
As yet another dangerous heatwave pushes temperatures well into the triple digits across much of Europe, climate defenders on Monday renewed calls for stronger action to combat the planetary emergency—including by ensuring that the impending European Climate Law ends fossil fuel use and eschews false solutions including international carbon offsetting.
Croatia, France, Italy, Portugal, and Spain are among the countries where near- or record-high temperatures have been recorded. Portugal and Spain both recorded their hottest-ever June days over the weekend. El Granado in southwestern Spain saw the mercury soar to nearly 115°C (46°C) on Saturday. The heatwave is expected to continue into the middle of the week, with authorities warning of elevated wildfire risk and potential severe health impacts.
"Extreme heat is no longer a rare event—it has become the new normal," United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres said Sunday on social media. "I'm experiencing it firsthand in Spain during the Financing for Development Conference. The planet is getting hotter and more dangerous—no country is immune. We need more ambitious #ClimateAction now."
On Monday, Real Zero Europe—"a campaign calling on the European Union to deliver real emissions reductions and real solutions to the climate crisis, instead of corporate greenwashed 'net zero' targets"—published a call for an E.U. Climate Law that does not contain provisions for international carbon offsetting, in which countries or corporations compensate for their greenhouse gas emissions by funding projects that reduce emissions in other nations.
🔴 OUT NOW📢 69 NGOs call on the EU to deliver a Climate Law that rejects international carbon offsetting & Carbon Dioxide Removals (#CDR), commits to a full fossil fuel phase-out, and reflects Europe’s fair share of climate responsibility!Read the statement👇www.realzeroeurope.org/resources/st...
[image or embed]
— Real Zero Europe (@realzeroeurope.bsky.social) June 30, 2025 at 2:40 AM
A draft proposal of the legislation published Monday by Politico revealed that the European Commission will allow E.U. member states to outsource climate efforts to Global South nations staring in 2036, despite opposition from the 27-nation bloc's independent scientific advisory board. The outsourcing will enable the E.U. to fund emissions-reducing projects in developing nations and apply those reductions to Europe's own 2040 target—which is a 90% net decrease in greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 levels.
The proposal also embraces carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies like carbon capture and storage, whose scalability is unproven. Climate groups call them false solutions that prolong the fossil fuel era.
"E.U. climate policy stands at a crossroads: Will the European Commission propose a climate law that ends fossil fuel use and reflects the E.U.'s fair share of climate responsibility?" the Real Zero Europe letter says. "Or will it choose political convenience—abandoning that goal under pressure from corporate and populist interests, and turning to risky, unjust carbon offsetting and other false solutions?"
"Taking responsibility for the E.U.'s past and present role in causing the climate crisis means doubling down on a just and full fossil fuel phaseout not hiding behind false solutions as currently proposed," the letter continues. "The law as planned will send a dangerous signal far beyond E.U. borders. The climate and biodiversity crises are already harming people, especially vulnerable communities and populations largely in the Global South, who have least contributed to the climate crisis."
The 69 groups stress that international carbon offsetting "is a smokescreen for giving license to fossil fuel use beyond 2050" that diverts critical resources and public funds from real climate solutions and climate finance."
"Given the scale of climate catastrophe, for the E.U. to allow international offsets and technological CDR gives a lifeline to polluting industries such as the fossil fuel, agribusiness, plastics, and petrochemical industries," the letter states.
"We say no to an E.U. Climate Law that puts polluting industries over people and climate by embracing the use of international offsets and CDR approaches," the letter's signers said. "We call on the Commission to deliver an E.U. Climate Law and its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) to the U.N. climate negotiations that clearly reflects the bloc's responsibility for the climate crisis. That means a full fossil fuel phaseout and a just transition."
This heatwave is brutal. Temperatures above 40°C in June across France, Spain, Italy...We still hear from right-wing politicians that “it’s just summer.” It’s not. This is the climate crisis courtesy of the fossil fuels industry. It’s not normal.
[image or embed]
— European Greens (@europeangreens.eu) June 30, 2025 at 7:01 AM
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk also addressed the European heatwave on Monday, saying that "the climate crisis is a human rights crisis."
"Rising temperatures, rising seas, floods, droughts, and wildfires threaten our rights to life, to health, to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, and much more," he continued. "The heatwave we are currently experiencing here shows us the importance of adaptation measures, without which human rights would be severely impacted."
"It is equally clear that our current production and consumption patterns are unsustainable, and that renewables are the energy source of the future," Türk asserted. "Production capacity for renewables increased five-fold between 2011 and 2023. What we need now is a roadmap that shows us how to rethink our societies, economies and politics in ways that are equitable and sustainable. That is, a just transition."
"This shift requires an end to the production and use of fossil fuels and other environmentally destructive activities across all sectors—from energy to farming to finance to construction and beyond," he added. "This will be one of the greatest transformations our world has ever seen."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular