February, 18 2025, 04:54pm EDT

Billionaire Commerce Nominee Howard Lutnick Simply Too Conflicted to Confirm
Tonight the Senate will hold a final confirmation vote on perhaps the most conflicted Trump cabinet nominee to date, Howard Lutnick. The billionaire nominated to lead the U.S. Commerce Department holds massive interests in cryptocurrency, computer chipmaker Nvidia, and the satellite industry – presenting unavoidable conflicts of interest with the sprawling Department’s oversight, rules, and research of each of these industries. While Lutnick has claimed he would divest from his multi-billion-dollar empire if confirmed, he made no such pledge for his children, who apparently will continue to run it.
“Any vote for the latest billionaire that won’t look out for working families vying to join the Trump cabinet is a vote to create a perfect storm for corruption and self-dealing that will do no favors for everyday American consumers and small businesses. Howard Lutnick has no business overseeing Commerce rules and research involving major industries that his family’s company is deeply invested in – he’s simply too conflicted to confirm. The Senate has an opportunity to send a message that the Trump administration has already exceeded its limit on super-wealthy Wall Street insiders that have no interest in helping working people get ahead,” said Accountable.US Executive Director Tony Carrk.
A VOTE FOR LUTNICK IS A VOTE FOR:
Potential Conflict Of Interest Between Lutnick’s Chinese Business Interests And Commerce Department Role Protecting U.S. Trade:
- Lutnick has developed a reputation as a “China hawk” and gave “full-throated support” for President-elect Trump’s proposed tariffs, including a 60% tariff on goods imported from China, arguing they help protect American industries from foreign competition. Following reports that the President-elect could narrow these tariffs to certain sectors, President-elect Trump doubled down and denied that he was considering “pared-back tariffs,” although universal tariffs could spur “price shocks” and further inflation. Despite Lutnick’s rhetoric and despite the fact that he will lead offices that will be “the tip of the spear in the U.S.-China trade war,” Lutnick’s firms have “profited from ties to China.” This includes financial services company BGC Group, which has “a joint venture in Beijing with Chinese-state owned China Credit Trust” and his firm Cantor Fitzgerald, which has “helped take Chinese firms public” in the U.S. Although Lutnick has claimed that he will divest from these companies and resign from his roles leading them, he remains deeply “entwined” with Cantor Fitzgerald. Dozens of current and former employees and associates told Bloomberg that Lutnick’s “knot of conflicts is unlikely to loosen easily” and his grip on his businesses is “bolted tight.” On top of this, Lutnick appear poised to keep the business close in his family, with his 26-year-old son being listed as the CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald’s latest blank-check company in December 2024.
Potential Conflict Of Interest Between Lutnick’s Interests In Chipmaker Nvidia And Commerce Department Enforcement Of Trade Restrictions Against China:
- In Lutnick’s most recent quarterly filing, his firm Cantor Fitzgerald reported almost $1.2 billion in holdings connected to chipmaker Nvidia, which was Cantor’s second-biggest holding at the time. This investment poses a stark conflict of interest to Lutnick’s potential role leading the Department of Commerce, which is central to enforcing trade restrictions against China and other U.S. competitors.
In January 2025, the Biden Commerce Department unveiled “unprecedented new export controls” on computer chips and other technology in order to slow China’s development of artificial intelligence capabilities. An Nvidia executive directly criticized the policy as an “‘extreme ‘country cap,’” referring to the Commerce Department’s new quotas on sales of AI technology to various countries through which China may circumvent the Biden administration’s existing trade restrictions on advanced chips. Nvidia has also spent at least $240,000 while directly lobbying the Department of Commerce and other federal policymakers on chip trade policy in the first three quarters of 2024 alone.
Potential Conflict Of Interest Between Lutnick’s Cryptocurrency Interests And Commerce Department Oversight Of Crypto-Related Issues:
- Lutnick developed a reputation as a vocal advocate of cryptocurrencies including telling an industry conference that bitcoin, the leading form of crypto, should be traded all over the world “‘without exception and without limitation.” Lutnick has also been called a “key ally” of massive crypto firm Tether, in which his firm Cantor Fitzgerald holds about $600 million and with which Cantor was developing a new $2 billion lending project in November 2024.
Lutnick’s financial interests in cryptocurrency pose a variety of conflicts with his potential role leading the Department of Commerce, which has a significant role in crypto policymaking and in researching crypto technologies.
In 2022, President Biden issued an executive order on digital assets instructing the Secretary of Commerce to establish a framework for “‘enhancing United States competitiveness in, and leveraging of, digital asset technologies.’” President Trump has since replaced this order with a new one directing relevant departments and agencies to recommend digital asset policies that should be “rescinded or modified.”
Additionally, the Commerce department has had a role in crypto policymaking, previously issuing a report on “Responsible Advancement Of U.S. Competitiveness In Digital Assets,” with Secretary Gina Raimondo calling for “‘effective regulatory approaches’” to crypto technologies. Additionally, the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology has multiple advanced projects researching blockchain, the underlying technology for cryptocurrencies.
Potential Conflict Of Interest Between Lutnick’s Satellite Industry Interests And Commerce Department’s Oversight Of Commercial Space Policy:
- The Department of Commerce controls the Office of Space Commerce (OSC), which sets space commerce policy, and the department has various responsibilities that affect the satellite and commercial space industry.
Lutnick and various Cantor Fitzgerald entities were shown to hold about 78 million shares, valued at about $80 million, in space imaging company Satellogic in a November 2024 filing. Cantor Fitzgerald also sponsored Satellogic’s $1.1 billion public launch in 2021, with Lutnick calling the company “‘uniquely positioned to dominate the earth observation industry.’” Although Lutnick resigned from Satellogic’s board following his nomination to be Secretary of Commerce, it does not appear that Cantor has disclosed divesting these shares in Satellogic.
Notably, Satellogic began relocating to the U.S. just last year in order to compete for federal contracts after taking a $30 million strategic investment from massive cryptocurrency firm Tether, in which his firm Cantor Fitzgerald holds about $600 million, which was developing a multi-billion dollar deal with Cantor in November 2024, and for which Lutnick’s son has been an employee.
Lutnick is also “close” to Elon Musk, whose SpaceX and Starlink businesses have direct interests in the Commerce Department’s commercial space policies. SpaceX has made regulatory comments to at least three major Commerce Dept. offices.
Accountable.US is a nonpartisan watchdog that exposes corruption in public life and holds government officials and corporate special interests accountable by bringing their influence and misconduct to light. In doing so, we make way for policies that advance the interests of all Americans, not just the rich and powerful.
LATEST NEWS
Amazon Won't Display Tariff Costs After Trump Whines to Bezos
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said all companies should be "displaying how much tariffs contribute to the total price of products."
Apr 29, 2025
Amazon said Tuesday that it would not display tariff costs next to products on its website after U.S. President Donald Trump called the e-commerce giant's billionaire founder, Jeff Bezos, to complain about the reported plan.
Citing an unnamed person familiar with Amazon's supposed plan, Punchbowl Newsreported that "the shopping site will display how much of an item's cost is derived from tariffs—right next to the product's total listed price."
Many Amazon products come from China. While U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed Sunday that "there is a path" to a tariff deal with the Chinese government, Trump has recently caused global economic alarm by hitting the country with a 145% tax and imposing a 10% minimum for other nations.
According toCNN, which spoke with two senior White House officials on Tuesday, Trump's call to Bezos "came shortly after one of the senior officials phoned the president to inform him of the story" from Punchbowl.
"Of course he was pissed," one officials said of Trump. "Why should a multibillion-dollar company pass off costs to consumers?"
Asked about how the call with Bezos went, Trump told reporters: "Great. Jeff Bezos was very nice. He was terrific. He solved the problem very quickly, and he did the right thing, and he's a good guy."
Earlier Tuesday, during a briefing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called Amazon's reported plan "a hostile and political act," and said that "this is another reason why Americans should buy American."
Leavitt also asked why Amazon didn't have such displays during the Biden administration and held up a printed version of a 2021 Reutersreport about the company's "compliance with the Chinese government edict" to stop allowing customer ratings and reviews in China, allegedly prompted by negative feedback left on a collection President Xi Jinping's speeches and writings.
Asked whether Bezos is "still a Trump supporter," Leavitt said that she "will not speak to" the president's relationship with him.
As CNBCdetailed Tuesday:
Less than two hours after the press briefing, an Amazon spokesperson told CNBC that the company was only ever considering listing tariff charges on some products for Amazon Haul, its budget-focused shopping section.
"The team that runs our ultra low cost Amazon Haul store has considered listing import charges on certain products," the spokesperson said. "This was never a consideration for the main Amazon site and nothing has been implemented on any Amazon properties."
But in a follow-up statement an hour after that one, the spokesperson clarified that the plan to show tariff surcharges was "never approved" and is "not going to happen."
In response to Bloomberg also reporting on Amazon's claim that tariff displays were never under consideration for the company's main site, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wrote on social media Tuesday, "Good move."
Before Amazon publicly killed any plans for showing consumers the costs from Trump's import taxes, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on the chamber's floor Tuesday that companies should be "displaying how much tariffs contribute to the total price of products."
"I urge more companies, particularly national retailers that compete with Amazon, to adopt this practice. If Amazon has the courage to display why prices are going up because of tariffs, so should all of our other national retailers who compete with them. And I am calling on them to do it now," he said.
Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Casar (D-Texas) on Tuesday framed the whole incident as an example of how "Trump has created a government by and for the billionaires," declaring: "If anyone ever doubted that Trump, and Musk, and Bezos, and the billionaires are all [on] one team, just look at what happened at Amazon today. Bezos immediately caved and walked back a plan to tell Americans how much Trump's tariffs are costing them."
Casar also claimed Bezos wants "big tax cuts and sweatheart deals," and pointed to Amazon's Prime Video paying $40 million to license a documentary about the life of First Lady Melania Trump. In addition to the film agreement, Bezos has come under fire for Amazon's $1 million donation to the president's inauguration fund.
As the owner of
The Washington Post, Bezos—the world's second-richest person, after Trump adviser Elon Musk—also faced intense criticism for blocking the newspaper's planned endorsement of the president's 2024 Democratic challenger, Kamala Harris, and demanding its opinion page advocate for "personal liberties and free markets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Medicare for All, Says Sanders, Would Show American People 'Government Is Listening to Them'
"The goal of the current administration and their billionaire buddies is to pile on endless cuts," said one nurse and union leader. "Even on our hardest days, we won't stop fighting for Medicare for All."
Apr 29, 2025
On Tuesday, Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Democratic Reps. Pramila Jayapal of Washington and Debbie Dingell of Michigan reintroduced the Medicare for All Act, re-upping the legislative quest to enact a single-payer healthcare system even as the bill faces little chance of advancing in the GOP-controlled House of Representatives or Senate.
Hundreds of nurses, healthcare providers, and workers from across the country joined the lawmakers for a press conference focused on the bill's reintroduction in front of the Capitol on Tuesday.
"We have the radical idea of putting healthcare dollars into healthcare, not into profiteering or bureaucracy," said Sanders during the press conference. "A simple healthcare system, which is what we are talking about, substantially reduces administrative costs, but it would also make life a lot easier, not just for patients, but for nurses" and other healthcare providers, he continued.
"So let us stand together," Sanders told the crowd. "Let us do what the American people want and let us transform this country. And when we pass Medicare for All, it's not only about improving healthcare for all our people—it's doing something else. It's telling the American people that, finally, the American government is listening to them."
Under Medicare for All, the government would pay for all healthcare services, including dental, vision, prescription drugs, and other care.
"It is a travesty when 85 million people are uninsured or underinsured and millions more are drowning in medical debt in the richest nation on Earth," said Jayapal in a statement on Tuesday.
In 2020, a study in the peer-reviewed medical journal The Lancet found that a single-payer program like Medicare for All would save Americans more than $450 billion and would likely prevent 68,000 deaths every year. That same year, the Congressional Budget Office found that a single-payer system that resembles Medicare for All would yield some $650 billion in savings in 2030.
Members of National Nurses United (NNU), the nation's largest union of registered nurses, were also at the press conference on Tuesday.
In a statement, the group highlighted that the bill comes at a critical time, given GOP-led threats to programs like Medicaid.
"The goal of the current administration and their billionaire buddies is to pile on endless cuts and attacks so that we become too demoralized and overwhelmed to move forward," said Bonnie Castillo, registered nurse and executive director of NNU. "Even on our hardest days, we won't stop fighting for Medicare for All."
Per Sanders' office, the legislation has 104 co-sponsors in the House and 16 in the Senate, which is an increase from the previous Congress.
A poll from Gallup released in 2023 found that 7 in 10 Democrats support a government-run healthcare system. The poll also found that across the political spectrum, 57% of respondents believe the government should ensure all people have healthcare coverage.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Advocates Warn GOP Just Unveiled 'Most Dangerous Higher Ed Bill in US History'
"This is the boldest attempt we've seen in recent history to segregate higher education along racial and class lines," said the Debt Collective.
Apr 29, 2025
At a markup session held by a U.S. House committee on the Republican Party's recently unveiled higher education reform bill Tuesday, one Democratic lawmaker had a succinct description for the legislation.
"This bill is a dream-killer," said Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-Ore.) of the so-called Student Success and Taxpayer Savings Plan, which was introduced by Education and Workforce Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) as part of an effort to find $330 billion in education programs to offset President Donald Trump's tax plan.
Tasked with helping to make $4.5 trillion in tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans possible, Walberg on Monday proposed changes to the Pell Grant program, which has provided financial aid to more than 80 million low-income students since it began in 1972. The bill would allocate more funding to the program but would also reduce the number of students who are eligible for the grants, changing the definition of a "full-time" student to one enrolled in at least 30 semester hours each academic year—up from 12 hours. Students would be cut off from the financial assistance entirely if they are enrolled less than six hours per semester.
David Baime, senior vice president for government relations for the American Association of Community Colleges, suggested the legislation doesn't account for the realities faced by many students who benefit from Pell Grants.
"These students are almost always working a substantial number of hours each week and often have family responsibilities. Pell Grants help them meet the cost of tuition and required fees," Baime toldInside Higher Ed. "We commend the committee for identifying substantial additional resources to help finance Pell, but it should not come at the cost of undermining the ability of low-income working students to enroll at a community college."
The draft bill would also end subsidized loans, which don't accrue interest when a student is still in college and gives borrowers a six-month grace period after graduation, starting in July 2026. More than 30 million borrowers currently have subsidized loans.
The proposal would also reduce the number of student loan repayment options from those offered by the Biden administration to just two, with borrowers given the option for a fixed monthly amount paid over a certain period of time or an income-based plan.
At the markup session on Tuesday, Bonamici pointed to her own experience of paying for college and law school "through a combination of grants and loans and work study and food stamps," and noted that her Republican colleagues on the committee also "graduated from college."
"And more than half of them have gone on to earn advanced degrees," said the congresswoman. "And yet those same individuals who benefited so much from accessing higher education are supporting a bill that will prevent others from doing so."
“In a time when higher ed is being attacked, this bill is another assault,” @RepBonamici calls out committee leaders for wanting to gut financial aid.
“With this bill, they will be taking that opportunity [of higher ed] away from others. This bill is a dream killer.” pic.twitter.com/UjTYvnOEKv
— Student Borrower Protection Center (@theSBPC) April 29, 2025
Democrats on the committee also spoke out against provisions that would cap loans a student can take out for graduate programs at $100,000; the Grad PLUS program has allowed students to borrow up to the cost of attendance.
The Parent PLUS program, which has been found to provide crucial help to Black families accessing higher education, would also be restricted.
"Black students, brown students, first-generation college students, first-generation Americans, will not have access to college," said Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.).
“We cannot take away access to loans, and not replace it with anything else, not make the system better. We know the outcome here—Black, brown, and poor students will not figure it out. Instead, only elite students from the 1% will continue to access education.”@RepSummerLee🙇 pic.twitter.com/oGbRH154Ed
— Student Borrower Protection Center (@theSBPC) April 29, 2025
As the Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC) warned last week, eliminating the Grad PLUS program without also lowering the cost of graduate programs would "subject millions of future borrowers to an unregulated and predatory private student loan market, while doing little to reduce overall student debt and the need to borrow."
Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director for SBPC, told The Hill that the draft bill is "an attack on students and working families with student loan debt."
"We've seen an array of really problematic proposals that are on the table for congressional Republicans," Canchola Bañez said. "Many of these would cause massive spikes for families with monthly student loan payments."
With the proposal, which Republicans hope to pass through reconciliation with a simple majority, the party would be "restructuring higher education for the worse," said the Debt Collective.
"It's the most dangerous higher ed bill in U.S. history," said the student loan borrowers union. "It strips the Department of Education of virtually every authority to cancel student debt. Eliminates every repayment program. Abolishes subsidized loans."
"This is the boldest attempt we've seen in recent history to segregate higher education along racial and class lines," the group added. "We have to push back."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular