SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
For Immediate Release
April, 27 2022, 10:52am EDT
Contact:
Cassidy DiPaola, Fossil Free Media, (401) 441-7196, cassidy@fossilfree.media
Jean Su, Center for Biological Diversity, (415) 770-3187, jsu@biologicaldiversity.org
500 Global Groups Urge Biden to End Fossil Fuel Era in Response to Russia-Ukraine War
Global Push to Accelerate Just Transition to Renewable Energy
WASHINGTON
More than 500 organizations from six continents sent a letter to President Biden and other world leaders today, urging them to speed the end of the fossil fuel era and spur a just and equitable transition to 100% renewable energy. The letter demands an end to the violence and climate chaos sowed by fossil fuels in solidarity with the people of Ukraine and people worldwide affected by the global volatility of oil and gas prices.
The letter states: "Humanity now faces a cascade of emergencies. The Russian military, business and political elites around President Putin are committing brutal crimes in Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine, annihilating basic principles of state sovereignty and undermining democracy. At the same time, the climate crisis is wreaking an "atlas of human suffering". These crises may seem entirely independent, but they share the same dangerous thread: dependence on fossil fuels."
The letter comes two months after Russia began its unlawful, fossil fuel-funded assault on Ukraine and days after the Biden administration made a renewed Earth Day push to confirm its commitment to addressing the climate emergency.
However, this purported commitment clashes with the administration's plans to rapidly expand U.S. fossil gas exports to Europe and restart the federal fossil fuel leasing program.
The letter condemns fossil fuel expansion, and calls for an end to fossil fuel extraction, windfall profits, subsidies and other financial support to the fossil fuel industry. A recent bill from Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse seeks to tax oil and gas companies' excess profits tied to spikes in global fossil fuel prices.
The letter also demands that Biden proliferate safe, distributed, democratic renewable energy systems and energy-efficiency technologies to displace the violent fossil energy system. A recent bill from U.S. Reps.Cori Bush (D-Mo.) and Jason Crow (D-Colo.) would require Biden to use the Defense Production Act to build a renewable energy industrial base to protect communities and achieve energy independence from deadly fossil fuels.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recently released a report confirming the scientific mandate to make rapid and deep cuts in carbon emissions by phasing out all fossil fuels and making transformative shifts toward energy efficiency, renewable energy, and forest and ecosystem conservation. United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres called the report a "file of shame" and warned that current empty pledges put us "firmly on track towards an unlivable world."
Below are statements from leading environment, climate, and frontline organizations:
"The US has shown a good example of how fast the right decisions can be made in times of need by banning fossil fuel imports from Russia after 2 weeks of war. However, because of being unprepared to cover the gap with renewables, now the US is basically looking for new suppliers of fossil fuels to feed itself. Other countries' dependency on coal, oil and gas are enabling Russia to continue its invasion of Ukraine. Creating new dependencies will only lead to more geopolitical and climate crises. I think the US can do better. And it should do better. We want to see the criminal fossil fuel industry end in the closest decade and transition to renewable energy as fast as possible. There should be no place for dirty and harmful energy suppliers in the world we're building." Olha Boiko, coordinator of CAN Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia
"The fossil fuel blood money funding Russia's war machine reveals the link between dirty energy and deadly conflict," said Jean Su, energy justice director at the Center for Biological Diversity. "But instead of working to break this vicious cycle, President Biden is doubling down on fossil fuels with expanded exports and broken-promise federal leasing. The right response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine isn't more drilling, but an energy transformation built on renewables, justice and peace. The good news is that President Biden has the executive tools to break free from fossil fuel oligarchs and turn the U.S. into a renewable-energy powerhouse. The violence of fossil fuels must come to an end to save life on Earth." Jean Su, Energy Justice Program director, Center for Biological Diversity
"Oil and gas infrastructure exposes my community in Freeport, Texas to toxic pollution and fuels the climate emergency hitting the Gulf Coast with worse hurricanes and storm surges. Biden and all world leaders need to transition now to clean, renewable energy to protect the health and wellbeing of Gulf Coast environmental justice communities like mine." Melanie Oldham, Chair, Citizens for Clean Air and Water in Brazoria County
"President Biden is failing to capitalize on an iconic moment in world history to move the U.S and its European allies beyond dependence on fossil fuels and into clean, green renewable energy. Rather than coordinate the transition with Europe, Biden has pivoted to big oil and gas, seeing in them the solution to the problem. But nothing could be further from the truth. An "all-of-the-above" play, like Sen. Manchin proposes, is a recipe for climate catastrophe and shooting well past 1.5 degrees Celsius by continuing reliance on fossil fuels.
Fortunately, Biden still can make a difference, but it will take Europe and our pollution overburden
Fossil Free Media is a nonprofit media lab that supports the movement to end fossil fuels and address the climate emergency.
LATEST NEWS
'Terrible Development': Trump Admin Restricts State Efforts to Help Kids Stay on Medicaid
"The Trump administration will stop at nothing to rip coverage away from American families, even kids they claim they want to protect," said Sen. Ron Wyden.
Jul 18, 2025
The Trump administration on Thursday said it will restrict waivers that have allowed states to keep kids enrolled in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program beyond the 12-month period of continuous coverage required under federal law.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), led by Mehmet Oz, announced the move on Thursday, saying that it has informed states of a "clear shift away from policies that extend beyond statutory limits," specifically restricting Section 1115 waivers that have been sought and approved in dozens of states across the U.S.
"CMS will allow currently approved initiatives to run out their course but does not anticipate extending them nor approving new waivers," the agency said in a statement, which came less than two weeks after President Donald Trump signed into law the largest Medicaid cuts in U.S. history.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, called the CMS announcement a "terrible development" and "yet one more awful example of the Trump administration's obsession with making it as hard as possible for Americans to access the healthcare they are eligible for."
In 2022, Oregon became the first state in the nation to receive federal approval to provide children with continuous Medicaid coverage from birth up to age 6 through a Section 1115 waiver. The policy was described as a "ground-breaking initiative" that would "help infants and young children get off to a healthy start in life without parents having to worry about renewing their Medicaid coverage annually," regardless of temporary changes to family income or other factors.
The CMS announcement points to the Oregon policy without explicitly naming the state. Oregon's federal waiver is set to expire in 2027.
Wyden said Thursday that "the Trump administration will stop at nothing to rip coverage away from American families, even kids they claim they want to protect."
Joan Alker, executive director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families, wrote that "in the name of 'protecting vulnerable Americans,' the Trump administration will rip away Medicaid coverage from babies and toddlers."
👀In the name of “protecting vulnerable Americans” the Trump Administration will rip away Medicaid coverage from babies and toddlers👀
CMS announces Medicaid demos that 8 states are implementing to cover babies and young children continuously w/o gaps will no longer be allowed pic.twitter.com/aXF0mKXL9S
— Joan Alker (@JoanAlker1) July 17, 2025
CMS insisted that the newly announced changes are aimed at protecting Medicaid's finances by ensuring that those who are no longer eligible for the program are removed.
But Amaya Diana, a policy analyst at the health research organization KFF, wrote Thursday that "not everyone who loses coverage at renewal is no longer eligible."
"During the unwinding of the [pandemic-era] Medicaid continuous enrollment provision, seven in 10 Medicaid enrollees who lost coverage were disenrolled for procedural reasons," Diana noted. "While some were no longer eligible, others lost coverage due to barriers such as communication issues."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Eases Pollution Rules for 100+ Facilities, Including Chemical and Coal Plants
"Trump is illegally delaying clean air laws from his desk because polluters make more money when they just dump their toxic chemicals in our air," said one critic.
Jul 18, 2025
Continuing a trend of prioritizing polluters over public health and the planet, U.S. President Donald Trump late Thursday signed a series of proclamations to provide what the Republican called "regulatory relief" to various industries.
While the names of Trump's four proclamations suggest they are intended to promote American "security" regarding energy, chemical manufacturing, iron ore processing, and sterile medical equipment, what they actually do is allow over 100 facilities across the country to not comply with rules put in place under Democratic former President Joe Biden.
A Trump White House fact sheet describes the rules from Biden's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as "burdensome." Meanwhile, environmental and health advocates blasted Trump over his new exemptions for coal-fired power plants, ethylene oxide commercial sterilizers, and facilities that manufacture chemicals and process taconite iron.
"If your family lives downwind of these plants, this is going to mean more toxic chemicals in the air you breathe."
Patrice Simms, vice president of litigation at Earthjustice's Healthy Communities Program, said in a Friday statement that "Trump is illegally delaying clean air laws from his desk because polluters make more money when they just dump their toxic chemicals in our air."
"Trump's action on behalf of big corporate polluters will cause more cancer, more birth defects, and more children to suffer [from] asthma," Simms warned. "The country deserves better."
The proclamation is not the first handout Trump has given the coal industry since returning to office in January. As Earthjustice noted:
In April 2025, the Trump administration exempted 68 coal-fired power plants from pollution limits set in the strengthened MATS rule, even though pollution controls are widely available and already in use. These came after EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin invited corporations to email the agency to request exemptions from clean air standards. Companies were told they could cite "national security" or "lack of available technology" as justification.
John Walke, clean air director for the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council, told The Associated Press that Trump's claims about national security concerns and technology issues were "pretexts" to further enrich large corporations.
"President Trump just signed a literal free pass for polluters," Walke said of the new proclamations. "If your family lives downwind of these plants, this is going to mean more toxic chemicals in the air you breathe."
The AP reported that "in a related development, the EPA said Thursday it will give utility companies an additional year to inspect and report on contamination from toxic coal ash landfills across the country," which Zeldin also called "regulatory relief."
Earthjustice senior counsel Lisa Evans told The New York Times on Thursday that while it may not seem like a lengthy delay, "a year's time is not irrelevant when you are living next to a coal plant."
"It's one more year of hazardous contaminants getting into the groundwater," Evans said. "And the more chemicals that get into the groundwater, the more difficult and expensive it is to remediate."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Doubt CBS Claim That Finances—Not Politics—Are Behind 'Late Show' Cancellation
The network announced the cancellation three days after host Stephen Colbert lambasted its parent company for a $16 million legal settlement with President Donald Trump.
Jul 18, 2025
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren was among those calling into question the official story behind CBS' cancellation of "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" on Thursday—suggesting that the decision to end the show's 32-year run wasn't driven by finances but by "political reasons."
The announcement from CBS executives came just three days after Colbert spoke out on his show about a recent $16 million settlement reached by CBS parent company Paramount over an interview that "60 Minutes" aired with former Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the 2024 election, in which Harris ran against President Donald Trump.
Colbert had told his audience that the settlement appeared to be a "big fat bribe" to end a "nuisance lawsuit."
"This all comes as Paramount's owners are trying to the get the Trump administration to approve the sale of our network to a new owner," said Colbert, referring to a pending $8.4 billion merger with the entertainment company Skydance—whose billionaire founder, David Ellison, has been spotted with Trump in recent months.
Warren (D-Mass.) said Thursday that the public "deserves to know if [Colbert's] show was canceled for political reasons."
Trump's lawsuit against Paramount claimed the Harris interview was deceptively edited and amounted to "partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference," allegations that legal experts and First Amendment scholars denounced as "ridiculous" and "dangerous."
After the settlement was announced earlier this month, with Paramount pledging to release transcripts of future "60 Minutes" interviews with presidential candidates, one press freedom group condemned the company for "capitulating" to the president's demands.
CBS executives appeared to preemptively respond to expected allegations that they were canceling Colbert's show due to his criticism of the settlement—and his frequent rebukes of the president—saying the decision, effective in May 2026, was "purely a financial" one.
"It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content, or other matters happening at Paramount," they said.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) expressed doubt that the end of Colbert's show, days after he spoke out against his parent company's legal decision, was "a coincidence."
Media critics joined lawmakers including Sanders and Warren in expressing skepticism.
"'The Late Show' isn't dying because people stopped watching late-night TV," wrote Parker Molloy at The New Republic. "It's being murdered because Stephen Colbert spent the last decade being one of Trump's most persistent critics on network television, and the billionaires about to take over CBS need Trump's approval for their merger."
Anonymous "Late Show" staffers also told The Independent they believed the cancellation of the show was "part and parcel of the Trump shakedown settlement."
Political scientist Norman Ornstein called the impending end of "The Late Show," considering the surrounding circumstances, "a terrible sign for democracy."
"There's only one reason to do this, and we know what it is," said Ornstein. "The same reason that this disgraceful excuse for a network succumbed to blackmail from Trump over the '60 Minutes' interview."
Trump, whose Federal Communications Commission is still deciding on approval of the merger, weighed in on Friday regarding the show's cancellation, saying in a social media post, "I absolutely love that Colbert got fired," and criticizing other late-night comedians who have taken aim at him.
As Status News reported after the Paramount settlement was announced, speculation has increased that comedian Jon Stewart, who co-hosts "The Daily Show"—where Colbert spent several years—could also "soon be silenced" after publicly criticizing the settlement. That show airs on Comedy Central, which is owned by the CBS parent company.
"Inside 'The Daily Show,' I'm told staffers have taken pride that Stewart showed once again he is willing to stand up to powerful interests, even if it potentially risks his future employment," wrote Oliver Darcy. "And while they may not yet know it, inside certain power circles, there is an open question: How much longer will Stewart have this platform?"
MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes said Friday that it is not "an overstatement to say that the test of a free society is whether or not comedians can make fun of the country's leader on TV without repurcussions."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular