

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Michael Galant, Win Without War: michael@winwithoutwar.org
Paul Kawika Martin, Peace Action: pmartin@peace-action.org
Today, 34 members of Congress sent a joint letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin urging temporary relief of U.S. sanctions on Iran to help reduce human suffering, increase access to medical supplies, and strengthen the Iranian people's ability to confront the coronavirus crisis. As the letter states "Pandemics know no borders. Allowing this crisis to become more dire in Iran threatens significant harm not only to the people of Iran but also to people in the United States and around the world."
The #EndCOVIDSanctions campaign -- a nationwide coalition of progressive organizations and grassroots activists working to end the U.S.'s deadly blanket sanctions on Iran -- fully supports this letter. We applaud all signers, and particularly commend the champions who put it forth: Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Jared Huffman, and Joaquin Castro and Sens. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Ed Markey.
This congressional letter comes after the #EndCOVIDSanctions campaign sent a joint organizational letter with similar demands earlier this month, and on the heels of a national petition and call-in campaign to the U.S. Treasury Department, and specifically the Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC).
"The global coronavirus crisis should be a wake-up call," said Erica Fein, Advocacy Director at Win Without War. "Human security is tied across borders. We can't bomb, sanction, or otherwise strong-arm our way to safety. In the face of shared global problems, from the climate crisis to pandemics, we must rethink our approach to human security, and build a foreign policy that puts international solidarity and collaboration first."
Ryan Costello, Policy Director at National Iranian American Council (NIAC) Action, said: "The Iranian people will remember which nations came to their assistance in their hour of need, and which chose to maintain senseless sanctions to their detriment. Half measures, as attempted by the administration thus far, won't be sufficient to prevent sanctions from inhibiting humanitarian trade and punishing ordinary Iranians. Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Sanders, along with all signers, deserve tremendous credit for leading this timely and bold effort that would deliver real relief and help contain the pandemic."
"I'm scared for my friends who are healthcare workers in Iran," said Nahid Soltanzadeh, Digital Organizing Fellow at MPower Change. "They are paying the price of U.S. sanctions, while being portrayed by the Iranian government as soldiers and martyrs. Broad-based sanctions don't 'target governments.' Just like wars, they kill ordinary people." Says Nahid Soltanzadeh, an Iranian digital organizer at MPower Change. "Iranians have been fighting for their own liberation and self-determination for years -- sanctions have only hurt our cause. A global pandemic calls for global solidarity and justice. And that's why MPower Change members are calling on Sec. Mnuchin to suspend sanctions now."
Hoda Katebi, Iranian-American community organizer with the No War Campaign, said: "My loved ones live in Iran, and I am deeply concerned for their lives. My aunt is a doctor on the frontlines and has seen first-hand the massive shortages of medical supplies in hospitals. Dozens of Iranian doctors have already died for this reason. And every day that violent U.S. sanctions continue to block Iran's ability to fight coronavirus, the death toll continues to rapidly rise. If this virus has taught us anything, it is that our health and lives are deeply connected and interdependent on a global scale. The US must do its part in flattening the global curve and lift its deadly sanctions on Iran immediately."
"The sanctions have played a devastating role in the spread of the coronavirus by hindering access to life-saving medicine and medical supplies. As an Iranian-American who recently lost a relative in Iran to the virus, it's imperative that the administration heed the call of countless global health officials and organizations, dozens of Members of Congress, as well as the UN, to ease sanctions at this critical time. Iran has been one of the hardest hit countries by the coronavirus, and if it doesn't have the resources to mitigate this pandemic, humanity as a whole will suffer," said Yasmine Taeb, Senior Policy Counsel at Demand Progress.
Ju-Hyun Park, a member of Nodutdol for Korean Community Development, said: "The devastation COVID-19 has caused in Iran can't be separated from the long-term effects of US sanctions on Iran's economy and medical system. We should expect similar hardship in the 38 other countries currently sanctioned by the US. From North Korea to Iran, US sanctions cause widespread suffering and thousands of preventable deaths by disrupting economies, destroying livelihoods, and depriving people of basic goods like food and medical equipment. US insistence on maintaining and escalating sanctions against Iran during this pandemic demonstrates a ruthless disregard for the Iranian people. The US must cooperate with multilateral international peace efforts instead of using economic and conventional warfare to impose its will abroad."
"For years the Trump administration has imposed catastrophic maximum pressure sanctions on Iran, which has had the effect of depriving millions of innocent people of critical medical supplies," said Hassan El-Tayyab, Legislative Manager for Middle East Policy at FCNL. "This has compounded the suffering in Iran and limited their ability to slow the spread of COVID-19. As every nation in the world grapples with this global pandemic, it's critical to remember this virus knows no borders and that all human health is interconnected. The U.S. must lift the economic sanctions hurting Iran's ability to address the coronavirus and support the global cooperation needed to defeat this pandemic."
"It is cruel to enforce sanctions that devastate economies and hurt healthcare systems, especially during a global pandemic," said Erik Sperling, Executive Director of Just Foreign Policy. "It's morally wrong and counterproductive to pursue regime change by knowingly increasing death and suffering of innocent people. We are so grateful to Rep. Ocasio-Cortez and these Congressmembers for joining the global call for sanctions relief during this crisis."
""Before the pandemic, U.S. sanctions silently and slowly killed civilians by restricting access to medical supplies and medicine, causing food insecurity and wreaking economic havoc," said Paul Kawika Martin the Senior Director for Policy for Peace Action. "Now, the continued economic warfare waged by these sanctions will devastate more people and exacerbate the COVID-19 crisis. For humanitarian reasons and to stop the spread of the coronavirus disease the U.S. needs to lift sanctions that hurt ordinary people."
Win Without War is a diverse network of activists and organizations working for a more peaceful, progressive U.S. foreign policy. We believe that by democratizing U.S. foreign policy and providing progressive alternatives, we can achieve more peaceful, just, and common sense policies that ensure that all people--regardless of race, nationality, gender, religion, or economic status--can find and take advantage of opportunity equally and feel secure.
Israel is seeking to invalidate the ICC's arrest warrants for fugitive Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes.
Appellate judges at the embattled International Criminal Court on Monday rejected Israel's attempt to block an investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes committed during the Gaza genocide.
The ICC Appeals Chamber dismissed an Israeli challenge to the assertion that the October 7, 2023, attacks and subsequent war on Gaza were part of the same ongoing "situation" under investigation by the Hague-based tribunal since 2021. Israel argued they were separate matters that required new notice; however, the ICC panel found that the initial probe encompasses events on and after October 7.
The ruling—which focuses on but one of several Israeli legal challenges to the ICC—comes amid the tribunal's investigation into an Israeli war and siege that have left at least 250,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing and 2 million more displaced, starved, or sickened.
The probe led to last year's ICC arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyhau and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity, including murder and forced starvation. The ICC also issued warrants for the arrest of three Hamas commanders—all of whom have since been killed by Israel.
Israel and the United States, neither of which are party to the Rome Statute governing the ICC, vehemently reject the tribunal's investigation. In the US—which has provided Israel with more than $21 billion in armed aid as well as diplomatic cover throughout the genocide—the Trump administration has sanctioned nine ICC jurists, leaving them and their families "wiped out socially and financially."
The other Hague-based global tribunal, the International Court of Justice, is currently weighing a genocide case against Israel filed in December 2023 by South Africa and backed by more than a dozen nations, as well as regional blocs representing dozens of countries.
University of Copenhagen international law professor Kevin Jon Heller—who is also a special adviser to the ICC prosecutor on war crimes—told Courthouse News Service that “the real importance of the decision is that it strongly implies Israel will lose its far more important challenge to the court’s jurisdiction over Israeli actions in Palestine."
Although Israel is not an ICC member and does not recognize its jurisdiction, Palestine is a state party to the Rome Statute, under which individuals from non-signatory nations can be held liable for crimes committed in the territory of a member state.
The Israeli Foreign Ministry condemned Monday's decision, calling it "yet another example of the ongoing politicization of the ICC and its blatant disregard for the sovereign rights of non-party states, as well as its own obligations under the Rome Statute."
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Washington, DC-based advocacy group, welcomed the ICC decision.
“This ruling by the International Criminal Court affirms that no state is above the law and that war crimes must be fully and independently investigated," CAIR said in a statement. "Accountability is essential for justice, for the victims, and survivors, and for deterring future crimes against humanity.”
"Wales and Sanger must be stopped from trying to censor the Wikipedia ‘Gaza genocide’ entry that clearly documents Israel’s horrifying crime against humanity.”
More than 40 advocacy groups on Monday called on Wikipedia editors and the Wikimedia board of trustees to reject efforts by the web-based encyclopedia's co-founders to censor the site's entry on the Gaza genocide.
After months of internal debate, editors of the Wikipedia article titled “Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza” renamed the entry "Gaza genocide" in July 2024, reflecting experts' growing acknowledgement that Israel's annihilation and siege of the Palestinian exclave met the legal definition of the ultimate crime. The entry also notes that the Gaza genocide is not settled legal fact—an International Court of Justice case on the matter is ongoing—and that numerous experts refute the claim that Israel's war is genocidal.
The move, and the subsequent addition of Gaza to Wikipedia's article listing cases of genocide, sparked heated "edit wars" on the community-edited site—which has long been a target of pro-Israeli public relations efforts. In the United States, a pair of House Republicans launched an investigation to reveal the identities of the anonymous Wikipedia editors who posted negative facts about Israel.
"Israeli officials and pro-Israel organizations are attempting to hide the horrifying reality... by putting pressure on institutions like Wikipedia to engage in genocide denial."
Wikipedia co-founders Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger have intervened in the dispute, with Wales—a self-described "strong supporter of Israel"—publicly stating that the Gaza genocide entry lacked neutrality, failed to meet Wikipedia's "high standards," and required "immediate attention" after an editor blocked changes to the article.
"Wales and Sanger are using their roles as Wikipedia founders to bypass the normal editing and review process and introduce their
own ideological biases into an entry that has already undergone exhaustive vetting and review by Wikipedia editors, including thousands of edits and comments," the 42 advocacy groups said in a letter to Wikimedia's board and site editors.
"Their efforts deny the documented reality of Israel’s genocide in Gaza and contradict the broad consensus among genocide scholars, international human rights organizations, UN experts, and both Palestinian and Israeli human rights organizations," the groups continue. "In doing so, Wales and Sanger are engaging in attempted censorship and genocide denial."
The letters' signers include the American Friends Service Committee, Artists Against Apartheid, Brave New Films, CodePink, Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN), Doctors Against Genocide, MPower Change Action Fund, Peace Action, and United Methodists for Kairos Response.
Since the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack, Israel's retaliatory obliteration and siege on Gaza—for which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant are wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes—have left more than 250,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing. Around 2 million other Palestinians have been forcibly displaced, sickened, or starved in what hunger experts say is an entirely human-caused famine.
"The simple reality is that Israeli officials and pro-Israel organizations are attempting to hide the horrifying reality of Israel’s genocide in Gaza by pretending that there is a substantive debate and by putting pressure on institutions like Wikipedia to engage in genocide denial," the groups' letter asserts.
"Wales’ 'both sides' framework for denying the Gaza genocide," the groups warned, "could also be used to legitimize Holocaust denial, denial of the Armenian genocide, or to platform 'flat-earthers' who deny the Earth’s spherical shape."
"Healthcare is a human right. That’s why we need Medicare for All," said one senator. "And the American people agree!"
In Maine, only one of the top two candidates in the Democratic US Senate primary has expressed support for the specific healthcare reform proposal that continues to be treated by the political establishment as radical—but which is supported by not only a sizable majority of Mainers but also most Americans surveyed in several recent polls.
Graham Platner, a veteran and oyster farmer who was a political novice when he launched his campaign in August and has polled well ahead of Gov. Janet Mills in several recent surveys, and a poll that asked Mainers about healthcare on Saturday showed he is in lockstep with many people in the state.
As the advocacy group Maine AllCare reported, the Pan Atlantic 67th Omnibus poll found that 63% of Mainers support Medicare for All, the proposal to transition the US to a system like that of other wealthy countries, with the government expanding the existing Medicare program and guaranteeing health coverage to all.
Those results bolster the findings of More Perfect Union in October, which found 72% of Mainers backing Medicare for All, and of Data for Progress, which found last month that 65% of all Americans—including 78% of Democratic voters—support a "national health insurance program... that would cover all Americans and replace most private health insurance plans.”
Even more recently, a Pew Research survey released last week found that 66% of respondents nationwide said the government should guarantee health coverage.
Platner has spoken out forcefully in support of Medicare for All, saying unequivocally last month that the proposal "is the answer" to numerous healthcare crises including the loss of primary care providers in many parts of the country and skyrocketing healthcare costs.
He made the comments soon after Mills said at a healthcare roundtable that "it is time" for a universal healthcare system, but did not explicitly endorse Medicare for All.
Maine AllCare noted that the latest polling on Medicare for All in the state comes as Maine "is on the verge of a multi-pronged healthcare crisis" due to Republican federal lawmakers' refusal to extend Affordable Care Act subsidies—which is projected to significantly raise monthly premiums for many Maine families as well as millions of people across the country. People in Maine and other states are also bracing for changes to Medicaid, including eligibility requirements.
Those changes "alongside long-standing affordability and access gaps, are projected to cost Maine billions and trigger deep operating losses in already strained hospitals," said Maine AllCare.
The group emphasized that that the Republican budget reconciliation law that President Donald Trump signed in July is projected to have a range of economic impacts on Maine, including a $450 million decline in statewide economic output, the loss of 4,300 state jobs, and the loss of $700 million in revenue at the state's hospitals due to Medicaid cuts.
“Maine needs a sustainable and universal healthcare system now. Poll after poll show people want Medicare for All. Our leaders can let the current health system continue collapsing—harming families, communities, and the economy of our state—or they can meet the moment and fight like hell to enact change that protects both the people and the future of the state," said David Jolly, a Maine AllCare board member. "That is the work Mainers elected them to do and that is what they must do now.”
Despite the broad popularity of the proposal to expand the Medicare program to everyone in the US—a system that would cost less than the current for-profit health insurance system does, according to numerous studies—supporters, including the 17 cosponsors of the Medicare for All bill in the US Senate and the 110 cosponsors in the US House, continue to face attacks from establishment politicians regarding the cost and feasibility of the proposal.
On Monday, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) explained to Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo how the Affordable Care Act that was passed by the Democratic Party is "not the solution" to the country's healthcare crisis, because it keeps in place the for-profit health insurance industry.
"The solution, as everyone knows, in my view, who has studied this, is Medicare for All," said Khanna. "People should have national health insurance. Healthcare is a human right. You should not be subject to these private insurance companies that have 18% admin costs, that are making billions of dollars in profits."
I made the case for Medicare for All on @MorningsMaria with @MariaBartiromo with facts and basic economics. https://t.co/ExZpCNQT7B pic.twitter.com/F226Kutv16
— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) December 15, 2025
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) also spoke out in favor of the proposal, pointing to the recent Data for Progress poll that showed 65% of Americans and 78% of Democrats backing Medicare for All.
"Healthcare is a human right. That’s why we need Medicare for All," said Merkley. "We need to simplify our system and make sure folks can get the care they need, when they need it. And the American people agree!"