Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

For Immediate Release

Contact

Press Release

Pruitt’s RFS Decision Defies Science, Undercuts Development of New Fuels

Statement by Jeremy Martin, Union of Concerned Scientists
WASHINGTON -

Scott Pruitt, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has finalized a change to biofuels policy, lowering the amount of cellulosic biofuel required under the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS). While political pressure from agricultural interests partly checked Pruitt’s effort to roll back the RFS standards, the cuts to cellulosic biofuels remain a major policy reversal with far reaching consequences.  It’s an arbitrary decision that conflicts with the purpose of the RFS, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).

Below is a statement by Jeremy Martin, senior scientist in the Clean Vehicles program of the Union of Concerned Scientists.

“There is simply no good reason to lower the cellulosic ethanol standard. In making this change, Administrator Pruitt ignored the evidence and analysis presented by his own staff. The RFS is designed to spur innovation and investment in cleaner fuels, but Administrator Pruitt’s change puts those investments at risk and concentrates power over our fuel system in his allies in the oil industry. This decision is yet another example of Administrator Pruitt disregarding science and the public interest to in favor of the interests of fossil fuel producers.

“Advanced biofuels, like cellulosic ethanol, are a small part of the industry today, but they have the biggest potential for growth. Arbitrary policy shifts like this undermine investment in new fuels. The point of the RFS is to cut our oil use and reduce the pollution that causes climate change—this decision undermines that goal and focuses on the interest of the oil industry. It’s disappointing to see Administrator Pruitt throwing an emerging and important industry into disarray. Administrator Pruitt’s job is to listen to the science and enforce the law—not to make policy based on his political preferences.”

###

The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.

Biden Denounced for Imposing New Sanctions as Iran Nuclear Talks Falter

One Middle East expert accused the U.S. administration of "continuing and embracing Trump's max pressure policy, while expecting a different result."

Brett Wilkins ·


Under 'Draconian Abortion Ban,' Woman in El Salvador Sentenced to 50 Years for Pregnancy Loss

Laws like El Salvador's are "now being replicated in states across the U.S.," noted one observer.

Julia Conley ·


Warren, Sanders, and Others Blast Biden's 'Failure' on Federal Cannabis Policy

While commending Biden's pardons and commutations, six senators wrote that "much more has to be done to address the racist and harmful legacy of cannabis policies on Black and Brown communities."

Jessica Corbett ·


Court Applauded for Tossing Trump-Era Rule That Allowed Taxpayer-Funded Discrimination

"We are thrilled that the court has removed the continuing threat the presence of the discriminatory Trump-era rule posed to some of the most vulnerable members of society," said one attorney.

Kenny Stancil ·


'Broken' Capitalist Food System Drives Soaring Global Hunger: Oxfam

Criticism from the charity's food policy director came in response to a new United Nations report revealing that around 1 in 10 people worldwide went hungry last year.

Brett Wilkins ·

Common Dreams Logo