April, 05 2011, 02:39pm EDT
Libya: Abandoned Weapons, Landmines Endanger Civilians
Civilians and Aid Workers Need Protection
NEW YORK
Eastern Libya is littered with massive amounts of unexploded ordnance, abandoned and unsecured weapons and munitions, and recently-laid landmines from the fighting since February 2011, posing a great threat to civilians, Human Rights Watch said today.
Human Rights Watch called on the transitional authority in eastern Libya to safeguard munitions depots in areas under its control. The authorities should also secure, monitor, and clear areas contaminated by unexploded ordnance (UXO) and abandoned munitions, Human Rights Watch said.
"When ordinary civilians, even children, can walk into a weapons depot and remove anti-tank missiles, landmines, and surface-to-air missiles capable of shooting down a civilian aircraft, you have a real problem," said Peter Bouckaert, emergencies director at Human Rights Watch, who just completed two weeks of research in eastern Libya. "The rebel authorities should take urgent action to secure the arms depots under their control."
On April 2, the United Nations issued a warning on the threat from landmines and explosive remnants of war in Libya. The urgent need is for emergency risk education, safeguarding weapons depots under rebel control, mine clearance, and the marking and disposal of explosive ordnance, Human Rights Watch said.
Abandoned Weapon and Munitions Storage Facilities
As the Gaddafi government lost control over eastern Libya starting in late February 2011, anti-government rebels and civilians gained access to massive military weapon and munitions depots, abandoned by government forces. Among those depots are the 60-bunker Hight Razma facility on the eastern outskirts of Benghazi and a 35-bunker facility on the eastern outskirts of Ajdabiya, a city that has changed hands between government and opposition forces several times in recent weeks. Both storage facilities are packed with weapons and munitions, and readily accessible to civilians.
Human Rights Watch researchers visited the Ajdabiya storage facility on March 26, as opposition forces retook the city. No guards were defending the facility, allowing civilians to haul away munitions.
Human Rights Watch inspected 20 of the 35 weapons bunkers. Inside were thousands of 122mm Grad rockets - one single bunker contained more than 2,000; hand-held SA-7 Grail surface-to-air missiles capable of shooting down a civilian airplane; various guided anti-tank missiles, including AT-2 Swatter, AT-3 Sagger, AT-4B Spigot, AT-14 Spriggam, and AGM-22; hand-held rocket-propelled grenade launchers (RPG-7); 76mm and 106mm high-explosive squash-head (HESH) rounds; 73mm PG-15V anti-tank missiles; 105mm howitzer high explosive projectiles; 105mm white phosphorus artillery projectiles; 105mm High-Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) rounds for recoilless guns; 100mm, 122mm, and 155mm artillery shells; 51mm, 60mm, 81mm, and 120mm high explosive mortar rounds; 81mm white phosphorus mortar shells; and many other types of munitions.
A UN Mine Action Service investigator working in cooperation with Human Rights Watch found similar weapons and munitions stored at the Hight Ramza depot in Benghazi, which also has 12 full bunkers of plastic PRBM antivehicle mines, large stocks of napalm, large numbers of anti-aircraft guns of different caliber, as well as stocks of plastic explosives. At the Benghazi depot, civilians have been looting antivehicle mines to re-use the explosives for fishing.
On the battlefield around Ajdabiya and further west, Human Rights Watch saw all of these weapons, often in the hands of people with no previous military experience. Various types of anti-aircraft guns were commonly used by rebel fighters, as were RPGs, mortars, artillery pieces, rocket launchers, SA-7 Grail missiles, and recoilless guns. Human Rights Watch also observed rebels using Grad rocket launchers around the town of Ras Lanuf. Grad rocket systems are capable of launching up to 40 122mm missiles in one salvo at targets from four to 40 kilometers away. They can cause large-scale civilian casualties if deployed indiscriminately against civilian-populated areas, or by people untrained in their use.
The unchecked looting of the arms depots in eastern Libya poses a direct risk to civilians, Human Rights Watch said. The arms depots may accidentally explode if munitions are carelessly moved. The weapons could also pose direct dangers to civilians if used by untrained people, abusive rebel groups, or others willing to engage in terrorist attacks.
An arms depot near Benghazi accidentally exploded on March 4 as untrained people were removing munitions, killing at least 27.
Abandoned and Unexploded Ordnance
In recent weeks, the battlefield in eastern Libya has shifted rapidly from town to town along the coastal road, as the rebels advanced or were pushed back by government forces. In the process, large stocks of munitions have been left behind, either abandoned by retreating troops or unexploded after combat operations. The failure or "dud" rate of munitions is compounded by the age of many of the munitions, dating back to the 1960s and 1970s. The soft sand areas in which much of the fighting takes place adds to detonator failures.
Among the unexploded and abandoned ordnance documented by Human Rights Watch were large numbers of 155mm high-explosive artillery projectiles and 81mm mortar rounds left behind on the outskirts of Ajdabiya by retreating government forces; an unexploded AT-14 laser-guided Spriggan anti-tank missile found on the outskirts of Benghazi after government forces retreated; various unexploded artillery rounds; unexploded Grad rockets; abandoned RPG and tank rounds; containers of volatile bulk propellant used by artillery and tanks - including some exposed to direct sun, which makes them a highly unstable explosive threat; 106mm HEAT rounds; SA-7 Grail missiles; AT-3 Sagger and AT-4 Spigot anti-tank missiles; 107mm rockets; and various types of small arms and anti-aircraft ammunition.
In addition, the Libyan Air Force has hit several munitions storage facilities in an attempt to deny rebel forces the weapons. In recent days, coalition forces have also targeted munitions storage facilities under the control of government forces. Human Rights Watch saw damaged munitions warehouses in the east with large amounts of unexploded ordnance strewn around the premises from the explosions, posing a danger to civilians. These partially destroyed warehouses exist at the main arms depot in Ajdabiya, as well as the Hight Ramza ammunition storage facility in Benghazi.
Airstrikes by international coalition forces on Libyan government military targets have added to the problem of unexploded ordnance. Many of the targets struck by the military alliance have been ammunition vehicles, as well as tanks and artillery pieces loaded with munitions. As a result, many of the munitions from the struck vehicles get "kicked out" and remain strewn around the vehicles, posing a threat to civilians.
In some cases, crowds of people, including families with children, have visited the strike sites to take mementoes. Human Rights Watch documented dozens of unexploded 122mm Grad rockets lying around the main highway between Benghazi and Ajdabiya after coalition airstrikes, unexploded Grad rockets still in the launch tubes of destroyed launchers, and live, unexploded Howitzer rounds still in the body of self-propelled Howitzer vehicles that had been struck, while children were climbing on the destroyed vehicles (which resemble tanks).
"We saw many instances of Libyans collecting souvenirs from destroyed armored vehicles or picking up explosive ordnance," Bouckaert said.
Antipersonnel and Antivehicle Mines
Libyan authorities have vast stockpiles of both antipersonnel and antivehicle mines, and have deployed both during the recent conflict. On March 30, Human Rights Watch confirmed the presence of a newly laid minefield with antipersonnel and antivehicle mines on the outskirts of Ajdabiya. Since then, a second minefield, also consisting of antivehicle and antipersonnel mines, has been discovered in the same general area, surrounding an abandoned tank position of government forces.
Human Rights Watch also confirmed the existence of a large minefield, unmarked except for the barbed wire surrounding it, around the main weapons depot in Ajdabiya. It is presumed that other weapons depots in Libya are similarly mined.
Human Rights Watch has identified the mines that government forces deployed around Ajdabiya. They include Chinese-produced Type-72 metal-encased antivehicle mines and Brazilian-produced T-AB-1 antipersonnel mines, which are mostly plastic and thus very difficult to detect.
"The local population urgently needs mine risk education," Bouckaert said. "This will increase awareness and minimize casualties from mines and unexploded ordnance."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during
November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'One Step Closer': Arizona House Votes to Repeal 1864 Abortion Ban
"With a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever," one state campaigner said of a November ballot measure.
Apr 24, 2024
Three Republicans in the Arizona House of Representatives on Wednesday joined with Democrats to advance legislation that would repeal an 1864 ban on abortion—a development rights advocates welcomed while stressing that the fight is far from over.
The 32-28 vote on House Bill 2677—with GOP Reps. Tim Dunn (25), Matt Gress (4), and Justin Wilmeth (2) voting in favor—was the third attempt in as many weeks to pass repeal legislation since the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the ban.
"The state Senate could vote on the repeal as early as next Wednesday, after the bill comes on the floor for a 'third reading,' as is required under chamber rules," according toNBC News. Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs on Wednesday toldThe Washington Post that "I am hopeful the Senate does the right thing and sends it to my desk so I can sign it."
Applauding the House passage of H.B. 2677, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona president and CEO Angela Florez said that "today, Arizona is one step closer to repealing the state's Civil War-era total abortion ban. While the repeal still must pass the Senate, this is a major win for reproductive freedom."
"We must celebrate today's vote in support of abortion rights and harness our enthusiasm to spread the word and urge lawmakers in the Senate to support this necessary repeal bill," she continued. "Despite this step forward, Arizonans cannot stop fighting."
Florez noted that "even with the repeal of the Civil War-era ban, the state will still have a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy that denies people access to critical care. And lawmakers continue to attack Arizonans' ability to access reproductive healthcare. Our right to control our bodies and lives is hanging on by a thread."
"Thankfully, voters will have the opportunity to take back control if the Arizona Abortion Access Act is on the ballot this November," she added. "Abortion bans are out-of-step with the will of Arizonans and will force pregnant people to leave their communities for essential healthcare. Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona will continue fighting to ensure everyone has the right to make decisions about their health and futures."
The Arizona Abortion Access Act is a proposed state constitutional amendment that would prevent many limits on abortions before fetal viability and safeguard access to care after viability to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient.
The coalition supporting the amendment, Arizona for Abortion Access, highlighted on social media that the House-approved bill "did not include the emergency clause required to stop the 1864 ban from taking effect on June 8," meaning H.B. 2677 wouldn't apply until 90 days after the end of the legislative session.
Coalition campaign manager Cheryl Bruce said that "with a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever. We remain committed to taking these decisions out of the hands of extremist politicians."
Arizona is one of multiple states where rights advocates are promoting abortion rights ballot measures this cycle. Reproductive freedom is also dominating political races at all levels, including the presidential contest. Democratic President Joe Biden is set to face former Republican President Donald Trump in November.
"Donald Trump is responsible for Arizona's abortion ban. Women in the state are still living under a ban with no exceptions for rape or incest and have been stripped of the freedom to make their own healthcare decisions," said Julie Chávez Rodriguez, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' reelection campaign manager.
While the presumptive GOP nominee has tried to distance himself from the Arizona Supreme Court's reinstatement of a 160-year-old abortion ban, he has also campaigned on his three appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court who helped reverse Roe v. Wade.
"Trump brags that he is 'proudly' the person responsible for these bans and if he retakes power, the chaos and cruelty he has created will only get worse in all 50 states," Chávez Rodriguez said. "President Biden and Vice President Harris are the only candidates who will stop him."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular