December, 23 2009, 09:10am EDT

Colombia: Protect Witnesses in Paramilitary Cases
The Colombian government should act swiftly to protect witnesses in
criminal cases against members of groups that are successors to
demobilized paramilitaries in the city of Medellin, Human Rights Watch
said today.
Human Rights Watch called on the government to investigate attacks
on witnesses and to bolster law enforcement efforts to stem the rapidly
rising violence in the city attributed to the successor groups.
WASHINGTON
The Colombian government should act swiftly to protect witnesses in
criminal cases against members of groups that are successors to
demobilized paramilitaries in the city of Medellin, Human Rights Watch
said today.
Human Rights Watch called on the government to investigate attacks
on witnesses and to bolster law enforcement efforts to stem the rapidly
rising violence in the city attributed to the successor groups.
On December 20, 2009, unidentified armed men repeatedly shot and
killed Alexander Pulgarin, a community leader in the La Sierra
neighborhood of Medellin. Pulgarin was a key witness in the
prosecution of John William Lopez (known as "Memin"), a demobilized
paramilitary member who was recently convicted of ongoing criminal
activity. Pulgarin had been receiving frequent threats as a result of
his testimony and community work.
"Alexander Pulgarin took enormous risks in testifying against the
demobilized paramilitaries who brutally controlled his neighborhood,"
said Maria McFarland, Washington deputy advocacy director at Human
Rights Watch. "His shooting in broad daylight shows that the
government is not protecting witnesses adequately or providing
desperately needed security in Medellin."
Local authorities told Human Rights Watch that several armed men
accosted Pulgarin as he stepped out of a community soccer game that he
had helped to organize in La Sierra. The men shot him multiple times,
killing him.
Human Rights Watch had interviewed Pulgarin at length in 2007 about
alleged abuses in La Sierra by "Memin" and Antonio Lopez (known as
"Job"), both of whom were demobilized members of the Cacique Nutibara
block of the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (United
Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, AUC). The AUC was a coalition of
mafia-like paramilitary groups, deeply involved in drug trafficking,
which committed horrific and widespread abuses for decades in Colombia
before it began a demobilization process in 2004.
Job and Memin were also members of the "Democracy Corporation," an
organization that for years worked closely with the municipal
government to coordinate the activities of demobilized paramilitaries
in Medellin. Job gained national prominence after Semana, a
leading newsmagazine in Colombia, reported in mid-2008 that he had met
with advisers to President Alvaro Uribe in the Presidential Palace in
Bogota in April 2008. Job was killed in Medellin a few weeks later.
Memin was subsequently arrested and tried for multiple crimes
related to his efforts to maintain control over criminal activity in
his neighborhood after the demobilization. News reports and local
authorities reported that during the trial, at least four witnesses
against Memin were killed. He was reportedly convicted in March 2009
and sentenced to 22 years in prison.
Pulgarin had been assigned an armed escort by the Colombian Ministry
of Interior's Protection Program for threatened human rights defenders
and community leaders. The escort is reported to have been shot and
wounded during the attack on Pulgarin; a policeman who ran to the scene
was also reportedly killed.
Because of the serious threats against him, for the last five months
Pulgarin had been living at the offices of a non-profit organization.
At a November 20 meeting with the Interior Ministry sponsored by the
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Pulgarin's lawyers had
requested that he be temporarily resettled and receive additional
protection. The ministry reportedly agreed to provide the additional
protection, but it had yet to deliver when Pulgarin was killed a month
later.
Violence in Medellin has been rising dramatically in recent years.
In the first ten months of 2009, the homicide rate has more than
doubled, from 830 killings in the same period in 2008, to 1,717 this
year, according to the Instituto de Medicina Legal (Forensic Medicine Institute) of Medellin.
Most of the increase is attributable to the AUC's successor groups,
which control criminal activity in the city. The groups fight among
themselves over territory, and also frequently commit targeted
killings, forced displacement, extortion, and threats against other
Medellin residents.
Human Rights Watch has documented the forced displacement of dozens
of residents from the Pablo Escobar neighborhood, also allegedly by a
successor group. In a positive step, prosecutors in Medellin arrested
18 members of that group. However, three others with pending
warrants remain at large.
Many of the displaced residents attempted to testify in the Pablo
Escobar case. However, Human Rights Watch has received information
indicating that as many as five of the witnesses have been killed in
recent months.
In June, Human Rights Watch wrote to the Office of the Attorney
General of Colombia to request that these witnesses be included in the
office's Witness Protection Program. The office replied that the cases
were under review. Most of the witnesses have yet to be included in
the program.
Human Rights Watch urged the government to take prompt and effective
measures to prevent killings of witnesses in existing and future
cases. These would include expanding and adequately funding the
witness protection program, ensuring that requests for protection are
processed rapidly, and establishing procedures to protect victims who
may not meet the requirements of the program but are at risk.
"It is good that some prosecutors are trying to investigate these
groups," McFarland said. "But with witnesses being killed left and
right, you have to wonder how hard the government is trying to break
the power of the successor groups."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Trump Social Security Chief Applauds Budget Bill That Will Harm Social Security's Finances
"The Social Security Administration put out a statement celebrating a bill that would lead to faster insolvency of the Social Security Trust Fund."
Jul 04, 2025
U.S. President Donald Trump's handpicked Social Security chief issued a statement Thursday applauding the passage of a Republican reconciliation bill that analysts say would negatively impact the New Deal program's finances.
Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano called the Republican legislation, which Trump is expected to sign on Friday, a "historic step forward for America's seniors" and a reaffirmation of the president's "promise to protect Social Security."
But experts warned in the lead-up to the bill's passage that its massive tax cuts would bring forward the date at which Social Security will no longer be able to pay out full benefits in the absence of legislative solutions.
"By raising the standard deduction for all filers, and raising it even higher for some seniors, fewer Social Security beneficiaries will pay taxes on their benefits, and those who do will pay lower rates," said Kathleen Romig and Gbenga Ajilore of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "Raising the standard deduction would deliver little to no benefit to lower- and moderate-income families while reducing income into Social Security's trust funds."
The Social Security Administration put out a statement celebrating a bill that would lead to faster insolvency of the Social Security Trust Fund pic.twitter.com/aRhLfcRiIv
— Bobby Kogan (@BBKogan) July 4, 2025
According to the latest Social Security Board of Trustees report—released ahead of the reconciliation bill's passage—the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund will be able to pay out 100% of benefits until 2033. Thereafter, if lawmakers don't act, the fund will be able to pay out 77% of total scheduled benefits.
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), a conservative think tank, estimated in an analysis released last month that the Republican reconciliation package would accelerate the depletion of Social Security and Medicare's trust funds by a year. Compared to current law, the GOP measure would also result in "even deeper" cuts to Social Security benefits after the trust fund depletion date, the analysis projected.
Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.), a leading champion of Social Security Expansion in Congress, highlighted CRFB's findings in a video posted to social media a day before House Republicans secured final passage of the reconciliation bill.
"We have to act now, not just to protect Social Security but to expand the benefits," said Larson. "It needs to be protected, it needs to be enhanced—not cut and diminished."
Keep ReadingShow Less
NYT Runs Hit Piece on Mamdani Based on Tip From Proponent of 'Race Science'
Reports from multiple outlets show the Times is vastly underselling its source's extreme views on race.
Jul 04, 2025
The New York Times on Thursday published a story questioning New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's past statements about his racial background based on a tip it received from a proponent of "race science."
The Times piece in question focused on Mamdani's college application to Columbia University in which he listed both "Asian" and "Black or African American" as his race.
Although both of Mamdani's parents are of Indian descent, he was born in the African country of Uganda and lived there for the first five years of his life. Mamdani told the Times that he checked the box on the application for "Black or African American" because he considers himself an American who was born in Africa. He emphasized that he does not identify as Black and argued that he found it difficult to express the complexity of his racial background given the options on the application.
However, what is stirring controversy about the Times piece isn't so much its content but the source of its information. The Times acknowledges that the information on Mamdani was culled from a large hack of a Columbia database and that it received a copy of Mamdani's application from "an intermediary who goes by the name Crémieux on Substack and X," whom it describes as "an academic who opposes affirmative action and writes often about I.Q. and race."
A report from The Guardian's Jason Wilson published earlier this year shows that the Times is vastly underselling its source's extreme views on race. As Wilson documented, the "Crémieux" cited by the Times is a man named Jordan Lasker, whose writings regularly defend the work of "race scientists" who use I.Q. test results to argue that Black people are mentally inferior to other races.
"Crémieux runs a Substack also featuring posts on the supposed relationships between race and I.Q.," Wilson explained. "A prominently featured post there seeks to defend the argument that average national IQs vary by up to 40 points, with countries in Europe, North America, and East Asia at the high end and countries in the global south at the low end, and several African countries purportedly having average national IQs at a level that experts associate with mental impairment."
Another report from Talking Points Memo's Hunter Walker found that Lasker has regularly posted about a racial "I.Q. gap" and has even suggested that there are "genetic pathways of crime." On his X account, Lasker has mused about the differences in brain sizes between Black and white Americans and between women and men more generally.
Brandon McEuen, a historian at Wayne State University who specializes in teaching about the history of the eugenics movement, slammed the Times for not only relying on Lasker as its source for the story on Mamdani but also for granting him anonymity.
"The decision to keep Lasker anonymous is ridiculous since his name has already been published in other outlets that don't provide softballs for eugenicists," he wrote on his Bluesky account.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Says Every Republican Who Backed Trump-GOP Budget 'Must Pay a Price at the Ballot Box'
"They do not deserve to be re-elected and they must be defeated," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Jul 04, 2025
As communities across the United States braced for impact after congressional Republicans approved the biggest Medicaid and nutrition assistance cuts in the nation's history, Sen. Bernie Sanders said Thursday that every lawmaker who supported the budget legislation "must pay a price at the ballot box" in the 2026 midterms and beyond.
"This bill includes the largest cut ever to Medicaid in order to pay for the largest tax break for billionaires that we have ever seen," Sanders (I-Vt.), who is working to recruit progressive candidates for office, said after the House passed the legislation, sending it to President Donald Trump's desk.
"Make no mistake about it: This bill is a death sentence for working-class and low-income Americans," said Sanders.
While some GOP lawmakers in the House and Senate voiced concerns about the bill's massive cuts to Medicaid and other programs as the measure moved through Congress, the legislation ultimately garnered near-unanimous support from the Republican caucus when it came time for the final votes. Just three out of 53 Republican senators and two out of 220 GOP representatives voted against the completed bill.
Analysts and advocates expect the legislation to inflict major damage across the country, shuttering rural hospitals, stripping health coverage and food aid from millions, raising costs for Medicare recipients, and devastating local economies.
Some of the pain will be concentrated in swing districts currently represented by Republican supporters of the budget package. For example, 64% of Rep. David Valadao's (R-Calif.) constituents in California's 22nd Congressional District rely on Medicaid.
Valadao is one of 10 Republicans targeted by an ad push that the advocacy group Protect Our Care launched following Thursday's vote in the House. The other targeted lawmakers are Reps. David Schweikert (R-Ariz.), Young Kim (R-Calif.), Ken Calvert (R-Calif.), Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.), Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), Ryan Mackenzie (R-Pa.), Rob Bresnahan (R-Pa.), and Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.).
Brad Woodhouse, president of Protect Our Care, said in a statement that "these Republicans just voted for the largest healthcare cuts in history in order to fund tax breaks for billionaires and big corporations, and we're going to make sure that every single one of their constituents knows it."
"These Republicans betrayed their constituents and working Americans' healthcare for billionaire tax cuts," Woodhouse added, "and we're ready to go from the grassroots to the airwaves until every last one of them is held accountable."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular