December, 23 2009, 09:10am EDT
Colombia: Protect Witnesses in Paramilitary Cases
The Colombian government should act swiftly to protect witnesses in
criminal cases against members of groups that are successors to
demobilized paramilitaries in the city of Medellin, Human Rights Watch
said today.
Human Rights Watch called on the government to investigate attacks
on witnesses and to bolster law enforcement efforts to stem the rapidly
rising violence in the city attributed to the successor groups.
WASHINGTON
The Colombian government should act swiftly to protect witnesses in
criminal cases against members of groups that are successors to
demobilized paramilitaries in the city of Medellin, Human Rights Watch
said today.
Human Rights Watch called on the government to investigate attacks
on witnesses and to bolster law enforcement efforts to stem the rapidly
rising violence in the city attributed to the successor groups.
On December 20, 2009, unidentified armed men repeatedly shot and
killed Alexander Pulgarin, a community leader in the La Sierra
neighborhood of Medellin. Pulgarin was a key witness in the
prosecution of John William Lopez (known as "Memin"), a demobilized
paramilitary member who was recently convicted of ongoing criminal
activity. Pulgarin had been receiving frequent threats as a result of
his testimony and community work.
"Alexander Pulgarin took enormous risks in testifying against the
demobilized paramilitaries who brutally controlled his neighborhood,"
said Maria McFarland, Washington deputy advocacy director at Human
Rights Watch. "His shooting in broad daylight shows that the
government is not protecting witnesses adequately or providing
desperately needed security in Medellin."
Local authorities told Human Rights Watch that several armed men
accosted Pulgarin as he stepped out of a community soccer game that he
had helped to organize in La Sierra. The men shot him multiple times,
killing him.
Human Rights Watch had interviewed Pulgarin at length in 2007 about
alleged abuses in La Sierra by "Memin" and Antonio Lopez (known as
"Job"), both of whom were demobilized members of the Cacique Nutibara
block of the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (United
Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, AUC). The AUC was a coalition of
mafia-like paramilitary groups, deeply involved in drug trafficking,
which committed horrific and widespread abuses for decades in Colombia
before it began a demobilization process in 2004.
Job and Memin were also members of the "Democracy Corporation," an
organization that for years worked closely with the municipal
government to coordinate the activities of demobilized paramilitaries
in Medellin. Job gained national prominence after Semana, a
leading newsmagazine in Colombia, reported in mid-2008 that he had met
with advisers to President Alvaro Uribe in the Presidential Palace in
Bogota in April 2008. Job was killed in Medellin a few weeks later.
Memin was subsequently arrested and tried for multiple crimes
related to his efforts to maintain control over criminal activity in
his neighborhood after the demobilization. News reports and local
authorities reported that during the trial, at least four witnesses
against Memin were killed. He was reportedly convicted in March 2009
and sentenced to 22 years in prison.
Pulgarin had been assigned an armed escort by the Colombian Ministry
of Interior's Protection Program for threatened human rights defenders
and community leaders. The escort is reported to have been shot and
wounded during the attack on Pulgarin; a policeman who ran to the scene
was also reportedly killed.
Because of the serious threats against him, for the last five months
Pulgarin had been living at the offices of a non-profit organization.
At a November 20 meeting with the Interior Ministry sponsored by the
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Pulgarin's lawyers had
requested that he be temporarily resettled and receive additional
protection. The ministry reportedly agreed to provide the additional
protection, but it had yet to deliver when Pulgarin was killed a month
later.
Violence in Medellin has been rising dramatically in recent years.
In the first ten months of 2009, the homicide rate has more than
doubled, from 830 killings in the same period in 2008, to 1,717 this
year, according to the Instituto de Medicina Legal (Forensic Medicine Institute) of Medellin.
Most of the increase is attributable to the AUC's successor groups,
which control criminal activity in the city. The groups fight among
themselves over territory, and also frequently commit targeted
killings, forced displacement, extortion, and threats against other
Medellin residents.
Human Rights Watch has documented the forced displacement of dozens
of residents from the Pablo Escobar neighborhood, also allegedly by a
successor group. In a positive step, prosecutors in Medellin arrested
18 members of that group. However, three others with pending
warrants remain at large.
Many of the displaced residents attempted to testify in the Pablo
Escobar case. However, Human Rights Watch has received information
indicating that as many as five of the witnesses have been killed in
recent months.
In June, Human Rights Watch wrote to the Office of the Attorney
General of Colombia to request that these witnesses be included in the
office's Witness Protection Program. The office replied that the cases
were under review. Most of the witnesses have yet to be included in
the program.
Human Rights Watch urged the government to take prompt and effective
measures to prevent killings of witnesses in existing and future
cases. These would include expanding and adequately funding the
witness protection program, ensuring that requests for protection are
processed rapidly, and establishing procedures to protect victims who
may not meet the requirements of the program but are at risk.
"It is good that some prosecutors are trying to investigate these
groups," McFarland said. "But with witnesses being killed left and
right, you have to wonder how hard the government is trying to break
the power of the successor groups."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Grand Jury Indicts Top Trump Aides, 11 Arizona Republicans Over 'Fake Electors' Scheme
Had it succeeded, said the state's attorney general, the scheme would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
Apr 25, 2024
A grand jury in Arizona on Wednesday charged seven aides to Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials over a "fake electors" scheme in the state that aimed to keep the former president in power after his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden.
Trump, who is currently facing nearly 90 charges across four criminal cases as he runs for another White House term, was described as "unindicted co-conspirator 1" in the 58-page indictment, which was announced by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.
"The people of Arizona elected President Biden," Mayes, a Democrat, said Wednesday. "Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency. Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for."
The indictment names former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, sitting state Republican Sens. Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon, and seven others as the "fake electors" who sought to declare Trump the rightful winner of the state's presidential contest.
The names of other individuals indicted by the state grand jury are redacted, but the document's descriptions make clear that former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani, and top Trump legal strategist Boris Epshteyn are among those facing felony charges—including fraud, forgery, and conspiracy.
"In Arizona, defendants, unindicted coconspirators, and others pressured the three groups of election officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results," the document reads. "Discussions about using the Republican electors to change the outcome of the election began as early as November 4, 2020. Those plans evolved during
November based on memos drafted by [an attorney for the Trump campaign, Kenneth Chesebro]."
Mayes said Wednesday that had the fake elector scheme succeeded, it would have "deprived Arizona's voters of their right to have their votes counted for their chosen president."
"It effectively would have made their right to vote meaningless," said Mayes.
A state grand jury, made up of everyday, regular Arizonans, has handed down felony indictments in the ongoing investigation into the fake elector scheme in Arizona. pic.twitter.com/Nu8GcD4ZqJ
— AZ Attorney General Kris Mayes (@AZAGMayes) April 24, 2024
Alex Gulotta, state director of All Voting Is Local Action Arizona, said Wednesday that "the indictment of the eleven fake electors is one of the first steps required in holding these election deniers accountable for their alleged attempts to take power away from voters by disrupting our free and fair elections."
"Arizonans deserve to trust the election officials responsible for administering our elections and preserving our democracy," said Gulotta, "and this is a positive step forward as we continue to strengthen the foundations of our democracy and restore faith in our elections."
The Arizona Republicreported Wednesday that "several of the Arizona electors have previously claimed they were merely offering Congress a backup plan, though nothing in the documents they sent to Congress and the National Archives backs up that assertion."
"The indictment includes several statements the false electors made on social media that contradict those claims," the newspaper observed.
Jenny Guzman, director of Common Cause's Arizona program, said the indictment "marks the start of a new chapter for the fake elector scheme that has plagued Arizona."
"Arizonans are still dealing with the fallout from the false electors and the Big Lie about the 2020 elections," said Guzman. "We are relieved that the investigation by Attorney General Mayes has concluded and Arizonans can now know that what comes next is accountability. These efforts by these fake electors to undermine the will of Arizona’s voters have had implications far beyond their failed attempt to overthrow the 2020 election."
"This indictment can reassure all Arizonans that if anyone, regardless of their political affiliation, attempts to undermine their vote, consequences will follow," Guzman added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Watchdog Urges FEC to Investigate Trump Campaign Over Scheme for Legal Fees
"By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much."
Apr 24, 2024
A campaign finance watchdog on Wednesday filed a Federal Election Commission complaint accusing former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign, affiliated political groups, and an accounting firm of violating U.S. law in a scheme "seemingly designed to obscure the true recipients of a noteworthy portion of Trump's legal bills."
The Washington, D.C.-based Campaign Legal Center (CLC) said that "evidence appears to show an illegal arrangement between several Trump-affiliated committees and a compliance firm named Red Curve Solutions that is designed to obscure the identities of those providing legal services and how much they are being paid."
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money."
CLC alleges that the Trump campaign, Trump's political action committee (PAC) Save America, and three affiliated organizations "violated federal reporting requirements based on a scheme in which the committees reportedly paid over $7.2 million—described as 'reimbursement for legal' costs or expenses"—to Red Curve.
The watchdog also said that Red Curve appears to be "making or facilitating illegal contributions that violate either federal contribution limits or the prohibition on corporate contributions."
According to CLC:
Red Curve is a domestic limited liability company that offers compliance and FEC reporting services but does not appear to offer any legal services. It is managed by Bradley Crate, who also serves as the treasurer for each of the five Trump-affiliated committees concerned in this complaint, as well as over 200 other federal committees.
According to filings with the FEC, Red Curve appears to have been fronting legal costs for Trump since at least December 2022, with Trump-affiliated committees repaying the company later. This arrangement appears to violate FEC rules that require campaigns to disclose not only the entity being reimbursed (here, Red Curve) but also the underlying vendor. By not disclosing the vendors that actually provided legal services, the Trump-affiliated committees effectively blocked the public from knowing which attorneys and firms are being paid—and how much they are being paid—through this arrangement.
"Voters have a right to know how the presidential campaigns and other committees supporting presidential candidates spend their money," CLC senior director of campaign finance Erin Chlopak said in a statement. "When campaigns and committees obscure that information from the public, not only do they make it difficult to determine if the law has been violated, but they deny voters the ability to make an informed choice when casting a ballot."
"The steps taken by the Trump campaign, its affiliated committees, and Red Curve Solutions concealed information about how campaign funds were used to pay former President Trump's legal expenditures, including the amounts and ultimate recipients of these expenditures—and the FEC must investigate immediately," Chlopak added.
Trump—who is the presumptive 2024 GOP presidential nominee—faces 91 federal and state felony charges related to his role in the January 6 insurrection and his organization's business practices. He is currently on trial in New York for allegedly falsifying business records related to hush money payments to cover up sex scandals during the 2016 election cycle. The twice-impeached former president has been open about his use of campaign donations to pay his legal costs.
The new CLC filing comes a day after the watchdog filed separate FEC complaints urging investigations into a pair of Trump-affiliated "scam PACs," which "pretend to fundraise for major candidates or issues while secretly diverting almost all of their donors' money back into fundraising or the fraudsters' own pockets."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'One Step Closer': Arizona House Votes to Repeal 1864 Abortion Ban
"With a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever," one state campaigner said of a November ballot measure.
Apr 24, 2024
Three Republicans in the Arizona House of Representatives on Wednesday joined with Democrats to advance legislation that would repeal an 1864 ban on abortion—a development rights advocates welcomed while stressing that the fight is far from over.
The 32-28 vote on House Bill 2677—with GOP Reps. Tim Dunn (25), Matt Gress (4), and Justin Wilmeth (2) voting in favor—was the third attempt in as many weeks to pass repeal legislation since the Arizona Supreme Court upheld the ban.
"The state Senate could vote on the repeal as early as next Wednesday, after the bill comes on the floor for a 'third reading,' as is required under chamber rules," according toNBC News. Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs on Wednesday toldThe Washington Post that "I am hopeful the Senate does the right thing and sends it to my desk so I can sign it."
Applauding the House passage of H.B. 2677, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona president and CEO Angela Florez said that "today, Arizona is one step closer to repealing the state's Civil War-era total abortion ban. While the repeal still must pass the Senate, this is a major win for reproductive freedom."
"We must celebrate today's vote in support of abortion rights and harness our enthusiasm to spread the word and urge lawmakers in the Senate to support this necessary repeal bill," she continued. "Despite this step forward, Arizonans cannot stop fighting."
Florez noted that "even with the repeal of the Civil War-era ban, the state will still have a ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy that denies people access to critical care. And lawmakers continue to attack Arizonans' ability to access reproductive healthcare. Our right to control our bodies and lives is hanging on by a thread."
"Thankfully, voters will have the opportunity to take back control if the Arizona Abortion Access Act is on the ballot this November," she added. "Abortion bans are out-of-step with the will of Arizonans and will force pregnant people to leave their communities for essential healthcare. Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona will continue fighting to ensure everyone has the right to make decisions about their health and futures."
The Arizona Abortion Access Act is a proposed state constitutional amendment that would prevent many limits on abortions before fetal viability and safeguard access to care after viability to protect the life or physical or mental health of the patient.
The coalition supporting the amendment, Arizona for Abortion Access, highlighted on social media that the House-approved bill "did not include the emergency clause required to stop the 1864 ban from taking effect on June 8," meaning H.B. 2677 wouldn't apply until 90 days after the end of the legislative session.
Coalition campaign manager Cheryl Bruce said that "with a total ban still set to take effect June 8, the Arizona Abortion Access Act is needed now more than ever. We remain committed to taking these decisions out of the hands of extremist politicians."
Arizona is one of multiple states where rights advocates are promoting abortion rights ballot measures this cycle. Reproductive freedom is also dominating political races at all levels, including the presidential contest. Democratic President Joe Biden is set to face former Republican President Donald Trump in November.
"Donald Trump is responsible for Arizona's abortion ban. Women in the state are still living under a ban with no exceptions for rape or incest and have been stripped of the freedom to make their own healthcare decisions," said Julie Chávez Rodriguez, Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris' reelection campaign manager.
While the presumptive GOP nominee has tried to distance himself from the Arizona Supreme Court's reinstatement of a 160-year-old abortion ban, he has also campaigned on his three appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court who helped reverse Roe v. Wade.
"Trump brags that he is 'proudly' the person responsible for these bans and if he retakes power, the chaos and cruelty he has created will only get worse in all 50 states," Chávez Rodriguez said. "President Biden and Vice President Harris are the only candidates who will stop him."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular